Block
Footballguy
The more I think about it, the more I find the Packers' RB situation among the most intriguing topics in fantasy football this season. On no team is less known about the potential starters, but arguably on no team (without a definite starter) does the starter (whomever it may be) have better fantasy prospects.
Runners like Edgar Bennett, Dorsey Levens, and Ahman Green have thrived in Green Bay with Brett Favre as quarterback, and I expect that to continue this year.
Most on this board seem to assume that Brandon Jackson will be that guy. He certainly could be, but I find that assumption flawed. Before we go any further, I'll try to explain why:
First, his collegiate career wasn't incredible. He did very little in 2004 and 2005, partially due to injuries. He started off slow in 2006 before picking it up over the final 9 games, eventually gaining 1300 yards and 10 TDs altogether. He has good hands and a quick burst, but lacks any long speed.
More disturbing, however, is his continued injury history. He had recurring shoulder problems in college and has had some sort of knee "issue" since getting drafted. Since any of his potential value is based on that 9-game showing last year, this makes him a risky prospect even if you expect him to eventually get the job.
Another thing of note that I have not seen anyone mention is this: while he was a second round pick, he was only the 63rd overall selection, the second-to-last pick of the round (after guys like Kenny Irons and Chris Henry). The Packers originally held the 47th overall pick and traded down. This means, at the very least, that the Packers weren't desperate to get Jackson, as there was a chance he would be gone by pick 63. If Jackson were selected two picks later, in the 3rd round, I suspect the hysteria surrounding his prospects would be significantly dulled.
Then we come to Vernand Morency, another enigma. Morency was selected by the Texans with the 73rd overall pick two years ago (notice, only 10 picks after Jackson; was there this kind of hype surrounding Morency?). He didn't see much action in 2005 behind Domanick Davis, and was traded to the Packers early last year in a swap for Samkon Gado. He started in place of Ahman Green a couple of times, and finished the year with a total of 552 yards and 2 TDs.
We really haven't seen enough of Morency at the pro level to know whether he can be "the guy", but he has done well with his limited opportunities thus far. I think it is also worthwhile to compare Morency's college stats to Jackson's: in his senior season at Oklahoma State, Morency amassed 1575 yards for 13 TDs. He did more in his earlier years than Jackson, with over 1000 yards in his previous years.
Everything I've heard thus far in the press indicates that Morency is atop the depth chart right now. There remains an outside chance that a sleeper like Noah Herron or Deshawn Wynn could emerge, but that's unlikely.
It basically comes down to Morency or Jackson, and at this point everyone seems to be assuming that Jackson will be the guy. Morency can be had 5 or 6 rounds after Jackson in a dynasty league, and probably even more in a redraft.
I guess I'm asking to be convinced. After all of this, is there really any reason to think it is Jackson instead of Morency, except that Jackson is the new shiny penny while Morency has been around for two years? The Packers didn't use a terribly high pick to take Jackson, he has an injury history and only started a few collegiate games, and Morency has been called the starter everywhere I've looked. I just don't get the hype with him.
*apologies for length*
Runners like Edgar Bennett, Dorsey Levens, and Ahman Green have thrived in Green Bay with Brett Favre as quarterback, and I expect that to continue this year.
Most on this board seem to assume that Brandon Jackson will be that guy. He certainly could be, but I find that assumption flawed. Before we go any further, I'll try to explain why:
First, his collegiate career wasn't incredible. He did very little in 2004 and 2005, partially due to injuries. He started off slow in 2006 before picking it up over the final 9 games, eventually gaining 1300 yards and 10 TDs altogether. He has good hands and a quick burst, but lacks any long speed.
More disturbing, however, is his continued injury history. He had recurring shoulder problems in college and has had some sort of knee "issue" since getting drafted. Since any of his potential value is based on that 9-game showing last year, this makes him a risky prospect even if you expect him to eventually get the job.
Another thing of note that I have not seen anyone mention is this: while he was a second round pick, he was only the 63rd overall selection, the second-to-last pick of the round (after guys like Kenny Irons and Chris Henry). The Packers originally held the 47th overall pick and traded down. This means, at the very least, that the Packers weren't desperate to get Jackson, as there was a chance he would be gone by pick 63. If Jackson were selected two picks later, in the 3rd round, I suspect the hysteria surrounding his prospects would be significantly dulled.
Then we come to Vernand Morency, another enigma. Morency was selected by the Texans with the 73rd overall pick two years ago (notice, only 10 picks after Jackson; was there this kind of hype surrounding Morency?). He didn't see much action in 2005 behind Domanick Davis, and was traded to the Packers early last year in a swap for Samkon Gado. He started in place of Ahman Green a couple of times, and finished the year with a total of 552 yards and 2 TDs.
We really haven't seen enough of Morency at the pro level to know whether he can be "the guy", but he has done well with his limited opportunities thus far. I think it is also worthwhile to compare Morency's college stats to Jackson's: in his senior season at Oklahoma State, Morency amassed 1575 yards for 13 TDs. He did more in his earlier years than Jackson, with over 1000 yards in his previous years.
Everything I've heard thus far in the press indicates that Morency is atop the depth chart right now. There remains an outside chance that a sleeper like Noah Herron or Deshawn Wynn could emerge, but that's unlikely.
It basically comes down to Morency or Jackson, and at this point everyone seems to be assuming that Jackson will be the guy. Morency can be had 5 or 6 rounds after Jackson in a dynasty league, and probably even more in a redraft.
I guess I'm asking to be convinced. After all of this, is there really any reason to think it is Jackson instead of Morency, except that Jackson is the new shiny penny while Morency has been around for two years? The Packers didn't use a terribly high pick to take Jackson, he has an injury history and only started a few collegiate games, and Morency has been called the starter everywhere I've looked. I just don't get the hype with him.
*apologies for length*