What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

PFT Report: Sherman Gets Arizona HC Job (1 Viewer)

PatsWillWin

Footballguy
http://www.profootballtalk.com/category/rumor-mill/

Multiple league sources tell us that the Arizona Cardinals have selected Texans assistant Mike Sherman to be their next head coach. It’s not known whether a contract has been finalized, but the word is that Sherman is getting the job.

We’d previously heard that the Cardinals were planning to go with an offensive coach, and that Sherman was the favorite.

The Cardinals were primarily attracted by his experience. He coached the Packers from 2000 through 2005, and also was the General Manager for several seasons.

No coach has been with the franchise for more than six seasons, and the team has won only one postseason game since the Truman administration.

Sherman is the third straight Cardinals coach having recent experience with an NFC team. His predecessor, Dennis Green, coached the Vikings for more than nine seasons, and the guy before Green, Dave McGinnis, had been the defensive coordinator in Chicago.

The Cardinals’ latest string of hires doesn’t include a former Lions coach, since even the Cardinals aren’t that desperate.
 
why do NFL franchises keep on hiring the same tired retread coaches again and again? Doesnt anyone want to give someone a new chance?

 
I for one didn't care for him as a coach or a GM! As an owner of a few AZ players - I am not happy about this hiring at all!

 
why do NFL franchises keep on hiring the same tired retread coaches again and again? Doesnt anyone want to give someone a new chance?
Yeah, nothing sexy about retreads, but where are the hot coordinators? Whisenhunt, Rivera, who else?Teams seem to be going to college route, that's where the hot names are anyway. Terrible track record too.And don't forget, Belichick was a retread once.
 
Hiring Mike Sherman really gets your blood pumping!! How exciting.
A lot of Pack fans were fine with Sherman the coach. It was Sherman the GM they really didn't like.Just playing Devil's Advocate.
As Packer fan, I wasn't happy with either. Sherman does not have a presence in the locker room. In Green Bay, the players didn't respect him. This was mentioned by some in the media. Basically, he had 'his guys.' If you were one of his guys, you were going to be on the field. Regardless of how bad you were. Think Cletidus Hunt, Robert Ferguson, and KGB. He is loyal to a fault. Sure, loyalty is cool in the beginning. He'll be a 'player's coach' to start. But as soon as his loyalty starts clouding his judgement, the players will take notice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This news is adding fuel to the idea that Russ Grimm and Ken Whisenhunt will both be back with the Steelers this year. Anyone know what other open jobs these guys interviewed for? Whis in Miami I think.

 
Yeah, nothing sexy about retreads, but where are the hot coordinators? Whisenhunt, Rivera, who else?
Norm chow...the guy is an offensive genius I mean he coached both palmer and leinart at USC and then young with tenn. A lot of teams are gonna regret not giving him a chance
 
This news is adding fuel to the idea that Russ Grimm and Ken Whisenhunt will both be back with the Steelers this year. Anyone know what other open jobs these guys interviewed for? Whis in Miami I think.
Yes, Whiz also interviewd in Miami. So far I haven't heard too much about the Oakland job, I wonder if they'll bring Grimm in for an interview.
 
This news is adding fuel to the idea that Russ Grimm and Ken Whisenhunt will both be back with the Steelers this year. Anyone know what other open jobs these guys interviewed for? Whis in Miami I think.
Yes, Whiz also interviewd in Miami. So far I haven't heard too much about the Oakland job, I wonder if they'll bring Grimm in for an interview.
Haven't heard his name, this year or last.Whis saying no thanks may have scared them off Pitt assistants as well. Steve Sarkisian has interviewed, and Mike Martz is the latest name I've heard.I'd be shocked if Grimm gets it over Whisenhunt, and pretty shocked as well if the Steelers go out-of -house. I think that job is Whisenhunt's to lose.
 
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.

 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
You're forgetting that GB had one of the best offensive lines in football when Sherman was there. The Cardinals...well not so much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
:thumbdown: As a Packers fan, there was a time I too hated Coach Sherman. But the reality is, he went 9-7, 12-4, 12-4, 10-6 before Sherman the GM destroyed his talent down to 4-12 (thats off the top of my head, so sorry if i missed something). He won the division 3 straight times. His playoff record isnt so hot, but i'll take losing in the playoffs to no playoffs, where Arizona has won what, just once, EVER?As long has he isnt the GM, i'd move up any Cardinal in my draft this next year.
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
You're forgetting that GB had one of the best offensive lines in football when Sherman was there. The Cardinals...well not so much.
And you're forgetting that Sherman is an old offensive line coach. And you're forgetting the running attatck he designed in 2003. If he can just get one or two servicable lineman, I think Edge will have a huge year.
 
