That is unless he is offered more from another team.More than likely he will re-sign for less money after the collective bargaining agreement is settled.
I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs. Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
I think Barnett is the better player but he is injury prone. He also is a bit of a pain in the butt and isn't very popular in Green Bay. Thus, I agree we might be better off trying to lock up AJ long term. I think locking up Barnett would actually be more costly. Either way it would be nice to get one of the two on a cheap long term deal. Although the reports are optimistic in regards to retaining Hawk, I just don't see that happening. Most likely AJ goes elsewhere as someone will pay him more and we keep Barnett for his remaining 1 year . I can see GB drafting a lot of LBs this year.I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs. Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs. Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
Since when has Thompson ever drafted for need? He goes BPA and does so brilliantly. If the right guys are there in the right spots and they happen to be linebacker, he'll pick them.I think Barnett is the better player but he is injury prone. He also is a bit of a pain in the butt and isn't very popular in Green Bay. Thus, I agree we might be better off trying to lock up AJ long term. I think locking up Barnett would actually be more costly. Either way it would be nice to get one of the two on a cheap long term deal. Although the reports are optimistic in regards to retaining Hawk, I just don't see that happening. Most likely AJ goes elsewhere as someone will pay him more and we keep Barnett for his remaining 1 year . I can see GB drafting a lot of LBs this year.I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.
I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.
Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs.
Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
BPA vs Need is such a farce that's it's not even worth debating. Every GM will tell you that the guy they drafted was the BPA at the time. What I saw over the last two years is Thompson drafting personnel to fit the 3-4 defense.Since when has Thompson ever drafted for need? He goes BPA and does so brilliantly. If the right guys are there in the right spots and they happen to be linebacker, he'll pick them.I think Barnett is the better player but he is injury prone. He also is a bit of a pain in the butt and isn't very popular in Green Bay. Thus, I agree we might be better off trying to lock up AJ long term. I think locking up Barnett would actually be more costly. Either way it would be nice to get one of the two on a cheap long term deal. Although the reports are optimistic in regards to retaining Hawk, I just don't see that happening. Most likely AJ goes elsewhere as someone will pay him more and we keep Barnett for his remaining 1 year . I can see GB drafting a lot of LBs this year.I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.
I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.
Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs.
Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
I think Thompson's drafting philosophy has changed as the team has. Early on he drafted BPA to build depth and build the team. Now that he has the team in place he has adjusted and drafted for need.BPA vs Need is such a farce that's it's not even worth debating. Every GM will tell you that the guy they drafted was the BPA at the time. What I saw over the last two years is Thompson drafting personnel to fit the 3-4 defense.Since when has Thompson ever drafted for need? He goes BPA and does so brilliantly. If the right guys are there in the right spots and they happen to be linebacker, he'll pick them.I think Barnett is the better player but he is injury prone. He also is a bit of a pain in the butt and isn't very popular in Green Bay. Thus, I agree we might be better off trying to lock up AJ long term. I think locking up Barnett would actually be more costly. Either way it would be nice to get one of the two on a cheap long term deal. Although the reports are optimistic in regards to retaining Hawk, I just don't see that happening. Most likely AJ goes elsewhere as someone will pay him more and we keep Barnett for his remaining 1 year . I can see GB drafting a lot of LBs this year.I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.
I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.
Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs.
Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
Not sure about that. Of course he drafted player that fit his system. However he did not reach for players because they were a position of need. He may well draft linebackers but he's not going to go crazy unless those guys are the BPA. Heck they still have what 11 linebackers on the roster. Battle tested guys.BPA vs Need is such a farce that's it's not even worth debating. Every GM will tell you that the guy they drafted was the BPA at the time. What I saw over the last two years is Thompson drafting personnel to fit the 3-4 defense.Since when has Thompson ever drafted for need? He goes BPA and does so brilliantly. If the right guys are there in the right spots and they happen to be linebacker, he'll pick them.I think Barnett is the better player but he is injury prone. He also is a bit of a pain in the butt and isn't very popular in Green Bay. Thus, I agree we might be better off trying to lock up AJ long term. I think locking up Barnett would actually be more costly. Either way it would be nice to get one of the two on a cheap long term deal. Although the reports are optimistic in regards to retaining Hawk, I just don't see that happening. Most likely AJ goes elsewhere as someone will pay him more and we keep Barnett for his remaining 1 year . I can see GB drafting a lot of LBs this year.I personally think they should keep Hawk and get rid of Barnett. He played very well this year and Barnett is injury prone.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.
