What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official National Signing Day thread*** (1 Viewer)

Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Like Notre Dame does every year you mean? When was the last time they won a title? Baylor would have been in the playoffs this past year without ever having had a top ten class. Sparty was in, Stanford close with the same story. i can offer many more examples, not sure why you are so opposed to my thought.

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Like Notre Dame does every year you mean? When was the last time they won a title? Baylor would have been in the playoffs this past year without ever having had a top ten class. Sparty was in, Stanford close with the same story. i can offer many more examples, not sure why you are so opposed to my thought.
Making the playoffs < > winning a national title. If you want to say you can get into the tourney without a top-10 class, then sure I would agree. Of course, Sparty got in and got immediately ripped to shreds like a puppy facing a pit bull.

Also, I know you know stats and just because you can provide outliers doesn't make the foundation false. Lots of schools in the top-10 of recruiting have failed on the field:All of the schools who have won a national title have excelled at recruiting to include multiple top-10 classes.

Both can be true at the same time.

 
The conference max #s seem to be taking hold now, after a few years.

There were only 3 schools in the top 25 ranked classes who signed over 25...Michigan, UCLA, and Stanford.

Compare that to '13...9 of the top 10 signed over 25.
I thought the B1G had a max of 28. I don't know how you guys keep track of your own conferences much less the others too :topcat: :hangover:

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Like Notre Dame does every year you mean? When was the last time they won a title? Baylor would have been in the playoffs this past year without ever having had a top ten class. Sparty was in, Stanford close with the same story. i can offer many more examples, not sure why you are so opposed to my thought.
Making the playoffs < > winning a national title. If you want to say you can get into the tourney without a top-10 class, then sure I would agree. Of course, Sparty got in and got immediately ripped to shreds like a puppy facing a pit bull. Also, I know you know stats and just because you can provide outliers doesn't make the foundation false. Lots of schools in the top-10 of recruiting have failed on the field:All of the schools who have won a national title have excelled at recruiting to include multiple top-10 classes.

Both can be true at the same time.
I can agree with this.
 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.

You've got some time. I'm heading to work.

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.You've got some time. I'm heading to work.
You're talking about the late 90s I take it? :lmao: :lmao:

Sorry recruiting and the information and ability for multiple people to scout these kids correctly is light years different now than 18 years ago. Almost embarrassing I have to point that out to you. It's called the Internet, you may have heard of it.

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.You've got some time. I'm heading to work.
You're talking about the late 90s I take it? :lmao: :lmao:

Sorry recruiting and the information and ability for multiple people to scout these kids correctly is light years different now than 18 years ago. Almost embarrassing I have to point that out to you. It's called the Internet, you may have heard of it.
So you're backing off on your statement?

 
Gray shirt has nothing to do with the previous year but rather the next. Kid basically doesn't enroll until next January and their eligibility doesn't begin until then. Basically the schools who can pick whatever recruit they want do it to 3-stars so they don't count against their scholarship cap this year.

:grad:
So what does the kid do for a year? Do they go to a community college? Can they practice with the team?
apparently grayshirts cannot practice with the team, but they are enrolled in school. blueshirts however, can practice with the team :loco:
And whaaaaat does it mean if you're not wearing a shirt at all? Or pants for that matter. Asking for a friend. :oldunsure:

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.You've got some time. I'm heading to work.
You're talking about the late 90s I take it? :lmao: :lmao:Sorry recruiting and the information and ability for multiple people to scout these kids correctly is light years different now than 18 years ago. Almost embarrassing I have to point that out to you. It's called the Internet, you may have heard of it.
So you're backing off on your statement?
It's amazing how much of a moron you strive to be.

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.You've got some time. I'm heading to work.
You're talking about the late 90s I take it? :lmao: :lmao:Sorry recruiting and the information and ability for multiple people to scout these kids correctly is light years different now than 18 years ago. Almost embarrassing I have to point that out to you. It's called the Internet, you may have heard of it.
So you're backing off on your statement?
It's amazing how much of a moron you strive to be.
I'm amazed you can spell moron.

