just reading all the back-drama here cuz i was gone all saturday (sorry, based on precedent one round wasn't going that quickly)
fred made what i thought was a good point, and it wasn't addressed. let me retype here.
if the clock is a strategic advantage (clearly most agree it is, just as they agree that JeffP delaying the draft 14 hours over 2 rounds was within the rules) then why should the turn not get the advantage that every other spot has?
So i have three questions:
1) If a pick is made at the start of the turn in the last possible minute (after 7 hours and 59 mins), and then the end of the turn pick is made another 7:59 after, is that within the rules? (Total draft delay: 15 hours 58 mins)
2) If a pick is NOT made after 8 hours on the turn, does it then go straight to the next player, rather than the 2nd turn pick with a 4 hour clock?
(Total draft delay: 12 hours)
3) Given that the clock is so clearly accepted as part of draft strategy, why prohibit "the turn" from the same "advantages" every other player gets?
I'm not tryin to stir the pot, but I believe in fairness in all aspects, even free imaginary sports on a forum on the internetz. This seems one issue that's unfair as it presently stands.
1. NO...eight hours for the turn.2. Yes...it goes straight to the next person.
3. It doesn't...and here's why...
As Bass already explained, the clock is not meant to provide a strategic advantage, nor a disadvantage. The truth is that the ends already have a slight disadvantage due to the long delay between picks. (That disadvantage is well compensated from the #1 position by virtue of 3 picks in the first 33).
The clock is meant to keep the draft moving while giving everybody the opportunity to live a life without being too closely tied to the ability to sign on line. To that end, there is no reason to allow the end to have in essence, a double clock, because if they signed on to make their first pick, it logically follows that life isn't interfering with their ability to make a second pick. The ends don't get the benefit of extra time because it simply runs counter to the first purpose of the clck (to keep the draft moving) while adding little to the second purpose.
Most of us saw Fred's point, and agreed that Jeff had used the clock to his strategic advantage. We all understood that Jeff had not broken the letter of the law, but had broken the spirit of the law. But that's where agreement stopped. People are all over the map as to the severity of the crime. Many think it a smart move and not a "crime" at all. Some think it a crime, but a small one not worth fretting over. A small minority see it as a major infraction.
Fred's point was acknowleged, and a solution rendered. That's where it should have stopped. Instead, bickering continued. Then, at the turn, Fred decided to further prove his point by purposefully twisting the rules, violating not just the spirit of the rules, but their letter also. Fred had earlier CORRECTLY pointed out that the spirit of the clock rules was to keep the draft moving. To that extent, Freds violation was far more serious then anything Jeff did.
To use an analogy...Jeff was driving 60 in a 55 zone. We all agree he was breaking the law (or the spirit anyway), but few deem it serious. Fred was so pissed off about how few thought it serious, that he went and had one too many brews, and ran at 62. When called out, he couldn't see the difference between a completely sober 60, and a (barely) drunk 62, and he's become bitter about it. Most cops, and most of us, shrug at 60, because most of us do it. At 62, many of us start to feel uncomfortable, and while it's still not a huge deal, we're watching for the cop who WILL write the ticket. To do so after a few beers...well...you deserve whatever happens to you.
I hope I've made my point. I know that was a little deeper an answer then you were looking for, but I think it was warrented.