Let's make it 24 for fun22 posts on this page so far and only 2 of them are actually "***Official*** Post Your 2016 Rookie Draft" posts.
Ok, 23 now.
I will not be part of the problem!Let's make it 24 for fun
Will Fuller at 1.04 = oofhttp://www67.myfantasyleague.com/2016/options?L=54079&O=17
Finished this one a few weeks back. My picks:
1.01 - Ezekiel Elliott
1.12 - Paul Perkins
2.06 - Tyler Boyd
3.11 - DeAndre Washington
4.11 - Sammie Coates
5.03 - Chris Conley
5.11 - Chris Hogan
We allow free agents to be drafted in the "rookie" draft each year. 12 team PPR, 25 roster spots in season, 35 in the off season
Yep, definitely gave that guy a lot of crap for that one.Will Fuller at 1.04 = oof
I am surprised in this draft that Coates lasted until the 4th....nice value there.http://www67.myfantasyleague.com/2016/options?L=54079&O=17
Finished this one a few weeks back. My picks:
1.01 - Ezekiel Elliott
1.12 - Paul Perkins
2.06 - Tyler Boyd
3.11 - DeAndre Washington
4.11 - Sammie Coates
5.03 - Chris Conley
5.11 - Chris Hogan
We allow free agents to be drafted in the "rookie" draft each year. 12 team PPR, 25 roster spots in season, 35 in the off season
Yeah and my buddy was drafting at the 5.03 and really wanted him, gave me the 5.03 and a 2017 3rd for Coates so I'm especially happy with that pick.I am surprised in this draft that Coates lasted until the 4th....nice value there.
Im not convinced that trading Coates for Conley and a future 3rd is something you'll still be happy about in 4-6 months...Yeah and my buddy was drafting at the 5.03 and really wanted him, gave me the 5.03 and a 2017 3rd for Coates so I'm especially happy with that pick.
Yeah, but if you look at my roster (http://www67.myfantasyleague.com/2016/options?L=54079&O=07&F=0001), how often do you think Coates will make it into my starting rotation? We don't even know for sure if this guy is going to put up many points (definitely could though). Keep in mind I'll have to cut that roster down to 25 players by the start of the season. That 2017 3rd rounder won't lose any value this season, and with the picks I've accumulated it could end up being part of a trade that lands me an even higher 1st rounder in the 2017 draft. That, the fact that I like Conley's upside, and the fact that I got Coates at the end of the 4th and moved up to a 3rd round pick made the trade make sense to me.Ben & Jerry's said:Yea I agree. You got a steal on Coates and now your buddy did too.
Anyone else surprised Josh Ferguson didn't get drafted in a 3 rounder?Finished this week. Dynasty, 20 man roster, PPR, 4pt QB
Obviously, I'm Knuckleheads
1.06 Michael Thomas
2.06 Tajae Sharpe
3.06 Pharoh Cooper
http://www61.myfantasyleague.com/2016/options?L=13236&O=17
There were several veterans chosen.Anyone else surprised Josh Ferguson didn't get drafted in a 3 rounder?
Not to me...he's getting a decent amount of timeshare/future starter buzz, and the other options in the back of round 1 aren't amazing.Washington is sneaking into the first round is surprising
If I were drafting purely off the players talent in a vacuum I think Perkins is more talented than Washington is, but I don't think they are that far apart. Both of them bother me with how they run high (Washington more than Perkins), I think Perkins has some sharper cuts. Both are good receiving RB. Neither impressed me with their pass protection, but Washington was worse than Perkins in this area imo.Paul perkins > hunter henry > boyd > jordan howard > washington
But hes crept into the early second
The reason i like henry over boyd is that i think boyd - who i really do like - has a ceiling in cincinatti that will keep him from getting the targets or red zone opportunities to be a wr1. Hes not going to be elite from his high ypa, either. But he should be a solid nfl receiver and could be a decent ff receiver too.While I am not that excited about Boyd I would take him over either of these guys
I think Henry is a better long term prospect as well, although I can understand avoiding drafting rookie TE because they take so long to become productive.
As we have discussed before Perkins has to deal with Shane Vereen. You seem to always forget about him.bostonfred said:Washington has to beat a young and somewhat effective murray. Perkins has to beat an old but more effective jennings. Either one could win the job with a strong preseason.
The other guys in new york are vereen and wiliams. It wouldnt shock me to see williams get cut. He just isnt good. Vereen is clearly slotted into the receiving back role, but for whatever reason he hasnt been used as a runner.
So i disagree that perkins is only a long term option. He has a very clear path to the job this year. Be better than jennings. Be as good as jennings. Stay healthier than jennings. Hes a really good runner and a good enough receiver to become a feature back and the competition around him is some of the worst in the league.
I feel the same way about michael thomas - people say its a murky situation and he has to beat out coleman and snead. What? No. Brees is so good he will get his yards and tds. Snead was the least worst option at wr last year. But hes not some insurmountable obstacle who will demand 100 targets. Hes about the easiest competition you could ask for.
Im not forgetting about vereen. I like vereen a lot and never understood why he didnt get more carries. But the giants made it pretty clear last year hes a receiving back. He had 61 rush attempts, 59 receptions and zero rushing touchdowns in a 16 game season where the backs around him were hardly keeping him out of the role. So what does deal with vereen mean?As we have discussed before Perkins has to deal with Shane Vereen. You seem to always forget about him.
Was not a mistake.Oh man Michael Thomas before Shepard jumps out at me as a mistake.
Was not insane.Too high for Thomas. I would take Derrick Henry before Thomas and Denver724 posted that someone in another league took Thomas before Doctson and that is insane.
You would be correct on that. Perfect ecample as to why NFL teams don't employ FF Forum posters as GMsWas not insane.