What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Peyton Hillis will be a top 15 rb this year (1 Viewer)

Huge BustKC is inept and Crennel is a terrible coach.Staying away from everything KC related, Bowe/Charles/Hillis etc.
They were 10-6 in 2010 and 7-9 last year despite being forced to roll out a Tyler Palko and Jackie Battle starting backfield the last quarter of the season. They're not a certain playoff team, but they're good enough to be in the hunt.
 
Charles will be top 10.
Yeah, Charles is awesome. Wouldn't surprise me if he's in the top-10. Unless he is going to set a new career high in touches the first year back from a major knee injury, though, it really won't effect Hillis too much, considering Hillis is still being drafted as a RB3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Shutout said:
I think a few components that are really under-talked about in all this are:1)Can the team REALLY run that much? I'm sure they CAN in theory but they might also have to be pretty fortunate that the game plan goes well, the defense keeps them in their games early, etc because they play in a division where all those teams can get points on you in a hurry and they play games against the Falcons, Saints, and Panthers this year where its not hard to envision having to pass to keep up. So, that's 9-10 games this year where I'm really calling that into question. Just hard for me to imagine the Chiefs going down to the dome in New orleans and running the ball down the saints throat all day. So I'm more inclined to think there will be situational spots where this works but a lot of games where it simply won't hold up.
If they are good at running the ball, they will eat UP MUCH OF THE TIME CLOCK AND KEEP THE OPPOSING TEAM'S OFFENSES OFF THE FIELD. On top of this...their defense will keep them in the game as well. Hence, minimizing This is why they won't be ALWAYS in a shootout which I believe your implying. Sure...they may have to a game here or there where they will have to catch up and pass (what team doesn't throughout the season) but I can see them running a lot and quite effectively this year.
 
'Buffaloes said:
I've seen him go anywhere from mid 1st -mid 2nd round. I don't think it's a bad pick in ppr. :shrug:The knee was healthy enough for the Pro Bowl last year. Bush was brought in for the GL, but forte was never a huge GL contributor anyway. I think it's a decent pick in the middle of the 1st. Maybe 1 or 2 picks early imo, but that's not a huge deal.
A decent pick? I don't know about you, but I'd rather my first round pick be a bit better than "decent." In PPR, there is no way on God's green earth that Forte should go before Rice, Foster, McCoy, Megatron, Gronk and Graham, and that is not even considering how many QBs you'd put in the first round ahead of the 4th best RB (I'd put at least three: Rodgers, Brees and Brady), so at best Forte is the 10th pick overall, and that is assuming you have him ahead of Chris Johnson, McFadden, Fitz, Cam Newton and maybe a couple more WRs (I personally do not). So, yeah, Forte at 1.06 is a MAJOR reach.
 
I think a few components that are really under-talked about in all this are:1)Can the team REALLY run that much? I'm sure they CAN in theory but they might also have to be pretty fortunate that the game plan goes well, the defense keeps them in their games early, etc because they play in a division where all those teams can get points on you in a hurry and they play games against the Falcons, Saints, and Panthers this year where its not hard to envision having to pass to keep up. So, that's 9-10 games this year where I'm really calling that into question. Just hard for me to imagine the Chiefs going down to the dome in New orleans and running the ball down the saints throat all day. So I'm more inclined to think there will be situational spots where this works but a lot of games where it simply won't hold up.
If they are good at running the ball, they will eat UP MUCH OF THE TIME CLOCK AND KEEP THE OPPOSING TEAM'S OFFENSES OFF THE FIELD. On top of this...their defense will keep them in the game as well. Hence, minimizing This is why they won't be ALWAYS in a shootout which I believe your implying. Sure...they may have to a game here or there where they will have to catch up and pass (what team doesn't throughout the season) but I can see them running a lot and quite effectively this year.
Both Hillis and Charles catch the ball well. I think even in catch-up mode they will use the backs. If they are smart they will play the two of them together a lot throughout the game. The value in the KC passing game can be found with Bowe and the two PPR backs.
 
I was very bullish on Hillis a month ago, but he has been used very sparingly in the last 2 preseason games with poor stats. I am not sure how to interpret it.

 
I was very bullish on Hillis a month ago, but he has been used very sparingly in the last 2 preseason games with poor stats. I am not sure how to interpret it.
I like to think it's because they've seen enough in training camp and the first two preseason games to know what they have in Hillis, they plan on using him accordingly during the regular season, and the coaches know they can run the ball with authority so they used that 3rd game to air it out.
 
