What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now is the time when we see who will be loyal to the party.  My guess is every single one of them rats to cover their own butt when they realize their friends in office are no longer there to protect them.

 
timschochet said:
I wish she had. I wish somebody would. 

But honestly, who was the last candidate to openly argue that Wall Street and Main Street might sometimes have mutual interests? Steve Forbes? Even Mitt Romney dared not come out and say it. 

And nobody will say it now, not in today's climate, with this unreasoning fear of big business and supposed plutocracy. 
Click to expand...
Ted Cruz did.   But you turned your back on him.   You preferred a corrupt witch.

 
cstu said:
Not worried:

Even if contributors received favorable treatment that's not enough evidence to prove corruption.
Click to expand...
i prefer Luca Bras criminals.  He was what he was.  Clinton Inc.  is worse than the mafia.   Plus they got guys  like you doing free services.  

 
Learned something new today - turns out that the Clinton Foundation has nothing to do with HIV/AIDS medicine distribution.  That claim is a farce.  And the management of the CHAI isn't too happy with being conflated with the CF.

 
I love that the right wing thinks they know more about this stuff than corruption prosecutors that continually take down guys in Albany and on Long Island (and de Blasio soon if I had to guess).  Forgive me, but I'll take their judgment over leaking FBI agents in this case.  

 
Sammy3469 said:
I love that the right wing thinks they know more about this stuff than corruption prosecutors that continually take down guys in Albany and on Long Island (and de Blasio soon if I had to guess).  Forgive me, but I'll take their judgment over leaking FBI agents in this case.  
Click to expand...
baaaa says the sheep

 
Sammy3469 said:
I love that the right wing thinks they know more about this stuff than corruption prosecutors that continually take down guys in Albany and on Long Island (and de Blasio soon if I had to guess).  Forgive me, but I'll take their judgment over leaking FBI agents in this case.  
Click to expand...
So the FBI is re-investigating for fun out of boredom?

 
Sammy3469 said:
I love that the right wing thinks they know more about this stuff than corruption prosecutors that continually take down guys in Albany and on Long Island (and de Blasio soon if I had to guess).  Forgive me, but I'll take their judgment over leaking FBI agents in this case.  
Click to expand...
:lmao:

 
Sammy3469 said:
Wow quite the non-sequitur, but yes I'll trust career law enforcement officials tasked with deciding what cases to prosecute.  Before you get to a jury trial, those officials have to decide if there is even a case to make which they have repeatedly done with Hillary.  They didn't with OJ.
Click to expand...
How about this OJ Simpson related reference based on your line of reasoning: 

Barry Scheck should just end his Innocence Project that has successfully overturned 343 wrongful convictions based on new DNA evidence that wasn't available at the time of the defendant's original trial.  Adult prosecutors and adult judges already ruled on those cases based on the lesser evidence they had available at the time so those cases are over and the defendant's are definitely guilty.

Will you at least concede that new evidence has presented itself since Comey's original decision that may change the FBI's decision whether to prosecute?

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
timschochet said:
I wish she had. I wish somebody would. 

But honestly, who was the last candidate to openly argue that Wall Street and Main Street might sometimes have mutual interests? Steve Forbes? Even Mitt Romney dared not come out and say it. 

And nobody will say it now, not in today's climate, with this unreasoning fear of big business and supposed plutocracy. 
Click to expand...
Mitt Romney and the Republicans say it all the time. Hillary's speeches could truly come right out their mouths. It's a good discussion back and forth that's had all the time.

Problem for Hillary is she's a Democrat. If you say it's a problem in terms of it being an unwinning message nationally, yeah, so Hillary lies about it. That's not to be applauded.
Click to expand...
Yep.  Hillary is just spouting the typical MSM and big corporate viewpoints.  It doesn't works to bring liberals into the fold during the general. 

It is funny to listen to Tim act like the plutocracy is supposed; what an ignorant guy.

 
Gary Coal Man said:
How about this OJ Simpson related reference based on your line of reasoning: 

Barry Scheck should just end his Innocence Project that has successfully overturned 343 wrongful convictions based on new DNA evidence that wasn't available at the time of the defendant's original trial.  Adult prosecutors and adult judges already ruled on those cases based on the lesser evidence they had available at the time so those cases are over and the defendant's are definitely guilty.

Will you at least concede that new evidence has presented itself since Comey's original decision that may change the FBI's decision whether to prosecute?
Click to expand...
curious analogy.

 
Wow, it's hard to believe that the posts in here could be worse than they are in the Trump thread, but some of you guys have managed that. :lmao:

 
Where is Donna Brazile?  I can't believe they haven't fired her yet.  Funny how we haven't been hear as much about Russia lately... 

 
Since Mr. Comey’s revelation, the F.B.I. has hurried to analyze a cache of emails belonging to one of Mrs. Clinton’s aides, Huma Abedin. It is increasingly unlikely that the review will be complete by Election Day, F.B.I. officials said, although they said there was a chance they could offer updates before Nov. 8.

The mood at the F.B.I. is dark, and nobody is willing to predict what the coming days will bring, particularly if agents and analysts do not complete their review of Ms. Abedin’s emails by Election Day. Officials said it would take something extraordinary to change the conclusion that nobody should be charged. But the absence of information has allowed festering speculation that the emails must be significant.
Click to expand...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/02/us/politics/fbi-james-comey-hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html?smid=tw-share

 
In August, around the same time the decision was made to keep the Manafort investigation at a low simmer, the F.B.I. grappled with whether to issue subpoenas in the Clinton Foundation case, which, like the Manafort matter, was in its preliminary stages. The investigation, based in New York, had not developed much evidence and was based mostly on information that had surfaced in news stories and the book “Clinton Cash,” according to several law enforcement officials briefed on the case.

The book asserted that foreign entities gave money to former President Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, and in return received favors from the State Department when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state. Mrs. Clinton has adamantly denied those claims.

In meetings, the Justice Department and senior F.B.I. officials agreed that making the Clinton Foundation investigation public could influence the presidential race and suggest they were favoring Mr. Trump. But waiting, they acknowledged, could open them up to criticism from Republicans, who were demanding an investigation.

They agreed to keep the case open but wait until after the election to determine their next steps. The move infuriated some agents, who thought that the F.B.I.’s leaders were reining them in because of politics.
Click to expand...
The case is still open but they obviously have nothing if they haven't charged her yet.

 
tommyboy said:
How could they brief Hillary when all her security clearances have been revoked
Click to expand...
It was probably done by the same people who scrubbed Michelle Obama's twitter account the other day. I think they were part of the 14 WikiLeaks operatives whose internet access was mysteriously cut off last month. It's all part of the master plan to release Hillary's 30,000 emails at 11 a.m. on Tuesday.

 
[scooter] said:
It was probably done by the same people who scrubbed Michelle Obama's twitter account the other day. I think they were part of the 14 WikiLeaks operatives whose internet access was mysteriously cut off last month. It's all part of the master plan to release Hillary's 30,000 emails at 11 a.m. on Tuesday.




 
Click to expand...
the 11am Tuesday surprise did coincide with the FBI Vaults releasing of info. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

mr. furley
Long Island serial killer suspect in custody
Replies
34
Views
2K
Dezbelief
Dezbelief
krista4
In this thread I rank my favorite Beatles songs: 204-1.
138 139 140
Replies
7K
Views
254K
rockaction
rockaction
HellToupee
***Official*** Joe Biden 2016 Presidential Thread
Replies
35
Views
2K
That one guy
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top