Fiddles.
Towel Waver
is there anyway to tell if a fan made this up or what the source is?Dont know if this has been posted but it sheds a ton of light. http://www.kraftkost.com/pages/1/index.htm
is there anyway to tell if a fan made this up or what the source is?Dont know if this has been posted but it sheds a ton of light. http://www.kraftkost.com/pages/1/index.htm
I wasn't referring to whether you were right or not, but rather you basically spoiled it for everyone before the show.Well, looks like we can quit speculating on whether it was a gun wound or stabbing.....and that Ana didn't do it.Interesting interview with minor spoilers:
http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=New...rticle&sid=1385
Extended interview![]()
![]()
Shuke's right, please put lines like the bolded above in spoiler text please.I wasn't referring to whether you were right or not, but rather you basically spoiled it for everyone before the show.Well, looks like we can quit speculating on whether it was a gun wound or stabbing.....and that Ana didn't do it.Interesting interview with minor spoilers:
http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=New...rticle&sid=1385
Extended interview![]()
![]()
I pulled this from the source code for this page:is there anyway to tell if a fan made this up or what the source is?Dont know if this has been posted but it sheds a ton of light. http://www.kraftkost.com/pages/1/index.htm
Copyright 1997-2001 MyComputer.com, Inc. More info available at http://www.mycomputer.com
Look, maybe I am being silly, but this thread almost jumped the shark because half the posts were like this full of spoilers...so I won't do it here. I will PM you if you like...instead of PM just quote it in white.
Yes, you are being silly.
), but I'll take it. I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp. That's what I'm going with anyway.Its definitely just a fan site.I pulled this from the source code for this page:is there anyway to tell if a fan made this up or what the source is?Dont know if this has been posted but it sheds a ton of light. http://www.kraftkost.com/pages/1/index.htmCopyright 1997-2001 MyComputer.com, Inc. More info available at http://www.mycomputer.com
I think that both Nathan and Ethan said they were from Canada, actually. Could be.Great episode. I had hope that the back story of the Tailies would take up more than one show (more like half the season), but I'll take it.
I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:
Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp.
That's what I'm going with anyway.
That's what I'm saying. Hearing Nathan talking to Ana, I thought, "Wow, this must be the standard response for the Others when questioned. Name, from Cananda, on a company trip (we don't know if Ethan ever said this though), etc." Once we learned that Goodwin killed Nathan and that he was the plant, I started to think that Ethan was just trying to use Nathan's identity. If he gets the name right, Hurly would have checked him off the passenger list.Granted all of this means nothing because we learned that Ethan is the plant by him kidnapping Charlie and Claire in the same episode that Hurly learns that he's not in the flight manifest.I think that both Nathan and Ethan said they were from Canada, actually. Could be.Great episode. I had hope that the back story of the Tailies would take up more than one show (more like half the season), but I'll take it.
I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:
Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp.
That's what I'm going with anyway.
The previews for next week's episode basically told us the same things as in the bolded text above, so not really a spoiler.Shuke's right, please put lines like the bolded above in spoiler text please.I wasn't referring to whether you were right or not, but rather you basically spoiled it for everyone before the show.Well, looks like we can quit speculating on whether it was a gun wound or stabbing.....and that Ana didn't do it.Interesting interview with minor spoilers:
http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=New...rticle&sid=1385
Extended interview![]()
![]()
Hmm... makes sense I guess.Great episode. I had hope that the back story of the Tailies would take up more than one show (more like half the season), but I'll take it.
I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:
Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp.
That's what I'm going with anyway.
He said this yesterday before last night's episode.The previews for next week's episode basically told us the same things as in the bolded text above, so not really a spoiler.Shuke's right, please put lines like the bolded above in spoiler text please.I wasn't referring to whether you were right or not, but rather you basically spoiled it for everyone before the show.Well, looks like we can quit speculating on whether it was a gun wound or stabbing.....and that Ana didn't do it.Interesting interview with minor spoilers:
http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=New...rticle&sid=1385
Extended interview![]()
![]()
jplvr on a roll today.Hmm... makes sense I guess.Great episode. I had hope that the back story of the Tailies would take up more than one show (more like half the season), but I'll take it.
