What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (4 Viewers)

Nips 2

Spartans Rule 1

Bottom 8: Spartans Rule

Dennis Eckersley '92 is the new pitcher. Wally Schang hits a double. [2] Lou Whitaker grounds out to 2B. Schang advances to third. [3] Hal Newhouser is being pinch hit for by Minnie Minoso. Minnie Minoso grounds out to 3B. Honus Wagner hits a popup to SS which is misplayed by Ozzie Smith. Official scorer: E-6. [1] Carl Yastrzemski hits a home run. Pitching change: Dennis Eckersley '92 is replaced by David Wells '95. Harry Heilmann flies out.

:bs:

 
Has anybody else benched a "star" player? I'm seriously considering benching Mickey Mantle. 0-3 w/ 3 K's today. At the very least moving him down in the order needs to start being considered. He's hitting somewhere around .200 and is near the league lead in K's. He's a B/A outfielder (which is better than what I have coming off my bench) and I have a big outfield but still...
Reggie Jackson and Rickey Henderson have both been benched, esp Jackson. Jackson was going to be my big power slugger, but I have gone with an OF of Henderson, Hamilton and Carey with Evans coming off the bench.
 
IP H R ER BB K HR PC ERA (season)

Harry Colliflower 3.00 17 22 22 7 0 7 123 17.20

Tough day at the office.
Not only that, but he got ejected from the game! Has that happened yet in this sim yet?Colliflower's inning from hell:

Bottom 7: N.O. Blackened Voodoo

Ted Kluszewski hits a double. [2] Eddie Murray gets walked. [12] George Brett hits a flyball triple to right center. [3] Ernie Lombardi hits a home run. Warren Spahn is being pinch hit for by Toby Harrah. Toby Harrah hits a double. [2] Tim Raines gets walked. [12] Buddy Myer gets walked. [123] Alan Trammell hits a home run. Stan Musial hits a home run. Ted Kluszewski hits a double. [2] Harry Colliflower '99 throws a wild pitch. Kluszewski advances to third. [3] Eddie Murray hits a single. [1] George Brett hits into a fielders choice. [1] Ernie Lombardi lines out to 2B. Toby Harrah gets walked. [12] Tim Raines gets walked. [123] Buddy Myer gets walked. Brett scores from third. [123] Alan Trammell hits a line drive double to left center. Myer scores from first. [2] Stan Musial hits a home run. Ted Kluszewski is hit by a pitch. Harry Colliflower '99 has been ejected. Brownie Foreman '96 is the new pitcher. [1] Eddie Murray flies out to deep LF.
:eek: I don't care if it is a filler team -- my team needed a breakout like this.

.
That's awesome! I haven't had anything like this and don't read everybody elses box-score for every game, but I think somebody mentioned somebody charging the mound before.
Oh, UCONN -- that happened in this last game, too. I didn't notice it the first time around ... but this is actually from the game summary:
Bottom 5: N.O. Blackened Voodoo

Warren Spahn grounds out. Tim Raines hits a single. [1] Buddy Myer hits a line drive double to right center. Raines scores from first. [2] Alan Trammell lines out to SS. Stan Musial hits a home run. Ted Kluszewski hits a home run. Eddie Murray hits a single. [1] George Brett hits a home run. Ernie Lombardi is hit by a pitch. Lombardi is not happy at all with that last pitch. Both benches have emptied. One of the coaches has just charged Harry Colliflower '99 and been thrown to the ground by his ears! Looks like he'll be okay though. Home plate umpire Steve Rippley issues a warning to Harry Colliflower '99. [1] Warren Spahn grounds out to SS.
The Voodoo coach charging the mound :rotflmao: I didn't know the sim had this kind of action! Gotta read my box scores more closely from here on.