NFL is saying he is going back there for another interview but nothing is official yet. Also, ESPN news isn't reporting it yet either. Is this official?

 
From the Arizona Republic:

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/...cardsbreak.html

Former Packers coach Mike Sherman is expected to leave the Valley tonight without an offer to coach the Cardinals, according to NFL sources.

Sherman interviewed with team officials for a second time Thursday, and there were reports that he had been offered the job. Several sources close to the process, however, said that was not the case, although Sherman remains a viable candidate for the job.

Sherman was scheduled tonight to return to Houston, where he is the Texans assistant head coach.

The Cardinals, meanwhile, plan to talk to other candidates on their short list.

Sherman was the first candidate to receive a second interview with the Cardinals, who announced Wednesday they had narrowed a field of eight candidates.

They wouldn’t reveal how many coaches were in the final group or their identities.

Meanwhile, Pittsburgh offensive coordinator Ken Whisenhunt has a second interview scheduled tomorrow.

I'm surprised that Pittsburgh hasn't closed the deal with Whisenhunt yet.

 
Update from PFT:

POSTED 3:22 p.m. EST; UPDATED 3:51 p.m. EST, January 11, 2007MIXED SIGNALS FROM 'ZONAIn our effort to confirm that Mike Sherman is/will be the next head coach of the Cardinals, we've learned that, technically, the team is still interviewing candidates.But we've also learned that the players generally believe that Sherman is getting the job.And since several players were involved in the process, it's safe to say that they know what they're talking about on this one.So ignore any lingering smoke and mirrors. Sherman is getting the job.
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
You're forgetting that GB had one of the best offensive lines in football when Sherman was there. The Cardinals...well not so much.
And you're forgetting that Sherman is an old offensive line coach. And you're forgetting the running attatck he designed in 2003. If he can just get one or two servicable lineman, I think Edge will have a huge year.
Edge? Isn't he going to bring Gado with him?
 
Update from PFT:

POSTED 3:22 p.m. EST; UPDATED 3:51 p.m. EST, January 11, 2007MIXED SIGNALS FROM 'ZONAIn our effort to confirm that Mike Sherman is/will be the next head coach of the Cardinals, we've learned that, technically, the team is still interviewing candidates.But we've also learned that the players generally believe that Sherman is getting the job.And since several players were involved in the process, it's safe to say that they know what they're talking about on this one.So ignore any lingering smoke and mirrors. Sherman is getting the job.
I'm not a PFT basher at all, but between this story, and the Lombardi/Oakland story, PFT has covered themselves for every possible outcome except Sherman and Lombardi running off together to start a cheerleading camp.
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
You're forgetting that GB had one of the best offensive lines in football when Sherman was there. The Cardinals...well not so much.
And you're forgetting that Sherman is an old offensive line coach. And you're forgetting the running attatck he designed in 2003. If he can just get one or two servicable lineman, I think Edge will have a huge year.
No offense, but he didn't exactly work wonders with the Houston O line this season. And you'll notice, once again, that the O line is littered with 'his' guys. Flanagan and Chris White are former Packers. Heck, look at that Houston team. Plenty of GB/Sherman outcasts found their way onto that roster. Not a good sign.
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
Agree, and did Andre Johnson truely breakout this year? or am I forgetting that?I like it. And hope he gets some O-line help here quick.
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
Agree, and did Andre Johnson truely breakout this year? or am I forgetting that?I like it. And hope he gets some O-line help here quick.
He caught alot of passes, but his 2004 season was alot "better" and more of a "breakout".
 
Not so fast here. Local Pittsburgh radio is saying that Steelers OC Ken Whisenhunt is going back to Arizona for a second interview.

 
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCHA league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team. On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."So what will happen with the Cardinals?"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
 
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCHA league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team. On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."So what will happen with the Cardinals?"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
You're forgetting that GB had one of the best offensive lines in football when Sherman was there. The Cardinals...well not so much.
And you're forgetting that Sherman is an old offensive line coach. And you're forgetting the running attatck he designed in 2003. If he can just get one or two servicable lineman, I think Edge will have a huge year.
You are forgetting one important factor. Edge is not that great anymore. I am not saying he is worthless, but Edge is a mediocre RB now. He used to have good quickness, incredible balance, good power, good vision and could catch and pass block well, but had poor top speed. Excellent all around back. However, the last few years you have seen much less quickness, even less overall top speed and his balance and power of dropped to one level, still very good balance. I think he is mediocre from a fantasy talent level and decent from an NFL standpoint because he is versatile (does the little things). Addai just got on the team and averaged 4.8 YPC and 8.1 per pass. In Edge's last year 2005 with the Colts he averaged 4.2 YPC and 7.7 YPP. Now that is not the only item to look at, but it is telling that Edge just has little explosiveness. You can't really look at the Arizona stats last year as an example because almost all RB's would post weak stats behind that line.Bottom line, I don't think Edge is the player he once was. He is still very worthy of having on an NFL roster, but he is in the middle of the pack with the ball in his hands now.4.8 8.1
 
