What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (10 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hillary coming out against the TPP?

Hillary Clinton is opposed to a critical piece of the Obama administration's Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would give corporations the right to sue sovereign nations over laws or regulations that could potentially curb their profits.

The policy position is contained in her book Hard Choices, and was confirmed to HuffPost by a spokesperson for her presidential campaign. ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/30/hillary-clinton-trans-pacific-partnership_n_7173108.html

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Hillary coming out against the TPP?

Hillary Clinton is opposed to a critical piece of the Obama administration's Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would give corporations the right to sue sovereign nations over laws or regulations that could potentially curb their profits.

The policy position is contained in her book Hard Choices, and was confirmed to HuffPost by a spokesperson for her presidential campaign. ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/30/hillary-clinton-trans-pacific-partnership_n_7173108.html
I though we stuck a fork in Dan Quayle's Council on Competitiveness a long time ago?

 
I don't see your point here. It's not 1994. Perhaps she was right then; but she's certainly right now.
Well it's hard to find a Democratic candidate with such a long a record of being against gay marriage, pro Iraq War, being tough on crime and pro-NAFTA. Of course now within the last couple months she is pro gay marriage, reduced penalties for crime, and of course she hasn't spoken on TPP but she may or may not evolve on that too (bated breath).
Technically, she wasn't pro Iraq War like you keep stating. She voted for the authorization for Bush to use military force based on his false claims that Iraq had WMDs and that is not the same thing.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Hillary_Rodham_ClintonIraq War[edit]On October 11, 2002, Clinton voted in favor of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, commonly known as the Iraq War Resolution, to give President Bush authority for the Iraq War.[84]
What's the difference between what she did and what Bush did? Both acted on the belief in WMD.

 
I don't see your point here. It's not 1994. Perhaps she was right then; but she's certainly right now.
Well it's hard to find a Democratic candidate with such a long a record of being against gay marriage, pro Iraq War, being tough on crime and pro-NAFTA. Of course now within the last couple months she is pro gay marriage, reduced penalties for crime, and of course she hasn't spoken on TPP but she may or may not evolve on that too (bated breath).
Technically, she wasn't pro Iraq War like you keep stating. She voted for the authorization for Bush to use military force based on his false claims that Iraq had WMDs and that is not the same thing.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Hillary_Rodham_ClintonIraq War[edit]On October 11, 2002, Clinton voted in favor of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, commonly known as the Iraq War Resolution, to give President Bush authority for the Iraq War.[84]
What's the difference between what she did and what Bush did? Both acted on the belief in WMD.
He knew or should have known the intelligence from Curveball was not trustworthy, but he didn't care, he just wanted revenge for trying to kill his daddy.

 
He knew or should have known the intelligence from Curveball was not trustworthy, but he didn't care, he just wanted revenge for trying to kill his daddy.
:lmao:

Is that Hillary's official position? in any event, that's a bunch of horse-#### and weak-### excuse to try and back out of something she supported in order to gain votes. She read the same reports that Bush did.

So, assuming what you posted was intended to be a joke, what's the difference between her and Bush again?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
She clearly pulls the race card on the police brutality issue.

 
Last edited:
He knew or should have known the intelligence from Curveball was not trustworthy, but he didn't care, he just wanted revenge for trying to kill his daddy.
:lmao: Is that Hillary's official position? in any event, that's a bunch of horse-#### and weak-### excuse to try and back out of something she supported in order to gain votes. She read the same reports that Bush did.

So, assuming what you posted was intended to be a joke, what's the difference between her and Bush again?
Hillary was briefed on the info but did not have full access to the information Bush or Chaney did. But if it makes you feel better, keep saying she knew just as much as they did and run on it and see how far that gets you in the general election. Forget Benghazi and the emails, campaign on that winning issue - I am really looking forward to seeing that. :popcorn:

