What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Panthers may lock up DeAngelo Williams with contract extension (1 Viewer)

Sigmund Bloom

Footballguy
Staff member
warning Stewart dynasty owners

The Panthers, by the way, may lock up tailback DeAngelo Williams with a contract extension before the start of the 2010 campaign
I have never thought it was wise to assume that Williams would leave via free agency next year. The Panthers have their running game exactly how they want it, why would they not attempt to keep it intact?
 
warning Stewart dynasty owners

The Panthers, by the way, may lock up tailback DeAngelo Williams with a contract extension before the start of the 2010 campaign
I have never thought it was wise to assume that Williams would leave via free agency next year. The Panthers have their running game exactly how they want it, why would they not attempt to keep it intact?
Williams is signed for this season. When next season begins, he will be 28 and it doesn't seem smart to spend money in a salary cap era for a RB when they could use it on a weak area of the team. It really depends on what kind of cap there will be and the amount of the contract. Unless the contract is very reasonable, it doesn't make sense to me.
 
warning Stewart dynasty owners

The Panthers, by the way, may lock up tailback DeAngelo Williams with a contract extension before the start of the 2010 campaign
I have never thought it was wise to assume that Williams would leave via free agency next year. The Panthers have their running game exactly how they want it, why would they not attempt to keep it intact?
Williams is signed for this season. When next season begins, he will be 28 and it doesn't seem smart to spend money in a salary cap era for a RB when they could use it on a weak area of the team. It really depends on what kind of cap there will be and the amount of the contract. Unless the contract is very reasonable, it doesn't make sense to me.
It may not make sense to you, but to the simplistic Panthers it makes complete sense. They don't look at their running game as an either/or proposition. They want to have two great running backs, and they do now. You have to also remember that Stewart hasn't been the most durable - injured every year at Oregon, came into the league with turf toe surgery, now achilles surgery. They won't have Delhomme's big price tag on the books next year. No first round pick signing bonus this year. They'll have the money to do it, elite RB contracts are actually reasonable compared to what we have seen for Peppers, Dunta Robinson, Antrel Rolle this offseason. I bet they can lock up DeAngelo for the rest of his career for 20-25 mil guaranteed. Burleson got 11 mil. It's not crazy to spend that to have dominant running game when your whole team blueprint is built around that.
 
warning Stewart dynasty owners

The Panthers, by the way, may lock up tailback DeAngelo Williams with a contract extension before the start of the 2010 campaign
I have never thought it was wise to assume that Williams would leave via free agency next year. The Panthers have their running game exactly how they want it, why would they not attempt to keep it intact?
Williams is signed for this season. When next season begins, he will be 28 and it doesn't seem smart to spend money in a salary cap era for a RB when they could use it on a weak area of the team. It really depends on what kind of cap there will be and the amount of the contract. Unless the contract is very reasonable, it doesn't make sense to me.
It may not make sense to you, but to the simplistic Panthers it makes complete sense. They don't look at their running game as an either/or proposition. They want to have two great running backs, and they do now. You have to also remember that Stewart hasn't been the most durable - injured every year at Oregon, came into the league with turf toe surgery, now achilles surgery. They won't have Delhomme's big price tag on the books next year. No first round pick signing bonus this year. They'll have the money to do it, elite RB contracts are actually reasonable compared to what we have seen for Peppers, Dunta Robinson, Antrel Rolle this offseason. I bet they can lock up DeAngelo for the rest of his career for 20-25 mil guaranteed. Burleson got 11 mil. It's not crazy to spend that to have dominant running game when your whole team blueprint is built around that.
:bs: Williams is their best player at the position that the Carolina offense is built around. He also has relatively low mileage since he didn't have a lot of carries early in his career. Panthers would be foolish to let him get away, regardless of how high the fantasy community as Jonathan Stewart ranked in dynasty rankings.

 
Williams is a good citizen, good pass receiver, breakaway back, with skills between the tackles. He's going to be their offensive leader with Stewart as either a great complement or the next "Michael Turner" in a year or two. Backs with Williams' size, vision, and quickness tend to be more durable long-term than bruisers with 1-2 big years. I like the move. This team is trying to be patient with its offensive philosophy and build on what works for them while tweaking what doesn't. Getting rid of Delhomme is a tweak. Letting Williams go in the next year or two his a huge move, even with Stewart's great skill. Talent-wise they have two of the 10 best RBs in the NFL.

 
This was one of the reasons I sold Deangelo this offseason in every league I owned him in. Too much uncertainty surrounding that situation. And the Panthers don't have a history of getting it correct right away (look how long it took them to give Deangelo the shot over Foster).