I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:
Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp.
That's what I'm going with anyway.
This does make sense, but Ethan also gave a surname of "Rom." In last night's episode, we didn't see Nathan giving his surname. Presumably, if Hurley was checking names against the manifest, he would have at least noticed a common surname, with a name that sounded so much like Nathan wouldn't he?I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:
Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp.
That's what I'm going with anyway.
I hadn't made this connection. Thanks.Another note: I know it was speculated that the flight crew was in on it or whatever. This was during all of the questions about whether or not there were 2 flights. Anyway, the Tailie that went missing on the trek to the Fuselage camp was the stewardess from the flight. I'm assuming this was just common knowledge for anyone that saw the show as she talked about the captain saying that they were 2 hours off course, but early last night it clicked that she was the same woman that gave Jack the vodka and that chased Charlie through the cabin.
The Others don't want survivors with good taste; they want survivors that taste good.I don't believe the "we only take good people" line that Goodwin gave. If you look deep enough, everyone's got some "bad" in them and with the original group (fronties), there seems to be quite a mixture of people. Jack, by and large is a good person, as is Sayid (Republican Guard service notwithstanding), Boone, Claire, Hurley.
Nice call. It applies logic to the puzzle instead of our assuming the similarities between Ethan and Nathan were a fluke. (One question, though: wouldn't Nathan have been on the flight log Hurley used when he fingered "Ethan" as someone who was not aboard the plane? Not a big deal, as there are gaping holes in some of the plots in this show and this is a mere pinhole leak in comparison.)There's always the chance we'll see all these events unfold from the perspective of The Others somewhere down the road, in much the same way we caught up with the Tailies and their story line in the last episode.Great episode. I had hope that the back story of the Tailies would take up more than one show (more like half the season), but I'll take it.
I wondered if anyone else would figure this out before I got to the end of the thread, but I'm pretty sure this explains the Nathan/Ethan thing:
Goodwin collected names and descriptions for the Tailies and gave them to the Others in the forrest. We know for one that Nathan wasn't very friendly from Ana, so Goodwin could have gotten some information wrong, and it's possible that "Ethan" only heard the name through the grapevine. Ethan hears the name from Goodwin or someone before going to the Fuselage camp, and when Hurly comes along asking his name for the census, Ethan stumbles and says "Ethan" instead of "Nathan." Ethan was trying to use Nathan's identity to infiltrate the Fuselage camp.
That's what I'm going with anyway.
I disagree. Look at who was taken. Eko (hypothesized to be a priest, regardless has a good nature about him), 2 other tallies (nothing known about them), taillie children, Claire & Walt. I think they are taking "pure" people without sin. Now how Rose, Bernard, Libby, etc sinned, I don't know, but I'm sticking with this theory for now.About the "good people" the others took.
I don't necessarily think it was meant in reference to the person's nature. It makes more sense to me that those people were "good canidates" for whatever experiments and what not is going on over at Other's central.
Then again, Goodwin clearly isn't mentally sound if he is one of the others anyway. I question the judgement of people who snatch people in the middle of the night.
Found this on the Theory Boards.. When you enlarge the picture you can kind of make out "I WILL" and "LORD"http://www.lost-media.com/modules.php?name...=814&pos=214you- What was Eko carving into his stick?
- Eko is a religious man. Wonder how that's going to play out with the good vs. evil theme that seems to be setting up.
That wasn't a spoiler......you basically saw her shoot Shannon last week. Just because you speculated otherwise does not make it a spoiler....Shuke's right, please put lines like the bolded above in spoiler text please.I wasn't referring to whether you were right or not, but rather you basically spoiled it for everyone before the show.Well, looks like we can quit speculating on whether it was a gun wound or stabbing.....and that Ana didn't do it.Interesting interview with minor spoilers:
http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=New...rticle&sid=1385
Extended interview![]()
![]()
They took Charlie previously. I'm not sure he qualifies for the good person criteria.Also, they tried to take Eko because he is a big dude. Goodwin admitted that the initial strike's intent was to eliminate threats.I disagree. Look at who was taken. Eko (hypothesized to be a priest, regardless has a good nature about him), 2 other tallies (nothing known about them), taillie children, Claire & Walt. I think they are taking "pure" people without sin. Now how Rose, Bernard, Libby, etc sinned, I don't know, but I'm sticking with this theory for now.About the "good people" the others took.
