Bogart
Footballguy
it means he is giving up one run an inning, give or takeLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.

it means he is giving up one run an inning, give or takeLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.

:honda:it means he is giving up one run an inning, give or takeLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.![]()
![]()
He's no Paul QuantrillLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.
Or Mike Myers.. <_< (<-- can we please get this smilie back...)He's no Paul QuantrillLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.
no..we have to have room for this.:bluedjinn:Or Mike Myers.. <_< (<-- can we please get this smilie back...)He's no Paul QuantrillLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.
Works just fine for me. Walking right into my trap. Palmer might give up 4 HRs to RF in ebbets.Me and you Koya 3 coming up, you'll see both of my lefties(Doc White and Vida Blue) then Palmer.That is luckier than Larry Boy.This is true. A team with a lot of over-achieving players should be #1. Now if your team can bat .240 and still go 8-3 against some of the best in the division by getting the right hit, the right steal, the right groundball, and the right sacrifice fly to win the game by 1, then that's just a good team.Larry_Boy_44's team 25-6 0.806 - 8-2 W3
that's why i'm #1...C. Mathewson '05 R 9 8 66.67 19 18 2.43 50 6 46 7 7 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1R. Clemens '91 R 8 8 55.33 22 22 3.58 45 14 38 5 6 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0P. Quantrill '03 R 11 0 16.00 3 3 1.69 10 4 7 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 0J. Smoltz '03 R 11 0 11.33 0 0 0.00 4 1 8 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0\T. Glavine '00 L 7 7 47.00 18 16 3.06 41 16 25 4 3 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 0D. Gooden '84 R 9 8 46.33 19 17 3.30 46 17 36 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0![]()
they are only jealous that their "ok" to "not so good" picks are not performing better than some of the all time greats of the game.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.
yep, teach me to start a thought, leave and then come back and hit post:honda:it means he is giving up one run an inning, give or takeLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.![]()
![]()
What is that exactly.. and why the hell does Zippy refer to it in his sig?no..we have to have room for this.:bluedjinn:Or Mike Myers.. <_< (<-- can we please get this smilie back...)He's no Paul QuantrillLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.
![]()
Isn't it a clique thing? Any smiley I can't explain I usually blame on the cliques.What is that exactly.. and why the hell does Zippy refer to it in his sig?no..we have to have room for this.:bluedjinn:Or Mike Myers.. <_< (<-- can we please get this smilie back...)He's no Paul QuantrillLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.
![]()
beats the hell out of me.What is that exactly.. and why the hell does Zippy refer to it in his sig?no..we have to have room for this.:bluedjinn:Or Mike Myers.. <_< (<-- can we please get this smilie back...)He's no Paul QuantrillLee Smith has a 9 ERA. Someone explain that please.
![]()
Paul Quantrill = All time, eh? Go ahead, explain for us.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.

