89% on Yahoo too50% owned? What is this a 2 team league? He is 98% owned in MFL Leagues and 85% owned in CBS Leagues. What planet are you on? I feel like the guy in your avatar.
Not sure if a no brainer but I am starting Bradford over Brady in W2. For Brady, I can see Buffalo (Rex) grinding the game out and limiting NE's offensive plays as to not expose the young QB (Taylor) to try to win it for them; also, I can see Belichick being Belichick and pulling the ol' reverse-a-roo from W1 and pound the ball with Blount (back) / Lewis and not expose his ancient QB to too many hits. As for Bradford, I can see Philly (Chip) wanting to try to see if he can run 100 plays in their home opener against a hated rival. Bradford's line will be about the same as last week's with a couple more TDs: 35/50/340/3/-1. Brady's line will be: 20/27/260/2/-1.No brainer. Brady might get killed this week.Guessed right and went Brady last week. I'm going Bradford this week. Not crazy about Brady on the road in Buffalo.Brady or Bradford next week?
10 team league on nfl.com. He is 50% owned and sitting on the waiver in both my leagues. you guys act like bradford is some unknown waiting to breakout. Foles took that roster and beat the damn seahawks, bradford threw FIFTY passes and put up nothing on a bad falcons defense. That was his ceiling for passes and murray wont finish every game with 10 yards.shadyridr said:50% owned? What is this a 2 team league? He is 98% owned in MFL Leagues and 85% owned in CBS Leagues. What planet are you on? I feel like the guy in your avatar.
lol.10 team league on nfl.com. He is 50% owned and sitting on the waiver in both my leagues. you guys act like bradford is some unknown waiting to breakout. Foles took that roster and beat the damn seahawks, bradford threw FIFTY passes and put up nothing on a bad falcons defense. That was his ceiling for passes and murray wont finish every game with 10 yards. Look at his schedule to end the year if he even makes it through the season, im jumping off when i hear the wheels creaking not after they come off.shadyridr said:50% owned? What is this a 2 team league? He is 98% owned in MFL Leagues and 85% owned in CBS Leagues. What planet are you on? I feel like the guy in your avatar.
If you are jumping off the Bradford bandwagon because you are scared of injury, I get that. That is a valid concern.10 team league on nfl.com. He is 50% owned and sitting on the waiver in both my leagues. you guys act like bradford is some unknown waiting to breakout. Foles took that roster and beat the damn seahawks, bradford threw FIFTY passes and put up nothing on a bad falcons defense. That was his ceiling for passes and murray wont finish every game with 10 yards.shadyridr said:50% owned? What is this a 2 team league? He is 98% owned in MFL Leagues and 85% owned in CBS Leagues. What planet are you on? I feel like the guy in your avatar.
Look at his schedule to end the year if he even makes it through the season, im jumping off when i hear the wheels creaking not after they come off.
Same here. Hopefully, Murray scores on a screen pass like last week. I can see 4 or 5 TDs from the Eagles' offense, so hopefully a few of them come from Bradford passes.thinking Sammy over Brady this week, just worry that Murray is going to be the star of the game but worth a shot.
And I don't get it. Because if you were scared of injury, what were you doing even looking at Bradford to begin with? If you drafted him, you knew what you were getting in for, and dropping him after one week just shows you don't have the nerves to have made the pick in the first place. Be risk-averse or be risk-willing, but changing your stance after one week is funny. The sad kind of funny.If you are jumping off the Bradford bandwagon because you are scared of injury, I get that. That is a valid concern.
Sam Bradford's final Week 1 box score showed 336 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He should've had another touchdown on a play where Jordan Matthews clearly reached inside the pylon, but the officials missed it and the up-tempo Eagles hurried back to the line to execute a goal-line carry. Although Bradford's performance was ultimately imperfect, I saw what I needed to see to keep treating him as an every-week QB1. In Week 2, he'll face an injury-riddled Dallas defense missing top CB Orlando Scandrick (ACL/MCL) and nickel rusher Randy Gregory (ankle).
Bradford's Week 1 target distribution: Jordan Matthews 13; Sproles 9; Zach Ertz 8; Murray 5; Riley Cooper and Ryan Mathews 4; Miles Austin and Josh Huff 3; Nelson Agholor 2; Brent Celek 1. ... Matthews left yards and the aforementioned TD on the field in last Monday night's loss to Atlanta, but still emerged with a 10-102 receiving line, playing 85% of the snaps. Matthews should make a run at WR1 numbers this season and is a chalk play versus Dallas, which uses second-year UDFA Tyler Patmon at slot corner. Patmon stands 5'10/179 to J-Matt's 6'3/212. Matthews is a matchup nightmare as Bradford's go-to guy. ...
