Koya
Footballguy
Party on, dude!without a doubt.I nominate the Mike Myers pick in Round 20.01 as the worst pick of the draft. Any arguements?
Party on, dude!without a doubt.I nominate the Mike Myers pick in Round 20.01 as the worst pick of the draft. Any arguements?
He's no Mike Myers.....or is that Meyers? I don't know.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!
come on man, you gotta get a ####ing drawing going here or something.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!
Paul Abbott = STILL AVAILABLE1875 is the earliest year, right?
"Hey Pickles, good luck in the FFA baseball players with spooky names draft.""Thanks.""Who do you have?""Freddy Garcia. Get it? Freddy, as in Freddy Kruger.""Nice one. Who you playing?""Larry Boy.""Who's he got?""Mike Myers.""Ouch."

:rotflmao: Good to see this schtick back, can't go wrong with a classic."Hey Pickles, good luck in the FFA baseball players with spooky names draft.""Thanks.""Who do you have?""Freddy Garcia. Get it? Freddy, as in Freddy Kruger.""Nice one. Who you playing?""Larry Boy.""Who's he got?""Mike Myers.""Ouch."
Maybe someone he scouted on a rerun of Little House on the Prairie.I wonder what nugget he found in 1874.
Would you like my short list for 1870s All-Star pitchers?I wonder what nugget he found in 1874.
Never get old"Hey Pickles, good luck in the FFA baseball players with spooky names draft.""Thanks.""Who do you have?""Freddy Garcia. Get it? Freddy, as in Freddy Kruger.""Nice one. Who you playing?""Larry Boy.""Who's he got?""Mike Myers.""Ouch."
Don't know their faces....come on man, you gotta get a ####ing drawing going here or something.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!
So was Nomo who went right before him. I had Nomo and Radke at the top of my list in that order. The season we'll end up using for Nomo will be a good one.Radke was a steal in round 22Post-1994 Draft is done. Check out the first page of our thread for results.![]()
![]()
can't see it at work.Don't know their faces....come on man, you gotta get a ####ing drawing going here or something.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!

I couldn't see these from work at first either, had to download a flash plug I think.Of all the reasons to get flash on my work laptop...can't see it at work.Don't know their faces....come on man, you gotta get a ####ing drawing going here or something.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!![]()
![]()

me eithercan't see it at work.Don't know their faces....come on man, you gotta get a ####ing drawing going here or something.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!![]()
![]()

I can see it, funny but the Mike Myers "Ouch" schtick was better.can't see it at work.Don't know their faces....come on man, you gotta get a ####ing drawing going here or something.Paul Quantrill is "off the board"!![]()
![]()
excellent pick20.01 1B/3B Roger Connor
Mike Myers was better.excellent pick20.01 1B/3B Roger Connor
Agree, very solid pickexcellent pick20.01 1B/3B Roger Connor
Yeah, Connor was a guy I looked at earlier. Good value here.Agree, very solid pickexcellent pick20.01 1B/3B Roger Connor
Ouch. A pat on the head and a golf clap is even worse. :rotflmao:Agree, very solid pickexcellent pick20.01 1B/3B Roger Connor
the Babe Ruth of his day - 1923 Reach Guide
Amazing how long he sat out there. Good pick this late.Pick for UCONN's team...
20.03 Sam Thompson - OF
Hall of Famer. He and Foxx are the only 2 players to have over 150 RBI with 2 different teams (unless someone's done it recently).
Top 3 OF in RBI per Game (a countdown):
3. Babe Ruth .884
2. Joe DiMaggio .885
1. Sam Thompson .923
Nice, this guy has some crazy numbers. The number of 100R + 100 RBI seasons he had was crazy. Would have taken him earlier if he had a little more HR power.Pick for UCONN's team...
20.03 Sam Thompson - OF
Hall of Famer. He and Foxx are the only 2 players to have over 150 RBI with 2 different teams (unless someone's done it recently).
Top 3 OF in RBI per Game (a countdown):
3. Babe Ruth .884
2. Joe DiMaggio .885
1. Sam Thompson .923
When did he play? If he was in the Deadball Era, his power will show up in the sim. At least, it should.Nice, this guy has some crazy numbers. The number of 100R + 100 RBI seasons he had was crazy. Would have taken him earlier if he had a little more HR power.Pick for UCONN's team...
20.03 Sam Thompson - OF
Hall of Famer. He and Foxx are the only 2 players to have over 150 RBI with 2 different teams (unless someone's done it recently).
Top 3 OF in RBI per Game (a countdown):
3. Babe Ruth .884
2. Joe DiMaggio .885
1. Sam Thompson .923
1880s-90sWhen did he play? If he was in the Deadball Era, his power will show up in the sim. At least, it should.
Just looked him up. He played in the late 1800's. In the normalized db, he shows up with two 40+ HR seasons and five 30+ HR seasons.His power will be there in the sim.When did he play? If he was in the Deadball Era, his power will show up in the sim. At least, it should.Nice, this guy has some crazy numbers. The number of 100R + 100 RBI seasons he had was crazy. Would have taken him earlier if he had a little more HR power.Pick for UCONN's team...
20.03 Sam Thompson - OF
Hall of Famer. He and Foxx are the only 2 players to have over 150 RBI with 2 different teams (unless someone's done it recently).
Top 3 OF in RBI per Game (a countdown):
3. Babe Ruth .884
2. Joe DiMaggio .885
1. Sam Thompson .923
Bump.Quick OOTP update:
While entering the rosters that I DO HAVE (Ahem, slackers...) I noticed that OOTP doesn't apply ratings to the really old guys very well when using the Lahman db. Guys that played in the Dead Ball Era get screwed for power ratings.
So, I found a better alternative. There's this guy named Ankit that created several variations of the Lahman db and one of them is a Normalize version of it. Basically, he took the Lahman db and normalized the stats for the historical players to match up with today's game.
I took a look at a few of them and they look pretty good. For example, in 1901 Sam Crawford had 16 HR. That was a ton for that era (props to Koya). Ankit's normalized db has Crawford with 49 HR for that year. Seems pretty good to me.![]()
Two caveats:
1) It only goes to the 2002 season. This isn't that big of a deal since we can use Lahman for 2003 or 2004 since they won't need to be normalized.
2) He's apparently working on a newer version with a different methodology for calculating the normalized stats.
I'm going to email him and see if I can get an update on the new version.