I never said he was an all-time great...although if we are talking about pure relievers, I would say he has to be up there, but that is mostly 'cuz relievers have only really been relievers for the last couple decades or so...and Quantrill has a number of good season in that capacity... 1992 23 BOS AL 2 3 27 0 0 0 10 1 49.3 55 18 12 1 15 24 1 1 213 2.19 4.23 193 1993 24 BOS AL 6 12 49 14 1 1 8 1 138.0 151 73 60 13 44 66 2 0 594 3.91 4.68 120 1994 25 BOS AL 1 1 17 0 0 0 4 0 23.0 25 10 9 4 5 15 2 0 101 3.52 5.05 143 PHI NL 2 2 18 1 0 0 5 1 30.0 39 21 20 3 10 13 3 0 135 6.00 4.30 72 TOT 3 3 35 1 0 0 9 1 53.0 64 31 29 7 15 28 5 0 236 4.92 4.63 94 1997 28 TOR AL 6 7 77 0 0 0 29 5 88.0 103 25 19 5 17 56 1 1 373 1.94 4.62 238 1998 29 TOR AL 3 4 82 0 0 0 32 7 80.0 88 26 23 5 22 59 3 1 345 2.59 4.66 180 1999 30 TOR AL 3 2 41 0 0 0 13 0 48.7 53 19 18 5 17 28 4 0 212 3.33 4.92 148 2000 31 TOR AL 2 5 68 0 0 0 24 1 83.7 100 45 42 7 25 47 2 1 367 4.52 4.97 110 2001 32 TOR AL 11 2 80 0 0 0 20 2 83.0 86 29 28 6 12 58 6 0 341 3.04 4.75 156 2002 33 LAD NL 5 4 86 0 0 0 22 1 76.7 80 27 23 1 25 53 3 0 330 2.70 3.79 140 2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231now, just talking relievers... is there anyone else who has 7 better seasons than his top 7?? (there are 10 that I listed in this post)???I'm sure there are a few... but are there 48 of them?Paul Quantrill = All time, eh? Go ahead, explain for us.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.![]()
I agreed with everything until your last line.Larry made some horrible, absolutely gut-busting laughable choices, and is somehow getting ahead in this thing due to the one-year only statistical nature of it.STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I never said he was an all-time great...Paul Quantrill = All time, eh? Go ahead, explain for us.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.![]()

I guess that's a no for the HOF?STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.

I never said he was an all-time great...although if we are talking about pure relievers, I would say he has to be up there, but that is mostly 'cuz relievers have only really been relievers for the last couple decades or so...and Quantrill has a number of good season in that capacity... 1992 23 BOS AL 2 3 27 0 0 0 10 1 49.3 55 18 12 1 15 24 1 1 213 2.19 4.23 193 1993 24 BOS AL 6 12 49 14 1 1 8 1 138.0 151 73 60 13 44 66 2 0 594 3.91 4.68 120 1994 25 BOS AL 1 1 17 0 0 0 4 0 23.0 25 10 9 4 5 15 2 0 101 3.52 5.05 143 PHI NL 2 2 18 1 0 0 5 1 30.0 39 21 20 3 10 13 3 0 135 6.00 4.30 72 TOT 3 3 35 1 0 0 9 1 53.0 64 31 29 7 15 28 5 0 236 4.92 4.63 94 1997 28 TOR AL 6 7 77 0 0 0 29 5 88.0 103 25 19 5 17 56 1 1 373 1.94 4.62 238 1998 29 TOR AL 3 4 82 0 0 0 32 7 80.0 88 26 23 5 22 59 3 1 345 2.59 4.66 180 1999 30 TOR AL 3 2 41 0 0 0 13 0 48.7 53 19 18 5 17 28 4 0 212 3.33 4.92 148 2000 31 TOR AL 2 5 68 0 0 0 24 1 83.7 100 45 42 7 25 47 2 1 367 4.52 4.97 110 2001 32 TOR AL 11 2 80 0 0 0 20 2 83.0 86 29 28 6 12 58 6 0 341 3.04 4.75 156 2002 33 LAD NL 5 4 86 0 0 0 22 1 76.7 80 27 23 1 25 53 3 0 330 2.70 3.79 140 2003 34 LAD NL 2 5 89 0 0 0 21 1 77.3 61 18 15 2 15 44 3 0 291 1.75 4.03 231now, just talking relievers... is there anyone else who has 7 better seasons than his top 7?? (there are 10 that I listed in this post)???I'm sure there are a few... but are there 48 of them?Paul Quantrill = All time, eh? Go ahead, explain for us.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.![]()
He's like drafting Fred Hoiberg in the alltime NBA draft because he can hit three's off the bench. The role isn't the point. The point is that HE'S NOT AN ALL TIME GREAT.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
name them...And yes larry, there are 48 better relief pitchers all-time than Paul ####ing Quantrill, but going into it with you is hardly worth the time.This draft could have gone 200 rounds and Paul Quantrill/Mike Myers would have had no business being selected.
keep reading... He SHOULD BE when he is finished, but isn't yet... although he's close...I never said he was an all-time great...Paul Quantrill = All time, eh? Go ahead, explain for us.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.![]()
![]()
Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
Now give the man his RIBS.are you kidding?there's 20-30 in the game TODAY who are better, if not more.name them...And yes larry, there are 48 better relief pitchers all-time than Paul ####ing Quantrill, but going into it with you is hardly worth the time.