 
I don't see your point here. It's not 1994. Perhaps she was right then; but she's certainly right now.
Well it's hard to find a Democratic candidate with such a long a record of being against gay marriage, pro Iraq War, being tough on crime and pro-NAFTA. Of course now within the last couple months she is pro gay marriage, reduced penalties for crime, and of course she hasn't spoken on TPP but she may or may not evolve on that too (bated breath).
Technically, she wasn't pro Iraq War like you keep stating. She voted for the authorization for Bush to use military force based on his false claims that Iraq had WMDs and that is not the same thing.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Hillary_Rodham_ClintonIraq War[edit]On October 11, 2002, Clinton voted in favor of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, commonly known as the Iraq War Resolution, to give President Bush authority for the Iraq War.[84]
What's the difference between what she did and what Bush did? Both acted on the belief in WMD.
He knew or should have known the intelligence from Curveball was not trustworthy, but he didn't care, he just wanted revenge for trying to kill his daddy.
Shouldn't they all?? :oldunsure:

 
Guys, don't worry. Hillary was just outwitted by George W. Bush, that's all. It happens to the best of us. She flew too close to the sun and, like Icarus, learned her lesson. She'll be, like, super careful the next time she tangles with someone of W's intellectual heft.

 
Guys, don't worry. Hillary was just outwitted by George W. Bush, that's all. It happens to the best of us. She flew too close to the sun and, like Icarus, learned her lesson. She'll be, like, super careful the next time she tangles with someone of W's intellectual heft.
This is one of my favorite events of politics. I love watching democrats trying to walk that line between "I am smarter than everyone in the room" and "damn, I was duped".

 
AP poll:

- 68% think the email server deletions are a problem, 31% say it's not a problem.

- 61% say Hillary is not "Honest"; 37% say she is. - 41% say she is "not at all honest"; 22% say she is "very" honest. - Pretty much 2/1 people consider her dishonest.

- 18% say they are "excited" about Hillary' candidacy.

In the survey, 61 percent said "honest" describes her only slightly well or not at all.

Nearly four in 10 Democrats, and more than six in 10 independents agreed that "honest" was not the best word for her.
She is still blowing everyone away on sheer name recognition tied to favorability

Even so, she is viewed more favorably than her potential Republican rivals, none of whom are as well-known as the former secretary of state, senator and first lady.
...Her use of a private email account run from a server kept at her New York home while serving as secretary of state has fed perceptions that she had things to hide. And questions are swirling about foreign donations to the family's charitable foundation and whether that money influenced her work at the State Department.

James Robins, an independent voter from North Carolina, says his generally positive opinion of Clinton has shifted over the past few months, as more details have emerged about her email usage and foundation fundraising practices.

"She and her family think they're above everything," he said. "She intentionally destroyed all the evidence on that server. And when you look at some of her other stuff recently it's equally as bad."

...The survey suggests that many Americans aren't buying Clinton's explanation: A majority said they believe she used a private address to shield her emails from transparency laws and they think she should turn her server over to a third party for further investigation.

..."We don't have the whole picture and all the information that we need to make a judgment," said Ruth Johnson, of Moorhead, Minnesota. "Will she show everything that was emailed? Or has she eliminated a lot of stuff we'll never know about?"

...Despite Clinton's dominance in the early primary field, the survey suggests that some in her party would be open to a challenger.

Among Democrats, only 34 percent said they were excited by her candidacy while 36 percent described themselves as merely satisfied. Another 19 percent said they were neutral, and 9 percent were disappointed or angry.

"I wish there was somebody else," said Kenneth Berger, of New York City. "She always has a problem."
http://ap-gfkpoll.com/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/AP-GfK_Poll_April_2015_Topline_Politics_Clinton.pdf

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8f2d40b420674ca08612e0400f14bab6/ap-gfk-poll-doubts-about-clintons-honesty-after-emails

 
Last edited by a moderator:
AP poll:

- 61% say Hillary is not "Honest"; 37% say she is. - 41% say she is "not at all honest"; 22% say she is "very" honest. - Pretty much 2/1 people consider her dishonest.

In the survey, 61 percent said "honest" describes her only slightly well or not at all.

Nearly four in 10 Democrats, and more than six in 10 independents agreed that "honest" was not the best word for her.
No, 61% did not say she is not honest. The 61% figure includes those that say honest describes her only slightly well and that is not the same as saying she is dishonest. If they broke it down further that could have a been a majority of those who answered the question rather than those who said not at all. As usual, in your zeal to bash Hillary with anything/everything you make an interpretation of the data that isn't justified. Sheesh.