Aaronstory said:
You people are crazy. All Sherman did was have one of the best offenses in the league mulitple years running. And that was with basicly Favre and one good year from Walker. You wait and see. Grab Edge for cheap now. You will thank me later.
Agree, and did Andre Johnson truely breakout this year? or am I forgetting that?I like it. And hope he gets some O-line help here quick.
He caught alot of passes, but his 2004 season was alot "better" and more of a "breakout".
This is partially true. 2004 and 2006 look very similar yardage wise and TD wise, but before David Carr imploded, Johnson was easily have his best year.Games 1-11:

84 receptions, 992 yards and 5 TDs or 7.6 receptions, 90.2 yards and 0.45 TDs Per Game

Games 12-16:

19 receptions, 156 yards and 0 TDs or 3.8 receptions, 31.2 yards and 0 TDs Per Game

Also, in 2006, AJ's best game was 152 yards with 0 TDs and never had more than one TD in a game. In those first 11 games, he had 9 games where he had at least 75 yards (the other 2 were above 50 yards) and in PPR leagues, he had 9 of 11 games with 6 or more receptions. He was very consistent until the end.

In 2004, he had a 12 reception, 170 yard, 2TD game. He had 3 other 100 yard games, but many, many more clunkers.

Again, on the surface they look very similar, but until the last 5 games, he was far and away having his best season. In my PPR league, he was the #1 WR for the first half of the season until CJ had his 2 huge games and Colston had his 3 huge games. I am pretty sure he was top 5 until the game 12-16 slide.

The question with AJ for next year is whether or not he stays consistent all year. If you looked at the second half of 2005 after he missed 4 or 5 games to injury, the start to 2006 was not surprising. He averaged almost 7 receptions and 80 yards per game in his last 8 games (Note, I do not count week 17 against SF as to me, they weren't trying to win that one).

 
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCHA league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team. On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."So what will happen with the Cardinals?"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
It may be a crock, but it also sounds like PFT looking for a reason to explain why they jumped the gun and named Sherman the guy.
 
massraider said:
Godsbrother said:
JetsWillWin said:
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCHA league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team. On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."So what will happen with the Cardinals?"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
It may be a crock, but it also sounds like PFT looking for a reason to explain why they jumped the gun and named Sherman the guy.
:shrug: That's how it felt to me too.
 
massraider said:
Godsbrother said:
JetsWillWin said:
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCHA league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team. On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."So what will happen with the Cardinals?"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
It may be a crock, but it also sounds like PFT looking for a reason to explain why they jumped the gun and named Sherman the guy.
:excited: That's how it felt to me too.
Sounds like PFT was dead on:from rotoworld: The Cardinals reportedly were ready to hire Mike Sherman, but balked at his $4 million salary request.If true, we're not sure who comes off more foolish here. The Cardinals possibly losing their choice over $1 million or Sherman for not figuring out how to make it work when he's not likely to get many coaching offers.
 
massraider said:
Godsbrother said:
JetsWillWin said:
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCH

A league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team.

On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.

But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.

Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."

So what will happen with the Cardinals?

"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
It may be a crock, but it also sounds like PFT looking for a reason to explain why they jumped the gun and named Sherman the guy.
:lmao: That's how it felt to me too.
Sounds like PFT was dead on:from rotoworld:

The Cardinals reportedly were ready to hire Mike Sherman, but balked at his $4 million salary request.

If true, we're not sure who comes off more foolish here. The Cardinals possibly losing their choice over $1 million or Sherman for not figuring out how to make it work when he's not likely to get many coaching offers.
I'm a PFT apologist as much as anyone else, but this is the kind of stuff they pull that turns people off.Make a proclamation that he is the coach.

Come back, write another piece essentially saying "don't worry, he's the guy."

Come back, after Sherman leaves town, and imply that something must have gone down.

Follow up with a piece quoting an unnamed source, who mocks the idea of a "second interview":

A league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team.

On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.

This is such a juvenile ploy it's absurd, and looks doubly stupid considering almost every other team with vacancies has been conducting multiple interviews with coaches. But Arizona didn't hire the guy that PFT said they would, so they produce the NFL source that claims the Cards can't make a decision, and it was this waffling that allowed Sherman to leave town.