On the other hand, I've kept Stewart everywhere I have him merely because he's the younger of the two and has more trade value.

 
This was one of the reasons I sold Deangelo this offseason in every league I owned him in. Too much uncertainty surrounding that situation. And the Panthers don't have a history of getting it correct right away (look how long it took them to give Deangelo the shot over Foster).On the other hand, I've kept Stewart everywhere I have him merely because he's the younger of the two and has more trade value.
Your logic would seem to dictate keeping Williams and selling Stewart, the opposite of what you have apparently done. :shrug:
 
This was one of the reasons I sold Deangelo this offseason in every league I owned him in. Too much uncertainty surrounding that situation. And the Panthers don't have a history of getting it correct right away (look how long it took them to give Deangelo the shot over Foster).On the other hand, I've kept Stewart everywhere I have him merely because he's the younger of the two and has more trade value.
Your logic would seem to dictate keeping Williams and selling Stewart, the opposite of what you have apparently done. :shrug:
Maybe.....if I weren't able to get maximum value for Deangelo that may be true.....but I did.And the reasoning behind keeping Stewart is that if news came out such as this, I find his trade value as much less volatile than Deangelo's....whether it should be or not.
 
Like the move. Lock up Williams and that combo for the next 3-4 years.
I agree, although Stewart is only signed for 3 more years. The reason I like it is if they let DeAngelo go then Stewart is going to ask for a bigger contract anyway before it's done. Keeping him in a RBBC with low stats makes it tough for him to ask to renegotiate.
 
This was one of the reasons I sold Deangelo this offseason in every league I owned him in. Too much uncertainty surrounding that situation. And the Panthers don't have a history of getting it correct right away (look how long it took them to give Deangelo the shot over Foster).

On the other hand, I've kept Stewart everywhere I have him merely because he's the younger of the two and has more trade value.
Agreed, and that has been a source of frustration for Panthers fans. It's John Fox who makes these decisions, and D-Will should have had his shot earlier. I like the fact we're re-signing him. Our core players are our main priority now.
 
This was one of the reasons I sold Deangelo this offseason in every league I owned him in. Too much uncertainty surrounding that situation. And the Panthers don't have a history of getting it correct right away (look how long it took them to give Deangelo the shot over Foster).On the other hand, I've kept Stewart everywhere I have him merely because he's the younger of the two and has more trade value.
DeAngelo had every chance to overtake Foster earlier, but he simply wasn't ready. He was poor in pass protection and danced nearly twice as bad as we are used to with Reggie Bush.
 
Stewart is making $2.1M, $2.4M, and $2.8M the next three seasons, so signing Williams to an extension is not cost-prohibitive. Makes sense, imo.

 
warning Stewart dynasty owners

The Panthers, by the way, may lock up tailback DeAngelo Williams with a contract extension before the start of the 2010 campaign
I have never thought it was wise to assume that Williams would leave via free agency next year. The Panthers have their running game exactly how they want it, why would they not attempt to keep it intact?
Williams is signed for this season. When next season begins, he will be 28 and it doesn't seem smart to spend money in a salary cap era for a RB when they could use it on a weak area of the team. It really depends on what kind of cap there will be and the amount of the contract. Unless the contract is very reasonable, it doesn't make sense to me.
It may not make sense to you, but to the simplistic Panthers it makes complete sense. They don't look at their running game as an either/or proposition. They want to have two great running backs, and they do now. You have to also remember that Stewart hasn't been the most durable - injured every year at Oregon, came into the league with turf toe surgery, now achilles surgery. They won't have Delhomme's big price tag on the books next year. No first round pick signing bonus this year. They'll have the money to do it, elite RB contracts are actually reasonable compared to what we have seen for Peppers, Dunta Robinson, Antrel Rolle this offseason. I bet they can lock up DeAngelo for the rest of his career for 20-25 mil guaranteed. Burleson got 11 mil. It's not crazy to spend that to have dominant running game when your whole team blueprint is built around that.
Not sure how the play would be affected by the uncapped year, but in a normal year (or if I were playing Panthers GM on sega) I'd trade d williams to the raiders for a few high picks, and spend one of those on young backup for J stewart (in the same mold of what he was to deangelo). Then you pick up a few DT's or CB's to plug the aging defense, you don't overpay for D williams (right before he nears the aging RB precipice). Stewart is ready, and it would allow you to have maybe a CJ Spiller in the wings, plus a few holed get plugged on defense, and you free up FA money to get a decent vetran QB to back up Matt Moore, or maybe even a stud/quality OL depth.
 
