What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Paleo / Primal Blueprint type diets (2 Viewers)

I've been adapting to a Paleo diet/lifestyle. I read the Sisson books and website, but I really like a lot of what the Nestor's Bulletproof exec espouses, especially his easy to follow chart.

A couple of questions-

What do others think of Nestor's chart?

Why is cheese neutral in the dairy category, but avoid in the protein category? I love me some cheese.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been adapting to a Paleo diet/lifestyle. I read the Sisson books and website, but I really like a lot of what the Nestor's Bulletproof exec espouses, especially his easy to follow chart.

A couple of questions-

What do others think of Nestor's chart?

Why is cheese neutral in the dairy category, but avoid in the protein category? I love me some cheese.
I'll also add that I like that Nestor seems to think its okay to include a little rice in the diet and maybe an occaisional potato. Also, he is a fan of Xylitol, which really opens the door to a lot of flexibility in beverages/sweets. I don;t have it very often, but sometimes it really help with cravings.What about coconut flour? Anyone using that for recipes> Looks like, if nothing else, it makes a good breading for panfrying fish in coconut oil.

 
'cosjobs said:
I'll also add that I like that Nestor seems to think its okay to include a little rice in the diet and maybe an occaisional potato. Also, he is a fan of Xylitol, which really opens the door to a lot of flexibility in beverages/sweets.
If you Google "safe starches" you'll find some debate about rice and potatoes. It seems to me, however, that the debate can be settled pretty easily by a few simple observations. Just like the idea that dietary fat is inherently bad for you should have been immediately refuted by the excellent health of the fat-guzzling Masai (and others), the idea that carbs are inherently bad for you is soundly refuted by the excellent health of the carb-guzzling Kitavans (and others).A few centuries ago, the Irish lived almost exclusively on potatoes and were reputed to be a remarkably healthy and fit people. Rice is fairly popular in certain parts of Asia, as I understand things — including areas renowned for their good health. The idea that consuming potatoes and rice generally leads to poor health is inconsistent with easily available evidence, and should therefor be discarded.I like Nestor's chart in general, but I think his distrust of carbs leads to a few odd results — restricting consumption of rice and potatoes, preferring Xylitol to raw honey, and having an "avoid" section on his fruits and veggies spectrum, for example. (Edit: the guy who created the chart appears to be named Dave, not Nestor.)(A lot of the very worst foods are laden with carbs — Mallomars, Pringles, Oreos, Twinkies, M&Ms, Doritos, HoHos, Coca-Cola, Ding Dongs... Low carb diets have worked well for many people, perhaps largely for that reason. But to banish potatoes along with Snickers is to throw the baby out with the bathwater.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'cosjobs said:
I'll also add that I like that Nestor seems to think its okay to include a little rice in the diet and maybe an occaisional potato. Also, he is a fan of Xylitol, which really opens the door to a lot of flexibility in beverages/sweets.
If you Google "safe starches" you'll find some debate about rice and potatoes. It seems to me, however, that the debate can be settled pretty easily by a few simple observations. Just like the idea that dietary fat is inherently bad for you should have been immediately refuted by the excellent health of the fat-guzzling Masai (and others), the idea that carbs are inherently bad for you is soundly refuted by the excellent health of the carb-guzzling Kitavans (and others).A few centuries ago, the Irish lived almost exclusively on potatoes and were reputed to be a remarkably healthy and fit people. Rice is fairly popular in certain parts of Asia, as I understand things — including areas renowned for their good health. The idea that consuming potatoes and rice generally leads to poor health is inconsistent with easily available evidence, and should therefor be discarded.I like Nestor's chart in general, but I think his distrust of carbs leads to a few odd results — restricting consumption of rice and potatoes, preferring Xylitol to raw honey, and having an "avoid" section on his fruits and veggies spectrum, for example. (Edit: the guy who created the chart appears to be named Dave, not Nestor.)(A lot of the very worst foods are laden with carbs — Mallomars, Pringles, Oreos, Twinkies, M&Ms, Doritos, HoHos, Coca-Cola, Ding Dongs... Low carb diets have worked well for many people, perhaps largely for that reason. But to banish potatoes along with Snickers is to throw the baby out with the bathwater.)
Maybe i am reading/interpreting the chart wrong, but I feel comfortable adding a small serving of rice 2-3 times a week, a baked potato once or twice. And being in texas a few corn tortillas cannot be avoided. The fat laden coffee on the intermittent fasting seems kind of bizarre, but I did it a day or two over the last couple of weeks with no ill effects.What I dislike most is his peddling of stuff linked to his advice. It makes me a bit distrustful.
 
If you are okay with some dairy and Xylitol, I just made a batch of homemade ice cream with Organic cream, pastured eggs, vanilla beans and xylitol. It was outstanding.

