What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*****OFFICIAL FORMULA ONE GRAND PRIX THREAD***** (4 Viewers)

Just got a little worse weekend for Mercedes/Antonelli - Russell took his last new power unit this weekend - and its likely damaged now...
 
The Formula 3 championship went down to the last corner of the final race of the season. The last three laps of the race are worth watching. The two title contenders are Leo Fornaroli in the red, white & blue car and his Italian countryman Gabriele Mini with the Alpine livery.


It didn't matter in the end because Mini was disqualified for underinflated tires.
 
The Formula 3 championship went down to the last corner of the final race of the season. The last three laps of the race are worth watching. The two title contenders are Leo Fornaroli in the red, white & blue car and his Italian countryman Gabriele Mini with the Alpine livery.


It didn't matter in the end because Mini was disqualified for underinflated tires.
Saw those final laps last night, that was great
 
I love the conspiracy theory that F1 found the Red Bull out of spec earlier in the year and have finally made Red Bull revert Verstappen's car to Perez's specs (presumably Perez had to revert back many races ago).
 
I love the conspiracy theory that F1 found the Red Bull out of spec earlier in the year and have finally made Red Bull revert Verstappen's car to Perez's specs (presumably Perez had to revert back many races ago).


I'm new to this, but watching DTS there was a similar thing that happened to Ferrari. Ferrari were very fast, but they had a "not by the rules" fuel flow advantage. Ferrari became really slow after the new technical directives came out, similar to Red bull now.

Just a coincidence that when the FIA state you cannot use asymmetrical breaking (iirc), Red Bull can't win a race and Max can't turn the car? :tinfoilhat:
 
I love the conspiracy theory that F1 found the Red Bull out of spec earlier in the year and have finally made Red Bull revert Verstappen's car to Perez's specs (presumably Perez had to revert back many races ago).


I'm new to this, but watching DTS there was a similar thing that happened to Ferrari. Ferrari were very fast, but they had a "not by the rules" fuel flow advantage. Ferrari became really slow after the new technical directives came out, similar to Red bull now.

Just a coincidence that when the FIA state you cannot use asymmetrical breaking (iirc), Red Bull can't win a race and Max can't turn the car? :tinfoilhat:
Apparently its been an issue with the FIA for awhile and they basically 100% decided it was against the rules during the summer break (the theory goes that Perez has been running the corrected setup for awhile now which is why he's languishing...it also makes more sense than Perez just suddenly sucking this year and the vote of confidence he got from Red Bull).

Apparently they're also still studying the "flexible wing" McClaren and Mercedes are using. I think we all know what that means....come on down Charles!
 
I love the conspiracy theory that F1 found the Red Bull out of spec earlier in the year and have finally made Red Bull revert Verstappen's car to Perez's specs (presumably Perez had to revert back many races ago).
As soon as Checo was challenging Max last year I felt Red Bull "turned him down" He went from right there with him to at least half a second back from that point on. Checo didn't just forget how to drive.
 
(Secretly hoping Lando loses the championship by about 5 points...)

#badtactics
What about not swapping cars on the last lap in Italy when they knew Oscar couldn't catch Charles? Whats that, 7 points now?

Need a running tally of McLaren throwing points out of the cockpit
I think they're up to 10...7 for Hungary and 3 last week. More than anything though, Piastri should have had orders to protect 1st place on the first lap rather than racing and forcing Norris to bail on the corner and give Piastri space.
 
Any race recommendations for Azerbaijan?

I've already watched he one where Max has a tire failure on the last lap, i giggled.
 
Ended up watching the 2017 race.

Was pretty wild. Vettel and Lewis playing bumper cars, Lewis's headrest coming loose during the race, Vettel getting a 10s stop and go. Stroll finishing 2nd :lmao:
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
They are trying to keep two #1 quality drivers happy. Telling Piastri after a few races that he's going to have to give away points to his teammate for the rest of the season even if Piastri is faster is crazy. Piastri would exercise the next available opt out in his deal and be gone.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
They are trying to keep two #1 quality drivers happy. Telling Piastri after a few races that he's going to have to give away points to his teammate for the rest of the season even if Piastri is faster is crazy. Piastri would exercise the next available opt out in his deal and be gone.
Exactly what came up on the pod.