Was it ever a sure thing that Williams would be gone after next season? I dont see anything there that is definite or news worthy. I still think the Panthers will wait as long as they can to give him an extension, if they do at all. I bet we dont see one before the season starts.

 
Perhaps CAR is a little concerned with Stewart's Achilles.
Ding, ding, ding. I love the Stewart manlove on the board (good player...when he plays), but if your O is based on a running game, you cannot take the chance on a guy who may not be there when you need him. ALL teams are going to the multiple RB model (some heavier than others, but still evident) and this is a team giving the "keys to the car" to Matt freakin' Moore...they need two capable RBs, because if one falters (or gets injured...which one is literally a "pro" at), they up a creek w/o said paddle.
 
Food for thought from the Dynsaty RB thread

QUOTE (Anthony Borbely @ Mar 4 2010, 02:13 PM) *I think the Portis and D Will comparison amounts to apples and oranges. Portis has a much bigger career workload
Right. Portis (done at 28) is the exception, not the rule.
LT's last effective year was at 28.Westbrook's decline started at 28.Jacobs' value went through the floor at 28.Ronnie's value went through the floor at 28.Parker's value went through the floor at 28.SSOG himself argues age over mileage for RB, doesn't he?
Wow. Has Dodds done any of his crazy algorithmic work on backs that go down hill at age 28?
 
Perhaps CAR is a little concerned with Stewart's Achilles.
Ding, ding, ding. I love the Stewart manlove on the board (good player...when he plays), but if your O is based on a running game, you cannot take the chance on a guy who may not be there when you need him. ALL teams are going to the multiple RB model (some heavier than others, but still evident) and this is a team giving the "keys to the car" to Matt freakin' Moore...they need two capable RBs, because if one falters (or gets injured...which one is literally a "pro" at), they up a creek w/o said paddle.
How many games has he missed to this point?Im sure every team would love to have two great RB's. Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.

 
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.

 
Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? ;) I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
 
Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? :tinfoilhat: I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
Put some numbers to your answer so I can get an idea of what you (and others) consider to be a reasonable contract that Williams would sign and Carolina would pay.
 
This thread reminds me of the old Fred Taylor talk, about how injury prone he was, but I just looked and he (Stewart) played all 16 games and DWill was the one that missed games.

If you can afford both it makes perfect sense to keep two awesome backs on your team.

This was also posted on Stewart's surgery:

Panthers GM Marty Hurney expressed no concern over the surgeries to DeAngelo Williams (foot) or Jonathan Stewart (heel).

Williams' surgery was just a minor clean-up, while Stewart's was designed to alleviate pain in his Achilles' tendon. Hurney expects both members of "Smash and Dash" to be participants in most pre-training camp activities.

 
Perhaps CAR is a little concerned with Stewart's Achilles.
Ding, ding, ding. I love the Stewart manlove on the board (good player...when he plays), but if your O is based on a running game, you cannot take the chance on a guy who may not be there when you need him. ALL teams are going to the multiple RB model (some heavier than others, but still evident) and this is a team giving the "keys to the car" to Matt freakin' Moore...they need two capable RBs, because if one falters (or gets injured...which one is literally a "pro" at), they up a creek w/o said paddle.
How many games has he missed to this point?
Stewart hasn't missed any games.
 
Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? :headbang: I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
Put some numbers to your answer so I can get an idea of what you (and others) consider to be a reasonable contract that Williams would sign and Carolina would pay.
I already did - 20-25 mil guaranteed, lets say 5 years 35 mil. I think that's the high end of what he can get. last year, MJD got a 5 year, 31 mil extension, with 17.5 guaranteed. In 08, Turner got 15 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 34.5 million dollar deal. SJax got 20.5 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 44 mil deal. Gore signed a 4 year, 28 mil extension in 07, but only 6.5 was guaranteed, along with a 4.2 mil option bonus in the next year. McGahee got 26 mil over 5 years and 7.5 mil guaranteed, and lots of bonuses in the first few years.Elite RBs aren't expensive compared to other positions, Cassius nailed it. Think about it. M-freakin-JD only got 6.5 mil more in guaranteed money last year than Burleson got this year, and he's got his whole prime ahead of him and a short injury history compared to Burleson.I'll also reiterate two more important points in favor of DeAngelo being re-signed - 1) Jake Delhomme's money is totally off the books now b/c of the uncapped year. 2) No first-round signing bonus this year because they traded the pick for Everette Brown. No first-round signing bonus last year because they traded the pick for Jeff Otah. They have money to spend.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you can afford both it makes perfect sense to keep two awesome backs on your team.

