What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
If that's true, then why do the Clinton's critics routinely refer to the foundation as a giant slush fund? Why do they suggest, without any evidence, that the Clintoms skim money from it? Why the constant false accusations about how much goes to overhead? 
I don't even understand that reasoning on your part. The Foundation could still be all those things and still do good work. It's not a shell entity like WJC LLC.

 
Don't get me wrong, intent/knowledge is an element of the crime and its absence here likely informed the decision not to prosecute.  But there were other factors, too- most notably that she didn't remove anything from anywhere and send it to someone "not entitled to receive it."
The "ignorance" part of this whole thing squashes this though doesn't it?  It's hard to say she was giving information to people who weren't suppose to have it if she didn't understand what the information was in the first place right?  If she doesn't know what it is, how is she suppose to know who's not allowed to have it?  That's why I say the ignorance angle is pretty much the only path for her in this situation outside of acknowledging and moving on.  

 
Yesterday Donald Trunp referred to the email/foundation story (he mentioned both so it was hard to distinguish what he was talking about) as "the biggest political scandal in American history" and "worse than Watergate!" All the while the crowd yelled "Lock her up! Lock her up!" 

 
Yesterday Donald Trunp referred to the email/foundation story (he mentioned both so it was hard to distinguish what he was talking about) as "the biggest political scandal in American history" and "worse than Watergate!" All the while the crowd yelled "Lock her up! Lock her up!" 
You should be falling at his knees in gratitude for making this the layup it's become for Clinton.  Don't understand why you're complaining.

 
You should be falling at his knees in gratitude for making this the layup it's become for Clinton.  Don't understand why you're complaining.
Exactly! Hillary is like the team that finished 8th in the Big Ten getting seeded against a 16th seed, because the stars aligned in some ####ed up way that it just unfolded like that.  

 
The "ignorance" part of this whole thing squashes this though doesn't it?  It's hard to say she was giving information to people who weren't suppose to have it if she didn't understand what the information was in the first place right?  If she doesn't know what it is, how is she suppose to know who's not allowed to have it?  That's why I say the ignorance angle is pretty much the only path for her in this situation outside of acknowledging and moving on.  
And I think that's what Comey was saying.

 
Where do you predict Bill and Hillary will fall on the related Presidents list?  Bill has an average ranking of 20.

- Franklin Delano Roosevelt (the 32nd president) was a fifth cousin of Theodore Roosevelt (the 26th president) - total ranking 7 (2 and 5).

- John Quincy Adams (the 6th president) was the son of John Adams (the 2nd president) - total ranking 33 (21 and 12).

- James Madison (the 4th president) and Zachary Taylor (the 12th president) were second cousins - total ranking 49 (14 and 35).

- George W. Bush (the 43rd president) is the son of George Bush (the 41st president) - total ranking 56 (34 and 22).

- Benjamin Harrison (the 23rd president) was the grandson of William Henry Harrison (the 9th president) - total ranking 68.

I don't think she'll be as bad as W so they should rank higher than the Bush's.  If she does even as well as Carter the Clintons will rank higher than Madison/Taylor.  

 
You should be falling at his knees in gratitude for making this the layup it's become for Clinton.  Don't understand why you're complaining.
I'm complaining because the hatred of Hillary is downright scary. And Im complaining because 90% of the criticism against Hillary Clinton is unjustified, as this thread has demonstrated IMO. About 10% she owns. But 90% is based on lies generated by the Vast Right Wing Movement (it's not a conspiracy, sorry Saints!) that has been out to get her for 25  years. 

 
The FBI just went through a slow spell and was looking for things to do, apparently.
They were basically flogged into dragging this thing on. They rolled their eyes every time Trey Gowdy called them for the latest summary. They likely considered the whole charade a colossal waste of time. 

 
I don't hate Donald Trump. I fear his presidency. That's not an emotional reaction either, but based on everything we've seen thus far. I'm not sure how a well informed rational American would not fear a Trump presidency. 
:goodposting:

Consider decisions like the one Obama made to take out Bin Laden- all the intelligence that had to be absorbed and considered, all the pros and cons and variables to be weighed, etc.  And I assume that presidents make similar decisions that we don't know about or don't think about somewhat frequently. If you prefer to keep it bipartisan, consider Bush's (correct) decision to sign TARP.

