Most who picked Peyton as their #1 QB have played him every week. Some didn't even draft a backup QB. Astute owners snagged the likes of Orton and Vick off the WW to block other teams from adding them knowing they most likely wouldn't go QBBC and will keep playing Manning every week.
Now here we are going into week 11 and Manning has lost Dallas Clark and A Gonzo for the year and Collie and White are dealing with injuries as is Tamme plus their running game has been hurt with injuries. Has it come time to replace Manning with either Orton or Vick completely or do you try the QBBC approach? It seems that with Orton and Vick you can expect more consistency on a week to week basis with a higher ceiling.
The question also applies to Manning owners that drafted late #2 QBs that are now coming on like Freeman and Garrard although I'd think these owners would be more inclined to play matchups and go RBBC.
Now here we are going into week 11 and Manning has lost Dallas Clark and A Gonzo for the year and Collie and White are dealing with injuries as is Tamme plus their running game has been hurt with injuries. Has it come time to replace Manning with either Orton or Vick completely or do you try the QBBC approach? It seems that with Orton and Vick you can expect more consistency on a week to week basis with a higher ceiling.
The question also applies to Manning owners that drafted late #2 QBs that are now coming on like Freeman and Garrard although I'd think these owners would be more inclined to play matchups and go RBBC.