What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pats done with Chad Jackson? (1 Viewer)

NorrisB

Footballguy
Gasper is reporting in the Globe that the Patriots have told Kelley Washington they won't pick up the 4 Million Dollar Option Bonus on his four remaining years of contract. They have allegedly told him they are interested in working out a contract to keep his services.He played fantastically on Special Teams and kept the team attitude fantastically all season. I give him total props for his professionalism even as he didn't manage to work onto the receiving units.The Patriots will have another interesting decision on this front with Stallworth who probably won't be deemed worth the 8 Million bonus option.This immedieatly would free up 12 Million Dollars in cap space as I understand it..As a side note from reading the DChat transcripts by Karen G, it seems the team is also done with the Chad Jackson experiment....Off-season news means moving on -
Anyone got a link for this? Havent heard anything about this and as a Chad Jackson owner in a few leagues this is bad news.Yudkin...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.

 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
Pre camp or in camp hammy his rookie year. Got back to the field, but was regularly tweaking his hamstring injury. Solid special teams contributor later in the season.Blew out his ACL in the AFCC vs. Colts, on PUP until late this year. Didn't get much of a look after being activated as the #5 WR at that point.I'd be surprised if now, after 2 years of injury and having a few question marks in the receiving corps, the Pats were to cut bait. I'd expect to see him come into camp with a handful of other receivers with an opportunity to earn a spot / PT as the #2. All based on Moss resigning and considering Welker the #3 / slot receiver.
 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
He was a consensus late first round pick and slipped to the top of the second round. His injuries have been a huge problem. He also had to fight through a pretty good crowd of veterans last year. I think he has a role as a speed guy but he's injured again, and with ACL and hammy injuries, he may never get back to 100%. I don't expect them to cut bait on him but if he can't get healthy in time for roster cutdowns, they may have to decide between putting him on IR or cutting Bam Childress, their perennial practice squadder.
 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
Pre camp or in camp hammy his rookie year. Got back to the field, but was regularly tweaking his hamstring injury. Solid special teams contributor later in the season.Blew out his ACL in the AFCC vs. Colts, on PUP until late this year. Didn't get much of a look after being activated as the #5 WR at that point.I'd be surprised if now, after 2 years of injury and having a few question marks in the receiving corps, the Pats were to cut bait. I'd expect to see him come into camp with a handful of other receivers with an opportunity to earn a spot / PT as the #2. All based on Moss resigning and considering Welker the #3 / slot receiver.
If nothing changed, I'd expect the three main receivers to be Moss, Welker, and Gaffney, with Gaffney a distant #3 in terms of targets and receptions. Wekler might play the slot but as we saw this year it's not totally accurate to call him the #3.
 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
Pre camp or in camp hammy his rookie year. Got back to the field, but was regularly tweaking his hamstring injury. Solid special teams contributor later in the season.Blew out his ACL in the AFCC vs. Colts, on PUP until late this year. Didn't get much of a look after being activated as the #5 WR at that point.

I'd be surprised if now, after 2 years of injury and having a few question marks in the receiving corps, the Pats were to cut bait. I'd expect to see him come into camp with a handful of other receivers with an opportunity to earn a spot / PT as the #2.

All based on Moss resigning and considering Welker the #3 / slot receiver.
My inclination is to agree with this statement except for one caveat; Jackson had a really bad attitude when he was brought into the league by the Pats. If he has not turned this around then he may have worn out his welcome.

Unofficially, it would only cost the Pats $646 if they cut Jackson before June 1st and $549,646 if cut after June 1st (http://www.patscap.com/). So this speculation of an early cut makes some sense.

 
Jackson should compete to be the WR3 with somebody.

Welker is the WR2. He plays the slot when they are in 3-wide sets, but whenever they are in 2-wide sets he's always on the field.