This draft could have gone 200 rounds and Paul Quantrill/Mike Myers would have had no business being selected.
like I said...name 48 relief pitchers who, since this draft is 1995 or earlier, pitched pre-1995 and are better than Quantrill and I'll show you why Quantrill is AT LEAST as good as they are...are you kidding?there's 20-30 in the game TODAY who are better, if not more.name them...And yes larry, there are 48 better relief pitchers all-time than Paul ####ing Quantrill, but going into it with you is hardly worth the time.
This draft could have gone 200 rounds and Paul Quantrill/Mike Myers would have had no business being selected.
At least those guys were closers. We're talking about a guy that almost pitched himself out of baseball as a starter but didn't have the pitches or the makeup to be a closer. He's about as situational a player as you can find in MLB history. Don't even compare him to Eck and Fingers. Quantrill can't carry their jocks.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
yes, but in a purely statistical sense, Quantrill is actually BETTER outside of thier best seasons...At least those guys were closers. We're talking about a guy that almost pitched himself out of baseball as a starter but didn't have the pitches or the makeup to be a closer. He's about as situational a player as you can find in MLB history. Don't even compare him to Eck and Fingers. Quantrill can't carry their jocks.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: I can't even argue with this stupidity. Sorry. If you're willing to say Paul Quantrill was as good as Rollie Fingers or Eck, based on adjusted ERA and nothing else, I have nothing for you. You're not worth my time.like I said...name 48 relief pitchers who, since this draft is 1995 or earlier, pitched pre-1995 and are better than Quantrill and I'll show you why Quantrill is AT LEAST as good as they are...are you kidding?there's 20-30 in the game TODAY who are better, if not more.name them...And yes larry, there are 48 better relief pitchers all-time than Paul ####ing Quantrill, but going into it with you is hardly worth the time.
This draft could have gone 200 rounds and Paul Quantrill/Mike Myers would have had no business being selected.
I already did it with Eck and Fingers, teh top two ever, and showed how Quantrill should be about on par with them, and is statistically outside of 1 crazy season as good if not better than they are...
heck, with Eck and Fingers, if you take thier sick one season out of the equation, Quantrill is actually BETTER than they are career wise...
Shame on you Larry.If Eck and Fingers don't measure up to Quantrill, then why are both in the HOF? And why won't Quantrill get even a mention? You drafted a middle reliever who had a strange, one year, statistical advantage on some of the closers drafted, that's all you did. And now your touting him as one of the 40 best relievers of ALL-TIME. Just zip it already, you're embarrassing yourself and making us all very, very ashamed to have taken part in this.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
:rotflmao: This is not a Lebron defense, but it's close!keep reading... He SHOULD BE when he is finished, but isn't yet... although he's close...I never said he was an all-time great...Paul Quantrill = All time, eh? Go ahead, explain for us.why?as far as relievers go he's pretty good...and ya'll are just jealous you didn't pick him first...Quantrill shouldn't have even been drafted in an alltime MLB draft.![]()
![]()
Give me a ####ing break. He pitches the 7th or 8th inning for awesome teams, hardly EVER has to pitch with men on base and if he does f'up who rescues him? The closer.yes, but in a purely statistical sense, Quantrill is actually BETTER outside of thier best seasons...At least those guys were closers. We're talking about a guy that almost pitched himself out of baseball as a starter but didn't have the pitches or the makeup to be a closer. He's about as situational a player as you can find in MLB history. Don't even compare him to Eck and Fingers. Quantrill can't carry their jocks.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
Amazing, you're all ashamed and it's not even because of Funkley or Bogart.Shame on you Larry.If Eck and Fingers don't measure up to Quantrill, then why are both in the HOF? And why won't Quantrill get even a mention? You drafted a middle reliever who had a strange, one year, statistical advantage on some of the closers drafted, that's all you did. And now your touting him as one of the 40 best relievers of ALL-TIME. Just zip it already, you're embarrassing yourself and making us all very, very ashamed to have taken part in this.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
An inconsistent god, but a god nonetheless.Carl Mays is a god.