And then I imagine Donald Trump being the one asked to consider all that information and make the right decisions. How anyone is OK with that is mind-boggling.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This coming from one of the biggest Trump fear mongers on this board.
I don't hate Donald Trump. I fear his presidency. That's not an emotional reaction either, but based on everything we've seen thus far. I'm not sure how a well informed rational American would not fear a Trump presidency. 
Phase of the Game said nothing about you hating Trump. And you just confirmed that you are one of the biggest Trump fear mongers on this board. I don't even like Trump, yet your fear mongering actually makes me want to vote for him just to piss you off.

 
I don't think she'll be as bad as W so they should rank higher than the Bush's.  If she does even as well as Carter the Clintons will rank higher than Madison/Taylor.  
Best case: If she and Bill keep their nose clean they can fall in the same category as Bill, which leaving out the scandal would put them in the middle third tier IMO. The economy was fantastic under Bill so if they do that well again move them up to the top of the tier. If you count scandal and ethics then they're back in the top of the bottom third tier IMO.

 
Phase of the Game said nothing about you hating Trump. And you just confirmed that you are one of the biggest Trump fear mongers on this board. I don't even like Trump, yet your fear mongering actually makes me want to vote for him just to piss you off.
How about if you don't actually vote for him but just say that you did?  Seems like a win-win :shrug:

 
Phase of the Game said nothing about you hating Trump. And you just confirmed that you are one of the biggest Trump fear mongers on this board. I don't even like Trump, yet your fear mongering actually makes me want to vote for him just to piss you off.
So you would vote for a man who could do serious damage to this country, just to piss off a poster on a Fantasy Football message board?

Hmmm

 
I'm complaining because the hatred of Hillary is downright scary. And Im complaining because 90% of the criticism against Hillary Clinton is unjustified, as this thread has demonstrated IMO. About 10% she owns. But 90% is based on lies generated by the Vast Right Wing Movement (it's not a conspiracy, sorry Saints!) that has been out to get her for 25  years. 
Hyperbole probably isn't the way to get your point across.  This thread should tell you that.  I, of course, disagree with your assessment that 90% is based on lies.  I do agree a lot of the hyperbole towards her has gotten out of control though.  It's absurd.  However, 95+% of the hyperbole against her through all the "scandals" is based on real concerns around her ethics, judgment and character.  She has brought those things into question on her own.  Strip the hyperbole away from these "scandals" and you'll find almost all of them get back to questionable actions in those areas.  The ones that are completely absurd like killing Vince Foster get to that level of VRWC you talk about and I agree with you there, but there's a lot more legitimacy here than you want to acknowledge.  It doesn't help things that people continue to blur the line between "right/wrong" and "legal/illegal".

 
I'm not on a side here.  Trump and Bill are both known associates and can both burn in Hell if they raped girls, which it's likely both did.
I presume both men are innocent of rape, statutory or otherwise.

Tim Tebow was friends with Aaron Hernandez. Doesn't make him a murderer.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Well except PP doesn't have employees and founders doing double duty in the White House.
Triple duty.  Teneo certainly has been paying WH folks, as well.

 
PlasmaDogPlasma said:
The so called "Lolita Express" was a plane owned by Donald Trump's long time friend Jeffery Epstein.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5556/7-things-you-need-know-about-trump-and-sex-slave-amanda-prestigiacomo
Do love how your deflection implicates Trumpmfor flying the "Lolita Express" "at least once."  I agree that's way too many!  Flight logs show Clinton flying it 26 times.  26!  5 of those he ditched his secret service detail.  Hmm.  That's curious.  I want that guy living in the White House.

Epstein also owned a little kiddie prom sex island.  And at least one girl said she saw Bill there as well.  

It's damn likely that both Bill and Donald had sexual interaction with underaged women within Epstein's network.  There is only one word for that, which is rape.  

 
Do love how your deflection implicates Trumpmfor flying the "Lolita Express" "at least once."  I agree that's way too many!  Flight logs show Clinton flying it 26 times.  26!  5 of those he ditched his secret service detail.  Hmm.  That's curious.  I want that guy living in the White House.

Epstein also owned a little kiddie prom sex island.  And at least one girl said she saw Bill there as well.  