I don't necessarily think it was meant in reference to the person's nature. It makes more sense to me that those people were "good canidates" for whatever experiments and what not is going on over at Other's central.
Then again, Goodwin clearly isn't mentally sound if he is one of the others anyway. I question the judgement of people who snatch people in the middle of the night.
The ABC television network and sister publishing label Hyperion Books are taking the concept of product placement into a new direction -- by turning an imaginary product into a real one. Producers of ABC's mega-hit castaway thriller "Lost" plan to introduce a new storyline centering on the discovery of a fictitious manuscript that will become the basis for a real-life novel that Hyperion will publish this spring. The book will then be promoted as the work of an author, named Gary Troup, who supposedly delivered the manuscript to Hyperion days before perishing in the show's stage-setting event, a plane crash that maroons a group of survivors on a spooky island. The "Lost" novel, titled "Bad Twin," is described as a private eye mystery about a wealthy heir's search for his evil sibling. Source: CNN
I'm invisi texting this, but I'm not sure thats necessary.
The ABC television network and sister publishing label Hyperion Books are taking the concept of product placement into a new direction -- by turning an imaginary product into a real one. Producers of ABC's mega-hit castaway thriller "Lost" plan to introduce a new storyline centering on the discovery of a fictitious manuscript that will become the basis for a real-life novel that Hyperion will publish this spring. The book will then be promoted as the work of an author, named Gary Troup, who supposedly delivered the manuscript to Hyperion days before perishing in the show's stage-setting event, a plane crash that maroons a group of survivors on a spooky island. The "Lost" novel, titled "Bad Twin," is described as a private eye mystery about a wealthy heir's search for his evil sibling. Source: CNN

Whats sad is it took me 15 seconds to get it.
What I found interesting is how easy it was to get in/out of the hatch's second door yet you had to blow up the other one.So, anyone else notice "Quartine" stamped on the inside of the 2nd hatch door as well?
I wonder if we'll start seeing people getting sick or going mental soon.
Claire had a child out of wedlock. That's not "pure" from a religious sense.I disagree. Look at who was taken. Eko (hypothesized to be a priest, regardless has a good nature about him), 2 other tallies (nothing known about them), taillie children, Claire & Walt. I think they are taking "pure" people without sin. Now how Rose, Bernard, Libby, etc sinned, I don't know, but I'm sticking with this theory for now.About the "good people" the others took.
I don't necessarily think it was meant in reference to the person's nature. It makes more sense to me that those people were "good canidates" for whatever experiments and what not is going on over at Other's central.
Then again, Goodwin clearly isn't mentally sound if he is one of the others anyway. I question the judgement of people who snatch people in the middle of the night.
I think the door we saw the Tailies go into was the main door. The door that the fuselage crew got in through was the backdoor, so to speak. Once they found the main entrance, they had no problems getting in and out.Again, I think the "Quarantine" was part of the experiment to keep people inside. I don't think we'll see much more of the "hatch" the Tailies were in, but it wouldn't surprise me if it had cement poured into part of it, blocking off another area, as well.What I found interesting is how easy it was to get in/out of the hatch's second door yet you had to blow up the other one.So, anyone else notice "Quartine" stamped on the inside of the 2nd hatch door as well?
I wonder if we'll start seeing people getting sick or going mental soon.
I couldn't figure out the 'Rom' part other than the fact that the writers needed it to complete "Other man."
I doubt we ever find out anything further, but there are surnames that end with a 'rom' sound. Braum is at least one.
Ethan FrommeWell I've heard this:Sounds good to me although what would be the central issue with Lost? The island itself? Others/Dharma? Rescue/after affects of living on the island?
There will be an episode that centers on the island itself. As in a flashback about it. What the heck that means (if it's true) I have no idea.