 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
Pre camp or in camp hammy his rookie year. Got back to the field, but was regularly tweaking his hamstring injury. Solid special teams contributor later in the season.Blew out his ACL in the AFCC vs. Colts, on PUP until late this year. Didn't get much of a look after being activated as the #5 WR at that point.I'd be surprised if now, after 2 years of injury and having a few question marks in the receiving corps, the Pats were to cut bait. I'd expect to see him come into camp with a handful of other receivers with an opportunity to earn a spot / PT as the #2. All based on Moss resigning and considering Welker the #3 / slot receiver.
If nothing changed, I'd expect the three main receivers to be Moss, Welker, and Gaffney, with Gaffney a distant #3 in terms of targets and receptions. Wekler might play the slot but as we saw this year it's not totally accurate to call him the #3.
Agreed. I meant #2 and #3 as the typical lineup, with the 1 & 2 out wide & Welker in the slot, not in the "depth chart" sense of the terms.
 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
Pre camp or in camp hammy his rookie year. Got back to the field, but was regularly tweaking his hamstring injury. Solid special teams contributor later in the season.Blew out his ACL in the AFCC vs. Colts, on PUP until late this year. Didn't get much of a look after being activated as the #5 WR at that point.I'd be surprised if now, after 2 years of injury and having a few question marks in the receiving corps, the Pats were to cut bait. I'd expect to see him come into camp with a handful of other receivers with an opportunity to earn a spot / PT as the #2. All based on Moss resigning and considering Welker the #3 / slot receiver.
If nothing changed, I'd expect the three main receivers to be Moss, Welker, and Gaffney, with Gaffney a distant #3 in terms of targets and receptions. Wekler might play the slot but as we saw this year it's not totally accurate to call him the #3.
Isn't Gaffney a UFA also?
 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
Pre camp or in camp hammy his rookie year. Got back to the field, but was regularly tweaking his hamstring injury. Solid special teams contributor later in the season.Blew out his ACL in the AFCC vs. Colts, on PUP until late this year. Didn't get much of a look after being activated as the #5 WR at that point.I'd be surprised if now, after 2 years of injury and having a few question marks in the receiving corps, the Pats were to cut bait. I'd expect to see him come into camp with a handful of other receivers with an opportunity to earn a spot / PT as the #2. All based on Moss resigning and considering Welker the #3 / slot receiver.
If nothing changed, I'd expect the three main receivers to be Moss, Welker, and Gaffney, with Gaffney a distant #3 in terms of targets and receptions. Wekler might play the slot but as we saw this year it's not totally accurate to call him the #3.
Isn't Gaffney a UFA also?
Yes, but there are fair expectations he resigns with NE.
 
is he due some big money? a 2nd round rookie contract entering the third year doesn't seem like it should cost a fortune to keep him for at least one more camp. jackson must really be damaged goods with no hope.

 
is he due some big money? a 2nd round rookie contract entering the third year doesn't seem like it should cost a fortune to keep him for at least one more camp. jackson must really be damaged goods with no hope.
contract info...Contract Information for Chad Jackson link

7/22/2006: Signed a four-year, $3.992 million contract. The deal included an initial roster bonus of $452,000 and a second-year option bonus of $1.64 million. 2008: $451,800 (+ $90,000 workout bonus), 2009: $633,000 (+ $90,000 workout bonus), 2010: Free Agent
to me, unless jackson has personality issues with BB, then it would be a shock if they cut him. he's playing for peanuts here.
 
is he due some big money? a 2nd round rookie contract entering the third year doesn't seem like it should cost a fortune to keep him for at least one more camp. jackson must really be damaged goods with no hope.
contract info...Contract Information for Chad Jackson link

7/22/2006: Signed a four-year, $3.992 million contract. The deal included an initial roster bonus of $452,000 and a second-year option bonus of $1.64 million. 2008: $451,800 (+ $90,000 workout bonus), 2009: $633,000 (+ $90,000 workout bonus), 2010: Free Agent
to me, unless jackson has personality issues with BB, then it would be a shock if they cut him. he's playing for peanuts here.
thanksthat is pretty low

 
is he due some big money? a 2nd round rookie contract entering the third year doesn't seem like it should cost a fortune to keep him for at least one more camp. jackson must really be damaged goods with no hope.
contract info...Contract Information for Chad Jackson link