 
'cosjobs said:
I'll also add that I like that Nestor seems to think its okay to include a little rice in the diet and maybe an occaisional potato. Also, he is a fan of Xylitol, which really opens the door to a lot of flexibility in beverages/sweets.
If you Google "safe starches" you'll find some debate about rice and potatoes. It seems to me, however, that the debate can be settled pretty easily by a few simple observations. Just like the idea that dietary fat is inherently bad for you should have been immediately refuted by the excellent health of the fat-guzzling Masai (and others), the idea that carbs are inherently bad for you is soundly refuted by the excellent health of the carb-guzzling Kitavans (and others).A few centuries ago, the Irish lived almost exclusively on potatoes and were reputed to be a remarkably healthy and fit people. Rice is fairly popular in certain parts of Asia, as I understand things — including areas renowned for their good health. The idea that consuming potatoes and rice generally leads to poor health is inconsistent with easily available evidence, and should therefor be discarded.I like Nestor's chart in general, but I think his distrust of carbs leads to a few odd results — restricting consumption of rice and potatoes, preferring Xylitol to raw honey, and having an "avoid" section on his fruits and veggies spectrum, for example. (Edit: the guy who created the chart appears to be named Dave, not Nestor.)(A lot of the very worst foods are laden with carbs — Mallomars, Pringles, Oreos, Twinkies, M&Ms, Doritos, HoHos, Coca-Cola, Ding Dongs... Low carb diets have worked well for many people, perhaps largely for that reason. But to banish potatoes along with Snickers is to throw the baby out with the bathwater.)
It sounds completely obvious when I type this out, but I will anyway: you can't underestimate the role physical activity plays in one's health. I'm sure the Irish, with their extreme starchy diet, suffered no ill effects partly because they were toiling all day on the family farm. Same goes for the rice diets of asian cultures, and the American farmer of the midwest. Days start off with biscuits, gravy, potatoes, and eggs. But they're working all of it off and need all the carbs they can get.So if you're exercising daily I don't think you'll have a problem with eating a few potatoes or helpings of rice.
 
So what's the verdict on cheese?

Costco now carries Kerry cheese made from pastured cows. Raw milk products are not really an option for me- so is this okay? I have no lactose problems.

 
So what's the verdict on cheese?Costco now carries Kerry cheese made from pastured cows. Raw milk products are not really an option for me- so is this okay? I have no lactose problems.
On the nutrition plan we use, the first 30 days is very strict. So no legumes, no rice, no potatoes, and no dairy.They say that you should reintroduce dairy and see if it has any negative effects. Some people don't even realize how much better they would feel until they cut dairy out. For others, it's fine to have it occasionally.
 
So what's the verdict on cheese?
mr roboto is right that everyone is different, so you have to try it for yourself. Go 30 days without dairy and then add it back in to see if you notice a difference. If you don't have a negative reaction to it, cheese is a great source of calcium and other nutrients. (Cheese has been a staple in several cultures renowned for their health — the famously hardy Swiss mountaineers, for example, lived largely on rye bread and cheese — so there's nothing inherently unhealthy about eating a lot of cheese. Of course, their cheese was made from raw, grass-fed milk; and their sourdough rye was traditionally slow-fermented.)
Costco now carries Kerry cheese made from pastured cows. Raw milk products are not really an option for me- so is this okay? I have no lactose problems.
The Costco near me also carries Tillamook, which is roughly as pastured as Kerrygold. (Both are pastured except in the winter; neither is pastured year-round.) Tillamook is also unpasteurized (although not completely raw: it's heated, just not to the point of pasteurization).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So what's the verdict on cheese?
mr roboto is right that everyone is different, so you have to try it for yourself. Go 30 days without dairy and then add it back in to see if you notice a difference. If you don't have a negative reaction to it, cheese is a great source of calcium and other nutrients. (Cheese has been a staple in several cultures renowned for their health — the famously hardy Swiss mountaineers, for example, lived largely on rye bread and cheese — so there's nothing inherently unhealthy about eating a lot of cheese. Of course, their cheese was made from raw, grass-fed milk; and their sourdough rye was traditionally slow-fermented.)
Costco now carries Kerry cheese made from pastured cows. Raw milk products are not really an option for me- so is this okay? I have no lactose problems.
The Costco near me also carries Tillamook, which is roughly as pastured as Kerrygold. (Both are pastured except in the winter; neither is pastured year-round.) Tillamook is also unpasteurized (although not completely raw: it's heated, just not to the point of pasteurization).
Good info, thanks. Tillamook is what I used to buy, but did not know it was from pastured (mostly) cows. But two months ago I wasn't scouring the labels like I do now.I think I may wait a month before excluding all dairy. I do not know if I could maintain in these early stages were it not for big mugs of strong coffee with cream.The cream I use is "low heat pasteurized" and very expensive (about double). Is that the same as how Tillamook processes their cheese? It great to know their product is so responsible produced, yet still delicious, affordable and widely available.
 
I'm a huge cheese fan, but I tend to like the aged cheeses that are bit more expensive. I haven't went 100% into the paleo, but I lost 15 lbs by significantly cutting back on grains. I then slacked off for a while, put a few lbs back on, so I went back to eliminating grains and poof, the weight drops again.

I'm not sure I have a point other than I've been eating cheese the entire time, but it's not processed cheese or cheap cheese. Tip, a little bit of good cheese goes a long way.

My 2 keys are restricting grains and eating when I want instead of the "you need at least 3 square meals a day, or you should eat 6 small meals a day" crap. Most days I eat twice and that's fine. Some days I eat 3/4 times. Eat when you're hungry.

Salads and nuts are a big part of my diet. Seriously, there are about a million different ways to make a salad. I LOVE Greek salads and I can take almost any salad, crush some almonds, walnuts, cashews, etc. and make it filling. Any meat can be added to a salad as you all know. I love vegetables and those fruits known as peppers and tomatoes as well. Big fan of berries.

