Chaos Commish
Footballguy
So not very long could be years. Got it. Zelensky said as much today.It depends on how long Russia wants to keep sending its soldiers to die, really. It’s certainly not going to be permanent, that’s sure.
So not very long could be years. Got it. Zelensky said as much today.It depends on how long Russia wants to keep sending its soldiers to die, really. It’s certainly not going to be permanent, that’s sure.
I wonder what the make up of the separatist groups are. Are they ethnically Ukrainian or Russian? I am sure there is no 100% answer to that but I do wonder if they are overwhelmingly Russian and if not, I wonder what the Ukrainian motives are to be in those groups.I had a few Mosins during the relic collecting years. I even wrote about it a bit in the long firearms thread here. It's just DPR troops cleaning off the cosmoline. That's Ukrianian citizen separatists and their only duty is to defend their towns. The Russian army is not using Mosins.
I’m not a clairvoyant, but people far smarter than I said it could take years for this to end. It’ll take less if someone in Russia grows a set and rids themselves of Vlad.So not very long could be years. Got it. Zelensky said as much today.
I’ve got a perfectly good French WW2 rifle for sale. It’s only been thrown down once.What a shocker that France thinks that surrender is the best option.
True story, I’ve been hunting with an old Winchester .30-30 that was the only thing that survived a house fire near my grandpa’s farm in WV. Still fired, I even shot my only deer with it. Still, that’s against an animal, not another human with superior weaponry pointed back at me.I’ve got a perfectly good French WW2 rifle for sale. It’s only been thrown down once.
And it’s still better than “follow that man with a rifle, when he goes down, pick up his rifle and keep moving forward”. Not much but a little.It predates the M1 Garand. If you were handed an M1 an told to march into Canada where the military has been getting chewed up... you are telling me you would be pumped up?
Geez... I don't even know which war the Mosin Nagant was first used. Well before WWI for sure. Heck, it probably served in the Russo-Japanese War we have touched on earlier.
No matter how effective the weapon was... it is still a weapon from the 19th Century.
You forgot the "and if you retreat we will shoot you"And it’s still better than “follow that man with a rifle, when he goes down, pick up his rifle and keep moving forward”. Not much but a little.
With the exception of having hair, he sure looks like a cancer patient there. Since the reasons for a coup are military failures (for the most part), I'm not sure how to take this. His PM is a hawk like him and would legally replace him temporarily. If better military minds want him out, because military failure leads to Russia's collapse, what are they planning? Something other than failure I should think. Unintended consequences could be bad here.
To his point that Russia hasn't found a response to Finland and Sweden applying for Nato... Erdogon is saying no to both.
Yea.... I can't see any other Russian that would continue to go all in with a pair of 2's when everyone knows your hand and you can't bluff but Putin won't push back from the table.I’m not a clairvoyant, but people far smarter than I said it could take years for this to end. It’ll take less if someone in Russia grows a set and rids themselves of Vlad.
Key Takeaway: Russian President Vladimir Putin likely intends to annex occupied southern and eastern Ukraine directly into the Russian Federation in the coming months. He will likely then state, directly or obliquely, that Russian doctrine permitting the use of nuclear weapons to defend Russian territory applies to those newly annexed territories. Such actions would threaten Ukraine and its partners with nuclear attack if Ukrainian counteroffensives to liberate Russian-occupied territory continue. Putin may believe that the threat or use of nuclear weapons would restore Russian deterrence after his disastrous invasion shattered Russia's conventional deterrent capabilities.
Turkey being Turkey.With the exception of having hair, he sure looks like a cancer patient there. Since the reasons for a coup are military failures (for the most part), I'm not sure how to take this. His PM is a hawk like him and would legally replace him temporarily. If better military minds want him out, because military failure leads to Russia's collapse, what are they planning? Something other than failure I should think. Unintended consequences could be bad here.
To his point that Russia hasn't found a response to Finland and Sweden applying for Nato... Erdogon is saying no to both.
The debate over this has been educational and kinda wild. Comments in that link touch on it.
Russian empty threat incoming…@KyivIndependent:️Finland officially announces that it will apply for NATO membership.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto and Prime Minister Sanna Marin made the announcement at a joint news conference.
