dparker713
Footballguy
I was aware that you two would object, that's why I qualified my post.
I was aware that you two would object, that's why I qualified my post.
True, good point.If Bill had that kind of power, wouldn't it have made more sense to pressure Lynch to conclude the investigation in November?
edit: assuming that the conclusion was going to criticize Hillary in any way.
I do not. And perhaps I am the only one here left who doesn't think so (but I believe there are a few others.)
Hillary is a typical politician and she skirts the lines of what is ethical and legal at times. But I do not believe she crosses those lines, and I do not regard her as corrupt.
"Chuck, I am not going to comment on the process. I have no knowledge, any timeline is entirely up to the department."
I have no knowledge - thats a no.
As for the other one, why? It sounded like Bill had a security detail, but not a staff with him. The security detail wasn't going to disclose anything. And Lynch's staff wasn't going to compound the problem by alerting Hillary's staff. So it's either Bill told her directly or her staff found out through the media. Considering how quickly this came out, it's entirely plausible that she found out from the news report.
- Now, who would know such a thing at that time?Edward Mejia Davis @TeddyDavisCNN
Sources tell CNN's Evan Perez: expectation is that there will be announcement of no charges in Clinton email probe w/in next two weeks or so
2:02 PM - 2 Jul 2016
thanks for the discussion)So she plays in the grey area and then is super secretive about it (with private servers, aides and associates taking the fifth) and the American people are suppose to trust her? When you are in grey areas you better be open and transparent about it. She works for the public and should have to earn their trust. It makes very little sense that people support her, but it is all about party and agenda.I do not. And perhaps I am the only one here left who doesn't think so (but I believe there are a few others.)
Hillary is a typical politician and she skirts the lines of what is ethical and legal at times. But I do not believe she crosses those lines, and I do not regard her as corrupt.
I trust her to be a typical politician.So she plays in the grey area and then is super secretive about it (with private servers, aides and associates taking the fifth) and the American people are suppose to trust her? When you are in grey areas you better be open and transparent about it. She works for the public and should have to earn their trust. It makes very little sense that people support her, but it is all about party and agenda.
It's her or Trump. When faced with that choice her trustworthiness issues fade into the background.So she plays in the grey area and then is super secretive about it (with private servers, aides and associates taking the fifth) and the American people are suppose to trust her? When you are in grey areas you better be open and transparent about it. She works for the public and should have to earn their trust. It makes very little sense that people support her, but it is all about party and agenda.
about the only reason anyone who identifies as a republican could support TrumpSo she plays in the grey area and then is super secretive about it (with private servers, aides and associates taking the fifth) and the American people are suppose to trust her? When you are in grey areas you better be open and transparent about it. She works for the public and should have to earn their trust. It makes very little sense that people support her, but it is all about party and agenda.
One choice being totally unacceptable, does not make the other acceptable by default.It's her or Trump. When faced with that choice her trustworthiness issues fade into the background.
It makes the other one look good in comparison.One choice being totally unacceptable, does not make the other acceptable by default.
She'll always be Fat Shady.One choice being totally unacceptable, does not make the other acceptable by default.
Exactly. She does have issues (which I can live with), yet Trump has multiple number of issues which disqualify him from being President. It is as simple as thatIt's her or Trump. When faced with that choice her trustworthiness issues fade into the background.
You're right. Trump looks better and better every day compared to HRC.It makes the other one look good in comparison.
So corruption isn't a disqualifier for you concerning Hillary? Wow.It's her or Trump. When faced with that choice her trustworthiness issues fade into the background.
Corrupt < Petulant <<< Ignorant <<<<<<<< Bigoted <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< StupidMaxThreshold said:So corruption isn't a disqualifier for you concerning Hillary? Wow.
I just dont find Trump to have any upperhand regarding shadiness or lying. And both are better then Cruz. Imagine that.MaxThreshold said:So corruption isn't a disqualifier for you concerning Hillary? Wow.
So I guess it's safe to say that HRC supporters are 100% for corruption, lying and general shadiness bordering on criminality. That's fine. However, you NEVER get to complain about any else with those same qualities either.
So the next time I hear a lefty complain about corruption (corporate, government or otherwise) I will laugh in your face and say, "Yeah, that's funny. Remember when you voted for Hillary?".
MaxThreshold said:So corruption isn't a disqualifier for you concerning Hillary? Wow.
So I guess it's safe to say that HRC supporters are 100% for corruption, lying and general shadiness bordering on criminality. That's fine. However, you NEVER get to complain about any else with those same qualities either.
So the next time I hear a lefty complain about corruption (corporate, government or otherwise) I will laugh in your face and say, "Yeah, that's funny. Remember when you voted for Hillary?".
There's nothing funny about this choice for president.MaxThreshold said:So the next time I hear a lefty complain about corruption (corporate, government or otherwise) I will laugh in your face and say, "Yeah, that's funny. Remember when you voted for Hillary?".
Trump makes the shrill look like the pope.Ramblin Wreck said:Truth hurts. She has no integrity whatsoever.
That's the disconnect - no he doesn't. They are both equally terrible.Trump makes the shrill look like the pope.
I don't think he has any upper hand. I think they are both equally awful and terrible choices for this country. 3rd Party is the way to go.I just dont find Trump to have any upperhand regarding shadiness or lying. And both are better then Cruz. Imagine that.
