What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (2 Viewers)

]
:pickle:

Wow, pretty cool.

Let's get to a 1000.

:pickle:
are we/you/whomever doing the next draft in the same thread?
No.We'll wrap this one up with a bow-tie, I'll give it a eulogy, nipsey will serve ribs and last resort will ##### about shtick.

Then we'll laugh, we'll cry, and we'll do it all over again.
Are you ####in kidding me? Stick with this one and shoot for a quarter million views :yes:
I've thought about it..I guess we can go with the popular opinion. :shrug: It is comfy here. :unsure:

 
,Apr 6 2005, 05:38 PM]

:pickle:

Wow, pretty cool.

Let's get to a 1000.

:pickle:
are we/you/whomever doing the next draft in the same thread?
No.We'll wrap this one up with a bow-tie, I'll give it a eulogy, nipsey will serve ribs and last resort will ##### about shtick.

Then we'll laugh, we'll cry, and we'll do it all over again.
Are you ####in kidding me? Stick with this one and shoot for a quarter million views :yes:
I've thought about it..I guess we can go with the popular opinion. :shrug: It is comfy here. :unsure:
Well I guess my vote don't count since I wasn't in the league.... just saying don't kick this ##### to the curb without at least considering it :) ... plus it would be pretty sweet if this thing managed to bring down the board. :ph34r:

 
]
]
:pickle:

Wow, pretty cool.

Let's get to a 1000.

:pickle:
are we/you/whomever doing the next draft in the same thread?
No.We'll wrap this one up with a bow-tie, I'll give it a eulogy, nipsey will serve ribs and last resort will ##### about shtick.

Then we'll laugh, we'll cry, and we'll do it all over again.
Are you ####in kidding me? Stick with this one and shoot for a quarter million views :yes:
I've thought about it..I guess we can go with the popular opinion. :shrug: It is comfy here. :unsure:
Well I guess my vote don't count since I wasn't in the league.... just saying don't kick this ##### to the curb without at least considering it :) ... plus it would be pretty sweet if this thing managed to bring down the board. :ph34r:
yes, but for a while, this thing was teetering on termination, due to our good buddy, Mr. You Know Who, reporting threads and all.Don't want to see it nuked.

 
How the National League Central was won:

Dragons, Arks and Lebron 6 9 2

Kobayashi Maru 14 18 1

Top 9: Dragons, Arks and Lebron

Nolan Ryan '74 is the new pitcher. Joe Gordon replaces Frisch at 2B. Frank White hits a single. [1] Kevin Elster is being pinch hit for by Art Shires. Art Shires is hit by a pitch. [12] Jose Canseco strikes out. Willie McGee hits a line drive single to CF. [123] Ken Caminiti gets walked. White scores from third. [123] Cory Snyder flies out to shallow LF. Travis Lee gets walked. Shires scores from third. [123] Hal Naragon gets walked. McGee scores from third. [123] Pitching change: Nolan Ryan '74 is replaced by Terry Forster '72. Firpo Marberry is being pinch hit for by Tim Teufel. Tim Teufel hits a home run. Pitching change: Terry Forster '72 is replaced by Trevor Hoffman '97. Frank White grounds out.

Dragons, Arks and Lebron 13 12 2

Kobayashi Maru 14 18 1
Kobayashi Maru 100-62 Koya's BK Bums 99-63

:excited:

 
]
]
:pickle:

Wow, pretty cool.

Let's get to a 1000.

:pickle:
are we/you/whomever doing the next draft in the same thread?
No.We'll wrap this one up with a bow-tie, I'll give it a eulogy, nipsey will serve ribs and last resort will ##### about shtick.

Then we'll laugh, we'll cry, and we'll do it all over again.
Are you ####in kidding me? Stick with this one and shoot for a quarter million views :yes:
I've thought about it..I guess we can go with the popular opinion. :shrug: It is comfy here. :unsure:
Well I guess my vote don't count since I wasn't in the league.... just saying don't kick this ##### to the curb without at least considering it :) ... plus it would be pretty sweet if this thing managed to bring down the board. :ph34r:
yes, but for a while, this thing was teetering on termination, due to our good buddy, Mr. You Know Who, reporting threads and all.Don't want to see it nuked.
Hrmmm valid point. Special order of protection from Joe himself? No nuking? A dose of self-policing followed Lock & Cleanup if it goes outta control again?

