From Wikipedia...Season 5 of the American competitive reality television series Hell's Kitchen began airing on the Fox Network starting on January 29, 2009. This season was taped in fall 2007 back to back with season 4.[citation needed] The season concluded on May 14, 2009.Daniel Veltri was announced the winner, and will be employed at the Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa in Atlantic City, New Jersey with a $250,000 annual salary. The season's runner up is Paula Dasilva.The last season's winner has already moved on, or else turned down the job.
Kevin seems like the obvious pick, so he probably wont win. My $$$ is on Jim, no real reason, just a hunch. Suzanne reminds me of an uglier version of my ex, makes me want to kick the TV when she is on.BTW, i'm picking Tek to be the winner.
They have 2 people who can cook and the rest are morons.This is even more evident when you watch the other cooking reality shows on cable, with actual chefs.
I bet you there's a couple of chicks with talent but they aren't assertive (or are laying low until later). It also seems as there are fewer hacks than last season. I couldn't watch last season because of that.They have 2 people who can cook and the rest are morons.This is even more evident when you watch the other cooking reality shows on cable, with actual chefs.There are a lot of hacks in this crop. I think Jim looks like he has some talent. The ladies are dead in the water.
Why the evacuation
Just look at the great leaders in American history. Most of them share the same common traits. George Washington was a quiet, composed individual who analyzed everything and put people in a position to succeed. Lincoln was a thoughtful, composed person who never, ever criticized a soul. Teddy Roosevelt was famous for his belief in the phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick".Those are real leaders. Ramsay is just a lout, unfit to lead.Can't build them up into what you want until you break them down first.Is the military approach right for cooking? Don't know, but it's what Ramsey himself went though.kaa said:Ramsay is an example of exactly how NOT to lead. Most people underperform when you destroy their morale.This has already happened, look back at his history.kaa said:If I yelled at Chef Ramsay for 6 weeks about every little mistake he made, he'd probably be the worst chef ever. Actually he'd probably cry like a baby and run out of the kitchen in the first 45 minutes.I was about to post this, he's simply dishing out what he took. It worked for him, so now he figures that's the way to make great chefs. I guess he figures if they're worth their salt, they can handle it, if it breaks them down, they weren't cut out for the business in the first place. I'm not saying I completely agree, but there is some merit to his method (of course it's cranked up a notch for TV, but he's really like that off camera too.)
Sure doesn't seem so. Half of the girls can't cook pasta. The one chick tried to cook a giant cut of frozen salmon. I think this is the weakest crop yet.Bald dude seems like the only solid one.It also seems as there are fewer hacks than last season.
Yea, I said to my fiance... 'Uh... haven't these people supposedly worked in the food industry?! It is like they are all my level of cooking! For crying out loud, I can cook a freaking chicken and make sure it is not raw!' Now, a lot of the times I think 'Oh, Gordon is just being Gordon' when he poo poos a dish but seriously.... these people can not even properly cook something without under or over cooking it. Isn't that the most basic of cooking skills?!Sure doesn't seem so. Half of the girls can't cook pasta. The one chick tried to cook a giant cut of frozen salmon. I think this is the weakest crop yet.Bald dude seems like the only solid one.It also seems as there are fewer hacks than last season.
Seriously I think its probably Ramsay's fault. A lot of people react to constant yelling and screaming by regressing.Yea, I said to my fiance... 'Uh... haven't these people supposedly worked in the food industry?! It is like they are all my level of cooking! For crying out loud, I can cook a freaking chicken and make sure it is not raw!' Now, a lot of the times I think 'Oh, Gordon is just being Gordon' when he poo poos a dish but seriously.... these people can not even properly cook something without under or over cooking it. Isn't that the most basic of cooking skills?!Sure doesn't seem so. Half of the girls can't cook pasta. The one chick tried to cook a giant cut of frozen salmon. I think this is the weakest crop yet.Bald dude seems like the only solid one.It also seems as there are fewer hacks than last season.
