What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** FFA WAGERING THREAD - Merry Christmas!!! (9 Viewers)

Tiger Fan said:
Played:

First Song: What Lovers Do +500

Over 165.5 million in total Nevada wagering

Pepsi +130

No Dirty Bird

No Hotlanta
same plus not admitting to mistake

no prop uses

no colin jersey

only able to bet $50

 
With the recent legalization of all the wagering, do you see the square side/majority side in the SB more square than usual this season?

 
During the late game - once the Chiefs got behind in the 1Q/2Q - live betting was selling Rams +107 and Pats +153 (and then Chiefs +400 or so).

 
Why so patriot focused?
I see what you mean. It just looks Patriot-focused. Honestly when I saw the 1Q totals my snap judgement kicked in and the situation seemed like it needed more investigating. Turns out when Belichick lost the 10 postseason games they averaged less than 20 ppg in doing so. Also the chronological 1Q scoring in Belichick's eight Super Bowls: 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3 with 10±4 average ppg 1H. To a lesser extent - McVay's team holding the opponent to 23 or fewer in 18 of his 26 career wins. Just gamblin' & showing out a little bit with the big payout numbers - diving in on the first angle I liked.

 
I see what you mean. It just looks Patriot-focused. Honestly when I saw the 1Q totals my snap judgement kicked in and the situation seemed like it needed more investigating. Turns out when Belichick lost the 10 postseason games they averaged less than 20 ppg in doing so. Also the chronological 1Q scoring in Belichick's eight Super Bowls: 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3 with 10±4 average ppg 1H. To a lesser extent - McVay's team holding the opponent to 23 or fewer in 18 of his 26 career wins. Just gamblin' & showing out a little bit with the big payout numbers - diving in on the first angle I liked.
Since you put it that way..... 

i still like under 28 1h

 
Bookmaker has a prop will kylie jenner appear on camera, I played no -200

1. Travis scott is not the main halftime performer

2. CBS is broadcasting the super bowl, E network is owned by NBC Universal, not a good idea to promote the character from a competing networks show

 
What was the bet again? I couldn't make hair nor hide of your earlier post.
The U.S. Flag Code asks that anyone addressing the flag during the national anthem put their right hands over their hearts. The wager in question asks whether or not Robert Gronkowski will choose to participate in this manner while simultaneously being captured on camera.

 
All kidding and bickering aside I think if you are going to back New England in this game now is the time to get down.  I’m seeing a lot of -2.5 -120’s

 
I dont know much about hockey, but why would the islanders be 35/1 in vegas to win the cup? They are currently the 2 seed. 
I just took a position on the Isles at 21-1 so I think that's great value. I also took Pens at 15-1 and Knights at 11-1

There are a number of teams that would be favored over the Isles, but they continue to play well. I think it will either
be Pens or Isles vs. Bolts in the East finals and despite TB being the far superior team, they haven't exactly been closers
come playoff time and you would have opportunity to buy out if necessary. At 35-1 I think that's good value. They're not
exactly a fluke, they've got a very good goal differential and they actually play a little defense now.

 
Saturday Hoops (also read as I don't know if you can get any more square than this)

Huskers -7
Iowa St PK
Baylor -3.5
UVA -11.5
NC St -6
K State -4.5
LSU -5
Kentucky -6
USC -1.5
Utah -5.5
USF -2

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top