 
How the National League Central was won:

Dragons, Arks and Lebron 6 9 2

Kobayashi Maru 14 18 1

Top 9: Dragons, Arks and Lebron

Nolan Ryan '74 is the new pitcher. Joe Gordon replaces Frisch at 2B. Frank White hits a single. [1] Kevin Elster is being pinch hit for by Art Shires. Art Shires is hit by a pitch. [12] Jose Canseco strikes out. Willie McGee hits a line drive single to CF. [123] Ken Caminiti gets walked. White scores from third. [123] Cory Snyder flies out to shallow LF. Travis Lee gets walked. Shires scores from third. [123] Hal Naragon gets walked. McGee scores from third. [123] Pitching change: Nolan Ryan '74 is replaced by Terry Forster '72. Firpo Marberry is being pinch hit for by Tim Teufel. Tim Teufel hits a home run. Pitching change: Terry Forster '72 is replaced by Trevor Hoffman '97. Frank White grounds out. 

Dragons, Arks and Lebron 13 12 2

Kobayashi Maru 14 18 1
Kobayashi Maru 100-62 Koya's BK Bums 99-63

:excited:
Congrats Spock. Represent us well in the post-season.
 
:shock: 500 Pages :shock:

Congrats on the end of a great season, and congrats to whoever beats me in the playoffs.

No congrats ot Larry, the WPE.  He cheated.

May our next draft be long and glorious, and may I win it again.

I'd like to thank you--because you've been with me through all of this, even when the others were carping and whining.  Really, this whole thing wouldn't have been as fun for me without you.

:thumbup: to WHIP and OBP.

:thumbdown: to whining about non-baseball elements in the thread (adios).

And to all the great shtick in these 500 pages, may I say...

:lol:   :lol:   :lol:
:thumbup: Great stuff in this thread. Seriously. There was a point in February where I was just pounding F5 and laughing my ### off. :lol:
What does f5 do?
 
:shock: 500 Pages :shock:

Congrats on the end of a great season, and congrats to whoever beats me in the playoffs.

No congrats ot Larry, the WPE.  He cheated.

May our next draft be long and glorious, and may I win it again.

I'd like to thank you--because you've been with me through all of this, even when the others were carping and whining.  Really, this whole thing wouldn't have been as fun for me without you.

:thumbup: to WHIP and OBP.

:thumbdown: to whining about non-baseball elements in the thread (adios).

And to all the great shtick in these 500 pages, may I say...

:lol:   :lol:   :lol:
:thumbup: Great stuff in this thread. Seriously. There was a point in February where I was just pounding F5 and laughing my ### off. :lol:
What does f5 do?
Deletes posts of people you don't like.
 
How the National League Central was won:

Dragons, Arks and Lebron 6 9 2

Kobayashi Maru 14 18 1

Top 9: Dragons, Arks and Lebron

Nolan Ryan '74 is the new pitcher. Joe Gordon replaces Frisch at 2B. Frank White hits a single. [1] Kevin Elster is being pinch hit for by Art Shires. Art Shires is hit by a pitch. [12] Jose Canseco strikes out. Willie McGee hits a line drive single to CF. [123] Ken Caminiti gets walked. White scores from third. [123] Cory Snyder flies out to shallow LF. Travis Lee gets walked. Shires scores from third. [123] Hal Naragon gets walked. McGee scores from third. [123] Pitching change: Nolan Ryan '74 is replaced by Terry Forster '72. Firpo Marberry is being pinch hit for by Tim Teufel. Tim Teufel hits a home run. Pitching change: Terry Forster '72 is replaced by Trevor Hoffman '97. Frank White grounds out. 