I was very bullish on Hillis a month ago, but he has been used very sparingly in the last 2 preseason games with poor stats. I am not sure how to interpret it.
I like to think it's because they've seen enough in training camp and the first two preseason games to know what they have in Hillis, they plan on using him accordingly during the regular season, and the coaches know they can run the ball with authority so they used that 3rd game to air it out.
One of those games they did start at the 10 yard line then give him 3 straight carries (on which he went 5 yards, 4 yards, touchdown). If nothing, it shows he will be their battering ram in the red zone. However, I'm not letting pre-season change my opinion. I hope other take his final two pre-season games as a sign of "things to come" so I can get him at even better value.
 
I was very bullish on Hillis a month ago, but he has been used very sparingly in the last 2 preseason games with poor stats. I am not sure how to interpret it.
I like to think it's because they've seen enough in training camp and the first two preseason games to know what they have in Hillis, they plan on using him accordingly during the regular season, and the coaches know they can run the ball with authority so they used that 3rd game to air it out.
One of those games they did start at the 10 yard line then give him 3 straight carries (on which he went 5 yards, 4 yards, touchdown). If nothing, it shows he will be their battering ram in the red zone. However, I'm not letting pre-season change my opinion. I hope other take his final two pre-season games as a sign of "things to come" so I can get him at even better value.
When you look at the KC backfield situation logically it's obvious Hillis has value. I'm still apprehensive though until I see it in the regular season. I punted at RB in both of my leagues because of my belief that Hillis will be a rock solid RB2.At RB27 he's still a value. I think he'll outproduce that spot fairly easily.
 
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season.

"They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.

Related: Jamaal Charles

Source: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM

:football:

 
Hillis looked pretty damn good in the limited action he had for KC tonight. Looks like KC is going to run the ball A LOT this year.

9 consecutive runs to start the game. The O line is opening up some nice holes.

 
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season."They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.Related: Jamaal CharlesSource: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM :football:
250 x 6.4 = 1600 rushing yards for Jamaal Charles.
 
Hillis looked pretty damn good in the limited action he had for KC tonight. Looks like KC is going to run the ball A LOT this year. 9 consecutive runs to start the game. The O line is opening up some nice holes.
It's one preseason game but tonight Hillis looked more like the 10' version than the Madden Cursed CIA agent wannabe from last season.
 
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season."They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.Related: Jamaal CharlesSource: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM :football:
250 x 6.4 = 1600 rushing yards for Jamaal Charles.
You must be heavily vested in jCharles. Endlessly down on Hillis and up Charles' jacque strap. Its cute.
 
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season."They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.Related: Jamaal CharlesSource: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM :football:
250 x 6.4 = 1600 rushing yards for Jamaal Charles.
There is zero chance Charles averages 6.4 ypc this season coming off his ACL. Zero. He's the one guy I would be worried about taking at his ADP specifically because Hillis will be a major TD vulture and because Hillis is running very, very well.
 
Can a 7th round, #3 RB really be a huge bust?
Yes, it is just relative. If he is your 3rd RB, that means you are likely planning on using him at a few points in the year or putting him in as your flex. I like Hills, but he certainly could end up being a low end RB3 and a poor flex play. That is a bust for what you hoped he would do at his spot.
 
Can a 7th round, #3 RB really be a huge bust?
sure, if you're taking him over better values like McGahee, Benson, Ridley etc. You've basically just hurt your team's chances at success.
Willis in the 7th is robbery. If you get him there, I am not sure you are a genius or an also questionable for passing on him in the 5th and 6th.
Agreed. ADP's at MFL...#60 McGahee#80 Ridley#83 Benson#87 HillisThe guys you are taking Hillis over are guys like Redman, Spiller, Ingram, Helu, Tate, etc. I'll take Hillis well ahead of any of those guys. If you are in a league with very small rosters and need lottery tickets I can understand someone else taking a chance on Ingram/Helu. They have high ceilings if all the stars align just right but they have much, much lower floors.
 
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season."They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.Related: Jamaal CharlesSource: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM :football:
250 x 6.4 = 1600 rushing yards for Jamaal Charles.
There is zero chance Charles averages 6.4 ypc this season coming off his ACL. Zero. He's the one guy I would be worried about taking at his ADP specifically because Hillis will be a major TD vulture and because Hillis is running very, very well.
Not only that but I see a lot of experts that seem to assume Charles gets twice as many receptions as Hillis. Hillis is a very capable receiver. I would say Charles gets more yards(similar overall touches with higher y/carry and y/reception) and Hillis gets substantially more TD's. I think their final production is much closer to 50/50 than any expert rankings I've seen thus far. Been grabbing Hillis on almost every team all summer and it has nothing to do with the assumption that Charles suffers a setback. The defense in the preseason worries me more than Charles cutting into his production. With an improved defense/OL I thought this team was in for a big jump in rushing attempts but the KC defense has been awful in the preseason.
 
