What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official*** NFL Draft Thread 2005 (1 Viewer)

Sirius Radio just said Rodgers has lost $1 million so far per year.#1 = $3 million averagenow = about $2 million on average

 
Who will take Rodgers?9. Washington -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.10. Detroit -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.11. Dallas -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.12. San Diego --- LOL13. Houston -- Not a chance with Carr.14. Carolina -- Very doubtful for a win now team.15. Kansas City -- If they don't draft defense...16. New Orleans -- Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.17. Cincinnati -- Not a chance with Palmer. 18. Minnesota -- Not a chance with Culpepper.19. St. Louis -- Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.20. Dallas -- See above re: Parcells21. Jacksonville -- LOL22. Baltimore -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.23. Seattle -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.24. Green Bay -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.27. Atlanta -- LOL28. San Diego -- LOL29. Indianapolis -- LOL30. Pittsburgh -- LOL31. Philadelphia -- LOL32. New England -- LOLSomeone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.

 
Sirius Radio just said Rodgers has lost $1 million so far per year.

#1 = $3 million average

now = about $2 million on average
Click to expand...
Could be way more if they're not factoring in the signing bonus.
 
Who will take Rodgers?

9. Washington -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.

10. Detroit -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.

11. Dallas -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.

12. San Diego --- LOL

13. Houston -- Not a chance with Carr.

14. Carolina -- Very doubtful for a win now team.

15. Kansas City -- If they don't draft defense...

16. New Orleans -- Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.

17. Cincinnati -- Not a chance with Palmer.

18. Minnesota -- Not a chance with Culpepper.

19. St. Louis -- Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.

20. Dallas -- See above re: Parcells

21. Jacksonville -- LOL

22. Baltimore -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.

23. Seattle -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.

24. Green Bay -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.

25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?

26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.

27. Atlanta -- LOL

28. San Diego -- LOL

29. Indianapolis -- LOL

30. Pittsburgh -- LOL

31. Philadelphia -- LOL

32. New England -- LOL

Someone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.
Click to expand...
I'll say GB.
 
Who will take Rodgers?

9. Washington -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.

10. Detroit -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.

11. Dallas -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.

12. San Diego --- LOL

13. Houston -- Not a chance with Carr.

14. Carolina -- Very doubtful for a win now team.

15. Kansas City -- If they don't draft defense...

16. New Orleans -- Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.

17. Cincinnati -- Not a chance with Palmer.

18. Minnesota -- Not a chance with Culpepper.

19. St. Louis -- Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.

20. Dallas -- See above re: Parcells

21. Jacksonville -- LOL

22. Baltimore -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.

23. Seattle -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.

24. Green Bay -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.

25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?

26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.

27. Atlanta -- LOL

28. San Diego -- LOL

29. Indianapolis -- LOL

30. Pittsburgh -- LOL

31. Philadelphia -- LOL

32. New England -- LOL

Someone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.
Click to expand...
I think GB is the obvious choice.
 
Who will take Rodgers?

9. Washington -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.

10. Detroit -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.

11. Dallas -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.

12. San Diego --- LOL

13. Houston -- Not a chance with Carr.

14. Carolina -- Very doubtful for a win now team.

15. Kansas City -- If they don't draft defense...

16. New Orleans -- Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.

17. Cincinnati -- Not a chance with Palmer.

18. Minnesota -- Not a chance with Culpepper.

19. St. Louis -- Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.

20. Dallas -- See above re: Parcells

21. Jacksonville -- LOL

22. Baltimore -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.

23. Seattle -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.

24. Green Bay -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.

25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?

26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.

27. Atlanta -- LOL

28. San Diego -- LOL

29. Indianapolis -- LOL

30. Pittsburgh -- LOL

31. Philadelphia -- LOL

32. New England -- LOL

Someone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.
Click to expand...
Rodgers will go @ 10. DET isnt married to Harrington anymore. I don't agree that NO is a "win-now" team, and they very well could be trading up.

Maybe GB is making a move? Very doubtful.

 
Looking back on the Moss trade the Vikings look terible.