Final report: No inside info, just a report from Foxsports.com's Czarnecki that they use to "vindicate" themselves. They did pick Sherman, like we said, but that cheapo Bidwill wouldn't cough up the money.

Not an all-time horrible blunder from PFT, but I don't see this gaining them many converts. And I'd say "dead on" is a major stretch.

 
Loopdog said:
why do NFL franchises keep on hiring the same tired retread coaches again and again? Doesnt anyone want to give someone a new chance?
Success. Come on, there are plenty of coaches coaching right now on their first shot. There were more coaches in 2006 on their first job than there were retreads. The first time coaches were Billick, Lewis, Crenell, Kubiak, Del Rio, Saban, Mangini, Cower, Fisher, Mora Jr., Fox, L. Smith, Marinelli, Childress, Payton, Reid, Nolan and Linehan. Lifetime, these coaches are 664-541 for a .551 winning percentage. Not bad. Now for the retreads, which include Jauron, Skeletor, Dungy, Edwards, Belichick, Shell, Shottenheimer, Green, Parcells, Coughlin, Holmgren, Gruden, and Gibbs. If you look at their tenure on their current jobs, these guys are 530-398 for a .571 winning percentage. Sure, there are some lemons among the retreads like Green, but the only guys under .500 on their current trip are Jauron, Shell, Green, Gruden and Gibbs. The rest of these guys are over .500. You try retreads so you can find the Skeletors, Dungys, and Belichicks of the world and avoid the Childresses of the world.
 
If Arizona hires this clown Sherman, it will be another

step back for a franchise that knows no other direction.

 
why do NFL franchises keep on hiring the same tired retread coaches again and again? Doesnt anyone want to give someone a new chance?
Success. Come on, there are plenty of coaches coaching right now on their first shot. There were more coaches in 2006 on their first job than there were retreads. The first time coaches were Billick, Lewis, Crenell, Kubiak, Del Rio, Saban, Mangini, Cower, Fisher, Mora Jr., Fox, L. Smith, Marinelli, Childress, Payton, Reid, Nolan and Linehan. Lifetime, these coaches are 664-541 for a .551 winning percentage. Not bad. Now for the retreads, which include Jauron, Skeletor, Dungy, Edwards, Belichick, Shell, Shottenheimer, Green, Parcells, Coughlin, Holmgren, Gruden, and Gibbs. If you look at their tenure on their current jobs, these guys are 530-398 for a .571 winning percentage. Sure, there are some lemons among the retreads like Green, but the only guys under .500 on their current trip are Jauron, Shell, Green, Gruden and Gibbs. The rest of these guys are over .500. You try retreads so you can find the Skeletors, Dungys, and Belichicks of the world and avoid the Childresses of the world.
:goodposting:
 
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCH

A league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team.

On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.

But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.

Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."

So what will happen with the Cardinals?

"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
It may be a crock, but it also sounds like PFT looking for a reason to explain why they jumped the gun and named Sherman the guy.
:goodposting: That's how it felt to me too.
Sounds like PFT was dead on:from rotoworld:

The Cardinals reportedly were ready to hire Mike Sherman, but balked at his $4 million salary request.

If true, we're not sure who comes off more foolish here. The Cardinals possibly losing their choice over $1 million or Sherman for not figuring out how to make it work when he's not likely to get many coaching offers.
I'm a PFT apologist as much as anyone else, but this is the kind of stuff they pull that turns people off.Make a proclamation that he is the coach.

Come back, write another piece essentially saying "don't worry, he's the guy."

Come back, after Sherman leaves town, and imply that something must have gone down.

Follow up with a piece quoting an unnamed source, who mocks the idea of a "second interview":

A league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team.

On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.

This is such a juvenile ploy it's absurd, and looks doubly stupid considering almost every other team with vacancies has been conducting multiple interviews with coaches. But Arizona didn't hire the guy that PFT said they would, so they produce the NFL source that claims the Cards can't make a decision, and it was this waffling that allowed Sherman to leave town.

Final report: No inside info, just a report from Foxsports.com's Czarnecki that they use to "vindicate" themselves. They did pick Sherman, like we said, but that cheapo Bidwill wouldn't cough up the money.

Not an all-time horrible blunder from PFT, but I don't see this gaining them many converts. And I'd say "dead on" is a major stretch.
Not that I particularly like Czar, but.....
CARDS WERE READY TO HIRE SHERMAN

John Czarnecki of FOXSports.com reports that the Arizona Cardinals were poised to hire Texans assistant Mike Sherman on Thursday, but that Sherman asked for a salary of $4 million per year.