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.You've got some time. I'm heading to work.
You're talking about the late 90s I take it? :lmao: :lmao:Sorry recruiting and the information and ability for multiple people to scout these kids correctly is light years different now than 18 years ago. Almost embarrassing I have to point that out to you. It's called the Internet, you may have heard of it.
So you're backing off on your statement?
It's amazing how much of a moron you strive to be.
I'm amazed you can spell moron.
Keep ignoring 16 years of data for an easily disproved sample from two decades ago just because your favorite team had a relatively mediocre recruiting class and you have to justify it to yourself somehow. :thumbup:

 
Love ya dr d but a top-30 class is :lmao: :lmao:

You are not winning a national title without multiple top-10 classes throughout a recruiting cycle.

http://www.sbnation.com/a/college-football-preview-2015/blue-chip-ratio

Look at the last 10 years and you only see 2010 Auburn and 2014 Ohio state (who was at 11) with a recruiting class outside the top-10 over 4 years. Auburn of course had a transcendent player.

http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/top-ten-signing-classes-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515

if you aren't in the top-10 consistently you aren't winning a national title.
Go back and look at the recruiting classes OU had the four years before they beat FSU.You've got some time. I'm heading to work.
You're talking about the late 90s I take it? :lmao: :lmao:Sorry recruiting and the information and ability for multiple people to scout these kids correctly is light years different now than 18 years ago. Almost embarrassing I have to point that out to you. It's called the Internet, you may have heard of it.
So you're backing off on your statement?
It's amazing how much of a moron you strive to be.
I'm amazed you can spell moron.
Keep ignoring 16 years of data for an easily disproved sample from two decades ago just because your favorite team had a relatively mediocre recruiting class and you have to justify it to yourself somehow. :thumbup:
Wow, talk about going off the deep end. :lmao:

 
No wonder Ole Miss has had such great recruiting classes lately.  One has to wonder how much they are paying the #1 QB recruit Shea Patterson?  Queue the 5yr NCAA investigation that will result in a minor punishment long after all the current coaches & players are gone.

 
No wonder Ole Miss has had such great recruiting classes lately.  One has to wonder how much they are paying the #1 QB recruit Shea Patterson?  Queue the 5yr NCAA investigation that will result in a minor punishment long after all the current coaches & players are gone.
Several predicted this would happen....I don't think anyone expected it to be this quick :lol:

 
@gump

Are you following any of this  Najee Harris fiasco?  I haven't been entertained this much in a while.  It even has a bit of the "flight tracking" element to it :lmao:   

I'd be shocked if he ended up anywhere other than Alabama though :kicksrock:  

 
@gump

Are you following any of this  Najee Harris fiasco?  I haven't been entertained this much in a while.  It even has a bit of the "flight tracking" element to it :lmao:   

I'd be shocked if he ended up anywhere other than Alabama though :kicksrock:  
Definitely a first for me!  Recruit flight tracking plus he's so quiet everyone is resorting to over-reacting to his boy Tua's quotes instead...

 
The Sooners added to their 2017 recruiting class on Thursday with a verbal commitment from four-star offensive tackle Adrian Ealy from Gonzales, La.

The 6-foot, 7-inch, 300-pound offensive lineman becomes the 24th member of the Sooners’ 2017 class that is rated anywhere from fourth to sixth depending on which recruiting service you follow.
OU also has a top 15 WR coming in named Charleston Rambo

That's a football name right there. 

 
According to 247 Sports, Ohio State has the highest rated class ever since it has tracked.  The previous high was 94.  OSU at 96 after Okudah.  There are currently 7 or 8 5 stars in that class depending on what site you use. :excited:

 
According to 247 Sports, Ohio State has the highest rated class ever since it has tracked.  The previous high was 94.  OSU at 96 after Okudah.  There are currently 7 or 8 5 stars in that class depending on what site you use. :excited:
Maybe that will help them score more than 0 points next time they play clemson. 