Vladimir Putin - your Showcase Showdown bid was a quick victory over Ukraine and preventing others from joining NATO. Showcase showdown price is....UKRAINE IS STILL FIGHTING AND FINLAND WILL JOIN NATO.@KyivIndependent:️Finland officially announces that it will apply for NATO membership.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto and Prime Minister Sanna Marin made the announcement at a joint news conference.
Sweden is looking at joining too, though Turkey looks to be recalcitrant about it.Vladimir Putin - your Showcase Showdown bid was a quick victory over Ukraine and preventing others from joining NATO. Showcase showdown price is....UKRAINE IS STILL FIGHTING AND FINLAND WILL JOIN NATO.
Mr. Putin, you are OVER!!
Yup, Sweden was right after Finland and it has been expected that they would be a package deal.Sweden is looking at joining too, though Turkey looks to be recalcitrant about it.
the threats empty or not, are russia has "no choice" but to use tactical nukes should nato bases be established in finland or sweden. "no choice" was used for weeks leading up to the invasion. dangerous times.Russian empty threat incoming…
Russia isn’t going to do anything, because they are bullies, and now the world knows how cowardly they truly are. They have no friends of significance in the region(Belarus is a puppet state, it doesn’t count), and even China is keeping at least some distance while still spouting off their rhetoric. They’re not going to rescue Russia, and Russia won’t use nukes, because to do so is a death sentence for Moscow and the nearest 2 time zones. I know Vlad has claimed that he’s fine with taking as many as he can with him, but he’s not suicidal. Genocidal, but not suicidal. All he has are empty threats, and his army dying by the scores.the threats empty or not, are russia has "no choice" but to use tactical nukes should nato bases be established in finland or sweden. "no choice" was used for weeks leading up to the invasion. dangerous times.
Putin says the Nordic countries to NATO is "no problem".the threats empty or not, are russia has "no choice" but to use tactical nukes should nato bases be established in finland or sweden. "no choice" was used for weeks leading up to the invasion. dangerous times.
Nobody tell Vlad what’s happened to a bunch of other Russian generals in this conflict.Putin involved in war ‘at level of colonel or brigadier’, say western sources
Welcome back to 1944 I guess?
That is out of context so not what he said. He said he has no problem with Finland and Sweden. As in, at the moment, ya know.Putin says the Nordic countries to NATO is "no problem".
Follow the story to Russian language media and that warning is a tactical nuclear threat.Vladimir Putin has said Russia has no issue with Finland and Sweden, but warned Moscow would react to the expansion of military infrastructure on their territories as both countries move closer to joining NATO.
Finland and Sweden have confirmed they will apply to join NATO despite warnings from Russia that it would be a "mistake" to do so.
Both countries have for decades considered that joining NATO would represent an unnecessary provocation of Moscow.
Just a couple days ago our DNI (director of national security) disagreed with you. She agreed at the moment there is no evidence Putin is about to use Nukes. She said he is settling in for a protracted war and focussing on the 8 year old objective in the Donbas and expanding his current Crimean landbridge to the separatists in Moldova. She then stated should Putin suspect an existential threat to his regime, or if he should come to believe Russia was losing, then his nuclear options would be in play.Russia isn’t going to do anything, because they are bullies, and now the world knows how cowardly they truly are. They have no friends of significance in the region(Belarus is a puppet state, it doesn’t count), and even China is keeping at least some distance while still spouting off their rhetoric. They’re not going to rescue Russia, and Russia won’t use nukes, because to do so is a death sentence for Moscow and the nearest 2 time zones. I know Vlad has claimed that he’s fine with taking as many as he can with him, but he’s not suicidal. Genocidal, but not suicidal. All he has are empty threats, and his army dying by the scores.
Someone else was better at being homicidal, suicidal and genocidal.I know Vlad has claimed that he’s fine with taking as many as he can with him, but he’s not suicidal. Genocidal, but not suicidal. All he has are empty threats, and his army dying by the scores.