Wasn't she the one that couldn't cook scallops, over and over? I thought she was just about as bad as pasta girl in that service.BTW, i'm picking Tek to be the winner.
Yes that was here .I don't know how she wasn't nominated with crazy eyesWasn't she the one that couldn't cook scallops, over and over? I thought she was just about as bad as pasta girl in that service.BTW, i'm picking Tek to be the winner.
She went off elsewhere after the initial 1 year prize. Not sure if she's actually on Ramsey's staff at a restaurant now, or if the producers hired her for this show. First year's winner is still part owner of the restaurant (prize in the first season was an actual restaurant, not the current "executive chef for a year at...")culdeus said:It also appears that the Christina one is the only winner to still be holding a job from Gordon, or even one that managed to hang on to it for more than a very short period of time. The last season's winner has already moved on, or else turned down the job.
I think most of the past winners have struggled in the beginning.Shaft said:Wasn't she the one that couldn't cook scallops, over and over? I thought she was just about as bad as pasta girl in that service.BTW, i'm picking Tek to be the winner.
she's a linecookI think most of the past winners have struggled in the beginning.Shaft said:Wasn't she the one that couldn't cook scallops, over and over? I thought she was just about as bad as pasta girl in that service.BTW, i'm picking Tek to be the winner.
She's actually unemployed. BTW:she's a linecookI think most of the past winners have struggled in the beginning.Shaft said:Wasn't she the one that couldn't cook scallops, over and over? I thought she was just about as bad as pasta girl in that service.BTW, i'm picking Tek to be the winner.
During Hell's Kitchen, Danny cooked roasted banana as his signature dish to Gordon Ramsay but failed to impress him. On the same night, he got yelled at by Ramsay for serving undercooked scallops. However, he quickly rose as one of the best contestants in the kitchen.
He's cooking risotto, not fighting off the British or ending slavery.kaa said:Just look at the great leaders in American history. Most of them share the same common traits. George Washington was a quiet, composed individual who analyzed everything and put people in a position to succeed. Lincoln was a thoughtful, composed person who never, ever criticized a soul. Teddy Roosevelt was famous for his belief in the phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick".Those are real leaders. Ramsay is just a lout, unfit to lead.Evilgrin 72 said:Lehigh98 said:Can't build them up into what you want until you break them down first.Is the military approach right for cooking? Don't know, but it's what Ramsey himself went though.Ramsay is an example of exactly how NOT to lead. Most people underperform when you destroy their morale.This has already happened, look back at his history.If I yelled at Chef Ramsay for 6 weeks about every little mistake he made, he'd probably be the worst chef ever. Actually he'd probably cry like a baby and run out of the kitchen in the first 45 minutes.I was about to post this, he's simply dishing out what he took. It worked for him, so now he figures that's the way to make great chefs. I guess he figures if they're worth their salt, they can handle it, if it breaks them down, they weren't cut out for the business in the first place. I'm not saying I completely agree, but there is some merit to his method (of course it's cranked up a notch for TV, but he's really like that off camera too.)
She looks like a bird.She was reasonably attractive except for those Crazy Eyesbigbottom said:Too bad they got rid of the one reasonably attractive female.Seemed like those things popped all the time
I can see that.... would be nerve racking as hell and could make someone that normally can do simple things get all flustered and mess it up. But still.Seriously I think its probably Ramsay's fault. A lot of people react to constant yelling and screaming by regressing.Yea, I said to my fiance... 'Uh... haven't these people supposedly worked in the food industry?! It is like they are all my level of cooking! For crying out loud, I can cook a freaking chicken and make sure it is not raw!' Now, a lot of the times I think 'Oh, Gordon is just being Gordon' when he poo poos a dish but seriously.... these people can not even properly cook something without under or over cooking it. Isn't that the most basic of cooking skills?!Sure doesn't seem so. Half of the girls can't cook pasta. The one chick tried to cook a giant cut of frozen salmon. I think this is the weakest crop yet.Bald dude seems like the only solid one.It also seems as there are fewer hacks than last season.
Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?I can see that.... would be nerve racking as hell and could make someone that normally can do simple things get all flustered and mess it up. But still.Seriously I think its probably Ramsay's fault. A lot of people react to constant yelling and screaming by regressing.Yea, I said to my fiance... 'Uh... haven't these people supposedly worked in the food industry?! It is like they are all my level of cooking! For crying out loud, I can cook a freaking chicken and make sure it is not raw!' Now, a lot of the times I think 'Oh, Gordon is just being Gordon' when he poo poos a dish but seriously.... these people can not even properly cook something without under or over cooking it. Isn't that the most basic of cooking skills?!Sure doesn't seem so. Half of the girls can't cook pasta. The one chick tried to cook a giant cut of frozen salmon. I think this is the weakest crop yet.Bald dude seems like the only solid one.It also seems as there are fewer hacks than last season.
Don't take this so seriously. Nobody is getting hired to run anything.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
one of the worst prizes on a reality showevery winner has been a chef for some contract period and then dropped of the mapDon't take this so seriously. Nobody is getting hired to run anything.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
Apparently they don't even require you to show up. You can if you want, but the contract is non binding and they can kick you out of the restaurant at any time. You get the cash up front either way so the incentive is to go off and so something else to get more for the pile. That Christina chick apparently probably got no other offers so she stuck around basically as a volunteer for a year. It isn't clear what she's doing now.It's just summer popcorn TV.one of the worst prizes on a reality showevery winner has been a chef for some contract period and then dropped of the mapDon't take this so seriously. Nobody is getting hired to run anything.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
A very good point. If you can survive Hell's Kitchen with Gordon screaming at you- you can handle any kitchen in any restaurant. Plus, it is some good TV and I am a fan of Gordon's with all his BBC stuff.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
17seconds said:one of the worst prizes on a reality show
Id say thats a pretty damn GREAT prize. 250k free and clear, with no further obligation.culdeus said:Apparently they don't even require you to show up......You get the cash up front
Not really. They usually go back to working in the city they were working at before. I know Rock (season 3) is still in DC.17seconds said:one of the worst prizes on a reality showevery winner has been a chef for some contract period and then dropped of the mapculdeus said:Don't take this so seriously. Nobody is getting hired to run anything.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
17seconds said:one of the worst prizes on a reality showId say thats a pretty damn GREAT prize. 250k free and clear, with no further obligation.culdeus said:Apparently they don't even require you to show up......You get the cash up front![]()
I could put some line cooks on Omaha Beach during D Day serving chow and led by a calm, assuring head chef with a positive attitude - and they would probably do an incredible job.I could put some line cooks in Denny's in the middle of the night when there's hardly any customers led by a head chef that yells and screams all the time and they would probably screw up every single order.Pressure is what you make it.I take one look at Ramsay and tell him to take off the chef hat because he's a disgrace to the profession, hand him a mop and tell him to clean up until his attitude improves.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
What's the show like?Typically, a guy like Ramsay that yells and screams a lot is extremely sensitive to criticism of their own work. If that's not factored in and dealt with, Ramsay might just up and quit a show that tests his skills against others, probably crying foul in the process. You'd basically have to mold Ramsay into someone who can get along with others first. Break his spirit.How do you think Gordon Ramsey would fare on a show like Top Chef Masters? Would he be one of the favorites?
Doubtful. That show seemingly rewards big flavors so far with big presentation. His cooking is more like Colichio's which is pretty laid back. Now he's got 100000000000 restaurants so I can't speak to all of them.How do you think Gordon Ramsey would fare on a show like Top Chef Masters? Would he be one of the favorites?
He'd be on equal footing, the contestants on that show are all very good, well known chefs. Probably a favorite over some of the younger ones, they haven't done all that well compared to some of the chefs that have been doing it forever.How do you think Gordon Ramsey would fare on a show like Top Chef Masters? Would he be one of the favorites?