Dragons, Arks and Lebron 13 12 2

Kobayashi Maru 14 18 1
Kobayashi Maru 100-62 Koya's BK Bums 99-63

:excited:
Congrats Spock. Represent us well in the post-season.
Thanks!Just need to point out that Nolan Ryan sucks as a relief pitcher as well! :rant:

 
:shock: 500 Pages :shock:

Congrats on the end of a great season, and congrats to whoever beats me in the playoffs.

No congrats ot Larry, the WPE.  He cheated.

May our next draft be long and glorious, and may I win it again.

I'd like to thank you--because you've been with me through all of this, even when the others were carping and whining.  Really, this whole thing wouldn't have been as fun for me without you.

:thumbup: to WHIP and OBP.

:thumbdown: to whining about non-baseball elements in the thread (adios).

And to all the great shtick in these 500 pages, may I say...

:lol:   :lol:   :lol:
:thumbup: Great stuff in this thread. Seriously. There was a point in February where I was just pounding F5 and laughing my ### off. :lol:
What does f5 do?
Stupid Mexican.
 
]
]
]
:pickle:

Wow, pretty cool.

Let's get to a 1000.

:pickle:
are we/you/whomever doing the next draft in the same thread?
No.We'll wrap this one up with a bow-tie, I'll give it a eulogy, nipsey will serve ribs and last resort will ##### about shtick.

Then we'll laugh, we'll cry, and we'll do it all over again.
Are you ####in kidding me? Stick with this one and shoot for a quarter million views :yes:
I've thought about it..I guess we can go with the popular opinion. :shrug: It is comfy here. :unsure:
Well I guess my vote don't count since I wasn't in the league.... just saying don't kick this ##### to the curb without at least considering it :) ... plus it would be pretty sweet if this thing managed to bring down the board. :ph34r:
yes, but for a while, this thing was teetering on termination, due to our good buddy, Mr. You Know Who, reporting threads and all.Don't want to see it nuked.
Hrmmm valid point. Special order of protection from Joe himself? No nuking? A dose of self-policing followed Lock & Cleanup if it goes outta control again?
Joe has said he would nuke the thread if it came to that.We were policing ourselves, but LB was wearing out the report function.

GB having a fake mod (rudnicki) on hand to help out though. I felt like Tony Soprano paying off the cops to keep them hush-hush.

 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
you mean like harrier's entire pitching staff? hey, you can't argue with success..
 
congrats on making it to 500. there were times in January and February when this thread was the only decent thing worth reading in the FFA. :thumbup: good times in here.

 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
Where are the no name statistical anomolies that were drafted in this league? :shrug:
 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
Where are the no name statistical anomolies that were drafted in this league? :shrug:
LB's closer... :shrug:
 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
Where are the no name statistical anomolies that were drafted in this league? :shrug:
LB's closer... :shrug:
Quantrill was dominant, because LB was using at a much better season that everyone lese was allowed to set their players at. If everyone were to use their players best seasons, Quantrill would have been a non-factor like he is now.
 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
Where are the no name statistical anomolies that were drafted in this league? :shrug:
LB's closer... :shrug:
Quantrill was dominant, because LB was using at a much better season that everyone lese was allowed to set their players at. If everyone were to use their players best seasons, Quantrill would have been a non-factor like he is now.
That DH that went in the 3rd round of a no-dh league... :shrug:
 
501 pages? Bully!

Nice work by all. Sorry about letting Mr. Nipsey down. I'll try harder next time.
You didn't let Nipsey down, he let you down. Next time, that won't happen. :thumbup:
If my next owner needs help, I have managerial experience. Won the 1890 Player's League championship.
 