WR Randy Moss for MLB Nap Harris and WR Troy Williamson :P

THanks for giving the Packers the NFC North Title :D
Click to expand...
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Click to expand...
I'm sick of hearing how the Vikings screwed themselves in the Moss trade. Frankly I find it very similar to the Shaq trade. You have a one-of-a-kind athlete who literally can do things that no one else who plays that game can. Thus, the idea of equal value is preposterous. You're not going to get equal value in a trade for either of these guys because no one else can do what they can. What you should do (and the teams tried to do) is just hang on to the player. Of course things change drastically when the players in question don't want to play any more. Then you're in the crappiest position in the world. You have the ultimate weapon on your team BUT HE DOESN'T WANT TO PLAY. It's a lose/lose situation. If you keep him you bite a huge salary cap bullet and the guy won't even play to his full capability. Of course, if you trade him you're not going to receive equal value in return and he actually will start playing to his full capability for his new team. There really is no solution. That's why people like us can criticize and deride the Lakers and Vikings endlessly for what they did, because they could not have done anything right in their situations. So the Vikings traded Moss and received unequal value in return. Should we really be that surprised?
 
I guess Rodgers could go here...or maybe Detroit (although that makes little sense to me, with Harrington and Garcia). But I think Washington trades down if they want Rodgers.

 
Do you think SD is trying to trade with Wash to get MW?Any chance Brees gets moved here?Makes sense from both sides imo.

 
For all the Rodgers to Det and GB fans....do you forget that Detroit signed Garcia and GB is the ultimate win now team with a horrible defense? How do you justify Rodgers to either of those teams?

 
Who will take Rodgers?

9. Washington  -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.

10. Detroit  -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.

11. Dallas  -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.

12. San Diego  --- LOL

13. Houston  -- Not a chance with Carr.

14. Carolina  -- Very doubtful for a win now team.

15. Kansas City  -- If they don't draft defense...

16. New Orleans  --  Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.

17. Cincinnati  -- Not a chance with Palmer.

18. Minnesota  -- Not a chance with Culpepper.

19. St. Louis  --  Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.

20. Dallas  -- See above re: Parcells

21. Jacksonville  --  LOL

22. Baltimore  -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.

23. Seattle  -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.

24. Green Bay  -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.

25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?

26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.

27. Atlanta  --  LOL

28. San Diego  -- LOL

29. Indianapolis  -- LOL

30. Pittsburgh  -- LOL

31. Philadelphia  -- LOL

32. New England  -- LOL

Someone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.
Click to expand...
Rodgers will go @ 10. DET isnt married to Harrington anymore. I don't agree that NO is a "win-now" team, and they very well could be trading up.

Maybe GB is making a move? Very doubtful.
Click to expand...
The entire Saints Front Office and Haslett has their collective head firmly up Brooks' butt. No way that happens.
 
I'm in shock.Rodgers I would've at least understood.Even Merriman I wouldn't have minded.But CB is overrated in today's NFL. To pass up Mike Williams is ####### ######ed. I'm officially a Ravens fan first, Redskins fan second now.

 
Who will take Rodgers?

9. Washington -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.

10. Detroit -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.

11. Dallas -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.

12. San Diego --- LOL

13. Houston -- Not a chance with Carr.

14. Carolina -- Very doubtful for a win now team.

15. Kansas City -- If they don't draft defense...

16. New Orleans -- Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.

17. Cincinnati -- Not a chance with Palmer.

18. Minnesota -- Not a chance with Culpepper.

19. St. Louis -- Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.

20. Dallas -- See above re: Parcells

21. Jacksonville -- LOL

22. Baltimore -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.

23. Seattle -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.

24. Green Bay -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.

25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?

26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.

27. Atlanta -- LOL

28. San Diego -- LOL

29. Indianapolis -- LOL

30. Pittsburgh -- LOL

31. Philadelphia -- LOL

32. New England -- LOL

Someone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.
Click to expand...
Rodgers will go @ 10. DET isnt married to Harrington anymore. I don't agree that NO is a "win-now" team, and they very well could be trading up.