Trump has his own integrity problems but just because he's bad doesn't mean Hillary has integrity, as some seem to claim here.Trump makes the shrill look like the pope.
In this entire thread, literally two people have this position. Two.Trump has his own integrity problems but just because he's bad doesn't mean Hillary has integrity, as some seem to claim here.
When you count, what number did you start with? Tim and Squisloc for sure but the guy that started the integrity comments counts too. That's 3 without even looking but many others get really defensive of Clinton the second her integrity gets questioned; not just in relation to Trump.In this entire thread, literally two people have this position. Two.
Doesn't it bother you that scandal always seems to find her and Bill? Would you just consider for one moment - where there is smoke there is fire?Those of you that are certain that she is corrupt- doesn't it bother you at all that one after another accusation against her turns out to be false? (Like the one squistion just linked that Politifact debunked). Doesn't this give you pause?
In Bill and Hillary's case, where there is smoke, there is a republican playing with matches.Doesn't it bother you that scandal always seems to find her and Bill? Would you just consider for one momant - where there is smoke there is fire?
Literally you are wrong. Literally.In this entire thread, literally two people have this position. Two.
It's all part of the VRWC, amiright?In Bill and Hillary's case, where there is smoke, there is a republican playing with matches.
No. They are like the Godfather crime boss that is so hard to catch with his own hand in the cookie jar.In Bill and Hillary's case, where there is smoke, there is a republican playing with matches.
TTPODHillary's got some trust issues, probably a touch of corruption, certainly hard to believe everything she says at times. She still the most qualified Presidential candidate we've seen in a long time, has credibility, experience and the temperament to handle all parts of the job of President and is by far the best candidate this year. This is about as objective as you can be if you survey most people, especially media people plugged into politics.
Not sure why it always has to be all or nothing within these threads. Go out on your decks and enjoy a beer and a hot dog for a few hours mates. It's a holiday weekend![]()
There are plenty of evidence that the Clintons are corrupt but you'll say Hillary is more innocent than a baby even if she's caught red handed. No, it doesn't give me pause because we know you've been living in an alternate realty for quite some time.Those of you that are certain that she is corrupt- doesn't it bother you at all that one after another accusation against her turns out to be false? (Like the one squistion just linked that Politifact debunked). Doesn't this give you pause?
Probably as close as you'll ever get.It's all part of the VRWC, amiright?
Yes, alcohol will numb your conscience when you vote to be Hillary's accomplice.Hillary's got some trust issues, probably a touch of corruption, certainly hard to believe everything she says at times. She still the most qualified Presidential candidate we've seen in a long time, has credibility, experience and the temperament to handle all parts of the job of President and is by far the best candidate this year. This is about as objective as you can be if you survey most people, especially media people plugged into politics.
Not sure why it always has to be all or nothing within these threads. Go out on your decks and enjoy a beer and a hot dog for a few hours mates. It's a holiday weekend![]()
That's way more of a bother of the entire Republican Party. An entire decade of pure conservative scandal crap in the 90s.Doesn't it bother you that scandal always seems to find her and Bill? Would you just consider for one moment - where there is smoke there is fire?
The reason the corruption angle sticks to her so well is that she never, ever been able to clearly articulate WHY she wants to be president. Trump articulates it very well in that he believes we need to change the culture of getting offended at everything and he strongly believe getting tough on immigration solves a lot of problems and that he can fix these things as president.Those of you that are certain that she is corrupt- doesn't it bother you at all that one after another accusation against her turns out to be false? (Like the one squistion just linked that Politifact debunked). Doesn't this give you pause?
Just because the accusations are dismissed - or not "criminal" - doesn't make them false. The accusations that she set up a private server for official business, that she deleted 30,000 emails, and that she lied about it all, are all very true accusations.Those of you that are certain that she is corrupt- doesn't it bother you at all that one after another accusation against her turns out to be false?
This, Tim. This. She is guilty of these things and has been exposed - regardless of charges.Just because the accusations are dismissed - or not "criminal" - doesn't make them false. The accusations that she set up a private server for official business, that she deleted 30,000 emails, and that she lied about it all, are all very true accusations.
How does one pile of #### look better than another pile of ####?dparker713 said:It makes the other one look good in comparison.
Usually people get whacked before they can rat on the Clintons, like this guy who was "killed by a dumb bell while he was exercising".No. They are like the Godfather crime boss that is so hard to catch with his own hand in the cookie jar.
Tim your argument for why the Clintons aren't corrupt reads like a shorthand for why most people think modern politics are corrupt. You think viewing business as a constituency is good. Most people Dem, Ind & GOP don't think that.Those of you that are certain that she is corrupt- doesn't it bother you at all that one after another accusation against her turns out to be false? (Like the one squistion just linked that Politifact debunked). Doesn't this give you pause?
The ultimate used car salesman has a green residue that makes things a touch worse, visually.How does one pile of #### look better than another pile of ####?
Utterly ####### mindboggling to me that people are this dense.How does one pile of #### look better than another pile of ####?
In the abstract, minus the accusations of tampering with classified information or accepting bribes to the Clinton Foundation in return for favors- why is setting up a private email system so bad?This, Tim. This. She is guilty of these things and has been exposed - regardless of charges.