 
AP poll:

- 61% say Hillary is not "Honest"; 37% say she is. - 41% say she is "not at all honest"; 22% say she is "very" honest. - Pretty much 2/1 people consider her dishonest.

In the survey, 61 percent said "honest" describes her only slightly well or not at all.

Nearly four in 10 Democrats, and more than six in 10 independents agreed that "honest" was not the best word for her.
No, 61% did not say she is not honest. The 61% figure includes those that say honest describes her only slightly well and that is not the same as saying she is dishonest. If they broke it down further that could have a been a majority of those who answered the question rather than those who said not at all. As usual, in your zeal to bash Hillary with anything/everything you make an interpretation of the data that isn't justified. Sheesh.
Are you a Scientologist?

 
AP poll:

- 61% say Hillary is not "Honest"; 37% say she is. - 41% say she is "not at all honest"; 22% say she is "very" honest. - Pretty much 2/1 people consider her dishonest.

In the survey, 61 percent said "honest" describes her only slightly well or not at all.

Nearly four in 10 Democrats, and more than six in 10 independents agreed that "honest" was not the best word for her.
No, 61% did not say she is not honest. The 61% figure includes those that say honest describes her only slightly well and that is not the same as saying she is dishonest. If they broke it down further that could have a been a majority of those who answered the question rather than those who said not at all. As usual, in your zeal to bash Hillary with anything/everything you make an interpretation of the data that isn't justified. Sheesh.
Are you a Scientologist?
No. Are you a Proctologist?

 
22% say she is VERY honest? Damn even I wouldn't make that claim. Even Chelsea wouldn't make that claim. Who is this 22%??

Lol

 
22% say she is VERY honest? Damn even I wouldn't make that claim. Even Chelsea wouldn't make that claim. Who is this 22%??

Lol
Partisans. If you ask a member of the Blue Tribe whether Hillary Clinton is honest, what they hear is "Is the Blue Tribe good?" It's the same way that Red Tribe members don't truly believe that Obama is a Muslim, but they still tell pollsters that because what they really mean to say is "The Blue Tribe is bad."

 
22% say she is VERY honest? Damn even I wouldn't make that claim. Even Chelsea wouldn't make that claim. Who is this 22%??

Lol
I'm with you and Chelsea - I don't think I could check the "very" honest box.
22% say very honest, 15% say somewhat honest, hence 37% think she is honest to some degree. The main thing is that any way you shake it twice as many people think she is (somewhat to very) dishonest than think she is (somewhat to very) honest. That includes (per AP) 40% of Democrats and 60% of indies who don't think the word "honest" applies to her.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
squistion said:
timschochet said:
22% say she is VERY honest? Damn even I wouldn't make that claim. Even Chelsea wouldn't make that claim. Who is this 22%??

Lol
I'm with you and Chelsea - I don't think I could check the "very" honest box.
22% say very honest, 15% say somewhat honest, hence 37% think she is honest to some degree. The main thing is that any way you shake it twice as many people think she is (somewhat to very) dishonest than think she is (somewhat to very) honest. That includes (per AP) 40% of Democrats and 60% of indies who don't think the word "honest" applies to her.
You are intentionally misinterpreting the numbers, it is not twice dishonest versus honest. Good attempt at spin but a fail on your part.

 
timschochet said:
The Scooby van is headed to California and the Silicon Valley this week. She's looking to pick up some serious cash.
In addition to the million+ in cash in pocket Bill and she have already gotten from the tech sector. You betcha. - Hillary just got paid $300,000 out there just 2 months ago.

Ten of the 13 firms that both lobbied the State Department and paid Bill Clinton speaking fees did so within the very same three-month reporting period. This group includes five technology firms -- Oracle, Dell, Microsoft, SalesForce and VeriSign -- that collectively paid Bill Clinton a total of $1.05 million.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
61% of Americans view Hillary as strong and decisive. Among women, her likability rating is off the charts, and she has strong favorability numbers against all GOP opponents. Everything is working in her favor.