OH NO!like I said...name 48 relief pitchers who, since this draft is 1995 or earlier, pitched pre-1995 and are better than Quantrill and I'll show you why Quantrill is AT LEAST as good as they are...are you kidding?there's 20-30 in the game TODAY who are better, if not more.name them...And yes larry, there are 48 better relief pitchers all-time than Paul ####ing Quantrill, but going into it with you is hardly worth the time.
This draft could have gone 200 rounds and Paul Quantrill/Mike Myers would have had no business being selected.
I already did it with Eck and Fingers, teh top two ever, and showed how Quantrill should be about on par with them, and is statistically outside of 1 crazy season as good if not better than they are...
heck, with Eck and Fingers, if you take thier sick one season out of the equation, Quantrill is actually BETTER than they are career wise...

Nice job. Someone's gotta do it.btw, I justlarry in extras.Nipsey avoided a sweep by the dummy team and is still in second place.Just like I said he would be.
![]()
I'm serious about this....can we get a verification here please? Smoltz not giving up a run to the best hitters of all-time stinks of something....Smoltz hasn't given up a run yet. WTF??!! Has anyone checked Larry's roster to make sure he's using the third best years? Something isn't right here.....
I didn't say he was better, I said statistically you could say he was...all I'm saying is that they are comparable, and Quantrill, statistically, does belong in this...:rotflmao: :rotflmao: I can't even argue with this stupidity. Sorry. If you're willing to say Paul Quantrill was as good as Rollie Fingers or Eck, based on adjusted ERA and nothing else, I have nothing for you. You're not worth my time.like I said...name 48 relief pitchers who, since this draft is 1995 or earlier, pitched pre-1995 and are better than Quantrill and I'll show you why Quantrill is AT LEAST as good as they are...are you kidding?there's 20-30 in the game TODAY who are better, if not more.name them...And yes larry, there are 48 better relief pitchers all-time than Paul ####ing Quantrill, but going into it with you is hardly worth the time.
This draft could have gone 200 rounds and Paul Quantrill/Mike Myers would have had no business being selected.
I already did it with Eck and Fingers, teh top two ever, and showed how Quantrill should be about on par with them, and is statistically outside of 1 crazy season as good if not better than they are...
heck, with Eck and Fingers, if you take thier sick one season out of the equation, Quantrill is actually BETTER than they are career wise...
Nips, I didn't say he was better, I said he fits statistically...and he does, statistically...Shame on you Larry.If Eck and Fingers don't measure up to Quantrill, then why are both in the HOF? And why won't Quantrill get even a mention? You drafted a middle reliever who had a strange, one year, statistical advantage on some of the closers drafted, that's all you did. And now your touting him as one of the 40 best relievers of ALL-TIME. Just zip it already, you're embarrassing yourself and making us all very, very ashamed to have taken part in this.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
He is, I checked.One thing I noticed, though, is that he's using Smoltz from 2002 which is actually his 12th best salary year but 3rd best RP salary year. It's probably his single best year, though, considering he had a 1.12 ERA and 0.87 WHIP. The IP column definitely skews some years' salaries higher than they should be.Lucked out there.Smoltz hasn't given up a run yet. WTF??!! Has anyone checked Larry's roster to make sure he's using the third best years? Something isn't right here.....
