What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** Washington Redskins 2011 Offseason Thread (1 Viewer)

Extremeskins insiders reporting Jenkins is close. I will say that they haven't had their finger on the pulse of things as much as they have in recent years. It actually is a breath of fresh air. I do hope the Jenkins rumors are true though. I just hope it isn't for Charles Johnson type money.

 
Reports are the 'Skins have signed Donte Stallworth.
That probably closes the door on pursuing one of the top FA WRs. That would give them Moss, Armstrong, Hankerson, Stallworth, Kelly, Banks, Austin, Paul, and others.
Or maybe not. I thought he had been productive more recently. 19 receptions the last three years, largely due to injuries and suspension (jail?). I guess this more of a "Sure, let's take a chance on him and see what happens" signing rather than a "He'll round out our WR corp" signing.
Yeah, I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up being camp fodder. Probably just brought in as another veteran presence to help bring along the rookies through camp or beyond.
Exactly. It's a 1-year deal, that I would imagine is at or close to vet minimum. The Junkies just likened it to the Larry Johnson signing. Bring in a vet to give the young guys competition, and if he shows he still has something, bonus. Otherwise, no big loss when he's cut.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'dgreen said:
'Eastwood said:
'Harjiran said:
Skins re-sign Santana Moss to 3-year deal. :thumbup:
I'm happy, but I hope Moss can become a #2 and we get someone like Rice or Holmes to be a true #1. (unless Hankerson is that good)
I have my doubts whether either Rice or Holmes are true #1s. I'm not sure I want them to commit WR1 money to either one for the next several years.
I agree. These are the type of deals I want to avoid. They are not fully proven #1 receivers. I think we have bigger holes to fill first, especially considering the money they would command. Rice is a constant injury risk and Holmes is one F up away from a year suspension. I like the Moss signing. Short years and not big money.
Jets are keeping Holmes.
 
Cofield's contract is 6 years, $36 million; $11 million guaranteed.
Giants have till Friday to match, he's an RFA.
They have until Friday to convince Cofield to stay because he can't officially sign a deal until Friday.
If the team and a player/agent have a deal in principal like that, I would be shocked if one end pulled back on it barring any unforeseen circumstances. The last thing an agent would want is a team that spends like drunken sailors not want to do future business with you.
 
Cofield's contract is 6 years, $36 million; $11 million guaranteed.
Giants have till Friday to match, he's an RFA.
How can that be? He's a 5-year vet.
Just going by beat writer, Mike Garafolo's tweets about draft pick compensation. He could be mistaken.
Probably compensatory picks which are awarded by the NFL (not traded by another team) for losing UFAs.
 
Cofield's contract is 6 years, $36 million; $11 million guaranteed.
Giants have till Friday to match, he's an RFA.
They have until Friday to convince Cofield to stay because he can't officially sign a deal until Friday.
If the team and a player/agent have a deal in principal like that, I would be shocked if one end pulled back on it barring any unforeseen circumstances. The last thing an agent would want is a team that spends like drunken sailors not want to do future business with you.
I agree, but he'd be allowed to do so.
 
Looks like Mike Garafolo's tweet should have said "the Giants put up a fight for Cofield" not "the Giants are putting up a fight" Enjoy your sloppy seconds Skins, he's a good player.

 
Chris Russell tweets:

Just spke to #Redskins OT Jammal Brown. He says he is waiting on his agent, wants to return, but has ignored a lot of (703) calls ..More
Jammal Brown says "I love Coach Shanahan" and "this lockout has been great for me," -- He said he absolutely wants to come back, but price??
 
Looks like Mike Garafolo's tweet should have said "the Giants put up a fight for Cofield" not "the Giants are putting up a fight" Enjoy your sloppy seconds Skins, he's a good player.
A couple of other tweets re: Cofield today:
'ProFootballFocus]Barry Cofield might not be the best schematic fit in DC said:
Yes. Or NT. Wash thinks he's versatile. RT @ChrisSca @espn_nfceast could Cofield play a 3-4 defensive end?
 
Looks like Mike Garafolo's tweet should have said "the Giants put up a fight for Cofield" not "the Giants are putting up a fight" Enjoy your sloppy seconds Skins, he's a good player.
A couple of other tweets re: Cofield today:
'ProFootballFocus]Barry Cofield might not be the best schematic fit in DC said:
Yes. Or NT. Wash thinks he's versatile. RT @ChrisSca @espn_nfceast could Cofield play a 3-4 defensive end?
Per Cofield's agent:"The thing about Barry is he played (nose tackle) in college and he's a big-body guy, so he's one of the few interior guys who can go either inside or outside. He has some versatility," said McCartney, a former director of personnel for the Eagles. "The one thing he hasn't had a chance to do a lot of is get up the field, and I think the Redskins' coaches did a good job of saying, 'We're going to utilize you in a variety of ways.'"
 