 
61% of Americans view Hillary as strong and decisive. Among women, her likability rating is off the charts, and she has strong favorability numbers against all GOP opponents. Everything is working in her favor.
Yep, I posted that above.

Some numbers (yes 'very' is usually combined with 'somewhat' here):

  • Favorable: 46% - the only candidate to come within half of that is Bush (29); possible Demo opponents only get to the 4-7% range.
  • Unfavorable is at 41%, up 2 points since February. The only others in this range are Pres. Obama (46), Chris Christie (40), and Jeb Bush (35). One thing to note is that though her Demo rivals have very, very low favorables, they also have extremely low unfavorables (8-11%).
  • Hillary's character: Strong 61%; Decisive 56%; Inspiring 44; Likable 44; Honest 37.
  • Feelings about Hillary running: Satisfied 21; Disappointed 21; Excited 18; Angry 13.
  • Those following the news reports on Hillary's destruction of emails/public records: Closely 34; Not closely 44.
  • The destruction of emails is a problem: 68%; not a problem 31.
  • Why did Hillary have a private server for public records?: Convenience 47%; Concealment 51%.
  • Should Hillary turn over the server?: She's done enough 46; She should turn it over 51.
http://ap-gfkpoll.com/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/AP-GfK_Poll_April_2015_Topline_Politics_Clinton.pdf

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bernie Sanders is in!

We gots ourselves a primary lol
I like Bernie, he believes in the things he talks about. Hillary dropped this op-ed in the Des Moines register on the way out:

Clinton: Iowans have great ideas for a better future

When I came to Iowa, I wanted to do something a little different. No big speeches or rallies. Just talking directly with everyday Iowans. Because this campaign isn't going to be about me, it's going to be about Iowans and people across our country who are ready for a better future. It's not enough to just get by, you deserve to get ahead and stay ahead. And everywhere I went, I met Iowans with great ideas for how we can get there.

Bryce Smith of Adel told me about how student debt made it harder for him to get the loans he needed to buy and grow his small business, the bowling alley where he had worked as a teenager. We talked about how to help more Iowans overcome these barriers, because if you have the passion and energy and know-how to start a business, student debt shouldn't stand in your way.

Brendan Comito of Des Moines shared his struggles to find enough skilled workers to keep growing his family's business. We discussed how to make sure more young people get the training they need to compete for the jobs of tomorrow.

I heard from young people like Ellen Schlarmann of Monticello, a high school student who's been taking classes at the local community college so she can graduate with dozens of college credits already completed. I loved hearing about how hard she's working to get ahead.

So is Bethany Moore, a single mom of three from Olin who's juggling a job, school and raising her kids. She's worried about piling up debt, but she hopes to continue her education and eventually earn a four-year degree. Like the other Iowans I met this month, Bethany doesn't expect anything to come easy. But she did ask me: What more can we do so it isn't quite so hard?

The answer is: We can do a lot if we do it together. We can build an economy for tomorrow, not yesterday, where being middle class means something again. We can strengthen families and communities, because when families get ahead, our country gets ahead, too. We can fix our dysfunctional political system and get unaccountable money out of it once and for all, even if that takes a constitutional amendment. And we can protect our country from the threats that we see around the world and ones that are still over the horizon.

These are the four big fights I'm taking on for you, but I can't do it alone. We've got to tackle this together. We need to build on the success, the hard work and the innovation I found in Iowa. As school principal Jason McLaughlin put it, Iowans are "pragmatic, proud people." That's certainly what I saw first-hand this month. And it's that spirit that's going to help move our country forward.

Americans have come back from tough economic times. But the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top. Something is wrong when CEOs earn 300 times more than a typical American worker and hedge fund managers pay a lower tax rate than a truck driver or a nurse. Americans are working harder and getting more productive, but they aren't seeing the reward in their paychecks. So it's time to reshuffle the deck and deal a better hand to the middle class.

Every conversation I had in Iowa this month left me more convinced that this is what we have to do.

