The Biden administration has minimized leaks since it came to power. But now it’s watching U.S. officials tell reporters about the darkening prospects for Ukraine’s counteroffensive and military advice Kyiv ignored — in what appears to be the first deliberate and sustained unauthorized leak campaign during Biden’s presidency.
This is nothing like the spill of
classified materials on Discord or the administration’s purposeful downgrade of intelligence ahead of Russia’s invasion. Stories appearing in
the Washington Post, the
New York Times, the
Financial Times and
this newsletter, among others, all suggest one thing: Some people, somewhere in the bowels of government, want to pin Ukraine’s battlefield woes on Kyiv and deflect blame aimed at Washington.
Consider, for example, that multiple outlets reported on U.S. officials urging their Ukrainian counterparts to amass troops along one spot on the front with Russia to punch through it, instead of spreading forces thin along the 600-mile line.
Major authorized leaks need White House approval in this administration. Multiple officials anonymously told NatSec Daily that no green light was given, which National Security Council spokesperson Watson also supported on the record. “There is no coordinated leak campaign. Ukrainian forces are fighting heroically to defend their country and the only thing we are focused on is putting Ukraine in the best possible position to do that,” she said.
Some positive news for Ukraine is getting out. One senior defense intelligence official, requesting anonymity to discuss internal assessments, told us that Chief of the Russian General Staff Gen.
VALERY GERASIMOV is “aggressively incompetent,” and his successful political maneuvering to retain his status signals that the Russian strategy is unlikely to change in any major way.
As for the more negative stories, dogged reporters, of course, could be talking to the same aides, who are more than happy to see their message spread around. It’s also natural that after one outlet reports a juicy nugget, others follow to confirm it, leading to an echo the original sources may never have intended.
But the reports have remarkably similar details and specific scenes. The NYT wrote about an Aug. 10 video teleconference in which Joint Chiefs Chair Gen.
MARK MILLEY, alongside the top U.S. military official in Europe and his British counterpart, convinced the senior-most Ukrainian Gen.
VALERIY ZALUZHNYY to focus on one main front.
Three U.S. officials, who like others spoke to us without authorization, said they believe Pentagon staffers — likely without the comms shop’s say so — are talking to the press out of turn, citing the above anecdote and a
NatSec Daily edition on Milley’s war views last week as evidence (rest assured, we never reveal sources). Two others theorized that the leaks were coming from the intelligence community, especially since an assessment’s details reached WaPo (though that story noted the intelligence was briefed “to some Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill”).
If there’s one thing NatSec Daily knows for sure, it’s that unauthorized leaks drive this White House crazy, especially if they hint Biden isn’t fully supportive of a friendly nation or is airing dirty laundry in public. They certainly won’t like the suggestion that the information may be designed to inoculate the administration from criticism should Ukraine’s counteroffensive fail. After all, the main takeaway from the stories is that America shares no responsibility for Kyiv’s wartime problems.
One U.S. official claimed any further leakers may soon look foolish: “It’s way too early to start pointing fingers or placing blame, because in a couple weeks, people may be scrambling to take credit.”