Mike, the only way you're getting $4 million a year from anyone is by possessing a lottery tickets with six numbers that match the digits on the ping pong balls that get vacuumed out of the popcorn machine.

So to those of you out there who still might be chortling regarding our foot-in-doo-doo report that Sherman was getting the job, allow us to echo in this space the introductory line from our Thursday story:

"Multiple league sources tell us that the Arizona Cardinals have selected Texans assistant Mike Sherman to be their next head coach. It's not known whether a contract has been finalized, but the word is that Sherman is getting the job."

In hindsight, the report was accurate. The Cardinals did select Sherman. But he wanted too much money from the notoriously cheap Bidwills.

So thanks, Czar, for giving us a little vindication.

Actually, we weren't all that chagrined about the fact that we were wr-wr-wr-wr-erroneous. Given the server snafu from Thursday, we're simply glad that anyone can see our content, be it accurate or otherwise.
 
"TYPICAL" CARDINALS SCREWING UP COACH SEARCH

A league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team.

On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.

But, instead, it now turns out that the Cardinals supposedly are conducting a second round of interviews, with Sherman and Ken Whisenhunt (and possibly more) coming back again for another look-see.

Said the source: "This whole second interview thing is a crock of sh-t. It's typical Arizona. They've either got too many cooks in the kitchen and can't make a decision or they are trying to negotiate with multiple coaches, trying to get a lowball deal done. A second interview in the NFL is when you make a job offer. The fact that Sherman left without an offer or acceptance means they weren't paying or someone's not buying Sherman's act."

So what will happen with the Cardinals?

"They'll probably end up hiring Jim Fassel or Mike Ditka," the source said. "They'll be the only coaches left by the time they make a decision."
Newest PFT update.
FWIW the Steelers ae suppose to conduct a second round of interviews as well. I think it is a crock, too.
It may be a crock, but it also sounds like PFT looking for a reason to explain why they jumped the gun and named Sherman the guy.
:coffee: That's how it felt to me too.
Sounds like PFT was dead on:from rotoworld:

The Cardinals reportedly were ready to hire Mike Sherman, but balked at his $4 million salary request.

If true, we're not sure who comes off more foolish here. The Cardinals possibly losing their choice over $1 million or Sherman for not figuring out how to make it work when he's not likely to get many coaching offers.
I'm a PFT apologist as much as anyone else, but this is the kind of stuff they pull that turns people off.Make a proclamation that he is the coach.

Come back, write another piece essentially saying "don't worry, he's the guy."

Come back, after Sherman leaves town, and imply that something must have gone down.

Follow up with a piece quoting an unnamed source, who mocks the idea of a "second interview":

A league source has teed off on that mess in Arizona otherwise known as a professional football team.

On Thursday, the Cardinals brought Texans assistant Mike Sherman in for a "second interview". In NFL circles, "second interview" typically means "job offer". And that's what the players thought was going down.

This is such a juvenile ploy it's absurd, and looks doubly stupid considering almost every other team with vacancies has been conducting multiple interviews with coaches. But Arizona didn't hire the guy that PFT said they would, so they produce the NFL source that claims the Cards can't make a decision, and it was this waffling that allowed Sherman to leave town.

Final report: No inside info, just a report from Foxsports.com's Czarnecki that they use to "vindicate" themselves. They did pick Sherman, like we said, but that cheapo Bidwill wouldn't cough up the money.

Not an all-time horrible blunder from PFT, but I don't see this gaining them many converts. And I'd say "dead on" is a major stretch.
:pics: Diesel is about as biased a person you will ever come across when it comes to PFT so his credibility on PFT and PFT alone is not reliable. Diesel, you take away from your other postings when you blindly back PFT.
 
On PFT.com and the Sherman, this is the price of rumor mongering. They are going to be wrong or give details before everything has played out.

On Arizona and Sherman. If I am remembering my facts correctly he is still due to make 3.5million on the last year of his packers contract. Houston picks up some of that tab for him to play teacher to Kubiak, but the point is Sherman is getting a lot of money with minimal job pressure. Did the Bidwells think Sherman was going to take a pay cut out of desparation to be a head coach? If you are the Cardinals you have to know Sherman wants at least what he has in his pocket now.

 
On PFT.com and the Sherman, this is the price of rumor mongering. They are going to be wrong or give details before everything has played out.
That's right. What PFT has improved on, especially last year, was clarifying as much as they can who (or in what capacity like "a team source", et.) their sources are, whether it's one or multiple sources, and how certain their sources are about the information. That's a vast improvement on just reporting something they heard, absent any context.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top