Except you can't. Because he's a successful restaurateur and you do what?I could put some line cooks on Omaha Beach during D Day serving chow and led by a calm, assuring head chef with a positive attitude - and they would probably do an incredible job.I could put some line cooks in Denny's in the middle of the night when there's hardly any customers led by a head chef that yells and screams all the time and they would probably screw up every single order.Pressure is what you make it.I take one look at Ramsay and tell him to take off the chef hat because he's a disgrace to the profession, hand him a mop and tell him to clean up until his attitude improves.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
Hell no.How do you think Gordon Ramsey would fare on a show like Top Chef Masters? Would he be one of the favorites?
I can't judge his ability to run a restaurant. We don't see that on his TV show. He's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he cannot lead. He consistently fails to get the most out of his contestants. They consistently underperform every single season and nearly every single show. Under him, a lot of chefs completely lose confidence and look like they have no idea how to cook. That's coming from HIM. He's in charge. He creates that.Don't try to tell me that Ramsay is an incredible leader saddled with a bunch of idiots all the time that don't listen. Ramsay is the root cause.Except you can't. Because he's a successful restaurateur and you do what?I could put some line cooks on Omaha Beach during D Day serving chow and led by a calm, assuring head chef with a positive attitude - and they would probably do an incredible job.I could put some line cooks in Denny's in the middle of the night when there's hardly any customers led by a head chef that yells and screams all the time and they would probably screw up every single order.Pressure is what you make it.I take one look at Ramsay and tell him to take off the chef hat because he's a disgrace to the profession, hand him a mop and tell him to clean up until his attitude improves.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
jesus ####### christ people. THE SHOW IS SCHTICK. He is not really like that in his real places.I can't judge his ability to run a restaurant. We don't see that on his TV show. He's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he cannot lead. He consistently fails to get the most out of his contestants. They consistently underperform every single season and nearly every single show. Under him, a lot of chefs completely lose confidence and look like they have no idea how to cook. That's coming from HIM. He's in charge. He creates that.Don't try to tell me that Ramsay is an incredible leader saddled with a bunch of idiots all the time that don't listen. Ramsay is the root cause.Except you can't. Because he's a successful restaurateur and you do what?I could put some line cooks on Omaha Beach during D Day serving chow and led by a calm, assuring head chef with a positive attitude - and they would probably do an incredible job.I could put some line cooks in Denny's in the middle of the night when there's hardly any customers led by a head chef that yells and screams all the time and they would probably screw up every single order.Pressure is what you make it.I take one look at Ramsay and tell him to take off the chef hat because he's a disgrace to the profession, hand him a mop and tell him to clean up until his attitude improves.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
That's not really an issue here. Even if it were 100% fake, we could still discuss Ramsay's leadership style as presented by the character. I think I said before a few days ago that's its probably good TV for certain demographics. Well I guess I didn't post that but I thought about it.jesus ####### christ people. THE SHOW IS SCHTICK. He is not really like that in his real places.I can't judge his ability to run a restaurant. We don't see that on his TV show. He's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he cannot lead. He consistently fails to get the most out of his contestants. They consistently underperform every single season and nearly every single show. Under him, a lot of chefs completely lose confidence and look like they have no idea how to cook. That's coming from HIM. He's in charge. He creates that.Don't try to tell me that Ramsay is an incredible leader saddled with a bunch of idiots all the time that don't listen. Ramsay is the root cause.Except you can't. Because he's a successful restaurateur and you do what?I could put some line cooks on Omaha Beach during D Day serving chow and led by a calm, assuring head chef with a positive attitude - and they would probably do an incredible job.I could put some line cooks in Denny's in the middle of the night when there's hardly any customers led by a head chef that yells and screams all the time and they would probably screw up every single order.Pressure is what you make it.I take one look at Ramsay and tell him to take off the chef hat because he's a disgrace to the profession, hand him a mop and tell him to clean up until his attitude improves.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
I am not sure about 'favorite' but he sure as heck could compete. I proposed this Q to my fiance who we are fans of Top Chef and Top Chef Masters. I watch with her Iron Chef, Chopped and Next Foodnetwork Star and any of the others that I am missing. As I said before, I enjoy Gordon and watch his stuff on BBC America more than even Hell's Kitchen. What I think is that as Chef's go, he is on par with any of the other Chef's that they have on Masters. I think that because of his stuff like Kitchen Nightmares and the F-Word, he would be more comfortable in the format and challenges as he has a lot more experience other than being an Executive Chef. So, in that, I think he would have some bit of an advantage. I also think because of that same work he does more actual cooking than a lot of these Executive Chef's a lot of times do, since they are use to telling their kitchens what to do and are not use to cooking by themselves or the format or pressures etc. So, I think he would have an advantange but I am not sure I would say he would be the favorite. You have a lot of good Chefs on Masters that fall on their face, like Chef Roy. It has nothing to do with their cooking skills and you never know what can happen with those challenges and what not.How do you think Gordon Ramsey would fare on a show like Top Chef Masters? Would he be one of the favorites?