Here’s the problem that I see: Russia is going to lose all of the territory they have attempted to steal from Ukraine, because they don’t have the manpower or the equipment to actually hold it. Now, Putin could see this as an “existential threat to his power” and could consider the use of nuclear weapons, but that means his own nation is destroyed in the process. I know he said he doesn’t care about a world without Russia, but I think he wants to stay alive. Opening that door dooms him and his supposed legacy, and I think he knows that.Just a couple days ago our DNI (director of national security) disagreed with you. She agreed at the moment there is no evidence Putin is about to use Nukes. She said he is settling in for a protracted war and focussing on the 8 year old objective in the Donbas and expanding his current Crimean landbridge to the separatists in Moldova. She then stated should Putin suspect an existential threat to his regime, or if he should come to believe Russia was losing, then his nuclear options would be in play.
Ukraine is determined to take back Crimea. The use of nuclear weapons is codified in Russian law should Crimea come under attack. Putin is moving to annex Donetsk, Luhansk and Kherson rather than establishing puppet statelets. In doing so they will fall under the same laws as Crimea.
People like hearing takes like yours. It feels good. It's what we want to be. It's the sugar-coated western narrative. But it isn't reflective of just how precarious this situation really is. Back to the DNI's recent grilling in DC, she said the next two months in the Donbas are gonna be ugly.
What if he really is terminally ill?Here’s the problem that I see: Russia is going to lose all of the territory they have attempted to steal from Ukraine, because they don’t have the manpower or the equipment to actually hold it. Now, Putin could see this as an “existential threat to his power” and could consider the use of nuclear weapons, but that means his own nation is destroyed in the process. I know he said he doesn’t care about a world without Russia, but I think he wants to stay alive. Opening that door dooms him and his supposed legacy, and I think he knows that.
I wonder if he has to say that, because admitting that those countries joining NATO is a problem is implicitly admitting that his invasion of Ukraine is a failure, or at least, is having unforeseen negative consequences.Putin says the Nordic countries to NATO is "no problem".
No no. He's not making suicidal statements. I've watched that show, I dunno, 2 dozen times. It is very common, not extremely rare as the twitterer states, for someone to "take the other side". It is all scripted. It is never live. It is approved by the state media apparatus before airing. So this piece is good news. Russian state media, with approval from above, is being truthful to the Russian people. In past shows where this same guy, or another opposing the war, gets time to make his points, he is regularly beat back with pro Russia bs. Of course, we don't get the rebuttals in that twit clip, but I've never heard such a definitive explanation of Russia's problems as that before. Nice.Sounds like a suicide in the making
https://twitter.com/francis_scarr/status/1526293852704890882/video/1
How?Now, Putin could see this as an “existential threat to his power” and could consider the use of nuclear weapons, but that means his own nation is destroyed in the process,
Then he had better make his peace while he can.What if he really is terminally ill?
By nuclear warheads being launched against Russia. The moment Vlad launches a nuke, there’s at least one on its way back.How?
Neither us nor Nato can simply press the button. Too much legal beauracracy in the way and too much debate about the right course of action. Because Russia sends a tactical nuke to a military installation near its border does in no way mean we go all psycho thermonuclear global war to end the world. Many analysts have made this point. It's the stupidest thing we could do. He has thousands more. I don't claim to know how we would respond militarily, just that we will not send one back instantly. The world will instantly be changed, and what's next everywhere unpredictable.By nuclear warheads being launched against Russia. The moment Vlad launches a nuke, there’s at least one on its way back.
Given what we've seen over the last few months in Ukraine, this is rhetorical, yes?Mariupol is about to fully fall. A rare "victory: for the Russians though the time and forces that were tied up holding the Aziovstol Steel Plant could be seen as a victory of sorts for the Ukranians.
Also, apparently unvonfirmed reports of a Russian operated S-300 anti-aircraft missiles were fired on Israeli F-16's duringa bombing raid in Syria. Reportedly there was never a radar lock so it wasn't in real danger. That is odd to me... why waste the S-300's without a radar lock? Are the Russians that incompetent? Was this a warning shot for Israel? Will they use the S-400's (in theatre) and actually target next time?
I mean... my first thought was that this had to be manned by Syrians but then looking at what has happened in Ukraine, I was caught myself... it is hard to reconcile 40 something years of belief that the Russians were peer or near peer to us to the complete ridiculous nature of their true capability as shown in Ukraine. I am continuously impressed with their incompetence.Given what we've seen over the last few months in Ukraine, this is rhetorical, yes?
Russia considers leaving WHO and WTO amongst other World organisations
It’s like Putin's goal is North Koreafication