Steve Tasker
Footballguy
Sounds goodSteve tasker, you are inventions judge.
Sounds goodSteve tasker, you are inventions judge.
I predict it won't last that long.I know what it is now, and I will snipe it.As far as my question to Big Rocks, it involves a work where, if someone selects it, I'm going to insist that they choose either the first half or the second half- you won't be allowed to choose both parts. Can't say more without spotlighting.
If my draft pick is Inspector Gadget can I have all his gadgets or do I have to select each gadget separately?
I am the man from Nantucket. Nufced.judging a haikuthe art of weighing nothingfat air, thin chance, eh?!
I dont know if this is like Heating and AC, but I like it. I didnt even think about it, but it does open up another traing of throught for me. Good pick.Torn between three choices, but I will select.........................
1.09 - APOLLO 11
Man Lands On the Moon, and returns to tell about it
Wildcard
Amazing to me that only about 65 years after The Wright Brothers, we were able to build a ship and chart a course capable of sending humans to the surface of the moon - and back again." Thats one small step for man, one Giant LEAP for mankind" - Neil Armstrong
Man On The Moon
As wildcard judge, I can tell you that an event like Apollo 11 would be ranked very high indeed...
...if it had actually happened.
Nice pick here. Definitely outside the box, but nice pick.Torn between three choices, but I will select.........................
1.08 - APOLLO 11
Man Lands On the Moon, and returns to tell about it
Wildcard
Amazing to me that only about 65 years after The Wright Brothers, we were able to build a ship and chart a course capable of sending humans to the surface of the moon - and back again." Thats one small step for man, one Giant LEAP for mankind" - Neil Armstrong
Man On The Moon
I would have picked the monkey in space instead.Nice pick here. Definitely outside the box, but nice pick.Torn between three choices, but I will select.........................
1.08 - APOLLO 11
Man Lands On the Moon, and returns to tell about it
Wildcard
Amazing to me that only about 65 years after The Wright Brothers, we were able to build a ship and chart a course capable of sending humans to the surface of the moon - and back again." Thats one small step for man, one Giant LEAP for mankind" - Neil Armstrong
Man On The Moon
SEEI really didn't want to just tke my time putting a list together because I knew - from personal experience, naturally - that there would be other drafters more than ready to go. Whatever, I don't want to just go with a VBD pick in a category with limited choices. I'll be the first to dive in headfirst into one of the deeper categories, and the one that interests me the most. Screw waiting on it just because there's plenty of good choices to be had later on.TidesofWar said:Layne getting antsy??? Abrantes has been in and out of this thread this PM - does he know he can pick now?BobbyLayne said:4 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
4 Members: BobbyLayne, Bonzai, rodg12, Abrantes
![]()
![]()
Its critical accolades don't matter much to me here. I'm picking it based on the sheer perfection of the music itself. It feels like I've listened to it enough times to internalize every note and tone, but every listen still brings back the same joy I had hearing it for the first time.
1.06 Miles Davis' Kind of Blue (Album)
As wildcard judge, I can tell you that an event like Apollo 11 would be ranked very high indeed...
...if it had actually happened.
That's great Krista, but do I have to draft French New Wave flicks to make you happy?Just catching up after the Leonard Cohen (poet, musician, composer, author...) concert tonight. Love these picks! Not a bad pick yet.tim, I would be happy to judge movies, leaving out of course any that I draft for Team Fennis.
Tremendous start. A few of these may not have been on my initial top ten, but I really like all of the picks so far.Gonna be awhile before we see a truly bad pick. Especially with LB not drafting.Round One
1. Fennis US Constitution
2. Rodg12 The Sistine Chapel (painting)
3. Postradamus Mona Lisa
4. timschochet Beethoven's 5th Symphony
5. Doug B The Great Pyramid of Giza
6. Abrantes Miles Davis- Kind Of Blue
7. BobbyLayne Declaration of Independence
8. Tides of War Apollo 11
9. wikkidpissah Divine Comedy
our brief, torrid affair ended over Kurosawa, so that's a good place to start, tim.That's great Krista, but do I have to draft French New Wave flicks to make you happy?Just catching up after the Leonard Cohen (poet, musician, composer, author...) concert tonight. Love these picks! Not a bad pick yet.tim, I would be happy to judge movies, leaving out of course any that I draft for Team Fennis.![]()
Tremendous start. A few of these may not have been on my initial top ten, but I really like all of the picks so far.Gonna be awhile before we see a truly bad pick. Especially with LB not drafting.Round One
1. Fennis US Constitution
2. Rodg12 The Sistine Chapel (painting)
3. Postradamus Mona Lisa
4. timschochet Beethoven's 5th Symphony
5. Doug B The Great Pyramid of Giza
6. Abrantes Miles Davis- Kind Of Blue
7. BobbyLayne Declaration of Independence
8. Tides of War Apollo 11
9. wikkidpissah Divine Comedy
Maybe we should have inserted a wrestling moves category...Gonna be awhile before we see a truly bad pick. Especially with LB not drafting.
