What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Player Speed and Size (1 Viewer)

Desmond Watson


The amount of kinetic energy Watson has by running 40 yards in 5.86 seconds, at 464 lbs is equal to a 240 lb linebacker running a 3.03 40 yard dash That’s not a typo.
Resident physics guy checking in. That statement may not be a typo, but it is not accurate. Just from rough mathematical reasoning, the linebacker has about 1/2 the mass of Watson. According to the distance and time measures, the linebacker has about twice the average speed of Watson. Kinetic energy is proportional to mass and proportional to the square of the speed. So cutting the mass in half but doubling the speed would result in a kinetic energy that is 2x bigger. The described linebacker has roughly twice the kinetic energy of Watson.

Physics aside, still an impressive specimen. I am even more in awe of that reported vertical leap than the 40 time.
 
Last edited:
Desmond Watson


The amount of kinetic energy Watson has by running 40 yards in 5.86 seconds, at 464 lbs is equal to a 240 lb linebacker running a 3.03 40 yard dash That’s not a typo.
Resident physics guy checking in. That statement may not be a typo, but it is not accurate. Just from rough mathematical reasoning, the linebacker has about 1/2 the mass of Watson. According to the distance and time measures, the linebacker has about twice the average speed of Watson. Kinetic energy is proportional to mass and proportional to the square of the speed. So cutting the mass in half but doubling the speed would result in a kinetic energy that is 2x bigger. The described linebacker has roughly twice the kinetic energy of Watson.

Physics aside, still an impressive specimen. I am even more in awe of that reported vertical leap than the 40 time.
So if you said momentum instead of kinetic energy would they be equal?
 
Desmond Watson


The amount of kinetic energy Watson has by running 40 yards in 5.86 seconds, at 464 lbs is equal to a 240 lb linebacker running a 3.03 40 yard dash That’s not a typo.
Resident physics guy checking in. That statement may not be a typo, but it is not accurate. Just from rough mathematical reasoning, the linebacker has about 1/2 the mass of Watson. According to the distance and time measures, the linebacker has about twice the average speed of Watson. Kinetic energy is proportional to mass and proportional to the square of the speed. So cutting the mass in half but doubling the speed would result in a kinetic energy that is 2x bigger. The described linebacker has roughly twice the kinetic energy of Watson.

Physics aside, still an impressive specimen. I am even more in awe of that reported vertical leap than the 40 time.
So if you said momentum instead of kinetic energy would they be equal?
This I could endorse
 
Desmond Watson


The amount of kinetic energy Watson has by running 40 yards in 5.86 seconds, at 464 lbs is equal to a 240 lb linebacker running a 3.03 40 yard dash That’s not a typo.
Resident physics guy checking in. That statement may not be a typo, but it is not accurate. Just from rough mathematical reasoning, the linebacker has about 1/2 the mass of Watson. According to the distance and time measures, the linebacker has about twice the average speed of Watson. Kinetic energy is proportional to mass and proportional to the square of the speed. So cutting the mass in half but doubling the speed would result in a kinetic energy that is 2x bigger. The described linebacker has roughly twice the kinetic energy of Watson.

Physics aside, still an impressive specimen. I am even more in awe of that reported vertical leap than the 40 time.
 
It's worth watching Florida cutups just to see #21 standing next to other, normal sized players
 
Last edited:
From my friend @Maurile Tremblay - Desmond Watson's 25-inch vertical jump is more impressive than his sub-6-second 40 time. That's insane.
Unless I am overlooking something, this link shows video of his bench press reps. I would love to see that vertical.

ETA...found video. https://x.com/IsaacEdelman/status/1905238524921602216 Not the greatest viewing angle though. Doesn't look like 25" from this angle.

I didn't mention any video in my link. My link was to the news story reporting the 25 inch vertical.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top