This was also posted on Stewart's surgery:

Panthers GM Marty Hurney expressed no concern over the surgeries to DeAngelo Williams (foot) or Jonathan Stewart (heel).

Williams' surgery was just a minor clean-up, while Stewart's was designed to alleviate pain in his Achilles' tendon. Hurney expects both members of "Smash and Dash" to be participants in most pre-training camp activities.
There's got to be the fear of the unknown for Stewart and his wonky achilles for Carolina. Not only do they want to keep their bread and butter intact with Deangelo and Stewart, they may be nervous about Stewart's future. How could they not be?Affording both this year will be tough. Deangelo dropped a bit in the rankings but still will require a 1st/2nd round pick. Stewart will cost what?.......a 3rd? 4th? 5th? :lmao:

 
Deangelo dropped a bit in the rankings but still will require a 1st/2nd round pick. Stewart will cost what?.......a 3rd? 4th? 5th? unsure.gif
are you talking a rookie draft pick for stewart? if you find anyone willing to part with him for a 3rd,4th,5th you've got a pretty dumb owner.i see still stewart as a solid #2 rb. at worst. he still scored 10 tds last season and went over a 1000 yards again. even if they lock up dwill for a few more years, they can trade him more easily and if anything that will help out stewarts career long term rather then getting over used his first couple of seasons. deangelo is still going to be 27 before the start of the season. so he likely has 2 more good years left in him if he doesn't break down beforehand. that was always the big question with him durability with his size.
 
Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? :thumbdown: I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
Put some numbers to your answer so I can get an idea of what you (and others) consider to be a reasonable contract that Williams would sign and Carolina would pay.
I already did - 20-25 mil guaranteed, lets say 5 years 35 mil. I think that's the high end of what he can get. last year, MJD got a 5 year, 31 mil extension, with 17.5 guaranteed. In 08, Turner got 15 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 34.5 million dollar deal. SJax got 20.5 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 44 mil deal. Gore signed a 4 year, 28 mil extension in 07, but only 6.5 was guaranteed, along with a 4.2 mil option bonus in the next year. McGahee got 26 mil over 5 years and 7.5 mil guaranteed, and lots of bonuses in the first few years.Elite RBs aren't expensive compared to other positions, Cassius nailed it. Think about it. M-freakin-JD only got 6.5 mil more in guaranteed money last year than Burleson got this year, and he's got his whole prime ahead of him and a short injury history compared to Burleson.I'll also reiterate two more important points in favor of DeAngelo being re-signed - 1) Jake Delhomme's money is totally off the books now b/c of the uncapped year. 2) No first-round signing bonus this year because they traded the pick for Everette Brown. No first-round signing bonus last year because they traded the pick for Jeff Otah. They have money to spend.
Using 5 years, 30-35 mils as a reasonable starting spot...the amount to the RB position is very reasonable. However, with a cap and several weaknesses such as QB, WR2, WR3, the secondary (especially if Marshall leaves (he was tendered a 2nd I believe) plus a very weak defensive line, would it be wise to sign Williams and let him and Stewart split 400-450 carries, or let Williams go, draft a RB to get 100 carries to Stewart's 300 and use that 6-7 million per year to shore up one of their weaknesses? That is my point. I don't think they are strong enough at a lot of positions to spend this much money on a RB when the options aren't bad. If they had a better overall team with few weaknesses, I would agree that they would be smart to sign him, but with their current team, I'm not so sure it is wise.
 
Perhaps CAR is a little concerned with Stewart's Achilles.
Ding, ding, ding. I love the Stewart manlove on the board (good player...when he plays), but if your O is based on a running game, you cannot take the chance on a guy who may not be there when you need him. ALL teams are going to the multiple RB model (some heavier than others, but still evident) and this is a team giving the "keys to the car" to Matt freakin' Moore...they need two capable RBs, because if one falters (or gets injured...which one is literally a "pro" at), they up a creek w/o said paddle.
How many games has he missed to this point?Im sure every team would love to have two great RB's. Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
No, he hasn't missed any games, but he has a fairly long injury history, dating back to Oregon. He has had multiple surgeries (before his rookie year, between year 1 and 2 I believe, and now again after his 2nd year). He hasn't been able to participate in many of the off-season/mini-camp work during his 2 year career, and he has never gotten a big workload.So, while Stewart hasn't missed any games, there are very good reasons for Carolina to keep DWill, since they can't be confident in Stewart's ability to carry a larger load and stay healthy.

 
I'm curious to see what sort of contract they'll be giving Deangelo.