Choose your next words carefully, sir.That's great Krista, but do I have to draft French New Wave flicks to make you happy?Just catching up after the Leonard Cohen (poet, musician, composer, author...) concert tonight. Love these picks! Not a bad pick yet.tim, I would be happy to judge movies, leaving out of course any that I draft for Team Fennis.![]()
There is only one director from the French New Wave whose films I enjoy, but I loooooooove all of his. Now it's your job to figure out which guy it is. Bwaaaahahahahaha!I'll try to put together some criteria tomorrow. Or everyone can just wade through my 8 squillion posts in the Recently Viewed Movie Thread.That's great Krista, but do I have to draft French New Wave flicks to make you happy?Just catching up after the Leonard Cohen (poet, musician, composer, author...) concert tonight. Love these picks! Not a bad pick yet.tim, I would be happy to judge movies, leaving out of course any that I draft for Team Fennis.![]()
I think a couple of his movies are just about perfect, but my love for Kurosawa is based more on body of work and versatility than one specific movie.our brief, torrid affair ended over Kurosawa, so that's a good place to start, tim.That's great Krista, but do I have to draft French New Wave flicks to make you happy?Just catching up after the Leonard Cohen (poet, musician, composer, author...) concert tonight. Love these picks! Not a bad pick yet.tim, I would be happy to judge movies, leaving out of course any that I draft for Team Fennis.![]()
Depends on the judge's ruling on the picks themselves, but I will take it into account if your choice has been updated and enhanced for use in today's society. Like you pick something that was invented in 1200 but has been updated for today....that will be taken into account.Alright, well if I'm judging the Inventions category...I'll be judging based on a few things. It's tough to explain without spotlighting, but hopefully you get the idea.- the invention's impact today- the invention's impact at the time it was invented- the "innovation factor" (Was this invention way ahead of its time? Bonus points. Was it something that was going to be invented by someone else in the next 5-10 years if Person X didn't invent it? Not as many bonus points.)Does this sound adequate?
Like dancing the Robot after scoring a goal?Depends on the judge's ruling on the picks themselves, but I will take it into account if your choice has been updated and enhanced for use in today's society. Like you pick something that was invented in 1200 but has been updated for today....that will be taken into account.Alright, well if I'm judging the Inventions category...I'll be judging based on a few things. It's tough to explain without spotlighting, but hopefully you get the idea.
- the invention's impact today
- the invention's impact at the time it was invented
- the "innovation factor" (Was this invention way ahead of its time? Bonus points. Was it something that was going to be invented by someone else in the next 5-10 years if Person X didn't invent it? Not as many bonus points.)
Does this sound adequate?
First of all, if the treatise is a political document, there is another category for that now. This category is not meant to be nebulous. There are many philosophical and political ideas that are worth exploration. I can't get into it here without spotlighting. It has to be attributable to a specific time and place (though there may be more than one.) An idea like "freedom" would be too nebulous for this category.I'm thinking about inviting Gigantomachia to judge this category. I realize that people were upset with him (myself included) over his evaluations in the WGD, but to his credit, he defended himself well. And the type of complaints we had in the WGD (regarding whether or not certain people existed) will not be present here, since we're dealing with ideas, not people.Philosophical/ political idea (3) Should be separated from scientific discoveries for comparative purposes. Need not be attributable to one person, though the idea should be specific.So we're not drafting treatise, we're drafting "ideas"? Why the change? Seems incredibly nebulous now.Do have an example of what you're talking about here?
Tremendous start. A few of these may not have been on my initial top ten, but I really like all of the picks so far.Gonna be awhile before we see a truly bad pick. Especially with LB not drafting.Round One
1. Fennis US Constitution
2. Rodg12 The Sistine Chapel (painting)
3. Postradamus Mona Lisa
4. timschochet Beethoven's 5th Symphony
5. Doug B The Great Pyramid of Giza
6. Abrantes Miles Davis- Kind Of Blue
7. BobbyLayne Declaration of Independence
8. Tides of War Apollo 11
9. wikkidpissah Divine Comedy
Yeah get Gig in here, that should clear it up.I received this PM, and wanted to respond to it here:
First of all, if the treatise is a political document, there is another category for that now. This category is not meant to be nebulous. There are many philosophical and political ideas that are worth exploration. I can't get into it here without spotlighting. It has to be attributable to a specific time and place (though there may be more than one.) An idea like "freedom" would be too nebulous for this category.I'm thinking about inviting Gigantomachia to judge this category. I realize that people were upset with him (myself included) over his evaluations in the WGD, but to his credit, he defended himself well. And the type of complaints we had in the WGD (regarding whether or not certain people existed) will not be present here, since we're dealing with ideas, not people.Philosophical/ political idea (3) Should be separated from scientific discoveries for comparative purposes. Need not be attributable to one person, though the idea should be specific.So we're not drafting treatise, we're drafting "ideas"? Why the change? Seems incredibly nebulous now.Do have an example of what you're talking about here?