7/22/2006: Signed a four-year, $3.992 million contract. The deal included an initial roster bonus of $452,000 and a second-year option bonus of $1.64 million. 2008: $451,800 (+ $90,000 workout bonus), 2009: $633,000 (+ $90,000 workout bonus), 2010: Free Agent
to me, unless jackson has personality issues with BB, then it would be a shock if they cut him. he's playing for peanuts here.
thanksthat is pretty low
I don't see the Pats cutting him.It's a very low risk situation.

Having said that, I don't expect a whole lot out of him,

but I still think he's worth keeping.

 
Gasper is reporting in the Globe that the Patriots have told Kelley Washington they won't pick up the 4 Million Dollar Option Bonus on his four remaining years of contract. They have allegedly told him they are interested in working out a contract to keep his services.He played fantastically on Special Teams and kept the team attitude fantastically all season. I give him total props for his professionalism even as he didn't manage to work onto the receiving units.The Patriots will have another interesting decision on this front with Stallworth who probably won't be deemed worth the 8 Million bonus option.This immedieatly would free up 12 Million Dollars in cap space as I understand it..As a side note from reading the DChat transcripts by Karen G, it seems the team is also done with the Chad Jackson experiment....Off-season news means moving on -
Anyone got a link for this? Havent heard anything about this and as a Chad Jackson owner in a few leagues this is bad news.Yudkin...
Once Stallworth is cut, the Pats will save $5.7 million against the cap due to the way they accounted for his contract and bonus structure. (They won't have to physically pay out the $6 million and $2 million roster bonuses he was due, but those are not added in as cap hits until they are paid out.) I doubt the Pats will try to re-sign Stallworth, as he will want more $$$ and more playing time (he would still be a WR3 or WR4 in NE).Washington has either been or will be cut. He was due a $4 million signing bonus and $900,000 in salary. However, the Pats will still be charged a $240,000 cap hit for this year due to spreading out whatever signing bonus he had last year. IIRC, his paperwork was filed slightly differently thatn Stallworth's was, so Washington's cap saving may only be around $660,000. The Pats are trying to bring Washington back, but who knows if another team will give him more $$$ and more playing time.I have heard conflicting reports on Jackson. The team would not save anything cap wise if they released him today (but would save $550,000 this year and next year if they released him after 6/1.) Reiss thinks they will give him a shot if he's healthy (I'd take his opinion over Karen G's). Given his realtively low cost and lack of WR depth at this point, I think he will at least get a shot in training camp to see what he could do.Gaffney is also a free agent, but I have not heard much in regards to him coming back. I know BB likes him, but if he wants a bigger role and a bigger paycheck I wonder how high NE would go.
 
I think he gets a shot. I think the risk reward is there in a dynasty if you get him cheap.

NE is thin at WR position why would they let this guy walk?

 
I think he gets a shot. I think the risk reward is there in a dynasty if you get him cheap. NE is thin at WR position why would they let this guy walk?
$6 million roster bonus due 3/1.$2 million workout bonus for coming to camp.$3 million salary for 2008 seasonTOTAL: $11 million for 2008
 
I think he gets a shot. I think the risk reward is there in a dynasty if you get him cheap. NE is thin at WR position why would they let this guy walk?
$6 million roster bonus due 3/1.$2 million workout bonus for coming to camp.$3 million salary for 2008 seasonTOTAL: $11 million for 2008
I'm assuming those are Stallworth's #'s?
Sorry . . . I thought this was the Stallworth thread. Yes, these are the numbers for Stallworth, not Jackson.
 