I think there's a diet for everyone. Paleo seems to work for me even if I eat cheese.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been doing it for a few weeks and feel good and dropped a few pounds.

I did have my first flour this morning, I am in New Orleans and had to have beignets for breakfast. They weren't nearly as good as I remembered.

Good to hear the good cheese results. It really makes the lifestyle much easier on me with a little cheese.

 
I've been doing it for a few weeks and feel good and dropped a few pounds.I did have my first flour this morning, I am in New Orleans and had to have beignets for breakfast. They weren't nearly as good as I remembered.Good to hear the good cheese results. It really makes the lifestyle much easier on me with a little cheese.
Of the "cheaper" cheeses, I hit Baby Swiss and Sharp/Super Sharp Cheddar up. We have some seriously good cheese producers in Ohio. Hoffman's and Guggisberg are my go to cheeses for the every day fix.
 
I posted this link in another thread, but I figured it would be appropriate here.

http://genaw.com/lowcarb/

It's not paleo/primal specific, but it has lots of low carb recipes that me and Mrs. SB have been using for a while.
Thanks for the link. I've been needing to do something drastic, so seeing some real recipes is a great help in preparing to do this. I'm going back to read the rest of this thread now.

 
Got on this train 5 weeks ago after having it recommended to me by a couple of different doctors in passing. Still having dairy (sour cream, a little milk, Tillamook cheddar) and wife and I cheat about 1 meal/week or two. Still dropping 3 lbs each week steadily. My biggest weakness is nuts...have to be careful not to overdo cashews or almonds. Sisson recommends <80 grams of carbs per day to lose weight. I'm usually in the 60-100 g/day depending on how many nuts I eat. But staying away from grains and sugar has been huge and is obviously making a big difference.

Thanks to all the input in this thread. It's encouraging.

 
Here is a very nice interview with Stephan Guyenet.

What is the "state of the art" in nutrition science, what theories are right now more advanced?

I’m fairly specialized in my research so I’m perhaps not the best person to say what’s state of the art in the field as a whole, but I’ll give my perspective on a few things that I find compelling.

One of the things that I’ve found really gratifying is seeing the field move in the direction of studying foods rather than specific nutrients. Essential nutrients such as minerals and vitamins are obviously important, but now that we really understand the great biological complexity of whole foods, it’s becoming less and less plausible that we can accurately predict the biological impact of a food by understanding only a few of its chemical components. A number of prominent researchers understand this and are moving their research in that direction.

Another line of investigation that’s important is understanding how genes and environment interact to produce health or disease—this field will continue expanding and providing important insights. There is no one-size-fits-all solution for health.

Gut bacteria and digestive health have also generated a lot of interest lately.

There is a lot of cutting-edge research going into understanding the brain mechanisms that mediate food intake. We’re getting to the point where we can predict obesity risk to some degree just by measuring cognitive traits (e.g., ability to delay gratification, impulsiveness, susceptibility to reward), or brain responses to food stimuli. Also, understanding how the energy homeostasis system in the brain is altered during the development of obesity—this is my field.

What is the real role of physical activity? Some argue that the more you exercise the more hunger, is that correct?

I think a person would have to be pretty stubborn at this point to think that physical activity doesn’t help at all with body weight control and general health, given the state of the evidence. For obesity, it seems to work best as a preventive measure rather than as a treatment, and this has been strongly supported both by animal studies and observational studies in humans. It’s hard to return to true leanness once a person is obese, no matter what strategy they use. As we say, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”. It is correct in a general sense that exercise increases hunger. However, on average it doesn’t increase hunger enough to make up for the calories you expended, and therefore you lose fat if you’re overweight.

There is a lot of individual variability here. Research has shown that some overweight people compensate for exercise by eating more, and others don’t, and in some cases they even eat less than if they hadn’t exercised. On average, exercise alone isn’t a very effective way to lose fat if you have a lot to lose, but it can increase the effectiveness of dietary interventions. However, some people respond exceptionally well to exercise and can lose 20, 30, 50 pounds. Regardless of whether or not it can turn people from fat to ripped, regular exercise is an absolutely essential component of a healthy lifestyle.

You have debated with Gary Taubes about the role of insulin and carbs in weight control, what is right or wrong with his view?

I think Taubes has been useful in the sense that he introduced many people to the low-carbohydrate diet, and the research challenging some of our conventional ideas about the health impacts of such diets. A number of studies on low-carbohydrate diets have shown that although they’re higher in fat and meat than most diets, when adopted by overweight or obese people they’re able to safely cause fat loss and health improvements over periods lasting up to two years. No one really knows what happens after that. They seem to cause more fat loss, and perhaps better metabolic improvements, than the conventional low-fat diet for periods up to one year. Although the ability of low-carbohydrate diets (and most diets in general) to cause fat loss is fairly modest in most clinical trials, some individuals respond extremely well to it and can lose large amounts of fat. For these people, the diet can be life-changing.

