Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Pfizer to release COVID-19 vaccine documentation to public... TODAY (originally 2076) (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Insein
- Start date
dkp993
Footballguy
dkp993
Footballguy
dkp993
Footballguy
pinkham13
Footballguy
It’s at the end of the article. They say we’re killing 117 kids for every one kid saved from a Covid death.
pinkham13
Footballguy
I know. If it’s not obviously fake news from legacy media you won’t eat it up. It’s more comfortable listening to the lies than the truth. Stay in your safe space news bubble from Zuckerberg and friends.
Last edited by a moderator:
cosjobs
Footballguy
I can understand how you feel that way, but don't post it in here and expect us not to question it.
jhib
Footballguy
Right off the bat:
This person has no clue what background rate means and how it should be used.
pinkham13
Footballguy
You have no clue what these criminals have been doing to us. AMA admits different batches were stronger.https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/big-naomi-wolf-confirms-big-pharma-adding-varying-amounts-active-ingredient-batches-covid-vaccine-video/
Insein
Footballguy
Yo new Pfizer records dropped.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/03/confidential-pfizer-docs-official-gov-data-vaccinated-suffering-ade/
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/03/confidential-pfizer-docs-official-gov-data-vaccinated-suffering-ade/
Founded in November 2020 and based in the United Kingdom, The Daily Expose publishes Covid-19 conspiracy and anti-vaccination news. The website completely lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page, disclose authors, editors, or owners. On April 2, 2021, The Daily Expose reports that Twitter suspended them for …
Thanks, but no.
Insein
Footballguy
For those that wish to have someone else do their thinking for them, can't help you.
Here's the link directly to the 15 documents that were released on Friday. They range in size.
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Here's the link directly to the 15 documents that were released on Friday. They range in size.
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Last edited by a moderator:
A question. Did you read them all, or are you drawing your conclusions from the prior link you posted?
Insein
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
Pickle Rody
IBL Representative
I give you props for posting the link to these documents.
Due to your post prior to this one I get the impression that you search for anything that might provide bias confirmation of your vaccine conspiracy beliefs. Which, of course, makes your first sentence in this quoted post quite hilarious. Stupefyingly funny even.
Again though, props on the link to the docs.
Terminalxylem
Footballguy
Let us know what questions you have. If you cut and paste from the primary documents it will simplify the process.
dkp993
Footballguy
So the crux of this story is you preferred to have dailyexpose do the thinking for you while then throwing judgment at others for not thinking for themselves? Interesting angle.
Stealthycat
Footballguy
if that terminology is being used, we have to also label pro-vaccination news
why can't there just be vaccination news?
Pickle Rody
IBL Representative
There is. It can be found on news sites such as Reuters, BBC and AP. Feel free to use these sites if/when you become interested in unbiased reporting of facts.
quick-hands
Footballguy
Dickies
Footballguy
Do you honestly feel like you're qualified to interpret these documents? I have a pretty good basic understanding of statistics and the scientific method, but when I read these studies it makes my head spin. When people not qualified to interpret the study start picking it apart (like a tabloid site) that's exactly how misinformation spreads.
Terminalxylem
Footballguy
My guess is he’ll never read them, but rely upon Cliffsnotes written by people who also aren’t qualified.
Insein
Footballguy
Haven't been posting lately but as expected, no one noticed another 80k pages dropped on Pfizer's site a couple days ago. Guess there was something that leaked far more important at coincidentally the same time.
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Here's some highlights.
https://timcast.com/news/what-we-can-learn-from-pfizers-latest-document-release-on-the-covid-vaccine/
On Vaccine Efficacy:
"According to the information included among the 80,000 pages released this week, the vaccine only had a 12% effectiveness for the first seven days after being administered. After seven days, the effectiveness dropped to roughly 0.84%. This is far below the 95% effectiveness that the FDA, doctors, or media have touted."
On Effectiveness for Pregnant Women:
"Another revelation within the documents revealed no trials in pregnant women and no data to support the statement that the drug was safe for a child in utero. This section of data noted the “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.”
It goes on to say that women should “avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.”
