rockaction
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Officially Serious Hillary Clinton Scandal? FBI Investigation. WaPo. (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter rockaction
- Start date
rockaction
Footballguy
GregR
Footballguy
Just chuckling over language like "Officially" on something that was uncertain enough it needed a question mark.
Last edited by a moderator:
rockaction
Footballguy
I did it for tim. Not kidding.Just chuckling over language like "Officially" on something that was uncertain enough it needed a question mark.
Last edited by a moderator:
GregR
Footballguy
I can believe it.I did it for tim. Not kidding.Just chuckling over language like "Officially" on something that was uncertain enough it needed a question mark.
timschochet
Footballguy
When the FBI reports no wrongdoing in a few weeks, will that make front page news as well? I doubt it. For the Clintons,somehow the exonerations never get the same attention.
I'll post it. But the response here will be "of course they didn't find anything. You think the FBI under Obama would dare seriously investigate Hillary?" Etc.
I'll post it. But the response here will be "of course they didn't find anything. You think the FBI under Obama would dare seriously investigate Hillary?" Etc.
Rayderr
Footballguy
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
The fact they have gone to the Denver vendor is a big deal, in my opinion this also means they have contacted Hillary about the physical location of the server. Stay tuned.
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet
Footballguy
Fantasizing? You put up $100, and I'll give you 5 to 1 odds she is never indicted or officially charged with any wrongdoing whatsoever with regard to this whole email thing.
timschochet
Footballguy
Of course you don't want to make that bet because you know that nothing is going to come of this. So how am I fantasizing?
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Wasn't there some long thread with some very principled people saying government collection of data was unconstitutional and some morally er "flexible" people saying they didn't see a problem with it and just a couple weeks ago the US gov actually had to go in and delete their whole repository of collected data due to a court order? Was there ever an update in that thread?Of course you don't want to make that bet because you know that nothing is going to come of this. So how am I fantasizing?
Last edited by a moderator:
IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
You know your candidate of choice has serious ethical problems when you're forced to set the bar at "not indicted."
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
I am not sure what happened to Eric Hoteham, but I don't think we've heard the last of him.
Some new names and facts:
were are in possession of classified data. How ya feelin' this mornin'?
- And obviously for a long time and the whole length of Hillary's SOS term there was less than a uhm fully "professional setup." Great.
Some new names and facts:
- So basically Hillary had State pay her IT guy who really worked for her, not State.
- Oh well that's just dandy, it seems the SOS's server was down for a while, no problems there.
- Guess what boys, you
- And obviously for a long time and the whole length of Hillary's SOS term there was less than a uhm fully "professional setup." Great.
- Sure are a lot of political people handling classified data here.
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
- Somehow Joe Biden's name suddenly popping up out of thin air at just this particular time seems like a little too much of a coincidence. Like you said before, I think Earl Weaver gave the signal for the bullpen to warm up.
timschochet
Footballguy
Ofcourse she's got ethical problems. I've aittedthis several times; it aggravates me to no end. But they're not serious enough to derail her.
timschochet
Footballguy
Thats not going to happen.
otello
Footballguy
Does this bet include any acts inconsistent with government rules or policies?
timschochet
Footballguy
There is no bet. He declined.
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
The John Deutch example is possible. Deutch was Sec. of Defense under Bill Clinton who was basically accused of something similar, holding classified material on a private server. The AG Janet Reno "investigated", then did not prosecute (shocker) but did recommend his security clearance be removed. Pres. Bill Clinton pardoned him, which of course suggested a crime had been committed - but the GOP was taking over the WH at that point. And Sandy Berger was prosecuted, so was Gen. Petraeus.
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
It may not happen. I said his name popped up at this particular time for a possible run, that has happened.
Last edited by a moderator:
parasaurolophus
Footballguy
This is why you look stupid when you say you wish you could give more than 100 bucks to planned parenthood. Actually it just makes you look like a liar.
Dinsy Ejotuz
Footballguy
Baloney Sandwich
Footballguy
IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
It's just a slow day at the FBI, so they decided to check in on somebody who they're sure is all on the up and up. They do this all the time. Nothing to see here.
Ramsay Hunt Experience
Footballguy
They decided to check on the custody measures for maintaining the email. That seems both prudent and completely consistent with the statement that Clinton isn't a target.
randall146
Footballguy
I must be crazy, because I read the article and I don't see that anyone is being accused of any wrongdoing. I read it as the FBI investigating whether there were data breaches/security holes.
timschochet
Footballguy
Youre fantasizing!
Gary Coal Man
Footballguy
Do the exonerations get as much attention as the allegations for anyone?Allegations are usually Page 1 above the fold. Exonerations are hidden somewhere within the newspaper.
Apple Jack
Footballguy
I have never seen a person as obsessed with another as Saints is with Hillary Clinton.
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
So question: is mishandling of classified data, documents or information in connection with an unauthorized server, drive or location, a crime?
And if not could it result in firing from the executive branch or State department or loss of security clearance or other penalties?
And if not could it result in firing from the executive branch or State department or loss of security clearance or other penalties?
Last edited by a moderator:
He doesn't want to make that bet because never being indicted or officially charged <> being innocent (besides the absurdity with betting strangers on the interwebs in the first place).Of course you don't want to make that bet because you know that nothing is going to come of this. So how am I fantasizing?
rockaction
Footballguy
timschochet
Footballguy
Are there any significant differences in opinion between Warren and Sanders?bagger said:
TheAristocrat
Footballguy
It's cool. Another couple of lies, some finger-pointing, and backroom threats should take care of this one too.
cstu
Footballguy
Online poker down?humpback said:He doesn't want to make that bet because never being indicted or officially charged <> being innocent (besides the absurdity with betting strangers on the interwebs in the first place).timschochet said:Of course you don't want to make that bet because you know that nothing is going to come of this. So how am I fantasizing?Slapdash said:timschochet said:
Everyone including Slapdash knows nothing will come of this, hence him being unwilling to put down money at any odds.
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't heard Sanders refer to a war on women's health and a Republican conspiracy when asked about PP selling baby body parts.
Pretty dishonest response by Warren.
