This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
A sure thing is a sure thing and you bet every nickel you can rake up, because you can't lose. If I was as confident as you folks are about the outcome, I would cash out every bank account and stock I own and borrow everything I could on top of that. Yet no one is taking advantage of this certainly that Hillary can't beat Trump - wonder why?
Books have small limits when it comes to politics. Also, anyone who bets offshore knows it can be a drag to get your money. As far as why people aren't betting with you it's because your lack of character is obvious. I wouldn't bet a nickle with you as I'm sure the second your wager starts looking like a loser, you'll disappear like a fart in the wind.
I have never made the prediction it is a sure thing or that she can't lose, unlike the Hillary haters who state categorically she can't win.
Can you explain to all of us just why you have this hatred of aliases?
You can tell. I am a horrible poker player, but even I know when she's lying. Her eyes get so big. Which is about 90% of the time!
There are plenty of more recent scandals for him to choose from. Probably plenty more on the way.
It is really an odd race. Somehow both sides not only picked the most polarizing candidate, they also picked candidates who have weak support amoung their base. This race is so ripe for a third party candidate.
None of this makes any sense. Hillary is not a polarizing candidate; she is a centrist. She neither inspires love nor hate (most of the "hatred" against Hillary is the generic hatred against Democrats from the right and establishment figures from the left and right).
Not really pertinent to what I wrote.
It is in the forum rules. I like to talk to one identity and the same identity, not someone using three different handles just to troll people (which happens constantly in this thread) or someone banned that keeps emerging under a supposedly new identity to continue their trolling. From the pinned Free For All FAQ:
I think the unfavorability number is definite ly an indicator of polarization.
Yes, if there's one thing Hillary supporters are known for, it's their zero-tolerance policy for those who break the rules.
She's pretty much the definition of polarizing. In an early debate in which the Dem candidates were asked to name their enemies, many of them said things like the NRA or various lobbying groups. Hillary cheerfully offered "Republicans".
How can anyone claim Hillary is not a polarizing candidate????
I disagree on your first point. But we'll see.
http://www.columbian.com/news/2016/may/28/sanders-says-clintons-email-situation-has-changed/
Lot of Bernie supporters here in Boise. Seeing the same thing. And now they are getting pissed about how rigged it is against Bernie, adding fuel to the anger that led to Bernie and Trump rising.
Same poll:
This is the most unfortunate part of this whole mess, and to me it's the most frustrating. There is no evidence whatsoever of any "rigging" that had any effect on this race. In fact, every piece of evidence we have suggests just the opposite: that the more democratic the primaries are, the more Hillary wins. Yet so many people seem to believe otherwise, with nothing to back it up.
Another example of why you don't have a grasp of the political climate and Hillary. Her unfavorable numbers are very related to her trust issues and that she is perceived as part of the establishment. The email situation only reinforces and worsens her reputation as someone that can be trusted.
If her numbers don't go up after July I will come into this thread and post that I was wrong about this, and that you, BeaverCleaver, were right, (among many others.)
They don't care about the facts, Timmy. If your starting premise in every situation is that Hillary is a career criminal, then you will view every outcome as being fixed no matter how much objective evidence there is to the contrary.
Tim, she's a lying ####. There's a reason she has lost so many of the last primaries. The truth is going to come out very soon.
Hillary has been so caught up in her own controversies that it's easy to forget one of the early drivers of Trump, the forthcoming expected Bush Vs Clinton sure thing matchup. Half that equation is still there. Trump already took care of the other half.
Sure Tim...if you need your ego stroked I will do that. This is sort of like the obsession some of you have with betting.
Is this you Scho?
I will absolutely come in and say I was wrong. It's not a coincidence that her numbers have plummeted. It's not because she's still in a race with Sanders. It's because she's a ####### scumbag.
Not an obsession at all. I don't care what you do, actually. But it's interesting to me that there's been a million and one predictions of Hillary failing in this thread, and whenever she wins another victory none of you guys ever come in here and say that you were wrong. Never happens. You just move on to the next prediction of her losing. 