The study paperwork also advised that the vaccine should not be used while breastfeeding an infant, and it is unknown if the drug is excreted into human breast milk."
On Subject deaths due to Vaccine:
"The document release also revealed that 1,223 people died due to the vaccine during the trial period. That number represents 3% of those in the drug trials who had a fatal response to the new drug."
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Here's some highlights.
https://timcast.com/news/what-we-can-learn-from-pfizers-latest-document-release-on-the-covid-vaccine/
On Vaccine Efficacy:
"According to the information included among the 80,000 pages released this week, the vaccine only had a 12% effectiveness for the first seven days after being administered. After seven days, the effectiveness dropped to roughly 0.84%. This is far below the 95% effectiveness that the FDA, doctors, or media have touted."
On Effectiveness for Pregnant Women:
"Another revelation within the documents revealed no trials in pregnant women and no data to support the statement that the drug was safe for a child in utero. This section of data noted the “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.”
It goes on to say that women should “avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.”
The study paperwork also advised that the vaccine should not be used while breastfeeding an infant, and it is unknown if the drug is excreted into human breast milk."
On Subject deaths due to Vaccine:
"The document release also revealed that 1,223 people died due to the vaccine during the trial period. That number represents 3% of those in the drug trials who had a fatal response to the new drug."
So much for 'effective'. This basically states that the useless jab did nothing for the overwhelming majority and the level of sickness was the same if one got the jab or didn't, just as I always knew. Man, what's it like to get duped like that into taking an experimental jab? Anyone here? I mean I know 90% or more of you fell for this.
The data notes that 3,410 COVID-19 infections occurred after administering the vaccine: 1,816 of those cases were among people who received the placebo and 1,594 infections occurred in those who received the Pfizer vaccine. In calculating vaccine effectiveness, or VE, these control numbers reveal a 12.2% effective rate. Using the numbers provided for infections that occurred more than seven days after the vaccine, the VE drops to a rate slightly above 0.84%.
All those stating 'my symptoms would be much worse if I wasn't max jabbed and boosted', are 100% clueless lemmings blabbering with zero facts to back up their statement.
The 'safe' part, of course, has already been debunked. This latest data dump just reinforces that it is dangerous. Dangerous for a weak virus that killed unhealthy and/or fat people at a rate of under 2%.
On Subject deaths due to Vaccine:
"The document release also revealed that 1,223 people died due to the vaccine during the trial period. That number represents 3% of those in the drug trials who had a fatal response to the new drug."
The data notes that 3,410 COVID-19 infections occurred after administering the vaccine: 1,816 of those cases were among people who received the placebo and 1,594 infections occurred in those who received the Pfizer vaccine. In calculating vaccine effectiveness, or VE, these control numbers reveal a 12.2% effective rate. Using the numbers provided for infections that occurred more than seven days after the vaccine, the VE drops to a rate slightly above 0.84%.
All those stating 'my symptoms would be much worse if I wasn't max jabbed and boosted', are 100% clueless lemmings blabbering with zero facts to back up their statement.
The 'safe' part, of course, has already been debunked. This latest data dump just reinforces that it is dangerous. Dangerous for a weak virus that killed unhealthy and/or fat people at a rate of under 2%.
On Subject deaths due to Vaccine:
"The document release also revealed that 1,223 people died due to the vaccine during the trial period. That number represents 3% of those in the drug trials who had a fatal response to the new drug."
HellToupee
Footballguy
moleculo
Footballguy
Insein
Footballguy
They're pushing to get the jab approved for 6months to 5 year olds for emergency use so they can again avoid liability and have a free market to push on.
LawFitz
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
The Commish
Footballguy
It was up a bit ago and the posts had "snippets" of the documents...no context or linking to specific documents etc. I think you're likely correct.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Well…why think that? Because it seems they get misrepresented every time? I mean, we even got a little “coincidence “ of another leaks. So far the SCOTUS leak was to get attention away from a bad “documentary “ and now this. What else will the leak be blamed for taking attention from?
Max Power
Footballguy
Pfizer takes a different approach in fraud claim trail.
Pfizer admits to fraud in court (rumble.com)
Pfizer admits to fraud in court (rumble.com)