I dont think th packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.
Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs.
Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
I cant tell you how much I hate people who get mad at players for doing the same type of stuff by deciding to hold out for a better business side outcome.It works both ways. Its perfectly acceptable, both ways.“With _________, the business side of the game is driving this decision. ”
There are plenty of teams that could. Broncos moving back to the 4-3. Lions for sure. The Rams.Hawk has like 24 hours to sign elsewhere. Giants and Titans could sorely use LBs
saints do too. i would love to see him alongside vilma, especially since he could offer insight from a a very good opposing NFC team.Hawk has like 24 hours to sign elsewhere. Giants and Titans could sorely use LBs
Eagles too. Go get him Banner!Hawk has like 24 hours to sign elsewhere. Giants and Titans could sorely use LBs
As a Packer fan, I thought you'd be better than that. Hawk will be resigned, and he will be the starter alongside Bishop. Barnett will be looking for work once they resign Hawk. Barnett has played in 29 of the last 48 games. Last I checked, being available on Sunday is huge in the NFL.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.I dont think the Packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs. Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
Hawk has started almost every game in his pro career since the day he was drafted, has led the Packers in tackles or finished second every season in his career, and was the defensive co-captain and a pro-bowl alternate this season. I'm not saying he'll definitely be back with the Packers, but he's not a backup.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.I dont think the Packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs. Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
As a Packer fan, I thought you'd be better than that. Hawk will be resigned, and he will be the starter alongside Bishop. Barnett will be looking for work once they resign Hawk. Barnett has played in 29 of the last 48 games. Last I checked, being available on Sunday is huge in the NFL.I dont think he will resign to be a back up.
I dont think the Packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.
Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs.
Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
'Kitrick Taylor said:As a Packer fan, I thought you'd be better than that. Hawk will be resigned, and he will be the starter alongside Bishop. Barnett will be looking for work once they resign Hawk. Barnett has played in 29 of the last 48 games. Last I checked, being available on Sunday is huge in the NFL.'Choke said:I dont think he will resign to be a back up.I dont think the Packers will pay him a lot as a back up... certainly not as much as another team will to be a potential starter.Barnett and Bishop are the Packers ILBs. Could Hawk play ROLB? I would think he could, but he hasnt played there at all.
'tommy300 said:A.J. Hawk back with Pack
March 2, 2011 10:11 p.m. | Just as quick as he was cut, A.J. Hawk is back, with the Pack. Two sources have told TMJ4's Lance Allan that the linebacker is scheduled to fly back to Green Bay on Thursday, and sign a new 5-year deal.
According to JS Online
'Choke said:I cant tell you how much I hate people who get mad at players for doing the same type of stuff by deciding to hold out for a better business side outcome.It works both ways. Its perfectly acceptable, both ways.'KingPrawn said:“With _________, the business side of the game is driving this decision. ”
Agreed. He has done well in the 3-4...stepped up big time after being taken off of the nickel packages to start the year...and stepped up even more when Barnett went down.The defense all talked about how calm Hawk is in getting the defensive calls in and getting everyone on D set. The coaches love him, his teammates love him...it was a very good move to lock him up for 5 more years.With this, plus the statements that Bishop is the starter...I see Barnett looking for another team soon.I think Hawk is a very good player. The issue is he (as are many players) will only ever be seen in the context of when he was drafted. Where he was drafted, many Packer fans expected him to be great and make the impact that Mathews had. But his tackling is important to the defense Capers runs and I really didn't see them letting him walk.
Blame the CBA. The players collectively bargain their way to the system that can put them on the street.If they hold out, they are basically breaching their contract. If the NFL cuts them, they are acting within the rules of the contracts as they have been bargained.So yes, I do take fault at players holding out.'Choke said:I cant tell you how much I hate people who get mad at players for doing the same type of stuff by deciding to hold out for a better business side outcome.It works both ways. Its perfectly acceptable, both ways.'KingPrawn said:“With _________, the business side of the game is driving this decision. ”