They’re the underdog no doubt. But I do see them winning. It’s a tough road for sure and if forced I’d have to put my money on N.O. But it’s far from a lock. 60/40 Saints imo.Don't see the Rams winning this unfortunately.
Saints-34
Rams-26
I came in to post about Rankins. He's out, and that is going to hurt the Saints ability to stop the run/control the clock. Huge loss.I am a Saints fan, but last week I brought up the fact that the Saints have been sluggish offensively down the stretch. Some argued that was cherry picking and that they would score 31 or more easily. They started slowly, but their defense stepped up and kept the game close. Still, they only scored 20 points at home in the win.
The Rams had their way running the ball against a fairly good defensive front of the Cowboys and yes, the Saints are better defensively. However, Sheldon Rankins, one of their top defensive linemen and an excellent run stopper may not play. I think that the Rams will be able to establish a run game and this one is going to be a struggle, likely lower scoring that most expect particularly since the Rams are 2nd in scoring and the Saints 3rd.
I expect this game is going to be very close and hope that Brees and the Saints are in position to make a play late to secure the win. Go Saints, but like someone said earlier go hard from the jump start or this one could get away.
There's serious depth at that position. It sucks, but I don't think we miss a beat.I came in to post about Rankins. He's out, and that is going to hurt the Saints ability to stop the run/control the clock. Huge loss.
Only during Sean Payton's tenure. The Saints lost a few playoff games at home when Jim Mora was HC.Saints have never lost a playoff game at home, I like that.
Unfortunately this is a distinct possibility, MT is a beast and Peters has been massively disappointing this year. But with Talib back the truth is Peters won’t be as exposed and likely isn’t covering MT the majority of the time.Marcus Peters is about to get abused again by Mike. He should just shut up.
We'll Talib isn't what he once was. They're going to have to double Mike and see if that works. Brees will take advantage of that.Unfortunately this is a distinct possibility, MT is a beast and Peters has been massively disappointing this year. But with Talib back the truth is Peters won’t be as exposed and likely isn’t covering MT the majority of the time.
Bobby Hebert has been talking this up all week on the drive-time sports radio shows, as well. Fans in the Dome will be well aware of the need to keep up the noise between :45 and :15 on the play clock.One other item that has come out is that Payton has clued the fans in that apparently McVay calls out signals to Goff right up until he hits the 15 second mark before the snap, so he has suggested that the fans help out by raising the noise level pre LOS. Hopefully that pans out, sounds like a good idea.
Cheating?I expect the Saints to win this game the same way they won the NFC Championship Game back in 2009: with a field goal in overtime
Saints 31, Rams 28 (OT)
And I thought I was the only who noticed that. It doesn't help that he has flabby man boobs, which are impossible to not notice.Rams kick that ###. Payton continues to look like a woman in his grandma glasses. That's my prediction
After seeing this and who posted it I'm going drop a G on the Saints -2.5. Thanks!Rams win. look, Eagles had a nice lead last week, and probably should've won that game. and they didn't run the ball at all. they didn't even have a great offensive game but still nearly stole it..Rams will put up 35+ we know this.
the difference for me comes down to coaching,specifically, defensive coordinators. Wade Phillips >>>>> D. Allen..he's just WAY better. Suh is playing lights-out ball now, Talib is back, CJ Anderson has the freshest legs of any player in the playoffs. Rams have a chip on their shoulders about Payton and his smarmy, sarcastic remarks after the first meeting. revenge games area a beautiful thing ( see Giants 2007 season barely losing to NE final week of he season,beat them in the SB).
Rams 35-24.
I really like this call. I am going to go Rams 28, Saints 27I expect the Saints to win this game the same way they won the NFC Championship Game back in 2009: with a field goal in overtime
Saints 31, Rams 28 (OT)
Man, wouldn't that be something. The Saints losing Rankins hurts. They seem more limited now on offense without Kirkwood - Kamara, Thomas, and Ginn. But it is Brees and Payton so.Rams win this one by 13+. Easily control the game with Gurley and Anderson. LA blowout.
What did those guys have last week going into the Eagles @ Saints game?ZenoRazon said:Pickwatch is a place all those out there who pick games SU/ATS have their plays listed. 81% of these guys have the Saints winning SU. That is strong.
It's a nice thing in retrospect, but will have no bearing today. Today's game is an independent event.Have to like the fact Drew Brees has never lost a home playoff game.
Why is it the Lions have never played in a SB or the Browns? All those different players all those years just don't matter, while there are the Pats in how many SB's?What did those guys have last week going into the Eagles @ Saints game?
It's a nice thing in retrospect, but will have no bearing today. Today's game is an independent event.
Correct. The 1970s Steelers, 1980s 49ers, and 2000-10s Patriots didn't have decades of dominant history to draw upon when their dynasties got going. Especially the Steelers ... they had struggled for decades before Chuck Knoll, Terry Bradshaw, and the Steel Curtain hit town.Why is it the Lions have never played in a SB or the Browns? All those different players all those years just don't matter, while there are the Pats in how many SB's?
So you would feel the same if it was the Saints with Brees have lost six in a row NFC title games at home. No difference at all, none.....really?Correct. The 1970s Steelers, 1980s 49ers, and 2000-10s Patriots didn't have decades of dominant history to draw upon when their dynasties got going. Especially the Steelers ... they had struggled for decades before Chuck Knoll, Terry Bradshaw, and the Steel Curtain hit town.
If the "never loses a home playoff game" were meaningful, Drew Brees and the Saints could have slacked off on preparation this week and went and partied it up last night in the French Quarter with no ill effects. Brees being at home is not magic -- the team still has to prepare and execute successfully to beat the Rams.
No, I would indeed feel a lot different. No doubt about it. At the same time, I'd recognize that my feeling doesn't affect the outcome of the game.So you would feel the same if it was the Saints with Brees have lost six in a row NFC title games at home. No difference at all, none.....really?