When I talk with fellow grandparents, I can see it in their eyes. We share the joy in seeing our little ones start to thrive but also a sense of responsibility to do everything we can to leave them a world with more opportunity. I want all our kids to have the same chance at success as my own granddaughter. And that's what I'm going to fight for as president, every single day.

I will carry the stories and wisdom of the Iowans I met with me throughout the campaign and hopefully onto the White House. You are the reason I got into this race and I will work my heart out to earn your votes.
Thoughts?
"Man, you'd look great in that Caprice. She's a real cream puff, just 40,000 miles driven by an old lady to church every Sunday. Let me tell you about this rust-proofing special we're running..."
 
Unfavorable is at 41%, up 2 points since February. The only others in this range are Pres. Obama (46)
She's less unfavorable than a two term President.

I like her chances.

 
Unfavorable is at 41%, up 2 points since February. The only others in this range are Pres. Obama (46)
She's less unfavorable than a two term President.

I like her chances.
She's probably going to win. I also don't think anyone has explained how the GOP is going to get around winning the battleground states. The only way I see it i if they do something to capture (more of) the Hispanic vote.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread needs more enthusiasm. She's going to be the best President we've had in decades!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hillary is a young energetic grandmother. But she projects wisdom as well.
I don't think I have the wherewithal but I would be curious what the all time list of ages of presidential candidates and results are.

I agree that her age isn't an argument against her, just curious how politicians have done in this age range. All I can think of are Reagan (W, x2), McCain (L), Dole (L), Bush Sr. (2nd race) (L), Grover Cleveland (3rd race) (W, but vs Harrison also 65+), Benjamin Harrision (2nd race) (L) but I am guessing there must have been more age 65 or over during our full history.

We have definitely taken a turn for younger presidents, with Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama in 6 straight elections.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread needs more enthusiasm. She's going to be the best President we've had in decades!
I don't see how she beats Chafee in the primary.
I don't either but a 60 point lead over him gives her the slightest of chances.
She had a 30 point lead in October 2007 over Obama and look how that turned out. Plus, Rhode Island gives Chafee a pretty big state already in his back pocket.

 
This thread needs more enthusiasm. She's going to be the best President we've had in decades!
I don't see how she beats Chafee in the primary.
I don't either but a 60 point lead over him gives her the slightest of chances.
She had a 30 point lead in October 2007 over Obama and look how that turned out. Plus, Rhode Island gives Chafee a pretty big state already in his back pocket.
For a semi-serious point campaign finance also happens to be Chafee's big issue and again people trust him on it, like Sanders.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-keep-giving-speeches-pay-bills-153748288.html

Washington (AFP) - Former US president Bill Clinton said in an interview that aired Monday he will keep giving lucrative speeches "to pay our bills" while wife Hillary Clinton runs for the White House.

Defending his charity work on a trip to Africa, Clinton said Hillary told him no foreign official has sought to influence her through donations to the family's foundation, which has come under fire for accepting millions of dollars from foreign governments.

Bill Clinton told NBC News he would step down from running the foundation "if it's the right thing to do."

But he insisted he would maintain a schedule of speaking events -- several of which reportedly paid him $500,000 a pop in recent years -- despite amassing a fortune in the 14 years since leaving the White House.

"Oh, yeah. I've got to pay our bills," Clinton said when asked if he would carry on with paid speaking engagements.

Clinton said he gives 10 percent of his revenue each year to the Clinton Foundation, and that Hillary "gave 17 percent" in the years she was with it.

Hillary Clinton has since stepped down from the foundation, amid accusations that her involvement with it raised potential conflicts of interest.

Criticism has persisted, however, and her husband sought to tamp down accusations that foreign donors tried to buy influence with the Democratic presidential frontrunner.

"I asked Hillary about this," Clinton told NBC during a charity trip to Africa.

"She said 'no one's ever tried to influence me by helping you. No one has even suggested they have a shred of evidence to that effect.'"

The comments come the day before publication of a potentially damning book, "Clinton Cash," which is said to detail potential financial conflicts involving the Clinton Foundation.

"I don't think there's anything sinister in trying to get wealthy people and countries that are seriously involved in development to spend their money wisely in a way that helps poor people," Bill Clinton said.