I'm never a believer in allocating a great deal of funds to the RB position. Deangelo turns 27 in a month. Personally, I think this is the point in every good RB's career where it's time to start shopping him while you still can, not locking him up long-term.

Then again, age isn't a huge issue, as the back end of an NFL contract is completely meaningless. Hopefully, they don't crush themselves in the short term with the guaranteed money. I assume this being an uncapped year will help a great deal.

Probably a good move with the uncapped year. If it weren't an uncapped year, I suspect I wouldn't like the move.

 
Perhaps CAR is a little concerned with Stewart's Achilles.
Ding, ding, ding. I love the Stewart manlove on the board (good player...when he plays), but if your O is based on a running game, you cannot take the chance on a guy who may not be there when you need him. ALL teams are going to the multiple RB model (some heavier than others, but still evident) and this is a team giving the "keys to the car" to Matt freakin' Moore...they need two capable RBs, because if one falters (or gets injured...which one is literally a "pro" at), they up a creek w/o said paddle.
How many games has he missed to this point?
Stewart hasn't missed any games.
I know, i dont think Sweet Love knew that, based on his "when he plays". Im not sure why poeple post about things they know nothing about.
 
Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? :thumbup: I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
Put some numbers to your answer so I can get an idea of what you (and others) consider to be a reasonable contract that Williams would sign and Carolina would pay.
I already did - 20-25 mil guaranteed, lets say 5 years 35 mil. I think that's the high end of what he can get. last year, MJD got a 5 year, 31 mil extension, with 17.5 guaranteed. In 08, Turner got 15 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 34.5 million dollar deal. SJax got 20.5 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 44 mil deal. Gore signed a 4 year, 28 mil extension in 07, but only 6.5 was guaranteed, along with a 4.2 mil option bonus in the next year. McGahee got 26 mil over 5 years and 7.5 mil guaranteed, and lots of bonuses in the first few years.Elite RBs aren't expensive compared to other positions, Cassius nailed it. Think about it. M-freakin-JD only got 6.5 mil more in guaranteed money last year than Burleson got this year, and he's got his whole prime ahead of him and a short injury history compared to Burleson.I'll also reiterate two more important points in favor of DeAngelo being re-signed - 1) Jake Delhomme's money is totally off the books now b/c of the uncapped year. 2) No first-round signing bonus this year because they traded the pick for Everette Brown. No first-round signing bonus last year because they traded the pick for Jeff Otah. They have money to spend.
Theres a reason RB's dont get big salaries. There is also a reason you usually dont see two top 10 RB's on one team. Sure, the Panthers may resign Williams, but i think it only happens if he gives them a big home town discount. Which i doubt will happen considering this is the contract he will be retiring off of. Also, just because they can afford to do it now doesnt mean they will be able to afford it down the road. Which is why i think they will not resign him before the 2010 season. Maybe if they think they are a 2nd RB away from a SB run in 2011 he will resign, but other than that, i think he will be playing for another team after next season.Another thing i think people are overlooking is why would Williams want to resign with the Panthers? Take less money to split carries on a team that wont be contending for a SB any time soon.
 
Also, isn't this assuming that DeAngelo actually accepts Carolina's offer? Just because they may be willing to give him that money, he may get a larger offer elsewhere and take that. His contract is done after this year and, AFAIK, he's not obligated to sign anything or stay in Carolina at all.

 
Also, isn't this assuming that DeAngelo actually accepts Carolina's offer? Just because they may be willing to give him that money, he may get a larger offer elsewhere and take that. His contract is done after this year and, AFAIK, he's not obligated to sign anything or stay in Carolina at all.
There isn't going to be a number of huge offers available to him because he's a RB. Which is what usually happens in these situations.Serious question -> how often do major centerpieces of an offense, with no locker room baggage or signs of decline, end up walking away in free agency?Of those occassions, how many of them are RB's?It almost never happens. FA RB's and the original team end up needing each other, and a deal gets done.
 
Also, isn't this assuming that DeAngelo actually accepts Carolina's offer? Just because they may be willing to give him that money, he may get a larger offer elsewhere and take that. His contract is done after this year and, AFAIK, he's not obligated to sign anything or stay in Carolina at all.
There isn't going to be a number of huge offers available to him because he's a RB. Which is what usually happens in these situations.Serious question -> how often do major centerpieces of an offense, with no locker room baggage or signs of decline, end up walking away in free agency?Of those occassions, how many of them are RB's?It almost never happens. FA RB's and the original team end up needing each other, and a deal gets done.
May not be common, but it happens. Most RB's don't have their original contract expire like his will. Unless I'm mistaken, most star RB's have their contracts extended before they are done because teams want to lock them up. But, I think because of Stewart, that hasn't happened with DeAngelo. Thus, he may walk like Turner did. Can you name that last top tier RB whose contract has expired? If so, what happened to him? I would think that there's going to be plenty of teams eyeing this situation and planning on going after him vs. drafting a RB if they have a need.
 