:thumbup:
This must be Colliflower's MO for the sim.
Bottom 8: Maranville Rabbits

Tim Laudner replaces Pena at catcher. Claudell Washington replaces McGee in CF. Alf Anderson replaces Guillen at SS. Garth Iorg replaces Zimmer at 3B. Steve Lombardozzi replaces Ripken at 2B. Deion Sanders replaces Repulski in RF. Rabbit Maranville flies out. Deacon Phillippe is being pinch hit for by Bill Dahlen. Bill Dahlen gets walked. [1] Billy Hamilton is hit by a pitch. Hamilton is not happy at all with that last pitch. Both benches have emptied. One of the coaches has just charged Harry Colliflower '99 and been thrown to the ground by his ears! Looks like he'll be okay though.Home plate umpire Dutch Rennert issues a warning to Harry Colliflower '99. [12]Rickey Henderson gets walked. [123] Rogers Hornsby gets walked. Dahlen scores from third. [123] Jim Sundberg hits into a fielders choice. Hornsby is forced at second, but Jim Sundberg beats the throw to first. Hamilton scores. [13] Pie Traynor hits a groundball single to CF (-). [13] Pitching change: Harry Colliflower '99 is replaced by Brownie Foreman '96. Bill Terry pops out to 1B.
 
Koya and Spock both win 1 run games (does Spock ever ####### lose a close game? :rant: ) and the Troopers fail to capitalize on 4 errors (and a rare good day from Mantle). 5 games back of Spock tied for second w/ Koya. 2 games out of the wild-card. On a more positive note... 2/27/2005 pm2 at BRINGIN' IT HOME™ 2/28/2005 am BRINGIN' IT HOME™ Nice to see John Martinez scheduled me a couple easy ones to get out of this skid.

 
Spock might be up 5 games, but I think he has played less wuss teams than me at least, not sure about UCONN. Spock has a nice early hold on the division.

 
I got in on UCONN to win the tourney at 30 - 1. What does UCONN think of that?
I put 100 on them back when they were something like +5000 (so that would be around 50 to 1) and I like that bet. Tourney will be wide open. They've got just about as good a chance as anybody. Their inconsistancy on the defensive end is what concerns me the most, but they could put together 6 games good enough to win against anybody.
 
Spock might be up 5 games, but I think he has played less wuss teams than me at least, not sure about UCONN. Spock has a nice early hold on the division.
I had a series against the Lebron team and I think a series against Colome.
 
I lost another game due to pitchers being left in too long and a late inning error (Joe Jackson misplays routine flyball and winning run scores.) :rant: I thought Jackson was one of the greatest fielders of all time?

 
I lost another game due to pitchers being left in too long and a late inning error (Joe Jackson misplays routine flyball and winning run scores.) :rant:

I thought Jackson was one of the greatest fielders of all time?
"ouch"
 
Spock might be up 5 games, but I think he has played less wuss teams than me at least, not sure about UCONN.  Spock has a nice early hold on the division.
I had a series against the Lebron team and I think a series against Colome.
I have had Colome, Lebron and Leftovers which is I guess not a push over team. Lost one to Leftovers maybe, not sure.
 
I lost another game due to pitchers being left in too long and a late inning error (Joe Jackson misplays routine flyball and winning run scores.) :rant:

I thought Jackson was one of the greatest fielders of all time?
You missed my meltdown on Friday. I had enough of like 4 out of 5 games lost by one run, almost all on bullpen blowups that sent me whining up a storm.Admittedly, not a pretty site.

 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year. This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted. I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:use ANY year we wantORWe draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number. You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap. That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.