So then you lose Lando? Because in Hungary they told him to swap back because "he would need Piastri later if he wanted to win a title." Piastri then overtakes him on lap 1 in Italy and messes up Lando's race.


Fair enough if you're not going to tell Piastri not to overtake if Lando is leading, but then they should not have made Lando swap back in Hungary imo.
 
My daughter loves Lando and I made the mistake last week of saying I think Piastri is the better driver. But I do.

I'm in the same boat.

Piastri has been there 18 months while Lando has been there 6 years. He's definitely on a higher trajectory
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
They are trying to keep two #1 quality drivers happy. Telling Piastri after a few races that he's going to have to give away points to his teammate for the rest of the season even if Piastri is faster is crazy. Piastri would exercise the next available opt out in his deal and be gone.
Exactly what came up on the pod.

So then you lose Lando? Because in Hungary they told him to swap back because "he would need Piastri later if he wanted to win a title." Piastri then overtakes him on lap 1 in Italy and messes up Lando's race.


Fair enough if you're not going to tell Piastri not to overtake if Lando is leading, but then they should not have made Lando swap back in Hungary imo.
I would have been fine if they wanted to let Norris win in Hungary but I also understand them giving it back to Piastri; Piastri was only in that position because of a team screwup, not because Norris had outraced him.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
They are trying to keep two #1 quality drivers happy. Telling Piastri after a few races that he's going to have to give away points to his teammate for the rest of the season even if Piastri is faster is crazy. Piastri would exercise the next available opt out in his deal and be gone.

I don't think anyone was suggesting that Piastri yield to Norris after a "few races".

But, at this stage of the season - you have to see a bigger picture, and that is two-fold - as a team, you want to have a driver championship and a team championship - both lead to more sponsorship money.

Through 12 races of the season - just over half-way - Norris had finished ahead of Piastri 9 times. To date, Norris has out-qualified Piastri 14-2. Norris was in 2nd place in the drivers standing when the Hungary fiasco happened, where Lando undercut Piastri and was forced to give back the lead - despite using a legitimate strategy to gain the lead (and Norris only lost the lead because Piastri had a better start - otherwise, Norris out-qualified Piastri, and was pulling away in the end. Maiden win, I can sort of see that being a factor - but team orders should have been to get out front in a 1-2, and then race, not risk an issue that eliminates the 1-2.

Then you get to Monza where again, Lando, who sits second in the standings, while Piastri sits 4th, wins pole, and the team should have ensured that race stayed 1-2 from start to finish - this time, Piastri cost the team points by allowing Ferrari to try a different strategy that won the race.

On the back of all the whining by the team to Norris in Hungary about "needing Piastri for Lando to win a championship" - there should've been clear instructions that when Norris is ahead, Piastri is the supporting driver, and looking to maximize points for the team.

As near as I can tell, this has cost Norris 16 points in the standings - in what is shaping up to be a close race, assuming Red Bull don't find their earlier form.
 
I would have been fine if they wanted to let Norris win in Hungary but I also understand them giving it back to Piastri; Piastri was only in that position because of a team screwup, not because Norris had outraced him.
Not entirely true.

It was a "screwup" of sorts - but really the only thing Piastri did better than day was have a better start. Norris was on pole, and was puling away in the end. So, on balance, I would say Norris was the better driver overall - but that Piastri took advantage of the poor start.


And, it was only a "screwup" because the team had no idea who they were trying to cover off - but if Norris had been racing Max, instead of Piastri -the undercut was appropriate, and it worked like expected - in part because Norris put in the work to get the tires up to speed on the outlap and created the advantage via his driving.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
They are trying to keep two #1 quality drivers happy. Telling Piastri after a few races that he's going to have to give away points to his teammate for the rest of the season even if Piastri is faster is crazy. Piastri would exercise the next available opt out in his deal and be gone.

I don't think anyone was suggesting that Piastri yield to Norris after a "few races".

But, at this stage of the season - you have to see a bigger picture, and that is two-fold - as a team, you want to have a driver championship and a team championship - both lead to more sponsorship money.

Through 12 races of the season - just over half-way - Norris had finished ahead of Piastri 9 times. To date, Norris has out-qualified Piastri 14-2. Norris was in 2nd place in the drivers standing when the Hungary fiasco happened, where Lando undercut Piastri and was forced to give back the lead - despite using a legitimate strategy to gain the lead (and Norris only lost the lead because Piastri had a better start - otherwise, Norris out-qualified Piastri, and was pulling away in the end. Maiden win, I can sort of see that being a factor - but team orders should have been to get out front in a 1-2, and then race, not risk an issue that eliminates the 1-2.

