Denver defense allows the fewest rushing ypc in the NFLI think Josh Jacobs (who seems like he's playing) could hit some big runs against a Broncos defense that's better against the pass than the run (though that may be changing with Greenlaw)
They are tied for 1st in NY/A against the pass, I would rather attack the Broncos D on the ground if I were Matt LaFleur, was my point.Denver defense allows the fewest rushing ypc in the NFLI think Josh Jacobs (who seems like he's playing) could hit some big runs against a Broncos defense that's better against the pass than the run (though that may be changing with Greenlaw)
Fair enough. But you also said "Jacobs could hit some big runs." Why would you believe that against a run D giving up 3.7 ypc on the year?They are tied for 1st in NY/A against the pass, I would rather attack the Broncos D on the ground if I were Matt LaFleur, was my point.Denver defense allows the fewest rushing ypc in the NFLI think Josh Jacobs (who seems like he's playing) could hit some big runs against a Broncos defense that's better against the pass than the run (though that may be changing with Greenlaw)
That I think they'll wear them down a bit, and while he won't be consistently gaining yards, he could break a couple big ones, just off volume.Fair enough. But you also said "Jacobs could hit some big runs." What does that imply?They are tied for 1st in NY/A against the pass, I would rather attack the Broncos D on the ground if I were Matt LaFleur, was my point.Denver defense allows the fewest rushing ypc in the NFLI think Josh Jacobs (who seems like he's playing) could hit some big runs against a Broncos defense that's better against the pass than the run (though that may be changing with Greenlaw)
Yeah, you're being nice here, that was a backtrack.Fair enough. But you also said "Jacobs could hit some big runs." Why would you believe that against a run D giving up 3.7 ypc on the year?They are tied for 1st in NY/A against the pass, I would rather attack the Broncos D on the ground if I were Matt LaFleur, was my point.Denver defense allows the fewest rushing ypc in the NFLI think Josh Jacobs (who seems like he's playing) could hit some big runs against a Broncos defense that's better against the pass than the run (though that may be changing with Greenlaw)
I mean, maybe let the game play out before the excuses come out.Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Packers D is the heartbeat of the team and if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock, even just the really really bad ones the pass rush will become even more lethal, we'll see if the refs have the stomach for it. Still hurts losing Wyatt,
Absolutely no excuses made here. Parsons is a beast and he does just fine against bear hugs, headlocks, double and triple teams. If you don't think he's being mugged beyond what is normally called we can agree to disagree, but it hasn't slowed him much and i don't expect it will today either. Would be nice to see the blatant holds called is all and it would make a lethal pass rush that much betterI mean, maybe let the game play out before the excuses come out.Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Packers D is the heartbeat of the team and if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock, even just the really really bad ones the pass rush will become even more lethal, we'll see if the refs have the stomach for it. Still hurts losing Wyatt,
It's like, I'm calling a non-call hold on Bonitto now, maybe even TWO, gosh darn it all!
Good luck dude. We'll see how Love does, it's his time now, no excuses.

Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Lol ..
Another week another big Broncos game against one of the NFLs top teams. Broncos are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Everything @The Longtime Lurker said could be said about Denver![]()


FIFYAnother week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Lol ..
Another week another big Broncos game against one of the NFLs top teams. Broncos are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Everything @The Longtime Lurker said could be said about Denver![]()
Packers fan base sounds fired up today!!! It's cute.![]()
was really hoping they would rest Jacobs this week............That I think they'll wear them down a bit, and while he won't be consistently gaining yards, he could break a couple big ones, just off volume.Fair enough. But you also said "Jacobs could hit some big runs." What does that imply?They are tied for 1st in NY/A against the pass, I would rather attack the Broncos D on the ground if I were Matt LaFleur, was my point.Denver defense allows the fewest rushing ypc in the NFLI think Josh Jacobs (who seems like he's playing) could hit some big runs against a Broncos defense that's better against the pass than the run (though that may be changing with Greenlaw)
I was referring to this:Absolutely no excuses made here. Parsons is a beast and he does just fine against bear hugs, headlocks, double and triple teams. If you don't think he's being mugged beyond what is normally called we can agree to disagree, but it hasn't slowed him much and i don't expect it will today either. Would be nice to see the blatant holds called is all and it would make a lethal pass rush that much betterI mean, maybe let the game play out before the excuses come out.Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Packers D is the heartbeat of the team and if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock, even just the really really bad ones the pass rush will become even more lethal, we'll see if the refs have the stomach for it. Still hurts losing Wyatt,
It's like, I'm calling a non-call hold on Bonitto now, maybe even TWO, gosh darn it all!