Per Cofield's agent:

"The thing about Barry is he played (nose tackle) in college and he's a big-body guy, so he's one of the few interior guys who can go either inside or outside. He has some versatility," said McCartney, a former director of personnel for the Eagles. "The one thing he hasn't had a chance to do a lot of is get up the field, and I think the Redskins' coaches did a good job of saying, 'We're going to utilize you in a variety of ways.'"
:thumbup: Seeing that the 'Skins were in 4-man fronts basically as much as they were 3-man fronts last year, versatility is a great attribute to have.

I generally don't pay attention to much that Lavar has to say, but he's talking X's and O's here, plus he played a season w/ Cofield, so I'll just assume he knows better than me in this area :) :

Cofield looks deceptively compact, even though he’s listed at 6 feet 4 and 306 pounds. But he’s not built like a nose guard; he’s much smaller and better built.

He is athletic and tremendously strong, so if the Redskins would be able to line him up at nose guard for a couple plays at a time, I’m thinking. This maybe goes back to defensive coordinator Jim Haslett’s thought process: bring in durable, high-motor guys and get an athletic group of over achievers and let them tee off on centers all game long. I like it.

This would mean lining these undersize nose guards up on angles and in gaps so that they can use their strengths — speed and quickness — to possibly have the same results as a space eater.

If a tackle is quick enough upfield and strong enough to stay in his approach lanes, it can disrupt the whole flow of the offensive line, picking off pullers and disrupting pass protections. This allows blitzing linebackers or secondaries to have one-on-one matchups or overloads that would create free rushers.

This, in theory, is the same thing that a giant space eater does when he grabs a center and pushes him into the backfield. If this is what Haslett is banking upon, my biggest concern is how will he address the downhill running game, where a nose tackle will be directly attacked?

I’m not sure if undersize guys will be able to hold up week in and week out, but stay tuned: There will be more signings to come.
 
Given that almost everyone in the media was saying/writing that there would be no takers on a McNabb trade because everyone knew the Skins would cut him, I am actually happy they could get a couple 6th rounders for him.

 
Lavar better know his Giants.

#traitor

REALLY hope Portis doesn't go within the division. He should learn from Lavar's mistake and not burn any bridges at the end of his career.

(that was my first use of a hash tag, and yes, I feel a little slimy)

 
Given that almost everyone in the media was saying/writing that there would be no takers on a McNabb trade because everyone knew the Skins would cut him, I am actually happy they could get a couple 6th rounders for him.
Eh. Makes it petty, imo. Just show him some respect and cut him if that's what all we were going to settle for.
 
Lavar better know his Giants. #traitorREALLY hope Portis doesn't go within the division. He should learn from Lavar's mistake and not burn any bridges at the end of his career. (that was my first use of a hash tag, and yes, I feel a little slimy)
Lavarr didn't do the Giants any favors, ate up tons of cap$ and got injured.Pierce is the one that should sting a little.
 
Lavar better know his Giants. #traitorREALLY hope Portis doesn't go within the division. He should learn from Lavar's mistake and not burn any bridges at the end of his career. (that was my first use of a hash tag, and yes, I feel a little slimy)
Lavarr didn't do the Giants any favors, ate up tons of cap$ and got injured.Pierce is the one that should sting a little.
#### Pierce. He's a little #####.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Given that almost everyone in the media was saying/writing that there would be no takers on a McNabb trade because everyone knew the Skins would cut him, I am actually happy they could get a couple 6th rounders for him.
Eh. Makes it petty, imo. Just show him some respect and cut him if that's what all we were going to settle for.
Maybe I would be on board with that if McNabb was on board with wearing a wristband. Sorry, the Skins invested a lot and he failed to produce. I'm happy with whatever they can get considering word was they would not be able to get anything for him in return.
 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/27/personal-issues-not-money-now-holding-up-mcnabb-trade/

Personal issues, not money now holding up McNabb trade

Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on July 27, 2011, 10:36 AM EDT

It appears by all accounts that Donovan McNabb will likely be a Minnesota Viking sooner than later.