However, Taubes took this piece of useful information and stretched it much too far. He ditched most of the last 70 years of published research and constructed a mechanism whereby many of our modern health ills, particularly obesity and diabetes, are due to the ability of carbohydrates (particularly refined carbohydrate and sugar) to increase circulating insulin. It’s an extremely simple model if you think about it: carbs -> insulin acting directly on fat cells -> obesity. Much too simple in fact, given the many roles of insulin in various tissues including the brain, not to mention all the other processes that occur with food ingestion. Taubes has scathingly criticized seasoned researchers for not considering his hypothesis, which he felt was correct but ignored by researchers for non-scientific reasons (do I need to point out here that Taubes has virtually no training or experience in the biological sciences?). The reality is that researchers have not overlooked the hypothesis, they have tested it in many different ways and found that it does not explain obesity. As a scientist, I can’t say with 100 percent confidence that elevated insulin plays no role in obesity whatsoever, but what I can say with 99.99 percent confidence is that no single factor will ever be able to explain common obesity. I can also say with confidence that there are much more compelling explanations than excess insulin acting on fat cells, and these are currently being pursued by many brilliant researchers.

Is fructose a problem as Dr. Robert Lustig suggests?

Humans have a very long evolutionary history with fruit. Our ancestors were among the first organisms to eat fruit 55 million years ago, shortly after it evolved. Mammals likely evolved into primates specifically to access fruit, and our ancestors remained in trees eating fruit until relatively recently. Our closest living relatives the chimpanzees get most of their calories from fruit, and they therefore have a high-sugar diet. All human cultures that have access to fruit enjoy it and eat it regularly.

Studies suggest that fruit is healthy and can even aid fat loss a little bit under certain circumstances. However, most of the sugar people eat doesn’t come from fruit—it comes from processed corn or refined sugar cane juice. This poses a problem for several reasons. The first is that sugar and high-fructose corn syrup are virtually devoid of micronutrients and other beneficial substances, therefore they crowd out more nutritious food. The second is that sugar increases the energy density and palatability of foods, leading to increased meal size and eating/drinking between meals in the absence of hunger/thirst. This contributes to obesity and all the things that come along with it.

The third problem is that yes, in excess refined sugar can cause metabolic problems, and this is mostly due to its fructose content. To my knowledge, this has only ever been demonstrated with large amounts of refined sugar or fructose, and never with fruit. Lean people are more resistant to the insulin resistance and other metabolic problems that occur with fructose feeding, and this probably relates to the energy overload already present on the liver in obesity. It’s not clear whether or not the amount of fructose most people eat today is enough to cause these problems, however I suspect that for people eating more sugar than average, it is. Despite its ability to cause metabolic problems in excess, many studies have shown that fructose is no more fattening than other equally caloric sweet substances (such as glucose).

Is insulin the main problem? What about ghrelin, leptin and other hormones?

Insulin resistance (an inability of insulin to do its job properly) is definitely a central problem for health in the 21st century. It contributes to many different health conditions, particularly type II diabetes. The main cause of insulin resistance is excess body fat, plain and simple, although there are many other factors such as exercise and diet quality that also have an impact. To understand insulin resistance, we have to understand what causes excess body fat. Food intake is regulated by a “symphony” of signals that the brain receives and uses to determine whether or not a person will eat. Some of these signals are from sensory organs and the brain itself, while others are hormones in the circulation coming from the gut, body fat, the pancreas, and elsewhere. This finely tuned system is disrupted when a susceptible person is exposed to abundant, energy-dense, tasty food, in an environment that minimizes physical activity and sleep, and promotes psychological stress. Leptin is a key hormone that restrains food intake in this context, but it can only go so far. Eventually, leptin resistance develops, which makes it difficult to lose fat once obesity is established.

Is wheat that bad? If so, why?

Wheat is definitely bad for about one percent of Europeans and Americans who have celiac disease. This alone is a major public health burden attributable mostly to wheat. Beyond that one percent, I suspect that there are many other people who benefit from avoiding it for various reasons, but that is a supposition that will require more research to confirm. There are probably many people who can eat wheat with impunity.

I think one of the most problematic aspects of wheat is that it’s used to make things that are energy-dense and taste really good. Flour is a substance that can be homogenously mixed with fats, sugars, and flavorings, creating combinations that are virtually irresistible to the palate. Think brownies, cookies, cake, and even a hot loaf of crusty bread. Most people can find room for 200 calories of chocolate cake even when they’re stuffed at the end of a meal. Can you get that excited about a plain potato?

A fellow named Matt Lentzner organized something called “Gluten-Free January” last year where people gave up gluten for one month. An epidemiologist named Dr. Janine Jagger and I composed surveys to collect anonymous information from participants at the end of the month. We found that almost everyone who was overweight lost several pounds, and almost everyone with digestive problems and low energy noticed an improvement (1, 2). There was no control group so we don’t know how much of the improvement was due to avoiding gluten per se, how much was due to avoiding junk food and/or reducing carbohydrate, and how much was a placebo effect. However, it does suggest that many people benefit from giving up gluten, whatever the mechanism may be.

What about fats? Why they have been so criticized? What are the real dangerous fats?

Fats are energy dense, and saturated fats can increase circulating cholesterol in controlled trials, therefore it was thought that fats contribute to obesity and coronary heart disease. I think it’s still true that fat can contribute to obesity if it increases the energy density and palatability of food. However, paradoxically dietary fat is compatible with body fat loss in the context of a low-carbohydrate diet, so it’s not a simple relationship. The key in that context is that something is being restricted. High fat in combination with high carbohydrate will not cause fat loss.