Collision
* Scheduled air date: November 23, 2005
* Flashback: Ana-Lucia Cortez
* Written by: Javier Grillo-Marxuach and Leonard ****
* Directed by: Stephen Williams
Violence erupts when Ana-Lucia and her group stumble upon the other castaways. Includes a character called "Old Nick", played by Garry Jackson.
What Kate Did
* Scheduled air date: November 30, 2005
* Flashback: Kate Austen
As Kate’s backstory continues, her original crime is revealed. Locke and Eko make an interesting discovery about the film, and Michael has a mysterious encounter with the computer.
Merged
* Scheduled air date: December 14, 2005
This episode has some big questions answered. It shows flashbacks of the island. Yes, the island and tells you how the hatch came to be, what will happen if the 'numbers' aren't typed into the computer, and how the 'others' came on the island.
Source: E!
The Hunting Party
* Scheduled air date: January 11, 2006
Vindication
* Scheduled air date: January 18, 2006
I don't think it is fair to automatically assume Charlie isn't "Good". In his flashbacks they actually showed him in confession I believe a couple times, turning to a priest for advice. He was a good kid who was seeking guidance and actually seemed pretty religious. He eventually started using drugs to try to fit in better with his older brother, and then got hooked. Pretty sure Thou Shalt not use Heroin isn't one of God's Laws.And I'm pretty sure they kidnapped Claire for her unborn baby,..... not her.They took Charlie previously. I'm not sure he qualifies for the good person criteria.Also, they tried to take Eko because he is a big dude. Goodwin admitted that the initial strike's intent was to eliminate threats.I disagree. Look at who was taken. Eko (hypothesized to be a priest, regardless has a good nature about him), 2 other tallies (nothing known about them), taillie children, Claire & Walt. I think they are taking "pure" people without sin. Now how Rose, Bernard, Libby, etc sinned, I don't know, but I'm sticking with this theory for now.About the "good people" the others took.
I don't necessarily think it was meant in reference to the person's nature. It makes more sense to me that those people were "good canidates" for whatever experiments and what not is going on over at Other's central.
Then again, Goodwin clearly isn't mentally sound if he is one of the others anyway. I question the judgement of people who snatch people in the middle of the night.
Evidence
Look at the poster in the far left of the shot. The occupational therapy month poster. Its got a year on it. And, Walt is like 2/3 years old during this flashback. Which would place the events on the island in the 2009/2010 timeframe.
This combined with ticket stub thing from oceanic-air dot com that dated the ticket as 2009 really make me think that the show is set in 2009/10.Stub
They took Charlie, because he was with claire. Not for charlie.They took Charlie previously. I'm not sure he qualifies for the good person criteria.Also, they tried to take Eko because he is a big dude. Goodwin admitted that the initial strike's intent was to eliminate threats.I disagree. Look at who was taken. Eko (hypothesized to be a priest, regardless has a good nature about him), 2 other tallies (nothing known about them), taillie children, Claire & Walt. I think they are taking "pure" people without sin. Now how Rose, Bernard, Libby, etc sinned, I don't know, but I'm sticking with this theory for now.About the "good people" the others took.
I don't necessarily think it was meant in reference to the person's nature. It makes more sense to me that those people were "good canidates" for whatever experiments and what not is going on over at Other's central.
Then again, Goodwin clearly isn't mentally sound if he is one of the others anyway. I question the judgement of people who snatch people in the middle of the night.
They took Claire to get the baby. Not for Claire herself.So my question, how did Goodwin get his clothes and shoes? If Ann lucia was right, did Bernard just happen to see him, is that why he came out so fast? Why does he have shoes?Claire had a child out of wedlock. That's not "pure" from a religious sense.I disagree. Look at who was taken. Eko (hypothesized to be a priest, regardless has a good nature about him), 2 other tallies (nothing known about them), taillie children, Claire & Walt. I think they are taking "pure" people without sin. Now how Rose, Bernard, Libby, etc sinned, I don't know, but I'm sticking with this theory for now.About the "good people" the others took.
I don't necessarily think it was meant in reference to the person's nature. It makes more sense to me that those people were "good canidates" for whatever experiments and what not is going on over at Other's central.
Then again, Goodwin clearly isn't mentally sound if he is one of the others anyway. I question the judgement of people who snatch people in the middle of the night.