The most difficult part of completing the deal is not the trade compensation. The most logical sticking point was how to handle McNabb’s contract, but ESPN reports that the financial considerations are taken care of.

So why isn’t it a done deal just yet? Apparently McNabb isn’t thrilled with “how the Vikings side of the situation was handled.”

I grudgingly have to give Florio credit here. [Editor's note: Kiss my butt, Mr. Marbles.] He’s been saying all offseason that McNabb may not embrace a situation unless the red carpet is rolled out for him. The opposite seems to be happening in Minnesota.

It appears via multiple reports that McNabb may have been a backup plan in Minnesota to acquiring Tyler Thigpen. That could be tough news for McNabb to swallow. Even Christian Ponder’s ostensibly harmless quotes about competing to start could be viewed by McNabb as a threat when he wants the starting gig.

ESPN’s Adam Schefter compared the situation to all the commotion about the lockout late last week. After emotions subside, he fully expects McNabb to join the Vikings. Florio wonders via IM (remember, we’re like 12-year-old girls) if someone in the Vikings front office is leaking things to make McNabb think twice because there is disagreement in the organization about taking McNabb on.

We do anticipate McNabb allowing the deal to go through because his best chance for success.

No matter what happens, it’s clear we’ve come a long way from the moment McNabb was welcomed to Washington as a franchise savior.
 
This is funny.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/John-Beck-was-unrecognized-and-turned-away-at-Re?urn=nfl-wp3923

Tue Jul 26 11:30am EDT

John Beck was unrecognized and turned away at Redskins Park

By MJD

John Beck was unrecognized and turned away at Redskins Park

Redskins head coach Mike Shanahan is adamant that relatively unknown John Beck(notes) can be his team's starting quarterback this season. The rest of Washington, D.C., has been a little slower to embrace him.

Beck showed up to Redskins Park on Monday to try to meet with offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan, but he wasn't allowed to enter the building. The security guy at the gate had no idea he was the Redskins quarterback. From Mike Jones at the Washington Post:

He was turned away at the security gate by a guard, who didn't even know who he was.

Beck was told that players can't report until Tuesday morning, and left slightly disappointed, but not offended.

"I'm OK with that," Beck said of not being recognized when reached this afternoon. "I haven't done anything yet."

If I was in the security guy's shoes that day, I believe I'd have done the same thing. I'm not sure I'd recognize John Beck if he walked into my kitchen right now and started making me waffles.

Beck was drafted in the second round of the 2007 draft by the Dolphins. In two years with the Fish, he started just four games (with a spotless 0-4 record) and was unable to beat out Chad Pennington(notes), Chad Henne(notes) or the great Cleo Lemon(notes) for playing time. He spent 2009 wearing a Ravens uniform, but never got on the field.

In 47 days, he could be starting for the Redskins.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Skins trade Jarmon to Denver for Gaffney.
"Cheap and available."
Yea, and Jarmon didn't fit the new 3-4 scheme, so I like this deal. I was a little bummed when I heard the Jets resigned Holmes, but after seeing he's getting 10 million/year, that was too much, imo.The current wr's:Moss, Gaffney, Armstrong, Stallworth, Kelly, Banks, Hankerson, Paul, and the kid from SMU whose name I forget (Robinson?)Am I missing anyone?
 
Apparently, Brandon Stokely has now been signed, too.

ETA: Grant Paulsen tweets that Stokely makes 14 WRs on 'Skins roster. At most, they'll keep 5, right? Who do we think is a lock? I'm thinking Moss, Armstrong and Hankerson are basically locks. So, 11 WRs fighting for 2 spots? Talk about competition.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apparently, Brandon Stokely has now been signed, too.ETA: Grant Paulsen tweets that Stokely makes 14 WRs on 'Skins roster. At most, they'll keep 5, right? Who do we think is a lock? I'm thinking Moss, Armstrong and Hankerson are basically locks. So, 11 WRs fighting for 2 spots? Talk about competition.
So I'm missing 3 from my last above. Any idea who they are?
 
