the first was clearly his faultAnd 0 INTs.Yup looked good and the offense looks to be pass heavy. He should have had a 2nd TD
Yeah agree should have been 2 TDs and one INTthe first was clearly his faultAnd 0 INTs.Yup looked good and the offense looks to be pass heavy. He should have had a 2nd TD
Hopefully you will learn from your mistake going forwardLOL, started Bradford over Rodgers in a league. Bradford did start looking pretty good in 2nd half though.
My b my b. Totally forgot about the first 1.Yeah agree should have been 2 TDs and one INTthe first was clearly his faultAnd 0 INTs.Yup looked good and the offense looks to be pass heavy. He should have had a 2nd TD
Howard Eskin
He was very good in the second halfWell the good news is he played a dog#### game and still scored 21 pts if you count the phantom Matthews TD.
(6 pts per TD pass)
Eagles will hopefully play better than they did tonight.
Bump for 2015If he can't get it done with the weapons he has now he never will. No more excuses, Sam.
The questions are sustainability of that frenetic pace, and getting Murray touches. Man they are scary good in spurts. Sproles looked great last night.LOL, started Bradford over Rodgers in a league. Bradford did start looking pretty good in 2nd half though.
You underestimate Brady and Big Bum.He's going to have some monster games this year. Only QBs with more upside are Luck and Rodgers and the Colts are a mess right now.
The Philadelphia Daily News "believes" Sam Bradford sprained his ankle in Monday night's loss, but that he was "walking normally afterward."
Bradford admitted to undergoing an X-ray, but insisted he was fine. Bradford's Week 2 status is not in any sort of doubt. It's just a reminder that, yes, this is a quarterback who's been hurt a number of times. Despite Monday's uneven performance, Bradford basically did everything fantasy owners could have hoped for, racking up attempts and yards. He's locked in as a QB1 for Sunday's grudge match with the Cowboys.
Source: Les Bowen on Twitter
Sep 15 - 1:34 PM
I didn't see the most recent game of Bradford playing with the Eagles. But yes I have noticed that Bradford does not often look off the defense. He also does not see defenders in this throwing lane sometimes, causing interceptions.I noticed he always looks in the direction he plans on throwing. He didn't scan the field. Right from the snap he would look directly where he wanted to throw it, and didn't scan the other side. Did anyone else notice that?
I hope you find something of more value to occupy your next hour of time than what this did for the last.I left work today and felt a little something, I won't reveal where but when I got home I went ahead and had some precautionary x-rays taken. Now folks I played a lot of football growing up and I can't remember too many games where any of us just had some precautionary x-rays taken. Can we drop the adjective and just call it what it was? "X-Rays" and they aren't precautionary, they are taken when players complain about possible broken bones. Usually a doctor or someone the NFL deems a medical professional probably pushed, poked, prodded and pulled a little at which point Sam Bradford went OWWWW!!! and they said we better take an x-ray.
Just as a precaution I rolled out of bed this morning and had some x-rays taken before my morning oatmeal, everything's fine, doesn't matter what I had scanned or looked out...everything's perfectly alright now, we're fine we're all fine here now, how are you?
yepAnd yet you think Manning is fine. Good to note.He stinks
Could also be NFL form of "babying" an injury prone guy made of glass and being sure on all accounts.I left work today and felt a little something, I won't reveal where but when I got home I went ahead and had some precautionary x-rays taken. Now folks I played a lot of football growing up and I can't remember too many games where any of us just had some precautionary x-rays taken. Can we drop the adjective and just call it what it was? "X-Rays" and they aren't precautionary, they are taken when players complain about possible broken bones. Usually a doctor or someone the NFL deems a medical professional probably pushed, poked, prodded and pulled a little at which point Sam Bradford went OWWWW!!! and they said we better take an x-ray.
Just as a precaution I rolled out of bed this morning and had some x-rays taken before my morning oatmeal, everything's fine, doesn't matter what I had scanned or looked out...everything's perfectly alright now, we're fine we're all fine here now, how are you?
Yep. Very impressed with Dan Quinn. He had his team ready to play. We'll see how he continues to look as a HC, but that gameplan was solid on both sides.ShaHBucks said:I'm More impressed with Atlanta's defense than down on Bradford. He looked fine. He'll get his numbers.