Seriously, I don't understand how if we're doing another draft to build a team for a sim, that some people have a different "intent" than to draft a team to try and win the thing?  I just don't get it.   :shrug:   If winning the sim isn't important to people, why are they #####ing?  Somebody explain it to me.  If you don't want to win the sim, that's fine!  Just don't force others to share in your apathy.
I'd like to win the sim with a team of the greatest players of all time while playing against other teams with the greatest players of all time.Make sense?
Not at all. What I fail to understand is how you can determine whether or not someone calls a player an "all-time great" because of a certain number a player has reached with a single stat in his career. You want to take an abstract term like "all-time great" and make it a "fact" by saying if that "all-time great" reaches some kind of statistical milestone then he's eligible to be drafted. That just doesn't fly with me. I have no clue why we're trying to limit this thing. I don't see what you're afraid of.
Like I said, I'll just do my thing and draft all time caliber players. If you don't get it, that's ok with me. I'd like to sim against players that are known, not against some ####### sandlot pitcher who threw 600 innings a year in a park with no freakin' fences.
If I "don't get" what? What the hell are you talking about? Draft whoever you want, that's all I'm saying.
I'm saying if you do that you have the potential to end up with a bunch of no-name, statistical anomolies on the teams. Its more entertaining for me if I know the players.
Where are the no name statistical anomolies that were drafted in this league? :shrug:
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.

 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.
"John" has the best idea I"ve heard in this thread yet...BTW, are you in the next one? or is it a conflict of interest since you own the site??? :rotflmao:

 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.
"John" has the best idea I"ve heard in this thread yet...BTW, are you in the next one? or is it a conflict of interest since you own the site??? :rotflmao:
Way to tank that last series and give me and Koya no chance at the wild-card...
 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.
JM -I understand exactly what you're saying, it just doesn't sound as exciting to me as everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time. That being said, I'll do whatever the group wants to do.

-T

 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.
JM -I understand exactly what you're saying, it just doesn't sound as exciting to me as everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time. That being said, I'll do whatever the group wants to do.

-T
But this:"everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time" IS exactly what I'm saying. This is not what you have been saying. You want people to draft who YOU think are the greatest all-time players.

 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.
JM -I understand exactly what you're saying, it just doesn't sound as exciting to me as everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time. That being said, I'll do whatever the group wants to do.

-T
But this:"everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time" IS exactly what I'm saying. This is not what you have been saying. You want people to draft who YOU think are the greatest all-time players.
You're right. The reason I'd prefer to lay ground rules is that some nut-bag will draft solely on WIS.com stats, and that annoys me because anyone can sit there and sift through all of the WIS salaries. You know my preference and you also know that I'll go with either option (I'll just whine if I don't get my way :ph34r: ). So be it.

 
Aren't you talking about opening up to any player any season in the 2nd one?
Here's what I'm saying:Let's draft a team and do a sim league on WIS. Draft whoever you want. There is no salary cap. We're all starting on equal ground. May the best man win.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? If guys want to sim fish? Great. If guys want to draft all first basemen and play them where ever they want? Great. If guys want to draft Walter Johnson and have him be their closer? Great. If guys want to draft a team made of of solely hall-of-famers? Great. If someone wants to draft only DH's and play them all over the diamond? Great. You want to draft a dead-ball era pitcher and start him everyother day? Great. Let's see who can win the sim using the strategy they want to. That would be fun.

If you want to do a draft based on restrictive rules and snooty perceptions, that's fine. I just don't think that's at all intersting or necessary.
JM -I understand exactly what you're saying, it just doesn't sound as exciting to me as everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time. That being said, I'll do whatever the group wants to do.

-T
But this:"everyone drafting who they think are the greatest players of all time" IS exactly what I'm saying. This is not what you have been saying. You want people to draft who YOU think are the greatest all-time players.
You're right. The reason I'd prefer to lay ground rules is that some nut-bag will draft solely on WIS.com stats, and that annoys me because anyone can sit there and sift through all of the WIS salaries. You know my preference and you also know that I'll go with either option (I'll just whine if I don't get my way :ph34r: ). So be it.
Why can't you sift through salaries? Are you just going to draft off the top of your head? What list will you be using? You're talking about only allowing players that qualify using some predetermined career statistical benchmarks, no? You can sift through that, but you can't glance at a single page of salaries? I just don't know what you're fearing here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top