I think he gets a shot. I think the risk reward is there in a dynasty if you get him cheap. NE is thin at WR position why would they let this guy walk?
$6 million roster bonus due 3/1.$2 million workout bonus for coming to camp.$3 million salary for 2008 seasonTOTAL: $11 million for 2008
I'm assuming those are Stallworth's #'s?
Sorry . . . I thought this was the Stallworth thread. Yes, these are the numbers for Stallworth, not Jackson.
No problem, Just clearing that up. Thanks for your insight.
 
Who is this Karen G? Is she sleeping with Bellichick or how would she know anything? Stallworth and his 11 million is clearly history. $540,000 to have Jackson's services this year is chump change. They wouldn't cut him unless they were certain his injury was career-ending or unless he slept with Bellichick's mistress (Karen G???).

Someone posts a blog from another site and you guys take it as gospel.

Also, it sounds like Kelley Washington is being shown the door so again, with both him and Stallworth likely to leave, Gaffney a FA and Moss a FA, it wouldn't make much sense to cut Chad Jackson when you have him under contract for so little.

http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patr...hington_up.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who is this Karen G? Is she sleeping with Bellichick or how would she know anything? Stallworth and his 11 million is clearly history. $540,000 to have Jackson's services this year is chump change. They wouldn't cut him unless they were certain his injury was career-ending or unless he slept with Bellichick's mistress (Karen G???).

Someone posts a blog from another site and you guys take it as gospel.
Karen G ("Karen Guergian") is a Boston sports writer. I believe she writes for the Boston Herald.
 
Who is this Karen G? Is she sleeping with Bellichick or how would she know anything? Stallworth and his 11 million is clearly history. $540,000 to have Jackson's services this year is chump change. They wouldn't cut him unless they were certain his injury was career-ending or unless he slept with Bellichick's mistress (Karen G???).

Someone posts a blog from another site and you guys take it as gospel.
Karen G ("Karen Guergian") is a Boston sports writer. I believe she writes for the Boston Herald.
Is there a link to her saying this and does she mention a source or an explanation? Right now this qualifies as hearsay...and it doesn't make sense.
 
Who is this Karen G? Is she sleeping with Bellichick or how would she know anything? Stallworth and his 11 million is clearly history. $540,000 to have Jackson's services this year is chump change. They wouldn't cut him unless they were certain his injury was career-ending or unless he slept with Bellichick's mistress (Karen G???).

Someone posts a blog from another site and you guys take it as gospel.
Karen G ("Karen Guergian") is a Boston sports writer. I believe she writes for the Boston Herald.
Yes. Karen Guregiann covers the Pats for the Herald, although John Tomase is their primary Pats reporter.I have not seen her comments in a chat or blog on Jackson, so I don't know what she said or didn;t say.

 
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
UF homer, and I said when he was drafted that I thought it was a mistake. His measurables might have been off the chart, but his college production was almost woeful. For a "home run threat" like Jackson to average about 10 yards per reception his last year in college raises serious red flags for me. I'm always wary of players whose draft positions dramatically oustrip their production, and that was Jackson to a "T".
 
rotoworld reports they are sniffing at Marty Booker, so that may be consistent with leaving Jackson inactive/on the bench ...

 
rotoworld reports they are sniffing at Marty Booker, so that may be consistent with leaving Jackson inactive/on the bench ...
They are sniffing at Booker (and I'm sure others) because they could easily be without Stallworth (pretty much a sure thing), Washington (I believe he was already released but they are trying to get him back) and Gaffney (free agent),So NE looking at WRs likely is not something we can conclude anything about Jackson's chances/outlook.
 
rotoworld reports they are sniffing at Marty Booker, so that may be consistent with leaving Jackson inactive/on the bench ...
They are sniffing at Booker (and I'm sure others) because they could easily be without Stallworth (pretty much a sure thing), Washington (I believe he was already released but they are trying to get him back) and Gaffney (free agent),So NE looking at WRs likely is not something we can conclude anything about Jackson's chances/outlook.
I dont disagree. But it might be different if they were looking to pickup a younger WR who would frequent the ST packages ...
 