Also, isn't this assuming that DeAngelo actually accepts Carolina's offer? Just because they may be willing to give him that money, he may get a larger offer elsewhere and take that. His contract is done after this year and, AFAIK, he's not obligated to sign anything or stay in Carolina at all.
There isn't going to be a number of huge offers available to him because he's a RB. Which is what usually happens in these situations.Serious question -> how often do major centerpieces of an offense, with no locker room baggage or signs of decline, end up walking away in free agency?

Of those occassions, how many of them are RB's?

It almost never happens. FA RB's and the original team end up needing each other, and a deal gets done.
May not be common, but it happens. Most RB's don't have their original contract expire like his will. Unless I'm mistaken, most star RB's have their contracts extended before they are done because teams want to lock them up. But, I think because of Stewart, that hasn't happened with DeAngelo. Thus, he may walk like Turner did. Can you name that last top tier RB whose contract has expired? If so, what happened to him? I would think that there's going to be plenty of teams eyeing this situation and planning on going after him vs. drafting a RB if they have a need.
You might want to read the OP. Or at least save this "argument" until his contract actually expires.Also - Turner, as talented as he is and as highly regarded as he was at the time, is not a good comparison to DeAngello as he was a backup when he hit free agency. Not really a good example of a centerpiece of an offense walking away in free agency. Feel free to keep looking though, I'm genuinely curious as to how many times it's happened.

 
Also, isn't this assuming that DeAngelo actually accepts Carolina's offer? Just because they may be willing to give him that money, he may get a larger offer elsewhere and take that. His contract is done after this year and, AFAIK, he's not obligated to sign anything or stay in Carolina at all.
There isn't going to be a number of huge offers available to him because he's a RB. Which is what usually happens in these situations.Serious question -> how often do major centerpieces of an offense, with no locker room baggage or signs of decline, end up walking away in free agency?

Of those occassions, how many of them are RB's?

It almost never happens. FA RB's and the original team end up needing each other, and a deal gets done.
May not be common, but it happens. Most RB's don't have their original contract expire like his will. Unless I'm mistaken, most star RB's have their contracts extended before they are done because teams want to lock them up. But, I think because of Stewart, that hasn't happened with DeAngelo. Thus, he may walk like Turner did. Can you name that last top tier RB whose contract has expired? If so, what happened to him? I would think that there's going to be plenty of teams eyeing this situation and planning on going after him vs. drafting a RB if they have a need.
You might want to read the OP. Or at least save this "argument" until his contract actually expires.Also - Turner, as talented as he is and as highly regarded as he was at the time, is not a good comparison to DeAngello as he was a backup when he hit free agency. Not really a good example of a centerpiece of an offense walking away in free agency. Feel free to keep looking though, I'm genuinely curious as to how many times it's happened.
I read the OP. Again, he's not obligated to accept the extension. Is that better?I know Turner is a perfect compare, but look how much money a "backup" got when available. RB's of top quality don't often hit the FA market. It's very possible that DeAngelo decides to not agree to an extension and test the market next year. I'm quite sure if Turner could land the contract he did without ever proving himself that DeAngelo could do the same. Especially if he could potentially go to a team where he isn't sharing carries or a team that is a contender.

 
Two things to add:

1) a contract extension doesn't guarantee a player plays out the contract. Most of the time there are escalator clauses, with the salary going up consecutive years, and teams can opt out of contract after the initial guaranteed money. So, re-signing Williams might mean a split backfield for another couple of years but doesn't mean that Williams will be there forever.

2) Re-signing Williams doesn't guarantee that the roles don't change. Williams could become the second back in the duo at any time, even in 2010.

RBs who leave their team after playing out their rookie contract and making big salaries?

Michael Turner would be one

Warrick Dunn ( I remember him getting 25 million and thinking it was a fortune and that he would never play out the full contract, but I think he did, and I think he was worth it)

Jamaal Lewis? He played six years with BA and then went to CLE in 2007. I assume he played out his contract. Not sure how much $ he got paid.

 
Also, isn't this assuming that DeAngelo actually accepts Carolina's offer? Just because they may be willing to give him that money, he may get a larger offer elsewhere and take that. His contract is done after this year and, AFAIK, he's not obligated to sign anything or stay in Carolina at all.
There isn't going to be a number of huge offers available to him because he's a RB. Which is what usually happens in these situations.Serious question -> how often do major centerpieces of an offense, with no locker room baggage or signs of decline, end up walking away in free agency?