:thumbup:

 
http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-keep-giving-speeches-pay-bills-153748288.html

Washington (AFP) - Former US president Bill Clinton said in an interview that aired Monday he will keep giving lucrative speeches "to pay our bills" while wife Hillary Clinton runs for the White House.

Defending his charity work on a trip to Africa, Clinton said Hillary told him no foreign official has sought to influence her through donations to the family's foundation, which has come under fire for accepting millions of dollars from foreign governments.

Bill Clinton told NBC News he would step down from running the foundation "if it's the right thing to do."

But he insisted he would maintain a schedule of speaking events -- several of which reportedly paid him $500,000 a pop in recent years -- despite amassing a fortune in the 14 years since leaving the White House.

"Oh, yeah. I've got to pay our bills," Clinton said when asked if he would carry on with paid speaking engagements.

Clinton said he gives 10 percent of his revenue each year to the Clinton Foundation, and that Hillary "gave 17 percent" in the years she was with it.

Hillary Clinton has since stepped down from the foundation, amid accusations that her involvement with it raised potential conflicts of interest.

Criticism has persisted, however, and her husband sought to tamp down accusations that foreign donors tried to buy influence with the Democratic presidential frontrunner.

"I asked Hillary about this," Clinton told NBC during a charity trip to Africa.

"She said 'no one's ever tried to influence me by helping you. No one has even suggested they have a shred of evidence to that effect.'"

The comments come the day before publication of a potentially damning book, "Clinton Cash," which is said to detail potential financial conflicts involving the Clinton Foundation.

"I don't think there's anything sinister in trying to get wealthy people and countries that are seriously involved in development to spend their money wisely in a way that helps poor people," Bill Clinton said.

:thumbup:
What's funny about this is that Hillary has now stopped accepting fees but anything Bill makes, Hillary makes. You pay Bill, you pay Hillary. Hillary cannot control Bill.

Also on that Africa trip Bill is getting paid by a company owned by the Moroccan government.

It will culminate in a lavish conference in Marrakesh with the King of Morocco, funded by donors including a Moroccan-government-owned phosphate company, which POLITICO reported donated $1 million.
But the Marrakesh event could be the last foreign foundation meeting for many years, thanks to restrictions on foreign meetings and donations voluntarily enacted by the foundation for Hillary Clinton’s campaign — constraints that are expected to extend into any subsequent presidency.
Bottom line is the future president and her spouse have a non-profit that is about to get a $1 million payment from the Moroccan government.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/bill-clintons-africa-entourage-117445.html#ixzz3ZBkCn6vh

And even though the Foundation has clamped down ethical restraints, Bill is going to go ahead and do it anyway. We really have a lot to look forward to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/bill-clinton-slams-political-attack-on-family-foundation-117596.html

"There is no doubt in my mind that we have never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy."

You tell em, Bill!
Next breath:

“People should draw their own conclusions. I’m not in politics,” Clinton said.
That is a real winner.

But I agree that's a much better response than Hillary's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0

5/bill-clinton-slams-political-attack-on-family-foundation-117596.html

"There is no doubt in my mind that we have

never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy."

You tell em, Bill!
Pretty sure Bill has a decidedly different definition of inappropriate than most people.
Wait a second gents, we missed something:

"knowingly".

You've gotta love the guy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0

5/bill-clinton-slams-political-attack-on-family-foundation-117596.html

"There is no doubt in my mind that we have

never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy."

You tell em, Bill!
Pretty sure Bill has a decidedly different definition of inappropriate than most people.
Wait a second gents, we missed something:

"knowingly".

You've gotta love the guy.
Well he is a lawyer.
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0

5/bill-clinton-slams-political-attack-on-family-foundation-117596.html

"There is no doubt in my mind that we have

never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy."

You tell em, Bill!
Pretty sure Bill has a decidedly different definition of inappropriate than most people.
Wait a second gents, we missed something:

"knowingly".

You've gotta love the guy.
Well he is a lawyer.
Yes, I'm thinking Danny DeVito in The Rainmaker kind of lawyer. Of course Hillary would be Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton...

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top