got_nugs
Footballguy
Sounds like you just got ammo for a hellaparty thoI went stupid in Tampa.
o4½ 12/10
o6½ 3.15/3
o7 4/4
o9 2.14/2
Irresponsible as ####.
Sounds like you just got ammo for a hellaparty thoI went stupid in Tampa.
o4½ 12/10
o6½ 3.15/3
o7 4/4
o9 2.14/2
Irresponsible as ####.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_(1988_film)Have you ever heard of this. A person buys a home with a pool and the day after closing they go to the newly purchased home and see that the previous owner has taken the pool pump with them.
I'll see your Donaldson and raise you a Betts over Hosmer -130.TheGooRoo said:Donaldson over Mazara -120
Donaldson is my first total bases supermax, 9200/7000.I'll see your Donaldson and raise you a Betts over Hosmer -130.
Oh yeah well I have a billion on Donaldson.Donaldson is my first total bases supermax, 9200/7000.
Nice call on the Tribegussy said:Tribe/O's F5 O6 (-115)
D'Backs TT O5.5 (-120)
Bucs TT O4.5 (-135)
Meh, 2 unit bet. Perfect scanario where Texas is hiding Mazara in the 8 spot, 1 extra base hit all year against lefties in 44 ab, then that. I didn't have Mook last night, too much historical success for Hos against Sale, do you take historical in consideration? It's one of the smallest variables for me but sample size over 50 ab is relevant imo.Page 3? Jesus, you guys.
Shout out to Goo for taking a big shot. Taking big shots. I had Donaldson too, can't win 'em all.
I like Beltre, Bellinger, and EE early for TB bets.
Rarely consider bat-vs-pitch history. It's fuzzy space, but the next layer I want to peel back is looking closely at strengths/weakenesses re: hitter strengths/weakness vs. pitcher strength/weakness, not just L/R. Haven't had time to go that deep yet what with the dumb civilian job and all.Meh, 2 unit bet. Perfect scanario where Texas is hiding Mazara in the 8 spot, 1 extra base hit all year against lefties in 44 ab, then that. I didn't have Mook last night, too much historical success for Hos against Sale, do you take historical in consideration? It's one of the smallest variables for me but sample size over 50 ab is relevant imo.
EE has weak history against Gauscan but he's in poor form lately wow. Always like Carrasco. Always like Hill. Manea gold against lefties but Hou is righty heavy. Haven't looked at the lines but I know Bellinger is a play, prob Seager too.
What do you mean by strengths/weakness for hitters and pitchers? Pitch type? One thing that I've been giving a lot of thought about is hitters versus a specific pitch type. You hear for example Ryon Healy is a great fastball hitter. Look deeper and he is a .150 hitter against off-speed stuff and a .350 hitter against fastball. Then you have him facing David Holmberg that's 70% curveball and changeup. By looking at the surface stats that we look at, we may actually back Healy when we should be fading him.Rarely consider bat-vs-pitch history. It's fuzzy space, but the next layer I want to peel back is looking closely at strengths/weakenesses re: hitter strengths/weakness vs. pitcher strength/weakness, not just L/R. Haven't had time to go that deep yet what with the dumb civilian job and all.
where the hell do you find this information at?What do you mean by strengths/weakness for hitters and pitchers? Pitch type? One thing that I've been giving a lot of thought about is hitters versus a specific pitch type. You hear for example Ryon Healy is a great fastball hitter. Look deeper and he is a .150 hitter against off-speed stuff and a .350 hitter against fastball. Then you have him facing David Holmberg that's 70% curveball and changeup. By looking at the surface stats that we look at, we may actually back Healy when we should be fading him.
Corey? Kyle? Both?Meh, 2 unit bet. Perfect scanario where Texas is hiding Mazara in the 8 spot, 1 extra base hit all year against lefties in 44 ab, then that. I didn't have Mook last night, too much historical success for Hos against Sale, do you take historical in consideration? It's one of the smallest variables for me but sample size over 50 ab is relevant imo.
EE has weak history against Gauscan but he's in poor form lately wow. Always like Carrasco. Always like Hill. Manea gold against lefties but Hou is righty heavy. Haven't looked at the lines but I know Bellinger is a play, prob Seager too.
Yes, pitch type. That's what I was trying to say but I'm pretty dumb.What do you mean by strengths/weakness for hitters and pitchers? Pitch type? One thing that I've been giving a lot of thought about is hitters versus a specific pitch type. You hear for example Ryon Healy is a great fastball hitter. Look deeper and he is a .150 hitter against off-speed stuff and a .350 hitter against fastball. Then you have him facing David Holmberg that's 70% curveball and changeup. By looking at the surface stats that we look at, we may actually back Healy when we should be fading him.
Yeah seems Fultz/Ball/Tatum is the order of the day.Josh Jackson over 3.5 -117
Picked this up yesterday at +140 but cautious about a Celtics trade or draft and trade.Josh Jackson over 3.5 -117
Ainge also throws a lot of bull#### out there, so you never know. Also possible that Boston trades down again.Yeah seems Fultz/Ball/Tatum is the order of the day.
Just hypothetical. I know I've seen the pitcher information by pitch type at Fangraphs or Baseball reference. Not sure on the batter stuff. Stats.com maybe?where the hell do you find this information at?
I played the over it starts in 3 minutes I think this gets even better against lefties cheersTwins home/night on 9 or more is .717
I really respect Phil. He knows more about College Football than I could know in 10 lifetimes. But if you listen to him on ESPN Behind the Bets pod the last couple of years, he's no better than any of us FFAWT degens at picking games vs. the spread.Been listening to a lot of the local Phil Steele interviews. He's telling anyone that will listen to him that the Florida Michigan game should be closer to PK then +4, fwtiw.
while i agree for the most part I would say he is better at these types of bets where there is a potential for a lot of valueI really respect Phil. He knows more about College Football than I could know in 10 lifetimes. But if you listen to him on ESPN Behind the Bets pod the last couple of years, he's no better than any of us FFAWT degens at picking games vs. the spread.