Of those occassions, how many of them are RB's?

It almost never happens. FA RB's and the original team end up needing each other, and a deal gets done.
May not be common, but it happens. Most RB's don't have their original contract expire like his will. Unless I'm mistaken, most star RB's have their contracts extended before they are done because teams want to lock them up. But, I think because of Stewart, that hasn't happened with DeAngelo. Thus, he may walk like Turner did. Can you name that last top tier RB whose contract has expired? If so, what happened to him? I would think that there's going to be plenty of teams eyeing this situation and planning on going after him vs. drafting a RB if they have a need.
You might want to read the OP. Or at least save this "argument" until his contract actually expires.Also - Turner, as talented as he is and as highly regarded as he was at the time, is not a good comparison to DeAngello as he was a backup when he hit free agency. Not really a good example of a centerpiece of an offense walking away in free agency. Feel free to keep looking though, I'm genuinely curious as to how many times it's happened.
I read the OP. Again, he's not obligated to accept the extension. Is that better?I know Turner is a perfect compare, but look how much money a "backup" got when available. RB's of top quality don't often hit the FA market. It's very possible that DeAngelo decides to not agree to an extension and test the market next year. I'm quite sure if Turner could land the contract he did without ever proving himself that DeAngelo could do the same. Especially if he could potentially go to a team where he isn't sharing carries or a team that is a contender.
:) You just finished saying that most big-time RB's extend their contract, and now you're talking up how DeAngello won't extend because of all the big money in the free agency market for RB's.

People are going to argue whatever points to Williams leaving town because they own Stewart and are so desperate to get a return for sitting on the guy.

Just reread Bloom's posts he does a far better job than I can at summing up the situation. Williams is the centerpiece of their ground-based offense, he's still young both in years and more importantly in carries, and the Panthers want to extend him. All of this "Panthers can't afford it" is generated by Stewart owners - even with the cap, pieces like Williams don't hit free agency, and we don't even have a cap right now.

Just keep grasping.

 
A lot of guys get traded before they play out their rookie contract and leave in FA.

Portis

Corey Dillon

This still seems to me the most likely scenario for Williams.

One might also ask how many teams have two superstar RBs and pay them collectively what it would take to keep both of these guys? It's one thing to have them for a couple of years like the past two but I can't think of too many teams keeping signing the veteran to a new, expensive contract, when they have a great RB ready to step into his shoes.

 
Two things to add:1) a contract extension doesn't guarantee a player plays out the contract. Most of the time there are escalator clauses, with the salary going up consecutive years, and teams can opt out of contract after the initial guaranteed money. So, re-signing Williams might mean a split backfield for another couple of years but doesn't mean that Williams will be there forever.2) Re-signing Williams doesn't guarantee that the roles don't change. Williams could become the second back in the duo at any time, even in 2010.
Agreed on these two, though I'm not sure why they'd extend him if they thought Stewart would take over so soon. But there's certainly the possibility. If Williams were to get a 5 year deal I think he'd pretty easily play out 3 of them since he'd be sharing work, as he did the first couple years of his career.
RBs who leave their team after playing out their rookie contract and making big salaries?
Actually no, it was RB's who are the centerpieces of an offense with no locker room baggage and signs of decline. Dunn may fit, I don't remember that one, but the other two do not. If the only example here is Dunn then that pretty much shows how rare it is.
Michael Turner would be oneWarrick Dunn ( I remember him getting 25 million and thinking it was a fortune and that he would never play out the full contract, but I think he did, and I think he was worth it)Jamaal Lewis? He played six years with BA and then went to CLE in 2007. I assume he played out his contract. Not sure how much $ he got paid.
 
Two things to add:

1) a contract extension doesn't guarantee a player plays out the contract. Most of the time there are escalator clauses, with the salary going up consecutive years, and teams can opt out of contract after the initial guaranteed money. So, re-signing Williams might mean a split backfield for another couple of years but doesn't mean that Williams will be there forever.

2) Re-signing Williams doesn't guarantee that the roles don't change. Williams could become the second back in the duo at any time, even in 2010.
Agreed on these two, though I'm not sure why they'd extend him if they thought Stewart would take over so soon. But there's certainly the possibility. If Williams were to get a 5 year deal I think he'd pretty easily play out 3 of them since he'd be sharing work, as he did the first couple years of his career.
RBs who leave their team after playing out their rookie contract and making big salaries?
Actually no, it was RB's who are the centerpieces of an offense with no locker room baggage and signs of decline. Dunn may fit, I don't remember that one, but the other two do not. If the only example here is Dunn then that pretty much shows how rare it is.