 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year. This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted. I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:

use ANY year we want

OR

We draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number. You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap. That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.
This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. :thumbup:
 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year.  This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted.  I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:

use ANY year we want

OR

We draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number.  You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap.  That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.
This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. :thumbup:
The only problem w/ the sal cap is you equalize teams. A guy ends up making great picks but has to bring himself down to the level of competition by staying w/in the cap. I'm not against the best year thing, but don't think it is very representative of a guy's career. Some terrible all time players have great single seasons. Far fewer poor players have a 3rd season that matches up w/ the 3rd season's of Hall of Famers. The gist of it is there will be no perfect system. If you were honest w/ yourself and just drafted a deserving team you could have fun w/ the sim and not be so results oriented. If you cheated (sim-fished, plugged in wrong years) all you really did is cheat yourself. Pat yourself on the back if you end up winning the championship, :rolleyes: . If you played square just enjoy the sim. Gloat when you win. ##### when you lose. Have a lot of fun in between.
 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year.  This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted.  I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:

use ANY year we want

OR

We draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number.  You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap.  That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.
This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. :thumbup:
The only problem w/ the sal cap is you equalize teams. A guy ends up making great picks but has to bring himself down to the level of competition by staying w/in the cap. I'm not against the best year thing, but don't think it is very representative of a guy's career. Some terrible all time players have great single seasons. Far fewer poor players have a 3rd season that matches up w/ the 3rd season's of Hall of Famers. The gist of it is there will be no perfect system. If you were honest w/ yourself and just drafted a deserving team you could have fun w/ the sim and not be so results oriented. If you cheated (sim-fished, plugged in wrong years) all you really did is cheat yourself. Pat yourself on the back if you end up winning the championship, :rolleyes: . If you played square just enjoy the sim. Gloat when you win. ##### when you lose. Have a lot of fun in between.
I dont do much gloating, but made up for it with #####ing. I think 5th year or worse, but your choice of which season, would be pretty representative of a great players very very good "average" year. Obviously we would be sim fishing after the 5th year but at least we would have the players we drafted.

just my opinion

 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year.  This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted.  I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:

use ANY year we want

OR

We draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number.  You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap.  That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.
This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. :thumbup:
The only problem w/ the sal cap is you equalize teams. A guy ends up making great picks but has to bring himself down to the level of competition by staying w/in the cap. I'm not against the best year thing, but don't think it is very representative of a guy's career. Some terrible all time players have great single seasons. Far fewer poor players have a 3rd season that matches up w/ the 3rd season's of Hall of Famers. The gist of it is there will be no perfect system. If you were honest w/ yourself and just drafted a deserving team you could have fun w/ the sim and not be so results oriented. If you cheated (sim-fished, plugged in wrong years) all you really did is cheat yourself. Pat yourself on the back if you end up winning the championship, :rolleyes: . If you played square just enjoy the sim. Gloat when you win. ##### when you lose. Have a lot of fun in between.
I dont do much gloating, but made up for it with #####ing. I think 5th year or worse, but your choice of which season, would be pretty representative of a great players very very good "average" year. Obviously we would be sim fishing after the 5th year but at least we would have the players we drafted.

just my opinion
That very well may be the case. I personally think it pulls the truly great players down and elevates the "accumulators" which is not something I prefer. I'd rather have a representation of a guy's peak (taking out the top couple years to make sure not to let in the "flukes" though) but that's just me.
 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year.  This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted.  I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:

use ANY year we want

OR

We draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number.  You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap.  That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.
This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. :thumbup:
The only problem w/ the sal cap is you equalize teams. A guy ends up making great picks but has to bring himself down to the level of competition by staying w/in the cap. I'm not against the best year thing, but don't think it is very representative of a guy's career. Some terrible all time players have great single seasons. Far fewer poor players have a 3rd season that matches up w/ the 3rd season's of Hall of Famers. The gist of it is there will be no perfect system. If you were honest w/ yourself and just drafted a deserving team you could have fun w/ the sim and not be so results oriented. If you cheated (sim-fished, plugged in wrong years) all you really did is cheat yourself. Pat yourself on the back if you end up winning the championship, :rolleyes: . If you played square just enjoy the sim. Gloat when you win. ##### when you lose. Have a lot of fun in between.
I dont do much gloating, but made up for it with #####ing. I think 5th year or worse, but your choice of which season, would be pretty representative of a great players very very good "average" year. Obviously we would be sim fishing after the 5th year but at least we would have the players we drafted.

