lmao at 20 wins being some kind of benchmark for older era pitchers.
		
		
	 
You are correct that 20 wins really is not a big mark back in the day... but it did mean something.   But the rest of that stat line is rather impressive I think (Lefty's). After all, 4 of those 8 seasons he LED the league in wins.  It is hard to dispute that stat - espcially coming from someone with the top OVERALL adjusted era (for non active players) and 9 era crowns in his day.
		
 
		
	 
Did he win the Cy Young? 
 
		 
		
	 
No...but he won 2 triple crowns.  Cy Young only got 1.
		
 
		
	 
I think Nips was joking - seeing as the Cy didnt come around until mid '50s.
		
 
		
	 
You're right...BTW, when did they start giving out the Lefty Grove award? 
 
		 
		
	 
Dont get me wrong, Cy Young is considerably more legendary a player than Lefty.  His overall career is also more impressive (goodness, 500+ wins?).However, Lefty was the better picther.
Lefty/Cy
2/1 Triple Crowns
1/?  MVP (curious to know if any objective articles mention if Cy would have won one? two? more?
9/2  ERA Crowns
4/5  Tops in Wins
7(consecutive)/2 Stike Out Crowns
5/7  Walks+Hits/9 inn
3/3  Complete Games Lead
300/511 Career Wins
9/73 Place All Time Winning Percentage
1/17   Career Ajusted ERA (non active)
I have highlighted the career stats where there is a major discrpency either way.  Other than pitching much longer, Cy really doesnt show anything to say he was the superior pitcher to Lefty.  Lefty on the other had far more ERA and SO crowns - and even the even numbers (i.e. tops in wins, complete games) are suspect since Cy picthed twice as long.
I would gladly accept if you put this to poll with "who would you rather start a baseball team - Cy Young or Lefty.
Cy may have the history.  But Lefty had a more lethal arm.   My opinion at least.