Saturated fat has received a lot of blame over the years, but it’s becoming increasingly likely that it plays little or no role in heart disease in humans, in the context of a normal diverse diet. That doesn’t mean a person should put a huge amount of butter on everything or drink coconut oil, but in moderation as part of a mixed whole food diet, I don’t see any reason to be concerned about eating the natural fats contained in meat, dairy, eggs, and nuts, and to a lesser extent using fats like butter, unrefined coconut oil, red palm oil, and extra virgin olive oil in cooking.

I’m not a proponent of refined seed oils (“vegetable oils”). They’re refined and therefore contain virtually no nutritional value, and many of them (e.g. cottonseed and soy) are by-products of other industries. Furthermore, they tend to be high in polyunsaturated fat and are therefore susceptible to oxidation (rancidity) during cooking, and most of them contain a lot of omega-6 and very little omega-3, which can potentially disrupt many processes in the body (there are exceptions, such as canola oil). If you must use a refined seed oil for cooking, the best is probably high-oleic sunflower oil, a variety bred for low polyunsaturated and high monounsaturated fat content.

Do we have to be worried about cholesterol? Can we control it through diet or drugs?

Cholesterol in the blood is contained in particles called lipoproteins. Lipoproteins such as LDL (“bad” cholesterol) and HDL (“good” cholesterol) are causally related to the development of atherosclerosis (thickening and degeneration of the arteries), which increases heart attack risk. So yes, I think we should be worried about cholesterol. The ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol is a simple and effective indicator of risk. For people who are interested, the Framingham risk calculator can give an estimate of 10-year heart attack risk based on data collected from the Framingham study (3).

Diet and drugs do have an impact on lipoproteins. Excess body fat increases LDL and decreases HDL, and fat loss can reverse this to some extent. Polyunsaturated fat lowers LDL and HDL. Saturated fat increases LDL and HDL in trials lasting up to three months, although it’s not clear to what degree this effect persists in the long term (in any case, it appears to have little or no impact on heart attack risk). Dietary cholesterol has a modest ability to increase LDL and HDL. Moderate alcohol consumption and exercise increase HDL and reduce heart attack risk. Smoking cigarettes lowers HDL and greatly increases heart attack risk, while smokeless tobacco does not.

Drugs such as statins lower LDL and reduce heart attack risk. These drugs do have side effects for some people, but they’re probably worth it in high-risk individuals.

Your main point is that the reward and palatability plays a huge role in hunger and appetite? Why?

Food reward is the seductiveness of food—its ability to motivate you to seek it out and eat it. Palatability is a related concept—it’s the pleasure derived from eating a food. It’s really just common sense that if a food is seductive and tastes really good, you’re going to eat more of it, and you may even eat it between meals when you aren’t hungry.

Our ancestors lived in a world of simple foods. Even just a few hundred years ago, they didn’t have modern stoves, they didn’t have a spice rack, they often didn’t have cooking oils, sweeteners, or salt. They certainly didn’t have soda, candy bars, and French fries. They ate simply prepared whole foods, and this allowed their appetite control mechanisms to operate correctly, effortlessly matching energy intake to energy needs.

I won’t get into the details of the mechanism, but if food is highly rewarding and palatable, it modifies these appetite control mechanisms, allowing you to eat more and accumulate more body fat than you would if the food were more simple. In the US and globally we are increasingly surrounded by energy-dense, highly rewarding and palatable foods, and food cues in advertising that make us crave them. We eat less home-cooked food than ever before, instead outsourcing our food preparation to professionals who attempt to get our business by maximizing reward and palatability.

In Europe, the Dukan Diet is gaining traction as a way to lose weight, do you know it? What do you think?

The induction phase of the Dukan diet is basically a modified version of a protein-sparing modified fast (PSMF). PSMF diets have been around for a long time—they’re basically very high protein low-calorie diets that cause rapid fat loss while minimizing hunger and muscle loss due to the blandness, reduced carbohydrate, and high protein content. PSMF combines a low-fat and a low-carbohydrate diet. PSMF diets contain very little carbohydrate or fat, and in Dukan’s case they are also quite bland. This all contributes to the appetite suppressing effect of the diet, facilitating fat loss. It also resets the palate to some degree, diminishing psychological reliance on highly rewarding/palatable foods.

That’s OK for a while as long as you can tolerate the high protein and low calories, but obviously the diet is not nourishing enough to be a long-term solution, so it must give way to a maintenance phase. This is where things become difficult, because most people will rapidly regain lost fat. However, if you’re prepared to make positive and lasting changes to your diet and lifestyle, and never return to how you were living before, then it’s possible that you could maintain some or even most of the fat loss.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Got on this train 5 weeks ago after having it recommended to me by a couple of different doctors in passing. Still having dairy (sour cream, a little milk, Tillamook cheddar) and wife and I cheat about 1 meal/week or two. Still dropping 3 lbs each week steadily. My biggest weakness is nuts...have to be careful not to overdo cashews or almonds. Sisson recommends <80 grams of carbs per day to lose weight. I'm usually in the 60-100 g/day depending on how many nuts I eat. But staying away from grains and sugar has been huge and is obviously making a big difference.Thanks to all the input in this thread. It's encouraging.
Everything I've read says nuts-- almonds, cashews, etc-- are fine for paleo. Peanuts, which are actually legumes, are to be avoided.
 