The following is a serviceable crew:MossWelkerGafneyBookerJacksonI hope Gafney re-signs...
Me too. I can see Gaffney being more effective down the field than Stallworth was, although he isn't nearly as effective on the WR screens and other short stuff, where Stallworth's YAC was huge. Still, that does look like a very good receiving corps.
 
rotoworld reports they are sniffing at Marty Booker, so that may be consistent with leaving Jackson inactive/on the bench ...
Hadn't heard about the Pats being linked to Booker, though it makes some sense. Seems to me like Booker (big possession receiver) & Jackson (lanky long receiver) have vastly different roles/skill sets, so I'm not sure one has any bearing on the other?
 
rotoworld reports they are sniffing at Marty Booker, so that may be consistent with leaving Jackson inactive/on the bench ...
Hadn't heard about the Pats being linked to Booker, though it makes some sense. Seems to me like Booker (big possession receiver) & Jackson (lanky long receiver) have vastly different roles/skill sets, so I'm not sure one has any bearing on the other?
Pats to host Marty BookerPosted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff February 18, 2008 10:47 PM The Patriots are setting their sights on another former Dolphin, as receiver Marty Booker is scheduled to meet with team officials at Gillette Stadium Tuesday.Much like the Patriots’ decision to pursue Wes Welker last year, Booker’s success against New England might be a significant factor in the level of interest he’s received from Vice President of Player Personnel Scott Pioli and head coach Bill Belichick.In eight games against the Patriots over the last four seasons, the 6-foot-, 210-pound Booker had three 100-yard receiving games. He played a major role in the Dolphins’ last two wins against New England – catching eight passes for 103 yards and a touchdown in a 21-0 win Dec. 10, 2006, and seven receptions for 86 yards and a touchdown in a 28-26 victory Jan. 1, 2006.The 31-year-old Booker enters his 10th NFL season in 2008, after playing for the Bears (1999-2003) and Dolphins (2004-2007). He was released by the Dolphins on Feb. 11.
 
I checked around:

No news on any negotiations or status with Gaffney . . .

Jackson should be back and not a lot of talk to the contrary.

 
SSOG said:
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
UF homer, and I said when he was drafted that I thought it was a mistake. His measurables might have been off the chart, but his college production was almost woeful. For a "home run threat" like Jackson to average about 10 yards per reception his last year in college raises serious red flags for me. I'm always wary of players whose draft positions dramatically oustrip their production, and that was Jackson to a "T".
For as much hype as the Pats front office gets for being able to evaluate talent, they have been abysmal at drafting and developing wide receivers.
 
SSOG said:
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
UF homer, and I said when he was drafted that I thought it was a mistake. His measurables might have been off the chart, but his college production was almost woeful. For a "home run threat" like Jackson to average about 10 yards per reception his last year in college raises serious red flags for me. I'm always wary of players whose draft positions dramatically oustrip their production, and that was Jackson to a "T".
For as much hype as the Pats front office gets for being able to evaluate talent, they have been abysmal at drafting and developing wide receivers.
They got a 1st for Deion Branch. That was a pretty good evaluation ...
 
SSOG said:
What's holding Jackson back? From what I remember, he wowed at the scouting combine and was supposed to have tremendous natural ability.
UF homer, and I said when he was drafted that I thought it was a mistake. His measurables might have been off the chart, but his college production was almost woeful. For a "home run threat" like Jackson to average about 10 yards per reception his last year in college raises serious red flags for me. I'm always wary of players whose draft positions dramatically oustrip their production, and that was Jackson to a "T".
For as much hype as the Pats front office gets for being able to evaluate talent, they have been abysmal at drafting and developing wide receivers.
Here are the WRs drafted in the BB/Pioli era . . .2006 2-4 Chad Jackson2004 5-32 P.K. Sam 2003 2-13 Bethel Johnson2002 2-33 Deion Branch 2002 7-33 David GivensBranch and Givens were productive. They missed on Johnson. Too soon to tell on Jackson. So two decent picks, a miss, and an incomplete.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top