It's damn likely that both Bill and Donald had sexual interaction with underaged women within Epstein's network.  There is only one word for that, which is rape.  
In that case I sure hope nobody votes for either of them for president!

 
Do love how your deflection implicates Trumpmfor flying the "Lolita Express" "at least once."  I agree that's way too many!  Flight logs show Clinton flying it 26 times.  26!  5 of those he ditched his secret service detail.  Hmm.  That's curious.  I want that guy living in the White House.

Epstein also owned a little kiddie prom sex island.  And at least one girl said she saw Bill there as well.  

It's damn likely that both Bill and Donald had sexual interaction with underaged women within Epstein's network.  There is only one word for that, which is rape.  
All that about Clinton, but you lump in Trump at the end.

I was a good friend with a kid who ended up being radicalized and left to fight for Al-Shaabab in Somalia.  Does that make me complicit in terrorism?

 
It's damn likely that both Bill and Donald had sexual interaction with underaged women within Epstein's network.
It's much more likely that neither one of them did.

None of the victims have claimed Bill was involved. You jump to that conclusion because you always assume the worst about the Clintons.

 
It's much more likely that neither one of them did.

None of the victims have claimed Bill was involved. You jump to that conclusion because you always assume the worst about the Clintons.
See Baloney's post below yours.  You don't fly on a plane where hookers are the flight crew 26 times and ditch SS 5 on them by chance.  

 
All that about Clinton, but you lump in Trump at the end.

I was a good friend with a kid who ended up being radicalized and left to fight for Al-Shaabab in Somalia.  Does that make me complicit in terrorism?
Follow the original posts.  Somone posted a litany of facts tying Trump to the sex ring.  I had made the accusation against Bill, because I find it highly unlikely he partook -- which is rape.

 
Do love how your deflection implicates Trumpmfor flying the "Lolita Express" "at least once."  I agree that's way too many!  Flight logs show Clinton flying it 26 times.  26!  5 of those he ditched his secret service detail.  Hmm.  That's curious.  I want that guy living in the White House.

Epstein also owned a little kiddie prom sex island.  And at least one girl said she saw Bill there as well.  

It's damn likely that both Bill and Donald had sexual interaction with underaged women within Epstein's network.  There is only one word for that, which is rape.  
:yawn:

Wake me when Bill is running for President again.

 
Follow the original posts.  Somone posted a litany of facts tying Trump to the sex ring.  I had made the accusation against Bill, because I find it highly unlikely he partook -- which is rape.
Yeah - I'm not searching 1100 pages to find that.  

 
Perhaps a question for Tim and maybe squizzy....

Do you find no problem that her lawyers used a program called Bleachbit to delete her emails?  Let me repeat that.  Bleachbit.  A program whose main and sole purpose is to delete emails with little chance of recovery.  In essence, like throwing a piece of paper in a shredding machine.  I know it's been mentioned in here already but just curious on your thoughts on why that program would be used.  I'll hang up and listen....

 
Perhaps a question for Tim and maybe squizzy....

Do you find no problem that her lawyers used a program called Bleachbit to delete her emails?  Let me repeat that.  Bleachbit.  A program whose main and sole purpose is to delete emails with little chance of recovery.  In essence, like throwing a piece of paper in a shredding machine.  I know it's been mentioned in here already but just curious on your thoughts on why that program would be used.  I'll hang up and listen....
Before they answer: it has been established that despite the lies these were work emails that by law needed to be preserved...  Unless.  What's the unless?  Why did she/they want these gone forever?

 
So you would vote for a man who could do serious damage to this country, just to piss off a poster on a Fantasy Football message board?

Hmmm
The system is setup so one person can't do serious damage to the country. He won't be a king. Hillary on the other hand would be a queen, because... well... she already thinks she is one. 

 
Perhaps a question for Tim and maybe squizzy....

Do you find no problem that her lawyers used a program called Bleachbit to delete her emails?  Let me repeat that.  Bleachbit.  A program whose main and sole purpose is to delete emails with little chance of recovery.  In essence, like throwing a piece of paper in a shredding machine.  I know it's been mentioned in here already but just curious on your thoughts on why that program would be used.  I'll hang up and listen....
Not to mention she did it after she was told to turn those emails over. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top