He has a Redskins avatar. He's not speaking of Bradford as a fantasy player, he's speaking of him as a NFC East rival. Of course he's going to talk bad about him. In a division with Eli, Romo, and Bradford, he has Cousins and RG3. That has to hurt.And I don't get it. Because if you were scared of injury, what were you doing even looking at Bradford to begin with? If you drafted him, you knew what you were getting in for, and dropping him after one week just shows you don't have the nerves to have made the pick in the first place. Be risk-averse or be risk-willing, but changing your stance after one week is funny. The sad kind of funny.If you are jumping off the Bradford bandwagon because you are scared of injury, I get that. That is a valid concern.
I agree totally with what you are saying about drafting him in the first place. He did mention that he thought Bradford had a bad ankle after Monday's game so I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. However, why you have to cut him vs. benching him for a week to see how is ankle is I don't quite get. Assuming Bradford is healthy after this week two, is there a better back-up out there than Bradford? Maybe if it is a five team league.And I don't get it. Because if you were scared of injury, what were you doing even looking at Bradford to begin with? If you drafted him, you knew what you were getting in for, and dropping him after one week just shows you don't have the nerves to have made the pick in the first place. Be risk-averse or be risk-willing, but changing your stance after one week is funny. The sad kind of funny.If you are jumping off the Bradford bandwagon because you are scared of injury, I get that. That is a valid concern.
I'm pretty sure he's lying. Because he then said he's only owned in 50" of leagues. He's owned in 88% of Yahoo leagues.dhockster said:I agree totally with what you are saying about drafting him in the first place. He did mention that he thought Bradford had a bad ankle after Monday's game so I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. However, why you have to cut him vs. benching him for a week to see how is ankle is I don't quite get. Assuming Bradford is healthy after this week two, is there a better back-up out there than Bradford? Maybe if it is a five team league.Junior McSpiffy said:And I don't get it. Because if you were scared of injury, what were you doing even looking at Bradford to begin with? If you drafted him, you knew what you were getting in for, and dropping him after one week just shows you don't have the nerves to have made the pick in the first place. Be risk-averse or be risk-willing, but changing your stance after one week is funny. The sad kind of funny.dhockster said:If you are jumping off the Bradford bandwagon because you are scared of injury, I get that. That is a valid concern.
I'm not making any promises. I'm enjoying making fun of him.Can we all just agree to disagree with rimez about Bradford rather than arguing with him for thre rest of the season?
No brainer. Brady might get killed this week.Guessed right and went Brady last week. I'm going Bradford this week. Not crazy about Brady on the road in Buffalo.Brady or Bradford next week?
Most draft rankings had him ranked between 15-20. If he gives a few good matchup performances then it's just icing on the cake for most people who drafted him.This guy is not a QB1, he's a matchup play at best
People were on here saying he would be top 5, lol.Most draft rankings had him ranked between 15-20. If he gives a few good matchup performances then it's just icing on the cake for most people who drafted him.This guy is not a QB1, he's a matchup play at best
This guy is killing the Eagles offense. Chip should be very worried about his job.
the oline play and drops have way more to do with this performance than bradford, but it's the height of predictability there will be a thousand no-analysis "told ya so"s like this from people who made up their mind on bradford and aren't interested in understanding what happens on the field.This guy is killing the Eagles offense. Chip should be very worried about his job.
His average ranking among FBG staffers was 15.People were on here saying he would be top 5, lol.Most draft rankings had him ranked between 15-20. If he gives a few good matchup performances then it's just icing on the cake for most people who drafted him.This guy is not a QB1, he's a matchup play at best
He is very perceptive, unlike the fools who sat Brady this morning in favor of Sam 'I shredded the Packers D in preseason' Bradford.The "Shark" coach guy for MFL leagues has Bradford down for a massive 12 points in a 6 pt/td league this week. lmao. how is MFL still using that clown?
I know right.No brainer. Brady might get killed this week.Guessed right and went Brady last week. I'm going Bradford this week. Not crazy about Brady on the road in Buffalo.Brady or Bradford next week?