Apparently, Brandon Stokely has now been signed, too.ETA: Grant Paulsen tweets that Stokely makes 14 WRs on 'Skins roster. At most, they'll keep 5, right? Who do we think is a lock? I'm thinking Moss, Armstrong and Hankerson are basically locks. So, 11 WRs fighting for 2 spots? Talk about competition.
So I'm missing 3 from my last above. Any idea who they are?
Johnson, TaurusPrice, MauriceWilliams, RoydellJohnson and Price were signed to futures contracts following last season. Williams is apparently still under contract.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'southeastjerome said:
'Sebowski said:
'southeastjerome said:
Given that almost everyone in the media was saying/writing that there would be no takers on a McNabb trade because everyone knew the Skins would cut him, I am actually happy they could get a couple 6th rounders for him.
Eh. Makes it petty, imo. Just show him some respect and cut him if that's what all we were going to settle for.
Maybe I would be on board with that if McNabb was on board with wearing a wristband. Sorry, the Skins invested a lot and he failed to produce. I'm happy with whatever they can get considering word was they would not be able to get anything for him in return.
The Redskins were stupid pure and simple. They didn't do their homwork on McNabb at all. He was the exact same player here that he was when he was in Philly, I'm still : :confused: when someone complains about how McNabb fell apart. If you even watched the Skins/Eagles games over the years you should have known what he was going to do.
 
Apparently, Brandon Stokely has now been signed, too.ETA: Grant Paulsen tweets that Stokely makes 14 WRs on 'Skins roster. At most, they'll keep 5, right? Who do we think is a lock? I'm thinking Moss, Armstrong and Hankerson are basically locks. So, 11 WRs fighting for 2 spots? Talk about competition.
So I'm missing 3 from my last above. Any idea who they are?
Johnson, TaurusPrice, MauriceWilliams, RoydellJohnson and Price were signed to futures contracts following last season. Williams is apparently still under contract.
Thanks. Didn't know Roydell was still under contract. I don't see how he makes the team again.Looks like Johnson and Price have bounced around on practice squads.And I just remembered that Stokely played for Seattle last year.The competition at wr is defintiely going to be crazy.
 
'southeastjerome said:
'Sebowski said:
'southeastjerome said:
Given that almost everyone in the media was saying/writing that there would be no takers on a McNabb trade because everyone knew the Skins would cut him, I am actually happy they could get a couple 6th rounders for him.
Eh. Makes it petty, imo. Just show him some respect and cut him if that's what all we were going to settle for.
Maybe I would be on board with that if McNabb was on board with wearing a wristband. Sorry, the Skins invested a lot and he failed to produce. I'm happy with whatever they can get considering word was they would not be able to get anything for him in return.
The Redskins were stupid pure and simple. They didn't do their homwork on McNabb at all. He was the exact same player here that he was when he was in Philly, I'm still : :confused: when someone complains about how McNabb fell apart. If you even watched the Skins/Eagles games over the years you should have known what he was going to do.
Personally, I knew that McNabb wasn't the most accurate qb and that there were questions about his conditioning. What I didn't know, however, is that McNabb is basically uncoachable. I constantly heard about how great a relationship he and Andy Reid had.
 
Josh Wilson signs 3 year, 13.5 mill deal.Is he a starter? Will he return kicks?
I don't know much about Wilson, but as of now he's a starter. The only other CBs on the roster are Hall, Kevin Barnes, and Byron Westbrook.I heard today that the Redskins aren't thrilled with some "off the field stuff" with Brandon Banks. He was arguably one of their biggest weapons last year with his returns, but they may be ready to move on from him if they have quality replacements. Wilson could fit that bill at KR. Rookie Niles Paul also could fill that void at both KR and PR. If Banks stays on the roster, I don't see Wilson returning kicks.
 
Josh Wilson signs 3 year, 13.5 mill deal.Is he a starter? Will he return kicks?
Tweets from Pro Football Focus on Wilson
Josh Wilson allowed 46.9% of passes into his coverage to be complete in 2010, Rogers 69.4% - Repeat. UPgrade
QBs throwing at Carlos Rogers last season had a 95.2 rating. Throwing at Josh Wilson they were just 67.8 - DC upgraded
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apparently, Brandon Stokely has now been signed, too.ETA: Grant Paulsen tweets that Stokely makes 14 WRs on 'Skins roster. At most, they'll keep 5, right? Who do we think is a lock? I'm thinking Moss, Armstrong and Hankerson are basically locks. So, 11 WRs fighting for 2 spots? Talk about competition.
I think they could keep 6 at WR. I think Gaffney is more of a lock than Armstrong. I think really the only locks are Moss and Hankerson though. With the Wilson signing Banks' days may be numbered. I really want Niles Paul to make this team.
 
dont forget malcom kelly!!