Agreed. ADP's at MFL...#60 McGahee#80 Ridley#83 Benson#87 HillisThe guys you are taking Hillis over are guys like Redman, Spiller, Ingram, Helu, Tate, etc. I'll take Hillis well ahead of any of those guys. If you are in a league with very small rosters and need lottery tickets I can understand someone else taking a chance on Ingram/Helu. They have high ceilings if all the stars align just right but they have much, much lower floors.
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreed. ADP's at MFL...#60 McGahee#80 Ridley#83 Benson#87 HillisThe guys you are taking Hillis over are guys like Redman, Spiller, Ingram, Helu, Tate, etc. I'll take Hillis well ahead of any of those guys. If you are in a league with very small rosters and need lottery tickets I can understand someone else taking a chance on Ingram/Helu. They have high ceilings if all the stars align just right but they have much, much lower floors.
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
To be fair, I'll also admit that while it's true I've been taking him on almost every team this summer I just looked back and haven't actually selected him before pick #107 in any draft. While I think he's a great value this year I haven't really needed to go out on a limb to get him on those teams either.
 
I don't know why people think benson is goin to be fools gold this season. That's just silly. Ryan grant was extremely fantasy relevant in 2009 as a high end RB2. Then he got hurt and they haven't had a quality rb since. GB can and does run the ball enough to produce a 1000 yd 10td rusher. I see no reason to think that benson can't be that guy this year. He only needs to stay healthy and avg 62.5 yards per game rushing. He will get goal line looks.

 
'Ilov80s said:
Willis in the 7th is robbery. If you get him there, I am not sure you are a genius or an also questionable for passing on him in the 5th and 6th.
I see comments like this all the time lately. The thing is, in a draft like that where good players are slipping it usually isn't just one player slipping, so the more well-prepared drafters usually have other McGahee type players to choose from in the previous couple of rounds.
 
Benson is fools gold this season.
I don't know about that, man. With Zone-blocking and Rodgers stretching the field he could very well hit 1,000 yards. He's always been a solid one-cut power runner and that chip on his shoulder is some good motivation. He's got the physical tools to do well. Is he going to get many TDs? Nope. But a solid RB3 who may get a couple catches each game.? I'll buy him at that price. I would take him in the 7th/8th after securing a couple solid WRs.
 
'Ilov80s said:
Willis in the 7th is robbery. If you get him there, I am not sure you are a genius or an also questionable for passing on him in the 5th and 6th.
I see comments like this all the time lately. The thing is, in a draft like that where good players are slipping it usually isn't just one player slipping, so the more well-prepared drafters usually have other McGahee type players to choose from in the previous couple of rounds.
exactly, McGahee was just one example. Hillis is going in most drafts where there is much better risk/reward opportunity.

 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
 
'BoltBacker said:
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season."They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.Related: Jamaal CharlesSource: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM :football:
250 x 6.4 = 1600 rushing yards for Jamaal Charles.
There is zero chance Charles averages 6.4 ypc this season coming off his ACL. Zero. He's the one guy I would be worried about taking at his ADP specifically because Hillis will be a major TD vulture and because Hillis is running very, very well.
Not only that but I see a lot of experts that seem to assume Charles gets twice as many receptions as Hillis. Hillis is a very capable receiver. I would say Charles gets more yards(similar overall touches with higher y/carry and y/reception) and Hillis gets substantially more TD's. I think their final production is much closer to 50/50 than any expert rankings I've seen thus far. Been grabbing Hillis on almost every team all summer and it has nothing to do with the assumption that Charles suffers a setback. The defense in the preseason worries me more than Charles cutting into his production. With an improved defense/OL I thought this team was in for a big jump in rushing attempts but the KC defense has been awful in the preseason.
Let's remember that Flowers has been out. And yes he may miss a week or two in the regular season, but when he is back it will make a big difference. Also, this defense was trampled the first two REGULAR season games last year. Still ran over 27.5 times per game after that. Let's not put too much stock into how their defense looks in the preseason. It sure would be nice if it looked better, but there are definitely some solid players on their defense, so I wouldn't worry.
 
Everything is setting up perfectly for Hillis to have a huge year.

The O-line is pretty good. Eric Winston was the missing piece at RT.

People forget (and rightfully so) that Thomas Jones got MORE carries than Jamaal in 2010. 245-230. Jamaal caught 45 balls and Jones caught 14; so their total combined touches ended up at 534. Jones got most of the goal line carries. Jamaal got most of the 3rd down work.

This year, the new offensive regime includes none other than Coordinator Brian Daboll - Hillis O-Coordinator with the Browns in 2010. No one knows better than Daboll what Hillis can do. Under Daboll in 2010, Hillis had 270 carries and 61 rec, good for 331 total touches.