I haven't read any of the books, just skimmed through this thread and I read MDA anytime I'm curious about how primal a certain food is. Just cutting out the basics, and I'm probably < 20g carbs a day 6 days a week. I've lost 20 pounds in the last month. This is the first time I've ever lost weight like this with zero exercise. I'm usually big into cardio and weight lifting, but I've been off of it for several months because of work. I picked up a few things I didn't know, like the partially hydrogenated oils, and staying away from vegetable oil in general in place of animal fat. It definitely works for me, but I've always been able to lose/gain weight really easy.

 
Got on this train 5 weeks ago after having it recommended to me by a couple of different doctors in passing. Still having dairy (sour cream, a little milk, Tillamook cheddar) and wife and I cheat about 1 meal/week or two. Still dropping 3 lbs each week steadily. My biggest weakness is nuts...have to be careful not to overdo cashews or almonds. Sisson recommends <80 grams of carbs per day to lose weight. I'm usually in the 60-100 g/day depending on how many nuts I eat. But staying away from grains and sugar has been huge and is obviously making a big difference.Thanks to all the input in this thread. It's encouraging.
Everything I've read says nuts-- almonds, cashews, etc-- are fine for paleo. Peanuts, which are actually legumes, are to be avoided.
They're fine for paleo, but if you're trying to drop lbs, they can be a monkey wrench. Robb Wolf and Mark Sisson make note of that as well, very calorically dense and can stall or slow down weight loss. I personally eat them a few days a week to satiate hunger when I haven't had as much fat as I should have. Lately I've been eating more avacados instead (sprinkled with lime juice and salsa seasoning - yum).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone do a rundown on diet soda? I know obviously there was no soda in Paleo times, but I'm referring more to why it shouldn't be drank. I know the thoughts on artificial sweeteners, but aside for those concerns, are there actual dietary reasons to not drink diet sodas?

Also, what about refried beans? Obviously the thoughts on legumes from above apply, but are refried beans worse than, say, black beans? (I checked, didn't look like there was any added sugar, anything like that.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Got on this train 5 weeks ago after having it recommended to me by a couple of different doctors in passing. Still having dairy (sour cream, a little milk, Tillamook cheddar) and wife and I cheat about 1 meal/week or two. Still dropping 3 lbs each week steadily. My biggest weakness is nuts...have to be careful not to overdo cashews or almonds. Sisson recommends <80 grams of carbs per day to lose weight. I'm usually in the 60-100 g/day depending on how many nuts I eat. But staying away from grains and sugar has been huge and is obviously making a big difference.Thanks to all the input in this thread. It's encouraging.
Everything I've read says nuts-- almonds, cashews, etc-- are fine for paleo. Peanuts, which are actually legumes, are to be avoided.
They're fine for paleo, but if you're trying to drop lbs, they can be a monkey wrench. Robb Wolf and Mark Sisson make note of that as well, very calorically dense and can stall or slow down weight loss. I personally eat them a few days a week to satiate hunger when I haven't had as much fat as I should have. Lately I've been eating more avacados instead (sprinkled with lime juice and salsa seasoning - yum).
Yep, this exactly. They're primal, but it's easy to overdo them and eat too many calories and/or carbs from them.
 
Can someone do a rundown on diet soda? I know obviously there was no soda in Paleo times, but I'm referring more to why it shouldn't be drank. I know the thoughts on artificial sweeteners, but aside for those concerns, are there actual dietary reasons to not drink diet sodas?Also, what about refried beans? Obviously the thoughts on legumes from above apply, but are refried beans worse than, say, black beans? (I checked, didn't look like there was any added sugar, anything like that.)
From what I've read, its the chem icals in diet soda that make it bad. Some think xylitol (from birch bark) or stevia is okay in limited amounts. I've made ice cream with the xylitol with good results but I do not care for stevia. Beans are legumes are beans are legumes.... The problem is not the fat or lard or ham in preparing them its the bean itself. I pretty much avoid them, but maybe use a small amount making some mexican food once a week or so.
 
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.

Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.

I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle. I've been eating smoked ham from the grocery store wrapped in this hydroponic lettuce that I got from the local farmer's market and that stuff is #### (rhymes with 'bits')kl. I also like to eat apples (2 a day) and bananas on occasion. Water is pretty much the only thing I drink, but occasionally I'll have some cereal with soy or almond milk. I also like to smash unhealthy stuff once in a great while, but I've been pretty good about eating right for the most part I think. Some nights I'll buy some grass-fed beef and just eat it plain off the grill with some lettuce.

I feel real good but I need to figure out cheap, easy ways to add some flavor to these meals. I know nothing about vegetables or cooking so if anyone has tips feel free to share.

 
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle.
Is it really possible to build muscles in two or three weeks? Seems like it would take a lot more time than that.
 
'Ren Ho3k said:
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle. I've been eating smoked ham from the grocery store wrapped in this hydroponic lettuce that I got from the local farmer's market and that stuff is #### (rhymes with 'bits')kl. I also like to eat apples (2 a day) and bananas on occasion. Water is pretty much the only thing I drink, but occasionally I'll have some cereal with soy or almond milk. I also like to smash unhealthy stuff once in a great while, but I've been pretty good about eating right for the most part I think. Some nights I'll buy some grass-fed beef and just eat it plain off the grill with some lettuce. I feel real good but I need to figure out cheap, easy ways to add some flavor to these meals. I know nothing about vegetables or cooking so if anyone has tips feel free to share.
I usually saute peppers and onions when I grill out. By saute, I mean cooking the peppers/onions just long enough to soften. I know some are pretty technical when it comes to using that term. Asparagus is really easy to cook on the grill. Just brush the grill with a little olive oil and cook the aspargus for a 2/3 minutes. Done. Brussell Sprouts are easy, but take a bit longer. Make an aluminum foil bowl (use at least two sheets) and put the Sprouts in the bowl, sprinkle with olive oil, salt and pepper to taste. Turn the sprouts occasionally. Once they start charring, they're done.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Ren Ho3k said:
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.

Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.

I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle. I've been eating smoked ham from the grocery store wrapped in this hydroponic lettuce that I got from the local farmer's market and that stuff is #### (rhymes with 'bits')kl. I also like to eat apples (2 a day) and bananas on occasion. Water is pretty much the only thing I drink, but occasionally I'll have some cereal with soy or almond milk. I also like to smash unhealthy stuff once in a great while, but I've been pretty good about eating right for the most part I think. Some nights I'll buy some grass-fed beef and just eat it plain off the grill with some lettuce.

I feel real good but I need to figure out cheap, easy ways to add some flavor to these meals. I know nothing about vegetables or cooking so if anyone has tips feel free to share.
I usually saute peppers and onions when I grill out. By saute, I mean cooking the peppers/onions just long enough to soften. I know some are pretty technical when it comes to using that term. Asparagus is really easy to cook on the grill. Just brush the grill with a little olive oil and cook the aspargus for a 2/3 minutes. Done. Brussell Sprouts are easy, but take a bit longer. Make an aluminum foil bowl (use at least two sheets) and put the Sprouts in the bowl, sprinkle with olive oil, salt and pepper to taste. Turn the sprouts occasionally. Once they start charring, they're done.
Adding in garlic, that's how I usually grill asparagus. Is it better straight on the grill?
 
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.

Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.

I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle. I've been eating smoked ham from the grocery store wrapped in this hydroponic lettuce that I got from the local farmer's market and that stuff is #### (rhymes with 'bits')kl. I also like to eat apples (2 a day) and bananas on occasion. Water is pretty much the only thing I drink, but occasionally I'll have some cereal with soy or almond milk. I also like to smash unhealthy stuff once in a great while, but I've been pretty good about eating right for the most part I think. Some nights I'll buy some grass-fed beef and just eat it plain off the grill with some lettuce.

I feel real good but I need to figure out cheap, easy ways to add some flavor to these meals. I know nothing about vegetables or cooking so if anyone has tips feel free to share.
He doesn't post videos all that frequently, but Mike Dolce has some interesting youtube videos:
 
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle.
Is it really possible to build muscles in two or three weeks? Seems like it would take a lot more time than that.
yea theres no way you legitimately added muscle just from swimming for a few weeks...probably just lower body fat leading to the muscles showing more when you look in the mirror. To gain legitimate pounds of muscle you need to get on a progressive resistance training program that doesn't neglect the core full body lifts(squats, deadlifts, pullups, kettlebells, pushups, bench press, overhead press, power cleans, etc.)
 
I stepped on the scale a few weeks ago and weighed 200 pounds.

Since July 11th I started swimming a mile a day and trying to eat right.

I weighed in at 178.5 today after swimming and I think I've replaced much of what was originally fat with muscle. I've been eating smoked ham from the grocery store wrapped in this hydroponic lettuce that I got from the local farmer's market and that stuff is #### (rhymes with 'bits')kl. I also like to eat apples (2 a day) and bananas on occasion. Water is pretty much the only thing I drink, but occasionally I'll have some cereal with soy or almond milk. I also like to smash unhealthy stuff once in a great while, but I've been pretty good about eating right for the most part I think. Some nights I'll buy some grass-fed beef and just eat it plain off the grill with some lettuce.

I feel real good but I need to figure out cheap, easy ways to add some flavor to these meals. I know nothing about vegetables or cooking so if anyone has tips feel free to share.
I usually saute peppers and onions when I grill out. By saute, I mean cooking the peppers/onions just long enough to soften. I know some are pretty technical when it comes to using that term. Asparagus is really easy to cook on the grill. Just brush the grill with a little olive oil and cook the aspargus for a 2/3 minutes. Done. Brussell Sprouts are easy, but take a bit longer. Make an aluminum foil bowl (use at least two sheets) and put the Sprouts in the bowl, sprinkle with olive oil, salt and pepper to taste. Turn the sprouts occasionally. Once they start charring, they're done.
Adding in garlic, that's how I usually grill asparagus. Is it better straight on the grill?
Good idea. I think so, but I like the "grill" flavor. Just enough to char one side, turn over, char the other side and eat.ETA: Just noticed what you highlighted. The sprouts I put in aluminum foil. They will still char eventually, but you won't have the straight "grill" flavor. The asparagus I throw directly on the cast iron. Sprouts taste better "soft" imo so it's better to let them cook for a while.... indirect heat or the warming rack is usually where I put them at first while I'm cooking other food. I'm not a real experienced cook, but I'm learning. I read a bunch of recipes and get an idea as to what the main ingredients and temperature/time are and go from there. Experiment a little bit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've dropped 21 pounds just by getting rid of the grains. I'll save one meal a week for Italian, but other than that, it's all meat, vegetables, fruits, almonds/walnuts/cashews, and of course, my cheese. When I get a house, hopefully I'll have room to raise my own meat; a garden is a given. I'm buying my meat from a small market that buys their meat from local farmers, and as much produce locally as possible. It's summer, so I've been buying my produce from an Amish market. The garden over at my parents had to stay small this year for a few reasons I won't bore you with, but the tomatoes and peppers are coming in and we just canned 61 quarts of half-runners.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've dropped 21 pounds just by getting rid of the grains. I'll save one meal a week for Italian, but other than that, it's all meat, vegetables, fruits, almonds/walnuts/cashews, and of course, my cheese. When I get a house, hopefully I'll have room to raise my own meat; a garden is a given. I'm buying my meat from a small market that buys their meat from local farmers, and as much produce locally as possible. It's summer, so I've been buying my produce from an Amish market. The garden over at my parents had to stay small this year for a few reasons I won't bore you with, but the tomatoes and peppers are coming in and we just canned 61 quarts of half-runners.
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
 
