About the only thing keeping the rest of the world from just going in and taking Putin out are their nukes at this point. Pretty clear that, if we wanted to, we could go in and wipe out Russia’s military.@Biz_Ukraine_Mag: BREAKING: Red Cross says evacuation route from Mariupol offered by Russia was mined
Putin could use his nuke anytime he wants, but hasn't. IMO, this is just a threat to keep everyone on our side at bay.About the only thing keeping the rest of the world from just going in and taking Putin out are their nukes at this point. Pretty clear that, if we wanted to, we could go in and wipe out Russia’s military.
He’s just a bully, and we called him on his bluff, and he won’t do anything about it.Putin could use his nuke anytime he wants, but hasn't. IMO, this is just a threat to keep everyone on our side at bay.
Bozos is right....@christogrozev: This is not the worst part. In the phone call in which the FSB officer assigned to the 41st Army reports the death to his boss in Tula, he says they've lost all secure communications. Thus the phone call using a local sim card. Thus the intercept. https://twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1500970445889327118/photo/1
We haven't called his bluff yet. If we did that, we'd have NATO or at least EU troops in Ukraine in uniform. The only reason no army has stepped in to physically help Ukraine is because of the veiled nuclear threat Putin has made.He’s just a bully, and we called him on his bluff, and he won’t do anything about it.
Also, he may not be bluffing.We haven't called his bluff yet. If we did that, we'd have NATO or at least EU troops in Ukraine in uniform. The only reason no army has stepped in to physically help Ukraine is because of the veiled nuclear threat Putin has made.
This. Not sure how confident I am when the guy is purposefully targeting humanitarian corridors.Also, he may not be bluffing.
I mean, probably Putin is bluffing. But if he's not, the downside risks are . . . large. And we don't get a do-over if we misread him. If there's even a 5% chance that he'll really go nuclear, then escalating things on our end is pretty clearly -EV, and there's no way anybody can intelligently say that they're more than 95% sure that this is all a bluff.
I’m not entirely sure that he is. If we take a more active role in helping Ukraine and Russia is pushed out and humiliated, what do you think the consequences will ultimately be for Putin? Because I’d say the chances are much greater than zero that his people turn against him and overthrow him. And if you think Putin would lose everything before doing EVERYTHING in his power to retain it, then I think we have a different read on Putin.He’s just a bully, and we called him on his bluff, and he won’t do anything about it.
Makes sense that they would not have a stock market under communism.Fun fact that I did not fact check. So if fake news sue me.
The last time Russia shut down their stock market it did not re-open for 75 years.
I’m not entirely sure that he is. If we take a more active role in helping Ukraine and Russia is pushed out and humiliated, what do you think the consequences will ultimately be for Putin? Because I’d say the chances are much greater than zero that his people turn against him and overthrow him. And if you think Putin would lose everything before doing EVERYTHING in his power to retain it, then I think we have a different read on Putin.
Using store bought Garmin to navigate Russian helicopters
I have read previously (multiple times) that it must go through a chain of channels. I can’t verify that of course but I believe it.Not sure if this has been covered (or if anyone outside the Russian power structure even knows) but I just can't imagine that Putin has the ability to unilaterally launch a nuke.
I don't doubt that hes the decision maker, but I have to believe there's some officer somewhere who has to physically push a button/turn a key/pull a trigger (or multiple officers who have to confirm a launch code or something). And at the end of the day, I have to believe that person isn't gonna do that if they know they're only being ordered to because Putin is desperate and has nothing left to lose.
At least I hope that's the case.
God I hope so. My current nightmare is that the automated response system is still active (the 'dead man's switch' that automatically launches all the nukes if it detects a nuclear explosion within Russian territory). And that it hasn't be re-calibrated to the new borders. That is, Putin decides to nuke Kyiv, the Russian auto response detects it and classifies it as a nuke of Russian soil, then launches the stockpile. Would be just about the perfect bass-ackwards way to end this planet the way things are going.I have read previously (multiple times) that it must go through a chain of channels. I can’t verify that of course but I believe it.
Also, he may not be bluffing.
I mean, probably Putin is bluffing. But if he's not, the downside risks are . . . large. And we don't get a do-over if we misread him. If there's even a 5% chance that he'll really go nuclear, then escalating things on our end is pretty clearly -EV, and there's no way anybody can intelligently say that they're more than 95% sure that this is all a bluff.
