Except he's 8 games ahead of everyone in games played against "real teams". so while Quantrill may be important, it would only drop him back to even with the top teams, which I think we can all agree he shouldn't be.
Sammy -- I have to call

here. Think about it reasonably:
Larry_boy's record has nothing to do with it. Even w/o Quantrill, his team would at worst be a .667 squad in this sim. To assume otherwise is to make oneself vulnerable to the accusation that it's all about LB's record. And it's not.
but it IS about that with a few of the people complaining...they can't stand the fact that I might actually ahve a good team, 'cuz they don't like me and they felt like ripping my picks the whole draft...
it is about my record with a few of the people complaining... I am 100% convinced of it...
People like giving you a hard time about it because a lot of your picks did suck. The fact that they've become WIS sim monsters doesn't change that. You could easily win the sim and finish last in the FFA vote. Easily. THAT is why people are bothered by your record. Some of your picks are why people are bothered by your record. Your cluelessness with regards to the talent and careers of some of your players are why people are bothered by your record. Your team appears to be playing vastly above capability but then again it's clear you went fishing for a lot these picks too. But make no mistake, I didn't care about this until you were called on it last night and instead of showing a little class you blamed everyone else for not writing the rules in concrete.
wait, you mean you actually thought I had a chance in the FFA vote?I could have had Ruth, Bonds, Koufax, Seaver, Ryan, A-Rod, Griffey, Mantle, Mays, Williams, Dimaggio, & Clemens...
and I STILL would have lost the FFA vote and you know it...