jesus ####### christ people. THE SHOW IS SCHTICK. He is not really like that in his real places.I can't judge his ability to run a restaurant. We don't see that on his TV show. He's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he cannot lead. He consistently fails to get the most out of his contestants. They consistently underperform every single season and nearly every single show. Under him, a lot of chefs completely lose confidence and look like they have no idea how to cook. That's coming from HIM. He's in charge. He creates that.Don't try to tell me that Ramsay is an incredible leader saddled with a bunch of idiots all the time that don't listen. Ramsay is the root cause.Except you can't. Because he's a successful restaurateur and you do what?I could put some line cooks on Omaha Beach during D Day serving chow and led by a calm, assuring head chef with a positive attitude - and they would probably do an incredible job.I could put some line cooks in Denny's in the middle of the night when there's hardly any customers led by a head chef that yells and screams all the time and they would probably screw up every single order.Pressure is what you make it.I take one look at Ramsay and tell him to take off the chef hat because he's a disgrace to the profession, hand him a mop and tell him to clean up until his attitude improves.Would you rather see how people react to pressure before or after you hire them to run your restaurant?
its his personality x10people should watch BBC kitchen nightmares to get a real taste of Ramsay
F Word as well. He Springers it up on the US shows because for whatever reason, Americans love watching people yell at each other on TV.jesus ####### christ people. THE SHOW IS SCHTICK. He is not really like that in his real places.its his personality x10people should watch BBC kitchen nightmares to get a real taste of Ramsay
I was wondering why Ji didn't get the call back this seasonJust a hunch but I don't think Robert is going to be as good as he was last season. I think this season looks stronger.I'm saying Kevin & Ariel are the top from each teamWish they would have brought Ji back, instead of Robert. She looked the best early on last year but left with an ankle injury. She was hot too.Isn't Robert the odds on favorite to win this show? He has experience, can cook/work on a team, and GR seems to have a soft spot for him.The ambulance tonight couldn't be for him, why would they have to evacuate everyone for one guys heart condition? Its a fire drill, calling it now. Hope I'm wrong.
KN from the BBC, not the US version. Wish the US producers would take a queue from the BBC and not overproduce their shows. The fake cliff hangers, cheesy "drama' music, MTV style edits, and just an over produced show in general make it pretty hard to watch.its his personality x10people should watch BBC kitchen nightmares to get a real taste of Ramsay
Yea, he has a very confrontational, no holds barred type of personality but he also knows when to push and to back off (mostly) and when to be rough and when to nurture (mostly). But in this show, he kicks the confrontational/loud side of him up by a factor of at least 10. Kitchen Nightmares and F-Word seem to be much better representations of who he really is. It is not an act nor is it just shtick.... it is just highlighting and turbo charging one aspect of his personality and on purpose.