Part of that is the offense. Ball comes out fast, the routes and progressions are based on that timeframe so you just wont see Kelly's QBs looking back across the other side of the field very often.I noticed he always looks in the direction he plans on throwing. He didn't scan the field. Right from the snap he would look directly where he wanted to throw it, and didn't scan the other side. Did anyone else notice that?
If they are, they are probably doing it wrong.Part of that is the offense. Ball comes out fast, the routes and progressions are based on that timeframe so you just wont see Kelly's QBs looking back across the other side of the field very often.I noticed he always looks in the direction he plans on throwing. He didn't scan the field. Right from the snap he would look directly where he wanted to throw it, and didn't scan the other side. Did anyone else notice that?
this isn't accurate2010 - Brandon Gibson
2011 - Gibson, then Brandon Lloyd
2012 - Amendola
2013 - Austin
Bradford has a history of zeroing in on certain receivers.
Thanks, sorry, was trying to remember that. And 2013 my theory may not match up as I'm not really sure there was one dominant player, but Givens may have been the main receiver in 2013, you're right. Anyway, agreed. - eta - I think it was Mark Clayton I was thinking of, not Gibson. Between Clayton, Amendola & Lloyd, especially, I remember games where Bradford honed in on one receiver for 10+ targets in several games.this isn't accurate2010 -Brandon GibsonAmendola
2011 -Gibson, thenBrandon Lloyd
2012 - Amendola
2013 -AustinGivens
Bradford has a history of zeroing in on certain receivers.
It'd be Amendola, Lloyd, Amendola then Givens(Cook)
84%. 82% in third quarter, 86% in fourth. 25 attempts second halfDespite playing in the preseason, it would be understandable if he was rusty, first regular season action in nearly 23 months.
Didn't vet the stat, but I think Nate Burleson noted an 85% completion percentage in the second half.
And of the incompletions how many were drops?84%. 82% in third quarter, 86% in fourth. 25 attempts second halfDespite playing in the preseason, it would be understandable if he was rusty, first regular season action in nearly 23 months.
Didn't vet the stat, but I think Nate Burleson noted an 85% completion percentage in the second half.
You can't fix stupid.Dropped him? He's 100% owned in mfl leagues
Boring conversation anyway...everything's perfectly alright now, we're fine we're all fine here now, how are you?
Your concerns about injury are valid. To suggest Philly is short of good receiving options is ridiculous. The first half was rusty-Bradford. Hadn't played in 2 years. Second-half Bradford is what he'll be this year. Don't forget, the second interception went right through Matthews' hands. Should have been yet another completion. Plus, Matthews got in the end zone for a touchdown that the ref missed. Had over 200 yards and two touchdowns in a half of football.started him against ATL, dropped him for terrance williams. he will have some great games but will also do nothing against teams with a good run defense that double team matthews. he threw 50 some times and the numbers werent good, above average QB with below average pass catchers (story of his career). what worries me is he doesnt scan the field, a blitzer is going to blindside him and i dont want him on my active roster when it knocks him out of the game. latest report is the "precautionary" xray ankle is the severly swollen.
Guessed right and went Brady last week. I'm going Bradford this week. Not crazy about Brady on the road in Buffalo.Brady or Bradford next week?
No brainer. Brady might get killed this week.Guessed right and went Brady last week. I'm going Bradford this week. Not crazy about Brady on the road in Buffalo.Brady or Bradford next week?
he was outscored by jameis winston... you dont get points for potential. hes hobbled and the schedule gets harder from here, ill be amazed if he is in the top 20 after the dallas game. rather use that bench spot on someone i might actually use.You can't fix stupid.Dropped him? He's 100% owned in mfl leagues
Your league mates thank you.Plus I'm not sure what scoring system you're league uses but Bradford is well ahead of Jameis in all of mine.he was outscored by jameis winston... you dont get points for potential. hes hobbled and the schedule gets harder from here, ill be amazed if he is in the top 20 after the dallas game. rather use that bench spot on someone i might actually use.You can't fix stupid.Dropped him? He's 100% owned in mfl leagues