Hillis will get all of the goal line work this season, and unlike Thomas Jones, he will get his fair share of the 3rd downs as well. KC has used both backs in certain packages this preseason. It is absolutely a time share. Jamaal will not impact Peyton's numbers. The Chiefs will run it more than all but two or three teams this season - just like 2010. Cassel is inept. His only chance at success is heavily relying on the run game. I mean this is a guy who could only muster a 58% completion percentage when Jamaal was averaging a historic 6.4 per carry..

The defense has not been at full strength without Brandon Flowers. He will drastically change the pass D. And they will be a top 15 D when all is said and done.

The 3rd preseason game against Seattle was meaningless. It was D Bowe's 1st game back. He signed a couple days before the game and they ignored the run and force fed it to him.

I've drafted Hillis in the 5th round of every one of my drafts. He's a solid RB 2 this season.

I think his floor is 225 carries, 25 receptions, and 8 TD's. Assuming (his 2010 yds per) he runs at a 4.4 clip and catches at 7.8 per rec, that's basically 1,000 yds on the ground, 200 through the air and 8 TD's.

 
Huge BustKC is inept and Crennel is a terrible coach.Staying away from everything KC related, Bowe/Charles/Hillis etc.
Finally someone other than me says it.
KC was 5th in rushing attempts last year & 1st in 2010. They signed one of the best RTs in the league during the offseason, Jon Baldwin actually looks like a capable WR with a full offseason, and they have Moeaki, Berry, Charles, and Cassel returning from season-ending injuries. I'm not sure how they are going to be so much worse than the mediocre bunch they fielded last year. They are built around the running game and they appear to have the defence & OL necessary to run it a lot. I'm not seeing the downside of a hungry Hillis in a contract year as a flex or a low-end 2 (in PPR especially) especially considering the injury Charles is returning from. The fact that Cassel seems to love his checkdowns works in Hillis' favor too. Considering where he's being taken, I think he's got a solid upside with a relatively high floor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Kansas City Star's Adam Teicher believes the workload numbers will be "pretty close" between Jamaal Charles and Peyton Hillis by the end of the season."They intend to get these guys a similar amount of work," Teicher told PFT's Mike Florio. Teicher reiterates the Chiefs' plan for the two backs to combine for 500+ touches in "a perfect world," with "a lot of work for both." Teicher's comments lend credence to our suspicion that Hillis could end up with standalone RB2 value as the red-zone hammer with 12-15 touches per week.Related: Jamaal CharlesSource: PFT Live on NBCSports.com Aug 30 - 6:02 PM :football:
250 x 6.4 = 1600 rushing yards for Jamaal Charles.
There is zero chance Charles averages 6.4 ypc this season coming off his ACL. Zero. He's the one guy I would be worried about taking at his ADP specifically because Hillis will be a major TD vulture and because Hillis is running very, very well.
k
 
TD heavy, keeper and I took him in th 6th round over SJax, Stewart, McGehee. I need him as my starter until AP and or Wells are at full strength.

I'm thinking Hillis has a pretty high floor. I like that.

 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
Outstanding
 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
Outstanding
More GL opportunities because hes on a worse offense?Benson and Ridley have very little competition on the ground for GL work.
 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
Outstanding
:goodposting:
 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
Outstanding
More GL opportunities because hes on a worse offense?Benson and Ridley have very little competition on the ground for GL work.
GB and NE are more likely to throw inside the 5 is what I think he's saying.
 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
Outstanding
More GL opportunities because hes on a worse offense?Benson and Ridley have very little competition on the ground for GL work.
GB and NE are more likely to throw inside the 5 is what I think he's saying.
I agree with that for sure, I just think the difference in the amount of times they make it to the situation favors Ridley and Benson way more.
 
'LHUCKS said:
Okay, so Ridley and Benson were good examples given that their ADP ares within 7 spots of Hillis'.I don't consider Hillis over Ridley or Benson, and to do so is a mistake IMHO.
I'd be willing to bet Hillis outscores both of those guys. I figure...He's going to get as many or more touches.He's going to have more GL opportunities.He's on a superior run offense.Having Charles there isn't a hindrance when the stated objective is to use both guys heavily.
Outstanding
More GL opportunities because hes on a worse offense?Benson and Ridley have very little competition on the ground for GL work.
GB and NE are more likely to throw inside the 5 is what I think he's saying.
I agree with that for sure, I just think the difference in the amount of times they make it to the situation favors Ridley and Benson way more.
I agree they'll get there more, but there's also a reason Brady and Rodgers get 40+ TDs... I'm also skeptical of all the recent Benson love. Has anyone else owned a GB RB the last few years? I have. GB has one of the most annoying players in the league (for fantasy owners) . His name is JOHN KUHN. The fans LOVE Kuhn. Benson = no thanks. ( I do like Ridley though.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top