Shame on you Larry. You've made a mockery of this thing.Nips, I didn't say he was better, I said he fits statistically...and he does, statistically...Shame on you Larry.If Eck and Fingers don't measure up to Quantrill, then why are both in the HOF? And why won't Quantrill get even a mention? You drafted a middle reliever who had a strange, one year, statistical advantage on some of the closers drafted, that's all you did. And now your touting him as one of the 40 best relievers of ALL-TIME. Just zip it already, you're embarrassing yourself and making us all very, very ashamed to have taken part in this.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
Ecks and Fingers had the wierd statistical thing... if anything Quantrill has been as stead, if not more, than Ecks and Fingers have career wise... He has more years with a 180+ adjusted ERA for sure...
I never said he WAS better, I said statiscally, he looks better...I know Fingers and Eck had different roles...but name 50 relievers who have 4 or more years at 180+ adjusted ERA, because that is why I picked Quantrill, because he isn't gonna allow a lot of runs...larry advocating Quantrill is a top-48 pitcher of all-time certainly doesn't lend much cred to this thing.Him saying he is better than Fingers or Eck makes us all look like a clown show.#### LARRY, NOBODY IN BASEBALL, NOT EVEN PAUL QUANTRILL OR HIS MOM TAKES HIM AS ONE OF THE 50 GREATEST RELIEF PITCHERS EVER
He is, I checked.One thing I noticed, though, is that he's using Smoltz from 2002 which is actually his 12th best salary year but 3rd best RP salary year. It's probably his single best year, though, considering he had a 1.12 ERA and 0.87 WHIP. The IP column definitely skews some years' salaries higher than they should be.Lucked out there.Smoltz hasn't given up a run yet. WTF??!! Has anyone checked Larry's roster to make sure he's using the third best years? Something isn't right here.....

why? 'cuz your losing?Shame on you Larry. You've made a mockery of this thing.Nips, I didn't say he was better, I said he fits statistically...and he does, statistically...Shame on you Larry.If Eck and Fingers don't measure up to Quantrill, then why are both in the HOF? And why won't Quantrill get even a mention? You drafted a middle reliever who had a strange, one year, statistical advantage on some of the closers drafted, that's all you did. And now your touting him as one of the 40 best relievers of ALL-TIME. Just zip it already, you're embarrassing yourself and making us all very, very ashamed to have taken part in this.Nipsey -I did know what I was doing...STOP PUMPING UP PAUL QUANTRILL!!!!!
THE GUY HAS NO PLACE IN THIS THING AND THE ONLY REASON HE'S DECENT IN THE SIM IS BECAUSE OF SOME STATISTICAL GLITCH.
YOU HAVE SMOLTZ/QUANTRILL AND THEY'RE UNTOUCHABLE. I HAVE ECK/FINGERS AND THEY CAN'T GET AN OUT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE LARRY? STOP GLOATING LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE DOING!! YOU'RE STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CAPELLA.
I picked Quantrill because his top seasons are INCREDIBLE... he's never been a starter and he has a career adjusted ERA of 128, his high seasons in adjusted ERA are 238, 231, 193, 180, 156, and 3 in the 140s...
Fingers' high seasons: 332 (crazy-incredible), 196, 185, 146, 2 in the 130s, 3 in the 120s, 3 in the 110s...
Ecks' high seasons: 606, 237, 196, 148, 146, 4 in the 130s, 2 in the 120s...
Quantrill has 4 seasons at 180+, Eck & Fingers only have 3...
Quantrill is downgraded according to you guys because he isn't ancient, he actually compares relatively well to Eck and Fingers (except for those crazy sick seasons that Eck (606???) and Fingers (332?) had...)
Ecks and Fingers had the wierd statistical thing... if anything Quantrill has been as stead, if not more, than Ecks and Fingers have career wise... He has more years with a 180+ adjusted ERA for sure...