I would guess the first use of nukes would be more tactical than “let’s ruin all the world’s major cities with ICBMs from submarines.” So for example if NATO got involved and started launching airplanes from a Polish airbase or a carrier group, those would probably be the first targets. And I wonder if the chain of command wouldn’t be so complicated for that kind of strike.God I hope so. My current nightmare is that the automated response system is still active (the 'dead man's switch' that automatically launches all the nukes if it detects a nuclear explosion within Russian territory). And that it hasn't be re-calibrated to the new borders. That is, Putin decides to nuke Kyiv, the Russian auto response detects it and classifies it as a nuke of Russian soil, then launches the stockpile. Would be just about the perfect bass-ackwards way to end this planet the way things are going.
The Doomsday Clock is 75 years old this year.
Its currently at 100 seconds to midnight - the closest to midnight it has ever been.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/the-doomsday-clock-is-now-75-and-its-still-ticking
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thebulletin.org/2022/02/bulletin-statement-on-russians-invasion-of-ukraine/amp/
Let's just agree to these terms and call it a day:
- Ukraine can pursue EU, but not NATO
- Crimea is Russia
- The two other regions can vote for their independence under UN monitored elections
- Russia pays reparations to Ukraine
- Ukraine agrees to some type of certain offensive weapon limits -- but gets additional defensive weapons from allies
- Finland joins NATO
- NATO increases its defense spending
- Some sanctions come off now -- others burn off over time
Jayrod said:4 hours ago, BobbyLayne said:
The Doomsday Clock is 75 years old this year.
Its currently at 100 seconds to midnight - the closest to midnight it has ever been.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/the-doomsday-clock-is-now-75-and-its-still-ticking
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thebulletin.org/2022/02/bulletin-statement-on-russians-invasion-of-ukraine/amp/
Expand
We are on the precipice of something possibly. I don't think it will happen, but the chance is higher than ever that is for sure.
@phildstewart: BREAKING - Fitch cuts Russia's rating, says debt default imminent - Reuters News
Pretty sure the folks who have been running the Doomsday Clock set it to 11:55pm in 1962. Reasonably sure.Closer than we were during Cuban Missile Crisis? I'll have to come back and read Bobby's links. Curious how the two compare.
I’m fine with it. I’ll pay a little more for whatever.What could go wrong?
U.S. COULD CUT OFF CHINESE FIRMS FROM AMERICAN EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE THEY NEED TO MAKE THEIR PRODUCTS IF THEY DEFY U.S. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS - COMMERCE SECRETARY TELLS NYT
https://twitter.com/deitaone/status/1501299498366246923?s=10
thanks, that reminds me...
hey man @Tom Servo I was off target here - when you posted that, maybe an hour before I had witnessed several posters on Reddit "debunk" the first video of a farmer hauling off an armoured vehicle. judging by the number of times we have seen video of farm equipment hauling off abandoned Russian tanks, APCs, AA Systems, et al, clearly I was duped.That’s from 2015 and in Russia but if a Ukrainian farmer gets inspired by seeing it then hell yeah man
Just curious where you found the links to these news stories.Quite a bit of Nazi influence still rampant in Ukraine.
https://www.opindia.com/2022/03/nato-shares-image-of-ukrainian-soldier-wearing-nazi-insignia-deletes-it-later/
https://en.as.com/en/2022/03/08/latest_news/1646777690_106699.html
what means this?
That whole Poland sending Migs to a US airbase for us to send them to Ukraine didn’t sound like a good idea to me. Apparently Poland announced that proposal without talking to the USA about it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/03/08/poland-mig-29-ukraine/Is there a full media article on this? I see it on the twitters but mig laundering is something I would like more info on.
This is the correct answer.The answer, obviously, is to send 27 green tractorsto Poland to tow them back to Ukraine, but does anyone ask me? No.
Since it was targeting, it'll miss the first half of the Potato Bowl.Will it be Bowl eligible?
Eh, don't sweat, it GB. TBH, I forgotten all about this.thanks, that reminds me...
hey man @Tom Servo I was off target here - when you posted that, maybe an hour before I had witnessed several posters on Reddit "debunk" the first video of a farmer hauling off an armoured vehicle. judging by the number of times we have seen video of farm equipment hauling off abandoned Russian tanks, APCs, AA Systems, et al, clearly I was duped.
kind of makes you wonder if the Ruskies have people actively working message boards and social media trying (futilely IMO - Ukraine is crushing owning the narrative, which is little solace for the 1,500 or so civilians who have beenkilledmurdered) to push their point of view.
anyway, my bad, I was probably wrong in my post on 2/27.