Then you get to Monza where again, Lando, who sits second in the standings, while Piastri sits 4th, wins pole, and the team should have ensured that race stayed 1-2 from start to finish - this time, Piastri cost the team points by allowing Ferrari to try a different strategy that won the race.

On the back of all the whining by the team to Norris in Hungary about "needing Piastri for Lando to win a championship" - there should've been clear instructions that when Norris is ahead, Piastri is the supporting driver, and looking to maximize points for the team.

As near as I can tell, this has cost Norris 16 points in the standings - in what is shaping up to be a close race, assuming Red Bull don't find their earlier form.
The post I was replying to said at any point in the season where it appears one driver is more likely to win than the other, which could be at any time. If I'm McLaren, the Constructor's title is worth much more to me than Norris getting the driver title. If you've got two alphas on your team, tell them to go earn it. That's how racing should be. Manipulating race finishes to squeeze out a few more points for your favored driver seems really lame to me.

Edit: and to Norris's credit, that's the approach he seems to be taking rather than whining about not getting a handout. Good for him.
 
It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
Insane that that this hasn't been the case since he opened up a points lead vs. Piastri. F1 in general seems to have the least team-like teams of any sport. In every other sport being on a team means "you do whatever you're asked to do to help the team achieve its primary goals" in F1, it seems like being on a team means "I expect the team to give me almost exactly what they're giving my team-mate...no matter the situation".


It would appear that Zak Brown has intervened at McLaren and knocked some sense into the squad, and they will now be favoring Lando Norris to maximize points.
One of the reasons I struggle to respect this sport. Should be every driver for themselves. Best one wins.
I can't respect favoring one driver over another.


Wild reading these two replies back to back.

Think I agree with zoo here, it is a "team sport".

One of the podcasts I listen to brought this up and the question of team orders. I liked what they said Ferrari (iirc) did back with Vettel and Kimi (again, i think). They did not have team orders until half way through the season, then they would prioritize the driver ahead at that point. That kind of made sense to me as it let's the drivers fight it out on their own to a certain point, then you play the team game with the driver that earned the #1 spot.
That's more or less what I think makes sense. Except I'd say it shouldn't necessarily be 'the driver ahead at that point' and shouldn't always be halfway through the season. I think it should be that at any point in the season they favor whoever is more likely to win the season. So maybe you go into the season favoring Max...if Sergio is a few points ahead...well, Max is still more likely to win. But if you're 3/4 of the way through the season and Sergio has a 50 point lead...you're going to favor him. And if you have two drivers with roughly equal skill/history, then maybe you wait long enough for one to open up a clear lead before you favor either.

I'd also be fine with a complete free for all...but then they should do away with the two car teams...limit it to one car and let additional teams enter. I assume that would never happen since it would reduce the value of the teams for the existing ownership groups.
They are trying to keep two #1 quality drivers happy. Telling Piastri after a few races that he's going to have to give away points to his teammate for the rest of the season even if Piastri is faster is crazy. Piastri would exercise the next available opt out in his deal and be gone.

I don't think anyone was suggesting that Piastri yield to Norris after a "few races".

But, at this stage of the season - you have to see a bigger picture, and that is two-fold - as a team, you want to have a driver championship and a team championship - both lead to more sponsorship money.

Through 12 races of the season - just over half-way - Norris had finished ahead of Piastri 9 times. To date, Norris has out-qualified Piastri 14-2. Norris was in 2nd place in the drivers standing when the Hungary fiasco happened, where Lando undercut Piastri and was forced to give back the lead - despite using a legitimate strategy to gain the lead (and Norris only lost the lead because Piastri had a better start - otherwise, Norris out-qualified Piastri, and was pulling away in the end. Maiden win, I can sort of see that being a factor - but team orders should have been to get out front in a 1-2, and then race, not risk an issue that eliminates the 1-2.

Then you get to Monza where again, Lando, who sits second in the standings, while Piastri sits 4th, wins pole, and the team should have ensured that race stayed 1-2 from start to finish - this time, Piastri cost the team points by allowing Ferrari to try a different strategy that won the race.