I would think it would have to go in the science category.Philosophical Idea - Darwinian EvolutionProbably the wrong category... Maybe Scientific Discovery, but it's more of a theory than a discovery.
I would think it would have to go in the science category.Philosophical Idea - Darwinian EvolutionProbably the wrong category... Maybe Scientific Discovery, but it's more of a theory than a discovery.
:( Another great pick.I would think it would have to go in the science category.Philosophical Idea - Darwinian EvolutionProbably the wrong category... Maybe Scientific Discovery, but it's more of a theory than a discovery.That's where I had it in my rankings.
I'm going to be the guy that runs through the wall again, so to speak. I didn't do any PM's, but I'm guessing there is a question about the Bible because I've been flipping it around in my head as well as to where it would fit. Obviously, the bible or some parts of it are going to be drafted so spotlighting should not be an issue here, but if it is, then attack me again. I'm used to it.The Christian bible has two parts, and each part has several sub parts. The book is philosophical, theological, historical, political, heck you could probably even throw some military knowledge in there. It certainly isn't fiction(laughing by some aside as they read this) but is it just non-fiction. The problem you also have is that the Jewish Torah overlaps, so if you take the bible, can anyone else take the Torah? If you take the bible, can no one, then, select the Letter to the Romans, for example. Can the first 5 be broken out of the Old Testament as the Mosaic Law? And then the ideas and whatnot.I think we should allow the overlap in such instances. The fact of the matter is that the bible is many things to many people and can be viewed many many different ways. As a whole it stands by itself. But so can each part and idea. Solomon's wisdom is used by secular institutions, while the entirety of the bible isn't. It can be broken up and kept whole.Same with the Darwinian Evolution. The idea is something, but so is the book, as you mentioned. Honestly, given the extensive nature of this draft, and the ideal behind it, I don't think the overlap is a problem. Especially for such cases. Where you are going to have problems is in the discussion and judging, but isn't that kind of the point a little? Discourse?Good morning. A concern about the philosophic category has been raised to me, and I'm not quite sure how to answer it. Someone wanted to draft a certain book that has major philosophical and poliitical ideas, and I replied that belongs in non-fiction. But then the person pointed out that if he did so, would this prevent someone else from drafting one or more of the "ideas" from that book in the philosophy/political category? Wouldn't there be overlap?This also affects the last draft pick as well. Now that "Evolution" has been chosen, should someone still be allowed to draft the book where that idea came from?My initial answer is yes, if they so choose, and we'll simply evaluate it separately in each category. In the same way, you could choose an album and someone else could choose a song off of that album. Does everyone understand this? Please let me know here, not by PM, if it's still confusing. Does anyone have a complaint with this?
If you pick Inspector Gadget, you get all his inventions too, IMOThis all comes back to the Inspector Gadget question that I posed earlier, no?
This could come into play in the invention category as well, with different picks in the same category (i.e. smaller inventions as part of larger inventions). Did we determine how we were going to handle that??I don't have a problem with the song/album overlap, that's to be expected. The theory/book overlap is different, however, because whereas an album is composed of multiple songs and the overlap will only occur on a couple songs, the situation could exist where a book is entirely about the theory. In this case, I don't know how they can both be drafted since they're essentially about the same 'work.'Good morning. A concern about the philosophic category has been raised to me, and I'm not quite sure how to answer it. Someone wanted to draft a certain book that has major philosophical and poliitical ideas, and I replied that belongs in non-fiction. But then the person pointed out that if he did so, would this prevent someone else from drafting one or more of the "ideas" from that book in the philosophy/political category? Wouldn't there be overlap?
This also affects the last draft pick as well. Now that "Evolution" has been chosen, should someone still be allowed to draft the book where that idea came from?
My initial answer is yes, if they so choose, and we'll simply evaluate it separately in each category. In the same way, you could choose an album and someone else could choose a song off of that album.
Does everyone understand this? Please let me know here, not by PM, if it's still confusing. Does anyone have a complaint with this?
If you pick Inspector Gadget, you get all his inventions too, IMOThis all comes back to the Inspector Gadget question that I posed earlier, no?![]()
Would we be able to draft the koran? Or would that have to be chopped up into separate pieces as well?Or maybe we just leave religious texts out altogether.I feel like the Bible should be drafted by Book, Act, or Gospel... I wondered about it as well, but figured it wasn't worth drafting at all if there was going to be ambiguity about it.
I was thinking about this as well, but what's a great works draft if probably the most impactful works in the history of (wo)man-kind aren't included? Know what I mean?Would we be able to draft the koran? Or would that have to be chopped up into separate pieces as well?Or maybe we just leave religious texts out altogether.I feel like the Bible should be drafted by Book, Act, or Gospel... I wondered about it as well, but figured it wasn't worth drafting at all if there was going to be ambiguity about it.