I'm sure you meant Nathan....Watched the beginning just now and Ethan.......
First of all, it's NATHAN.Second of all, you are trying too hard here. It's OBVIOUS that Nathan was a misdirection. He didn't talk in the pit because he didn't know anything. He obviously didn't know which way the beach was and had to ask. And why would Goodwin kill him? Seriously, he was NOT an other.Watched the beginning just now and Ethan does not show up until the night of day 1 and is sleeping near Anna at the fire. Goodwin is also sleeping near her at this same fire but on the other side. Ethan was the first one to report to Anna about the missing people in night 1. He went to the bathroom alone and was gone for 2 hours at which time he never told anybody where he was or what he did. Ethan also did not try to convince Anna at all about him not knowing where the kids are and anything of that nature when he was in the hole. Goodwin had to get rid of him because Ethan was a liability. Why would we be shown Goodwin kill Ethan when we could have been left with Goodwin letting Ethan go and later finding out that Ethan was killed? Until I am shown different it is in my belief that Ethan and Goodwin were both Others.
He was definitely on Flight 815.I know it's been discussed about Mr. Eko being a religious man. But we also have to remember that small plane that Boone and Locke found. I somehoe remember Locke saying that it was some Nigerian Drug Smuggling Plane or something like that. Plus the fact that the drugs are in religious statues. I think Mr Eko has something to do with this plane. Nigerian Drug Smugglers...African accent...religious overtone...religious statues... I just think that he isn't as good as we're making him out to be.
Just a hunch.
First of all, it's NATHAN.Second of all, you are trying too hard here. It's OBVIOUS that Nathan was a misdirection. He didn't talk in the pit because he didn't know anything. He obviously didn't know which way the beach was and had to ask. And why would Goodwin kill him? Seriously, he was NOT an other.Watched the beginning just now and Ethan does not show up until the night of day 1 and is sleeping near Anna at the fire. Goodwin is also sleeping near her at this same fire but on the other side. Ethan was the first one to report to Anna about the missing people in night 1. He went to the bathroom alone and was gone for 2 hours at which time he never told anybody where he was or what he did. Ethan also did not try to convince Anna at all about him not knowing where the kids are and anything of that nature when he was in the hole. Goodwin had to get rid of him because Ethan was a liability. Why would we be shown Goodwin kill Ethan when we could have been left with Goodwin letting Ethan go and later finding out that Ethan was killed? Until I am shown different it is in my belief that Ethan and Goodwin were both Others.

Agreed. Nathan was NOT one of the others.I bet JJ loves the fact that fans are overanalyzing everything...First of all, it's NATHAN.Second of all, you are trying too hard here. It's OBVIOUS that Nathan was a misdirection. He didn't talk in the pit because he didn't know anything. He obviously didn't know which way the beach was and had to ask. And why would Goodwin kill him? Seriously, he was NOT an other.Watched the beginning just now and Ethan does not show up until the night of day 1 and is sleeping near Anna at the fire. Goodwin is also sleeping near her at this same fire but on the other side. Ethan was the first one to report to Anna about the missing people in night 1. He went to the bathroom alone and was gone for 2 hours at which time he never told anybody where he was or what he did. Ethan also did not try to convince Anna at all about him not knowing where the kids are and anything of that nature when he was in the hole. Goodwin had to get rid of him because Ethan was a liability. Why would we be shown Goodwin kill Ethan when we could have been left with Goodwin letting Ethan go and later finding out that Ethan was killed? Until I am shown different it is in my belief that Ethan and Goodwin were both Others.
Do you really believe that he went running out into the water when the tail of flight 815 hit? Because he came out of the water at the same time that Ana-Lucia did.I know it's been discussed about Mr. Eko being a religious man. But we also have to remember that small plane that Boone and Locke found. I somehoe remember Locke saying that it was some Nigerian Drug Smuggling Plane or something like that. Plus the fact that the drugs are in religious statues. I think Mr Eko has something to do with this plane. Nigerian Drug Smugglers...African accent...religious overtone...religious statues... I just think that he isn't as good as we're making him out to be.
Just a hunch.