This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Huh? He did well in PPR
lol, this one is going to get some replies..
Yep. He scored, but he and Anderson are not on the same page, and Fitz doesn't look close to 100%. I knew this all, yet still drafted him in one of my leagues. :(
I knew after Foster blew up Finley was too good to be true.
Not all leagues are PPR and unless he grows 3 feet taller, Smith isn't going to get it to him much more than he did today.
So far Fitz is one of only a few top 12 projected WRs who caught a TD. 16 tds for the year would look pretty good wouldn't it? those that didn't to name a few-MossA JohnsonCa JohnsonWhiteMarshallD Jackson
I'm glad you added the sarcasm tag, because I was totally going to respond to this on the assumption that you were being serious otherwise.
8 rec for 73 yards in a game were they were held to 6 points doesn't look like bust #'s to me. I think I'd be pretty happy with that. When they're scoring, he'll be getting alot of looksLook like top 10 #'s to me..
8-73 is a good TE day in my book. 7 points.8 rec for 73 yards in a game were they were held to 6 points doesn't look like bust #'s to me. I think I'd be pretty happy with that. When they're scoring, he'll be getting alot of looksLook like top 10 #'s to me..
He played (and his team held TD-less) against a team that won 9 games the last 2 years and his QB looked absolutely atrocious. I'd be very worried about him being a bust if I owned him. The thread isn't "whose numbers today average out over a season to be top 10". The offense looked awful and couldn't put up a TD despite having the Seattle team on it's heels and all the momentum on their side. Bad QB play and bad coaching equals bad news for owners.8 rec for 73 yards in a game were they were held to 6 points doesn't look like bust #'s to me. I think I'd be pretty happy with that. When they're scoring, he'll be getting alot of looksLook like top 10 #'s to me..
Don't remind me... :sigh: D-will wasn't much better
Does that every year. I drafted him in a dynasty as my #1 a while back only to be disappointed for years as he put up RB2-3 #'s when I needed him.
Considering all the struggles Matt Moore had today, Steve Smith had a pretty good game.
Seemed like we were talking based on week #1 production, who looked like a bust... Based on week 1 production, he does not look like a bust.. He produced...And if you're projecting no TD's for the rest of the year I'm not buying that one either.He played (and his team held TD-less) against a team that won 9 games the last 2 years and his QB looked absolutely atrocious. I'd be very worried about him being a bust if I owned him. The thread isn't "whose numbers today average out over a season to be top 10". The offense looked awful and couldn't put up a TD despite having the Seattle team on it's heels and all the momentum on their side. Bad QB play and bad coaching equals bad news for owners.8 rec for 73 yards in a game were they were held to 6 points doesn't look like bust #'s to me. I think I'd be pretty happy with that. When they're scoring, he'll be getting alot of looksLook like top 10 #'s to me..
I don't think Calvin had even one catch while Staffordshire Crystal was in the game. I'm thinking Hill or any other dreck QBs DET rolls out will be an upgrade for Calvin's numbers. His rookie year was his best year and that was with a bunch of drecky QBs throwing to him.
Every rush he had was down the middle. They had to give him something outside to make the opposition think about it. He's a lock to get 5 yards on a run outside.
I think that was his second year.
I think Megatron and Gore will get theirs barring injury.
Fortunately I didn't project no TDs for him. Quite frankly I'm not sure how you could even get that from my statement. I stand by my prediction, his situation looks to have bust potential written all over it. We're talking about week one play, and that includes the team, not just the player's stats. Otherwise we could just put up the weekly stats to fill the list instead of thinking about it.Seemed like we were talking based on week #1 production, who looked like a bust... Based on week 1 production, he does not look like a bust.. He produced...And if you're projecting no TD's for the rest of the year I'm not buying that one either.He played (and his team held TD-less) against a team that won 9 games the last 2 years and his QB looked absolutely atrocious. I'd be very worried about him being a bust if I owned him. The thread isn't "whose numbers today average out over a season to be top 10". The offense looked awful and couldn't put up a TD despite having the Seattle team on it's heels and all the momentum on their side. Bad QB play and bad coaching equals bad news for owners.8 rec for 73 yards in a game were they were held to 6 points doesn't look like bust #'s to me. I think I'd be pretty happy with that. When they're scoring, he'll be getting alot of looksLook like top 10 #'s to me..
Speaking of RB's, Michael Turner had a down game today.
With Smith and Troy healthy, don't expect too many big rushing numbers against Pittsburgh.
I didn't.
Based on what I saw from him and the niners today, I expect top 10 #'s from Davis. He'll get his looks, and that's what it takes. Wouldn't be hard to imagine 80+ rec 1000+ yards 7+ TD's based on today production.. He's the only definite/reliable option, there will be some offensive plays..
+1. Unless you're Ced Benson, no RB ever does well against the Curtain.EDIT:...whoops, got Pitt and Balt mixed up, but you get the point.
was kind of expected though with the Steelers front seven
Yeah, bust is a little strong yet, but if they become a run first team this year....uh oh...
With Smith under center, many, many plays will be offensive.