On the back of all the whining by the team to Norris in Hungary about "needing Piastri for Lando to win a championship" - there should've been clear instructions that when Norris is ahead, Piastri is the supporting driver, and looking to maximize points for the team.

As near as I can tell, this has cost Norris 16 points in the standings - in what is shaping up to be a close race, assuming Red Bull don't find their earlier form.
The post I was replying to said at any point in the season where it appears one driver is more likely to win than the other, which could be at any time. If I'm McLaren, the Constructor's title is worth much more to me than Norris getting the driver title.

giphy.webp
 
If I'm McLaren, the Constructor's title is worth much more to me than Norris getting the driver title.
It would be an interesting analysis - but I suspect the opposite is true. More sponsorship money and exposure for the team in having the World Champion, and no downside.


The Constructor's Championship is actually a bit of a Pyrrhic victory - yes you get a few more dollars, but it also comes with the cost of development time in the following season, and with the 2026 car coming around the corner, I don't think McLaren are going to be pleased to see that development time cut next season - as that can have knock-on effects for several seasons.

I suspect that Mercedes is secretly happy (now) that they are 4th in the Constructor's championship leading into next season.
 
If I'm McLaren, the Constructor's title is worth much more to me than Norris getting the driver title.
It would be an interesting analysis - but I suspect the opposite is true. More sponsorship money and exposure for the team in having the World Champion, and no downside.


The Constructor's Championship is actually a bit of a Pyrrhic victory - yes you get a few more dollars, but it also comes with the cost of development time in the following season, and with the 2026 car coming around the corner, I don't think McLaren are going to be pleased to see that development time cut next season - as that can have knock-on effects for several seasons.

I suspect that Mercedes is secretly happy (now) that they are 4th in the Constructor's championship leading into next season.
We're talking millions of dollars, not a few bucks. The analysts I've heard talk about it seem to agree the team championship is more important for the team and the brand. Red Bull isn't trying to tank to get more wind tunnel time.
 
If I'm McLaren, the Constructor's title is worth much more to me than Norris getting the driver title.
It would be an interesting analysis - but I suspect the opposite is true. More sponsorship money and exposure for the team in having the World Champion, and no downside.


The Constructor's Championship is actually a bit of a Pyrrhic victory - yes you get a few more dollars, but it also comes with the cost of development time in the following season, and with the 2026 car coming around the corner, I don't think McLaren are going to be pleased to see that development time cut next season - as that can have knock-on effects for several seasons.

I suspect that Mercedes is secretly happy (now) that they are 4th in the Constructor's championship leading into next season.
We're talking millions of dollars, not a few bucks. The analysts I've heard talk about it seem to agree the team championship is more important for the team and the brand. Red Bull isn't trying to tank to get more wind tunnel time.
That's interesting. My thinking earlier in the thread assumed that the individual championship was worth more, but I've only been following F1 for a bit more than a year, so wouldn't be surprised to learn that that's a bad assumption.
 
If I'm McLaren, the Constructor's title is worth much more to me than Norris getting the driver title.
It would be an interesting analysis - but I suspect the opposite is true. More sponsorship money and exposure for the team in having the World Champion, and no downside.


The Constructor's Championship is actually a bit of a Pyrrhic victory - yes you get a few more dollars, but it also comes with the cost of development time in the following season, and with the 2026 car coming around the corner, I don't think McLaren are going to be pleased to see that development time cut next season - as that can have knock-on effects for several seasons.

I suspect that Mercedes is secretly happy (now) that they are 4th in the Constructor's championship leading into next season.
We're talking millions of dollars, not a few bucks. The analysts I've heard talk about it seem to agree the team championship is more important for the team and the brand. Red Bull isn't trying to tank to get more wind tunnel time.
That's interesting. My thinking earlier in the thread assumed that the individual championship was worth more, but I've only been following F1 for a bit more than a year, so wouldn't be surprised to learn that that's a bad assumption.

I don't buy the argument that teams would downgrade the World Constructors' Championship in order to get a 5% increase in wind tunnel and CFD time the following season. In particular, McLaren hasn't won the constructors' title this century. It would be huge for them to win it this year after spending much of the last decade mired in the midfield.

The drivers' championship gets more popular and media attention but the prize money is paid out based on constructors' points.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top