WR: Santana Moss, Anthony Armstrong, Leonard Hankerson, Jabar Gaffney, Donte' Stallworth, Brandon Stokley, Niles Paul, Terrence Austin, Aldrick Robinson, Brandon Banks (KR/PR), Roydell Williams, Malcolm Kelly

Wow. Was really hoping Armstrong and his 86 targets for 44/871/3 and 19.8 ypc would get a shot either opposite Moss or Hankerson and have some bye week value despite the potentially bad QB situation.

 
'southeastjerome said:
'Sebowski said:
'southeastjerome said:
Given that almost everyone in the media was saying/writing that there would be no takers on a McNabb trade because everyone knew the Skins would cut him, I am actually happy they could get a couple 6th rounders for him.
Eh. Makes it petty, imo. Just show him some respect and cut him if that's what all we were going to settle for.
Maybe I would be on board with that if McNabb was on board with wearing a wristband. Sorry, the Skins invested a lot and he failed to produce. I'm happy with whatever they can get considering word was they would not be able to get anything for him in return.
The Redskins were stupid pure and simple. They didn't do their homwork on McNabb at all. He was the exact same player here that he was when he was in Philly, I'm still : :confused: when someone complains about how McNabb fell apart. If you even watched the Skins/Eagles games over the years you should have known what he was going to do.
Personally, I knew that McNabb wasn't the most accurate qb and that there were questions about his conditioning. What I didn't know, however, is that McNabb is basically uncoachable. I constantly heard about how great a relationship he and Andy Reid had.
I wouldn't expect him to be able to change too much after being in one system for his entire career. I just think the Head Coach and GM really dropped the ball in not finding out if McNabb and Kyle could work together.
 
dont forget malcom kelly!!WR: Santana Moss, Anthony Armstrong, Leonard Hankerson, Jabar Gaffney, Donte' Stallworth, Brandon Stokley, Niles Paul, Terrence Austin, Aldrick Robinson, Brandon Banks (KR/PR), Roydell Williams, Malcolm KellyWow. Was really hoping Armstrong and his 86 targets for 44/871/3 and 19.8 ypc would get a shot either opposite Moss or Hankerson and have some bye week value despite the potentially bad QB situation.
Despite all the additions, I personally think Armstrong is as safe as anyone. He's done so much, from his in season development last season to his off season leadership this year, that if he were cut I'd be about as surprised as if someone like Cooley or Fletcher were cut. I think we'll be seeing Moss, Armstrong and Hankerson on the field together a lot.
 
Will Coefield play NT?
He weighs 305 and is a 4-3 defensive tackle. They've signed another 4-3 defensive lineman to play in their 3-4, in other words. He's too small to be an effective nose tackle (unless he's Jay Ratliff, which he's certainly not). This coaching staff might want to run a 3-4 but they have little idea how to staff it so far.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'southeastjerome said:
Maybe I would be on board with that if McNabb was on board with wearing a wristband. Sorry, the Skins invested a lot and he failed to produce.
I'd say Mike Shanahan invested a lot in McNabb and Kyle Shanahan failed to like him. It's the stupidest and most damaging trade I've seen -- trading a 2nd and 4th for a veteran QB, a known quantity, whom your offensive coordinator did not want and could not work with. Trying to paint it as McNabb's fault is just the old Vinnie-style cattiness of blaming players for front office mistakes.
 
Over/under on total # of games played this season by Stokely plus total # of games played by Stallworth: 14

Stallworth has chronically-injured hamstrings, and Stokely (if I'm remembering correctly) is hurt a lot.

Gaffney might be some help, though. I'm very glad they re-signed Santana Moss. He's a good team player and a good WR. I'm sad that they failed to complete a Santana/Santonio combination though. It would be awesome listening to Sam Huff screw both those names up all year.

One theory I heard on the radio today was that, since Redskin QB's won't be too good and they'll be running for their lives and throwing balls all over the place, the Skins will run a lot of 10-WR formations.

I hope to god they do something to improve the offensive line.

 
'southeastjerome said:
Maybe I would be on board with that if McNabb was on board with wearing a wristband. Sorry, the Skins invested a lot and he failed to produce.
I'd say Mike Shanahan invested a lot in McNabb and Kyle Shanahan failed to like him. It's the stupidest and most damaging trade I've seen -- trading a 2nd and 4th for a veteran QB, a known quantity, whom your offensive coordinator did not want and could not work with. Trying to paint it as McNabb's fault is just the old Vinnie-style cattiness of blaming players for front office mistakes.
:goodposting:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top