This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Moot point even discussing it. It won't happen. For those that ignored the warnings, time is better spent figuring out who you can plug in your line-up for Jennings now.Cool, but what do you think about Jennings if Rodgers ends up playing the rest of the season?
Link GB QB thread*sigh*
For those who didn't see this coming, just search for my posts in the future or PM me.
I wouldnt replace Jennings in my lineup if you were the QB, the guy might be the best FF WR of all time.Moot point even discussing it. It won't happen. For those that ignored the warnings, time is better spent figuring out who you can plug in your line-up for Jennings now.Cool, but what do you think about Jennings if Rodgers ends up playing the rest of the season?
Link GB QB thread*sigh*
For those who didn't see this coming, just search for my posts in the future or PM me.
5 stars, unfortunately, GB will be going with Flynn, though. Jennings' value is toast.
Not true at all actually. Jenings is a deep thrwat and a dink & dunk receiver. He can get it done all over the field. Not that Moss can't, but it's a completely different game plan.
instead of jumping on the Rodgers hurt scenario, please explain Jennigns unbelievable start to 2008. You were so wrong it's not even funny.
I cannot find one single person that did not think it was not a good thing to go in with no viable backup.THough, you still have been proven dead wrong about Jennings.
Did you not say similar things with Rodgers replacing Favre?
Ted Thompson did, for one.
I think you know what I meant.
Mike McCarthy too.
If Rodgers is out for an extended period of time (4 or more weeks) the Packers' season is over. Thompson and McCarthy made the decision not bring in a vet with the security of newly signed 5 year contract extensions. Now, you can agree or disagree about not bringing in a vet (I railed against it for months on my blog - think it's the height of stupidity) but they're content to develop Flynn/Brohm and come back fighting next year. Right or wrong, it's their call to make and they won't be going anywhere for awhile...
What do their extensions have to do with anything?Even with them...if they mess up, they can be gotten rid of.Oh...and even with a vet...if Rodgers were to be out for more than 4 weeks, I would have wanted them to just say screw it and thrown one of the rooks into the fire at this point.Mike McCarthy too.
The extensions have everything to do with it. Do you really think Murphy and the Board would fire Thompson and McCarthy with four years remaining on both their contracts?What do their extensions have to do with anything?Even with them...if they mess up, they can be gotten rid of.Oh...and even with a vet...if Rodgers were to be out for more than 4 weeks, I would have wanted them to just say screw it and thrown one of the rooks into the fire at this point.Mike McCarthy too.If Rodgers is out for an extended period of time (4 or more weeks) the Packers' season is over. Thompson and McCarthy made the decision not bring in a vet with the security of newly signed 5 year contract extensions. Now, you can agree or disagree about not bringing in a vet (I railed against it for months on my blog - think it's the height of stupidity) but they're content to develop Flynn/Brohm and come back fighting next year. Right or wrong, it's their call to make and they won't be going anywhere for awhile...
If the team completely tanks, Rodgers is hurt, Harrell never comes back, the punting game keeps struggling and the Oline keeps sucking.I would say yes...they would be on very short leashes.Its on them. These extensions mean very little in this day and age.Aaronstory said:The extensions have everything to do with it. Do you really think Murphy and the Board would fire Thompson and McCarthy with four years remaining on both their contracts?sho nuff said:What do their extensions have to do with anything?Even with them...if they mess up, they can be gotten rid of.Oh...and even with a vet...if Rodgers were to be out for more than 4 weeks, I would have wanted them to just say screw it and thrown one of the rooks into the fire at this point.Aaronstory said:Mike McCarthy too.H.K. said:If Rodgers is out for an extended period of time (4 or more weeks) the Packers' season is over. Thompson and McCarthy made the decision not bring in a vet with the security of newly signed 5 year contract extensions. Now, you can agree or disagree about not bringing in a vet (I railed against it for months on my blog - think it's the height of stupidity) but they're content to develop Flynn/Brohm and come back fighting next year. Right or wrong, it's their call to make and they won't be going anywhere for awhile...
ya, he only lead the team in all statistical receving categories yesterday, but you can frame it how you want because that is what you do. Just give it up. He leads his team in Touchdowns, receptions and receiving yards and is on pace for absurdly good numbers.
And those 4 went for?And he still leads the league in yards...TDs have not dried up...and he is getting targeted often.Basically, every argument you have against him has been completely blown to bits.
Jennings is 1st in the NFL in receiving yards with 569 (the 2nd place receiver is 102 yards behind him). Jennings is 7th in the NFL in receptions (5th among WRs). Jennings is averaging 19.6 yards-per-catch.He is on pace for a 92-1,792-10 season. Jennings is a stud. This is not debatable, unless you are brain-dead.
i just had to bump this for you again. Whats the excuse now? He's 5-80-1 today, btw.
Embarrassing display and I'm not talking about Jennings who is like a magician on the field. You see him at the LOS and then shazzam, he's behind ya scoring AGAIN!
Driver leads Pack in receptions this week....again.
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little mindsR.W.E.Driver leads Pack in receptions this week....again.
H.K. - the comedy gift that keeps on giving.Moot point even discussing it. It won't happen. For those that ignored the warnings, time is better spent figuring out who you can plug in your line-up for Jennings now.Cool, but what do you think about Jennings if Rodgers ends up playing the rest of the season?Link GB QB thread*sigh*
For those who didn't see this coming, just search for my posts in the future or PM me.
Yes, we know. But it's still fun to tool on him about it. He is trying to be absurd now to cover up for the fact that he was so OFF. Sad, really, that he can't just admit he was wrong, but now has to pretend as if he was just joking about jennings not being good. I'll keep coming back every Sunday to post his stats. Sad as that may be, it is indeed fun!treat88 said:
Quit trying to pretend you've been joking the whole time. People aren't buying it.
It's understandable that you are shocked he didnt blow up again this week. He is so good we have just come to expect it.
Yup...just another ho hum day I guess.So other WRs never have that issue of having a bad day?Reggie Wayne anyone?TO?
Can I add Colston to that list?HK, the force is strong inside you. Keep up the good shtick, it's good for a laugh.
Wow 4th in receptions. 2 of the top 3 HAVE TO BE PAKERS right. Since Jennings is no better than the 4th option in GB behind Grant, Driver, and uh....umm....uh.....Brandon Jackson he did have a few receptions yesterday.
And he's still the number one WR in my league.H.K. said:
I can't feed the troll any longer so I wiped his part of the reply out as you all should do. Bad day for Jennings. Bad day for FavreCo who failed to check the weather report and the 30mph winds at the game. Calvin sat on the bench and I so fired my weatherman. Won't make that mistake again.And he's still the number one WR in my league.
With Steve Smith on a bye and Burress not getting much attention, I may have to start him.TN has been very good against the pass...I just think GB can attack them a bit differently than other teams have.And he is always a threat to break a shorter pass into a long gain or TD.
Absolutely not. NEVER BENCH YOUR STUDS.
ya, and i am going to bench roddy white, marshall and mcnabb too.