Michael Turner would be one

Warrick Dunn ( I remember him getting 25 million and thinking it was a fortune and that he would never play out the full contract, but I think he did, and I think he was worth it)

Jamaal Lewis? He played six years with BA and then went to CLE in 2007. I assume he played out his contract. Not sure how much $ he got paid.
How many 27 year old RB's have resigned with their original teams two years after that team drafted a RB in the first round?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Problem is, when you do, you better get use to guys like Moore as your QB, because that will be all you can afford.
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? :unsure: I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
Put some numbers to your answer so I can get an idea of what you (and others) consider to be a reasonable contract that Williams would sign and Carolina would pay.
I already did - 20-25 mil guaranteed, lets say 5 years 35 mil. I think that's the high end of what he can get. last year, MJD got a 5 year, 31 mil extension, with 17.5 guaranteed. In 08, Turner got 15 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 34.5 million dollar deal. SJax got 20.5 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 44 mil deal. Gore signed a 4 year, 28 mil extension in 07, but only 6.5 was guaranteed, along with a 4.2 mil option bonus in the next year. McGahee got 26 mil over 5 years and 7.5 mil guaranteed, and lots of bonuses in the first few years.Elite RBs aren't expensive compared to other positions, Cassius nailed it. Think about it. M-freakin-JD only got 6.5 mil more in guaranteed money last year than Burleson got this year, and he's got his whole prime ahead of him and a short injury history compared to Burleson.I'll also reiterate two more important points in favor of DeAngelo being re-signed - 1) Jake Delhomme's money is totally off the books now b/c of the uncapped year. 2) No first-round signing bonus this year because they traded the pick for Everette Brown. No first-round signing bonus last year because they traded the pick for Jeff Otah. They have money to spend.
Delhomme's money may be off the books for cap purposes, but Carolina still had to pay him all that guaranteed money. Consequently, I'm not sure it's safe to assume that your points mean they are prepared to lavish money on Williams.
 
I'm curious as to what kind of contract makes sense for Carolina that Williams will actually take. He won't come cheap and that is the difference between my opinion and the opinion of those who think he will stay. I don't see Carolina giving him a huge contract in a salary cap world, especially in a salary cap world.
Where are all of these examples of RB's that get massive contracts in free agency from other teams? :confused: I don't think Williams is going to get big money on par with quarterbacks, defensive ends, or even WR's. Teams simply don't break the bank for RB's. It won't be hard for Carolina to re-sign Williams.
Put some numbers to your answer so I can get an idea of what you (and others) consider to be a reasonable contract that Williams would sign and Carolina would pay.
I already did - 20-25 mil guaranteed, lets say 5 years 35 mil. I think that's the high end of what he can get. last year, MJD got a 5 year, 31 mil extension, with 17.5 guaranteed. In 08, Turner got 15 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 34.5 million dollar deal. SJax got 20.5 mil guaranteed in a 6 year, 44 mil deal. Gore signed a 4 year, 28 mil extension in 07, but only 6.5 was guaranteed, along with a 4.2 mil option bonus in the next year. McGahee got 26 mil over 5 years and 7.5 mil guaranteed, and lots of bonuses in the first few years.Elite RBs aren't expensive compared to other positions, Cassius nailed it. Think about it. M-freakin-JD only got 6.5 mil more in guaranteed money last year than Burleson got this year, and he's got his whole prime ahead of him and a short injury history compared to Burleson.I'll also reiterate two more important points in favor of DeAngelo being re-signed - 1) Jake Delhomme's money is totally off the books now b/c of the uncapped year. 2) No first-round signing bonus this year because they traded the pick for Everette Brown. No first-round signing bonus last year because they traded the pick for Jeff Otah. They have money to spend.
Using 5 years, 30-35 mils as a reasonable starting spot...the amount to the RB position is very reasonable. However, with a cap and several weaknesses such as QB, WR2, WR3, the secondary (especially if Marshall leaves (he was tendered a 2nd I believe) plus a very weak defensive line, would it be wise to sign Williams and let him and Stewart split 400-450 carries, or let Williams go, draft a RB to get 100 carries to Stewart's 300 and use that 6-7 million per year to shore up one of their weaknesses? That is my point. I don't think they are strong enough at a lot of positions to spend this much money on a RB when the options aren't bad. If they had a better overall team with few weaknesses, I would agree that they would be smart to sign him, but with their current team, I'm not so sure it is wise.
:unsure:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top