Good luck dude. We'll see how Love does, it's his time now, no excuses.
What excuses for Love? My comment is that he's playing great and not getting the respect he deserves. I'm certainly not making an excuse there either.
Good luck to you today aswell. Truthfully I don't know much and Denver outside of highlights. Looking forward to seeing what one of the AFCs best brings against one of the NFCs.
Edit. The website is wonky and i got cut off, but the end of the quote about Wyatt wasn't an excuse either, but a compliment to the D not skipping a beat. The part you quoted cut that off and maybe that wasn't intentional either, but definitely not an excuse.
No it's a reference to last week's gameI was referring to this:Absolutely no excuses made here. Parsons is a beast and he does just fine against bear hugs, headlocks, double and triple teams. If you don't think he's being mugged beyond what is normally called we can agree to disagree, but it hasn't slowed him much and i don't expect it will today either. Would be nice to see the blatant holds called is all and it would make a lethal pass rush that much betterI mean, maybe let the game play out before the excuses come out.Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Packers D is the heartbeat of the team and if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock, even just the really really bad ones the pass rush will become even more lethal, we'll see if the refs have the stomach for it. Still hurts losing Wyatt,
It's like, I'm calling a non-call hold on Bonitto now, maybe even TWO, gosh darn it all!
Good luck dude. We'll see how Love does, it's his time now, no excuses.
What excuses for Love? My comment is that he's playing great and not getting the respect he deserves. I'm certainly not making an excuse there either.
Good luck to you today aswell. Truthfully I don't know much and Denver outside of highlights. Looking forward to seeing what one of the AFCs best brings against one of the NFCs.
Edit. The website is wonky and i got cut off, but the end of the quote about Wyatt wasn't an excuse either, but a compliment to the D not skipping a beat. The part you quoted cut that off and maybe that wasn't intentional either, but definitely not an excuse.
"if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock"
Um, nothing's happened yet and you're calling for a flag or two FOR Parsons, claiming they are going to put him in headlocks.
You're reading that one wrong. It was in reference to last week and previous weeks. But if he's in a headlock today i do hope it's called.I was referring to this:Absolutely no excuses made here. Parsons is a beast and he does just fine against bear hugs, headlocks, double and triple teams. If you don't think he's being mugged beyond what is normally called we can agree to disagree, but it hasn't slowed him much and i don't expect it will today either. Would be nice to see the blatant holds called is all and it would make a lethal pass rush that much betterI mean, maybe let the game play out before the excuses come out.Another week another big Packer game against one of the NFLs top teams. Packers are again at their best as they have been all year against good competition with a national audience. Frustrating as they continue to play to the level of their competition, but as the playoffs approach competition only gets stiffer so it's becoming a good problem as the soft part of the schedule is long gone.
Packers D is the heartbeat of the team and if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock, even just the really really bad ones the pass rush will become even more lethal, we'll see if the refs have the stomach for it. Still hurts losing Wyatt,
It's like, I'm calling a non-call hold on Bonitto now, maybe even TWO, gosh darn it all!
Good luck dude. We'll see how Love does, it's his time now, no excuses.
What excuses for Love? My comment is that he's playing great and not getting the respect he deserves. I'm certainly not making an excuse there either.
Good luck to you today aswell. Truthfully I don't know much and Denver outside of highlights. Looking forward to seeing what one of the AFCs best brings against one of the NFCs.
Edit. The website is wonky and i got cut off, but the end of the quote about Wyatt wasn't an excuse either, but a compliment to the D not skipping a beat. The part you quoted cut that off and maybe that wasn't intentional either, but definitely not an excuse.
"if we can get a hold or two called when Parsons is in a headlock"
Um, nothing's happened yet and you're calling for a flag or two FOR Parsons, claiming they are going to put him in headlocks.
There were no excuses. It was light hearted about the season so far, I'm not even sure i mentioned much about today's game. Gonna move on from this since I'm not even sure what it's about.As for my comment regarding Love having no excuses. It's just addressing your preconceived notions on excuses. Meant to be somewhat funny.
Look, Love has had forever to "develop". If the Denver D has their way with him, I don't want to hear how great the D was and it was on the road. If he's great, these are the games he wins now. No excuses.
First time watching Denver this year. Pretty rough looking so far. Defense looks very, very mid. A lot of guys running wide open. Give up a lot of huge plays.
Made of glass.Well that sucks. Watson hurt is just brutal
Not necessarily. Players can typically walk on a torn [insert ligament here] - imma say it’s neutral at best.Parsons walking to the lockeroom is a good sign?