I've dropped 21 pounds just by getting rid of the grains. I'll save one meal a week for Italian, but other than that, it's all meat, vegetables, fruits, almonds/walnuts/cashews, and of course, my cheese. When I get a house, hopefully I'll have room to raise my own meat; a garden is a given. I'm buying my meat from a small market that buys their meat from local farmers, and as much produce locally as possible. It's summer, so I've been buying my produce from an Amish market. The garden over at my parents had to stay small this year for a few reasons I won't bore you with, but the tomatoes and peppers are coming in and we just canned 61 quarts of half-runners.
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Not true.
 
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
The problem with simple sugars like what is found in fruits and honey is that it causes a spike in insulin because too much glucose is entering the bloodstream too quickly. This can lead to insulin resistance and diabetes.The problem with getiing glucose from steak is that it comes with saturated fat that cause other diseases including heart disease and prostate cancer.

 
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
The problem with simple sugars like what is found in fruits and honey is that it causes a spike in insulin because too much glucose is entering the bloodstream too quickly. This can lead to insulin resistance and diabetes.The problem with getiing glucose from steak is that it comes with saturated fat that cause other diseases including heart disease and prostate cancer.
the saturated fat myth has largely been debunked
 
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
The problem with simple sugars like what is found in fruits and honey is that it causes a spike in insulin because too much glucose is entering the bloodstream too quickly. This can lead to insulin resistance and diabetes.The problem with getiing glucose from steak is that it comes with saturated fat that cause other diseases including heart disease and prostate cancer.
doubtful
 
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
The problem with simple sugars like what is found in fruits and honey is that it causes a spike in insulin because too much glucose is entering the bloodstream too quickly. This can lead to insulin resistance and diabetes.The problem with getiing glucose from steak is that it comes with saturated fat that cause other diseases including heart disease and prostate cancer.
You should read this thread before posting in it.You are pretty much parroting what is referred to as Common Wisdom (CW) most of what you wrote in your last two posts has been thoroughly debunked.

 
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
The problem with simple sugars like what is found in fruits and honey is that it causes a spike in insulin because too much glucose is entering the bloodstream too quickly. This can lead to insulin resistance and diabetes.The problem with getiing glucose from steak is that it comes with saturated fat that cause other diseases including heart disease and prostate cancer.
When is the last time you read something, late 80's?
 
'Scrooloose said:
'Maurile Tremblay said:
'Scrooloose said:
Your body needs the complex carbs from grains to produce glucose which your muscles and brain need to function properly. You are losing weight because the body is basically getting its fuel by breaking down muscle.
Grains are not the only source of glucose. All carbs break down into glucose and other sugars. Potatoes, bananas, honey . . . there's no sense in listing all sources of carbs because it's too long. In addition, your body can produce glucose from dietary protein, like steak. Avoiding grains should not lead to the breakdown of muscle. After all, for the huge majority of human history, pretty much nobody ate grains.
The problem with simple sugars like what is found in fruits and honey is that it causes a spike in insulin because too much glucose is entering the bloodstream too quickly. This can lead to insulin resistance and diabetes.
I believe the theory that insulin resistance is caused by postprandial insulin spikes lacks support. Those 30-bananas-a-day people, as nutty as they are, seem to have perfectly good insulin sensitivity.But even if insulin spikes did cause diabetes, it wouldn't be an argument for substituting grains for fruits. The insulinogenic response from fruit and from grain-based products (bread, pasta, rice) are similar.

Moreover, even if starches were better than fruits in terms of their effects on insulin, that still wouldn't support the idea that grains are necessary. Potatoes, sweet potatoes, yams, yuca, taro, beans — all are non-grain sources of starch.

The problem with getiing glucose from steak is that it comes with saturated fat that cause other diseases including heart disease and prostate cancer.
That was the mainstream view for the past few decades, but researchers are backing away from it as evidence to the contrary accumulates. If it were true, you'd expect cultures with very high intakes of saturated fat to have above-average levels of heart disease. But this is not observed. People in the Philippines for whom coconuts are a staple, for example, and people among the Masai who get a huge percentage of their calories from high-fat dairy, have extremely low rates of heart disease. (They don't get prostate cancer either.)In any case, talk of diabetes or CVD or cancer seems to have little to do with the notion that GreatLakesMike is losing muscle mass because he's given up grains.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Two books I highly recommend on this subject :

Wheat belly

It starts with food

As others have stated grains are the problem. Two slices of whole grain. Bread increase you GI more then two tbs of sugar.

I gave up all grains and sugar drinks and lost 33 pounds in 6 weeks. From 250 to 217.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top