Maybe GB is making a move? Very doubtful.
Click to expand...
The entire Saints Front Office and Haslett has their collective head firmly up Brooks' butt. No way that happens.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Plus the Saints top three players are all in their prime right now. Very much a win now team.
 
I'm in shock.

Rodgers I would've at least understood.

Even Merriman I wouldn't have minded.

But CB is overrated in today's NFL. To pass up Mike Williams is ####### ######ed.

I'm officially a Ravens fan first, Redskins fan second now.
Click to expand...
:lmao: :lmao:
 
As I continue to use the draft selection of Mike Williams to reveal the true insight of a team...if Williams goes to Detroit, what does that say about Charles Rogers?The NFC North doesn't play any defense anyway. Why not line up Kevin Jones, Charles Rogers, Mike Williams, Roy Williams and Cory Schlesinger?Detroit lacks a good TE and a good third WR anyway. I think Williams might be the best pick for them here.

 
Who will take Rodgers?

9. Washington  -- Seems doubtful. Defensive player or Mike Williams.

10. Detroit  -- Don't see how they do that with Harrington and Garcia.

11. Dallas  -- Parcells has had his fill of young QBs with question marks.

12. San Diego  --- LOL

13. Houston  -- Not a chance with Carr.

14. Carolina  -- Very doubtful for a win now team.

15. Kansas City  -- If they don't draft defense...

16. New Orleans  --  Win now team. Don't think Rodgers fits their plans.

17. Cincinnati  -- Not a chance with Palmer.

18. Minnesota  -- Not a chance with Culpepper.

19. St. Louis  --  Martz won't think that far ahead. Win now team.

20. Dallas  -- See above re: Parcells

21. Jacksonville  --  LOL

22. Baltimore  -- They are SB contenders, they can't waste this pick.

23. Seattle  -- They'd get eaten alive considering their D problems.

24. Green Bay  -- Heir apparent for Favre is trendy, but they need so much D.

25. Washington -- Is it possible he slips this far?

26. Oakland -- I could see Oakland taking him, Collins is no long term answer.

27. Atlanta  --  LOL

28. San Diego  -- LOL

29. Indianapolis  -- LOL

30. Pittsburgh  -- LOL

31. Philadelphia  -- LOL

32. New England  -- LOL

Someone tell me what I'm missing here? I can't see more than one or two teams likely to take Rodgers.
Click to expand...
Rodgers will go @ 10. DET isnt married to Harrington anymore. I don't agree that NO is a "win-now" team, and they very well could be trading up.

Maybe GB is making a move? Very doubtful.
Click to expand...
The entire Saints Front Office and Haslett has their collective head firmly up Brooks' butt. No way that happens.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Plus the Saints top three players are all in their prime right now. Very much a win now team.
Click to expand...
I dont think Ive ever read an intelligent statement which had the phrase "head firmly up ______ butt".Three players in their prime does nothing to determine the path of a team's draft needs.

 
As I continue to use the draft selection of Mike Williams to reveal the true insight of a team...if Williams goes to Detroit, what does that say about Charles Rogers?

The NFC North doesn't play any defense anyway. Why not line up Kevin Jones, Charles Rogers, Mike Williams, Roy Williams and Cory Schlesinger?

Detroit lacks a good TE and a good third WR anyway. I think Williams might be the best pick for them here.
Click to expand...
:goodposting:
 
Skins must be figuring that BMW will still be available with their 25 pick they way he is falling. :excited: :lmao: Who actually thought he would go higher than Williamson agian. :lol:

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BobbyLayne
Has your team had 15 players on the IR in the 2024 season?
Replies
33
Views
3K
BobbyLayne
BobbyLayne
Yogibear
Yogi's 2025 Mock Draft (1st Round)
Replies
9
Views
1K
Leroy Hoard
Leroy Hoard
QuizGuy66
*** Just In Time! The annual worst thread in the Shark Pool - the 2025 QuizGuy66 Season Prediction Thread *** (feel free to drop your own)
Replies
8
Views
939
IHEARTFF
I

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top