just my opinion
That very well may be the case. I personally think it pulls the truly great players down and elevates the "accumulators" which is not something I prefer. I'd rather have a representation of a guy's peak (taking out the top couple years to make sure not to let in the "flukes" though) but that's just me.
I can see that. I suppose what I realize is few players who arent "great" have 5 or more GREAT seasons. But true HoF's almost (if not all) do. So a 5th or 6th year of a HoF should still be say .300, or 35+ HRs... and their defensive abilities represented as well.I think you have a good number of players with 3 or 4 very good to great years but on a career level, didnt quite have enough (guidry, mattingly) to make that peak excellence sustain enough for true greatness.

again, just my take. id be fine as long as we had some choice of which year.

 
I'm convinced that the sim is failing because we are using third best year.  This thing is 90% luck and has very little to do with who you drafted.  I say for the next sim, the one without Larry and Capella, we just:

use ANY year we want

OR

We draft the same way, but we have a salary cap and you must "fit" your club inside of that number.  You can use a guys best season and another guys 12th best season to get under the cap.  That way we avoid things like the cheating/ 3rd year sim fishing that happened this time around.
This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. :thumbup:
The only problem w/ the sal cap is you equalize teams. A guy ends up making great picks but has to bring himself down to the level of competition by staying w/in the cap. I'm not against the best year thing, but don't think it is very representative of a guy's career. Some terrible all time players have great single seasons. Far fewer poor players have a 3rd season that matches up w/ the 3rd season's of Hall of Famers. The gist of it is there will be no perfect system. If you were honest w/ yourself and just drafted a deserving team you could have fun w/ the sim and not be so results oriented. If you cheated (sim-fished, plugged in wrong years) all you really did is cheat yourself. Pat yourself on the back if you end up winning the championship, :rolleyes: . If you played square just enjoy the sim. Gloat when you win. ##### when you lose. Have a lot of fun in between.
I dont do much gloating, but made up for it with #####ing. I think 5th year or worse, but your choice of which season, would be pretty representative of a great players very very good "average" year. Obviously we would be sim fishing after the 5th year but at least we would have the players we drafted.

just my opinion
That very well may be the case. I personally think it pulls the truly great players down and elevates the "accumulators" which is not something I prefer. I'd rather have a representation of a guy's peak (taking out the top couple years to make sure not to let in the "flukes" though) but that's just me.
I can see that. I suppose what I realize is few players who arent "great" have 5 or more GREAT seasons. But true HoF's almost (if not all) do. So a 5th or 6th year of a HoF should still be say .300, or 35+ HRs... and their defensive abilities represented as well.I think you have a good number of players with 3 or 4 very good to great years but on a career level, didnt quite have enough (guidry, mattingly) to make that peak excellence sustain enough for true greatness.

again, just my take. id be fine as long as we had some choice of which year.
There really is no "right" way to do the sim. Just throwing some ideas out there. All you can do is set rules and hope everyone follows them.
 
Kobayashi Maru 0 1 0

Nips 0 0 0

Bottom 1: Nips

Nolan Ryan '74 takes the mound. Joe Morgan flies out to RF (+). Joe Jackson grounds out. Hank Greenberg gets walked. [1] Jim Thome gets walked. [12] Manny Ramirez gets walked. [123] Enos Slaughter gets walked. Greenberg scores from third. [123] King Kelly gets walked. Thome scores from third. [123] Stan Hack hits a flyball single to RF. Slaughter scores from second. [13] David Wells strikes out.

Kobayashi Maru 0 1 0

Nips 4 1 0
Only Nolan Ryan can give a team a four run lead in the first on one hit. :rant: Thank God Nipsey blew the lead and I went on to win 5-4.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top