 
According to 247 Sports, Ohio State has the highest rated class ever since it has tracked.  The previous high was 94.  OSU at 96 after Okudah.  There are currently 7 or 8 5 stars in that class depending on what site you use. :excited:
That's not so much the class ranking, but the average ranking of the committed players.  OSU is still at 94.62, which is #1 at the moment, but they've fallen behind Bama for the #1 class for now 310 - 308.  

OSU has 20 commits now, bama has 24.  How many more is OSU going to take?  I think Bama can only take 3 more.  

:nerd: :nerd:

 
That's not so much the class ranking, but the average ranking of the committed players.  OSU is still at 94.62, which is #1 at the moment, but they've fallen behind Bama for the #1 class for now 310 - 308.  

OSU has 20 commits now, bama has 24.  How many more is OSU going to take?  I think Bama can only take 3 more.  

:nerd: :nerd:
Not much left, they are just too young.  Still waiting to see what Marvin does.  Okudah and Browning have been teasing they have him this week.  :shrug:

Fun time of year.

 
Not much left, they are just too young.  Still waiting to see what Marvin does.  Okudah and Browning have been teasing they have him this week.  :shrug:

Fun time of year.
Marvin Wilson?  Everything I hear is that it's between LSU and FSU.  And, yes, I'm irrationally excited about tomorrow.  Not taking off of work like some of these lunatics, but I'll be checking in often.   Then  :banned:

 
Marvin Wilson?  Everything I hear is that it's between LSU and FSU.  And, yes, I'm irrationally excited about tomorrow.  Not taking off of work like some of these lunatics, but I'll be checking in often.   Then  :banned:
Yes.  Not likely, but a possibility for a big flip surprise tomorrow.  They have 3 big time TX recruits that all know each other, and word is Marvin, Browning and Okudah are super close.  Dobbins is a friend as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Checking 247 Sports, they show Marvin still leaning LSU but the latest crystal ball projections have been tOSU. . . :excited: :unsure:

 
That's not so much the class ranking, but the average ranking of the committed players.  OSU is still at 94.62, which is #1 at the moment, but they've fallen behind Bama for the #1 class for now 310 - 308.  

OSU has 20 commits now, bama has 24.  How many more is OSU going to take?  I think Bama can only take 3 more.  

:nerd: :nerd:
I think we can take 4-5 more.  3 5-stars still on the board...a lot of confidence in 2 of them, with Solomon as a big ?.

 
I think we can take 4-5 more.  3 5-stars still on the board...a lot of confidence in 2 of them, with Solomon as a big ?.
How is that possible?  Haven't ya'll taken a full class every year for years?  How can you take 28 or 29?  I thought 3 was a stretch.  Just greyshirting and processing?

 
12 early enrollees is a big part of it.
OK.  I'm gonna ask, bc I honestly don't know, but don't early enrollees only count back to spots left open from last year if there are spots left open from last year?  There's still only 85 scholarships at any given time right?  I'm aware every program has some attrition, but damn.

 
OK.  I'm gonna ask, bc I honestly don't know, but don't early enrollees only count back to spots left open from last year if there are spots left open from last year?  There's still only 85 scholarships at any given time right?  I'm aware every program has some attrition, but damn.
Saban boots a bunch of kids. Most schools won't do it but that's why he can take those numbers. 

Edit: it has nothing to do with early enrollees. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, early enrollees do nothing.  OSU has 9 this time, as well.  All about kicking off the roster and transfers.

 
OK.  I'm gonna ask, bc I honestly don't know, but don't early enrollees only count back to spots left open from last year if there are spots left open from last year?  There's still only 85 scholarships at any given time right?  I'm aware every program has some attrition, but damn.
We also lost 3 QBs this year (of 4 total) from Schollys....a bunch of graduations...nothing odd going on other than he manages his 'roster' extremely closely.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top