harrycarey
Footballguy
ronald curry being back will help also
No problem. Your earlier argument was soundly defeated. You are now allowed to switch to a new one.Arguing which is better, Brooks or Collins, is like arguing who's dog has less smelly crap.
I don't like either QB.
My argument is that Aaron Brooks doesn't win enough games. He's a lousy NFL quarterback. He's on a short leash in Oakland and I simply do not believe that he will be a 16 game starter for the Raiders.
I wont debate that their schedule gets exponentially harder as weeks progress but taking a look at the first four weeks- theres a serious chance for great numbers here and at this point early in the season, he probably wont be fearing losing his job. In my opinion, he could easily be a top-5-10 fantasy qb comming out of week 5- and the possibility that they are .500 is significant. Personally I think he will lose his job somewhere down the line but if youre looking to get value out of a late round pick, Aaron Brooks might be a great spot start any of the first 5 weeks (4 games)I still wont put 3600 out of the question with a 5:3 TD/INT Ratio (most probably low 20's in TD's and 12-14 ints. I would expect 14 games. Better Completion % and slightly lower atts. than collins. 300+ completions.Raiders 2006 Schedule
Date Opponent Time/Result
Sep 11 San Diego 10:15pm
Sep 17 @Baltimore 1:00pm
Week 3 BYE
Oct 1 Cleveland 4:15pm
Oct 8 @San Francisco 4:05pm
Oct 15 @Denver 8:15pm
Oct 22 Arizona 4:15pm
Oct 29 Pittsburgh 4:15pm
Nov 6 @Seattle 8:30pm
Nov 12 Denver 4:05pm
Nov 19 @Kansas City 1:00pm
Nov 26 @San Diego 4:05pm
Dec 3 Houston 4:05pm
Dec 10 @Cincinnati 1:00pm
Dec 17 St. Louis 4:15pm
Dec 23 Kansas City 8:00pm
Dec 31 @N.Y. Jets 1:00pm
They could easily go 3-8 and Brooks could be on the bench.
I don't see how his schedule gets exponentially harder as the season goes on. Every defense he will face over the last 8 weeks of the season was in the bottom 10 in pass defense last year and 4 of his final 8 games will be against teams who were in the bottom 5.I wont debate that their schedule gets exponentially harder as weeks progress but taking a look at the first four weeks- theres a serious chance for great numbers here and at this point early in the season,Raiders 2006 Schedule
Date Opponent Time/Result
Sep 11 San Diego 10:15pm
Sep 17 @Baltimore 1:00pm
Week 3 BYE
Oct 1 Cleveland 4:15pm
Oct 8 @San Francisco 4:05pm
Oct 15 @Denver 8:15pm
Oct 22 Arizona 4:15pm
Oct 29 Pittsburgh 4:15pm
Nov 6 @Seattle 8:30pm
Nov 12 Denver 4:05pm
Nov 19 @Kansas City 1:00pm
Nov 26 @San Diego 4:05pm
Dec 3 Houston 4:05pm
Dec 10 @Cincinnati 1:00pm
Dec 17 St. Louis 4:15pm
Dec 23 Kansas City 8:00pm
Dec 31 @N.Y. Jets 1:00pm
They could easily go 3-8 and Brooks could be on the bench.
"Nah" is right -- those numbers don't happen often at all for anyone. No way does Brooks have an all-time-NFL-level season in 2006.Hmm, maybe 4100 and 32 TDs weren't enough...
Nah
Yes ... but where will those defenses rank in '06?Every defense he will face over the last 8 weeks of the season was in the bottom 10 in pass defense last year and 4 of his final 8 games will be against teams who were in the bottom 5.
I think your numbers look fine, but I disagree with the bolded statement. Last few years:2002 - 61/256/2 in 16 gamesBeing a Saints fan ... it would freak me out of my skin to see Brooks succeed wildly elsewhere. No way could I, personally, draft him as a #1 fantasy QB ... and I do realize that's homerism talking.
The weapons around him give him a chance at more or less similar numbers to his 2002-2004 campaigns:
3,650 yds
23 TDs
16 INTs
6 fumbles lost (if they count in your league)
Brooks doesn't run like he used to ... if Shell likes to sneak, he may get 3 or so TDs. If not ... he's not going to add much value scrambling around. Let's call his rushing numbers for the year:
225 yds
2 TDs
You got me.Wow, I didn't even realize how easy his shedule was on passing defense.
Hmm, maybe 4100 and 32 TDs weren't enough...
Nah
What reason would you give that they would all improve exponentially?Yes ... but where will those defenses rank in '06?Every defense he will face over the last 8 weeks of the season was in the bottom 10 in pass defense last year and 4 of his final 8 games will be against teams who were in the bottom 5.
I added passing defense ranked by yards per game. Now this is a pretty imperfect tool as good teams get up on other teams early and therefore face more pass attempts, so take these rankings with a grain of salt.If the Raiders can keep from imploding they could have a very good year with such an easy (at least it seems that way right now) schedule. I think they can easily be 5-1 or 4-2 going into Pittsburgh in week 8. The next stretch of games gets much tougher, but things lighten up considerably in week 13 vs Houston and on.I don't see how his schedule gets exponentially harder as the season goes on. Every defense he will face over the last 8 weeks of the season was in the bottom 10 in pass defense last year and 4 of his final 8 games will be against teams who were in the bottom 5.I wont debate that their schedule gets exponentially harder as weeks progress but taking a look at the first four weeks- theres a serious chance for great numbers here and at this point early in the season,Raiders 2006 Schedule
Date Opponent Time/Result - Passing Def Rank
Sep 11 San Diego 10:15pm - 28
Sep 17 @Baltimore 1:00pm - 8
Week 3 BYE
Oct 1 Cleveland 4:15pm - 4
Oct 8 @San Francisco 4:05pm - 32
Oct 15 @Denver 8:15pm - 29
Oct 22 Arizona 4:15pm - 12
Oct 29 Pittsburgh 4:15pm - 16
Nov 6 @Seattle 8:30pm - 25
Nov 12 Denver 4:05pm - 29
Nov 19 @Kansas City 1:00pm - 30
Nov 26 @San Diego 4:05pm - 28
Dec 3 Houston 4:05pm - 24
Dec 10 @Cincinnati 1:00pm - 26
Dec 17 St. Louis 4:15pm - 23
Dec 23 Kansas City 8:00pm - 30
Dec 31 @N.Y. Jets 1:00pm - 2
They could easily go 3-8 and Brooks could be on the bench.
I was also basing my rankings on passing yards allowed per game. Not sure I've ever seen a QB with such an easy schedule.Only 4 teams he will face all year are NOT in the bottom 10 in passing yards allowed and almost half of his games (7) will be against teams in bottom 5.I added passing defense ranked by yards per game. Now this is a pretty imperfect tool as good teams get up on other teams early and therefore face more pass attempts, so take these rankings with a grain of salt.If the Raiders can keep from imploding they could have a very good year with such an easy (at least it seems that way right now) schedule. I think they can easily be 5-1 or 4-2 going into Pittsburgh in week 8. The next stretch of games gets much tougher, but things lighten up considerably in week 13 vs Houston and on.I don't see how his schedule gets exponentially harder as the season goes on. Every defense he will face over the last 8 weeks of the season was in the bottom 10 in pass defense last year and 4 of his final 8 games will be against teams who were in the bottom 5.I wont debate that their schedule gets exponentially harder as weeks progress but taking a look at the first four weeks- theres a serious chance for great numbers here and at this point early in the season,Raiders 2006 Schedule
Date Opponent Time/Result - Passing Def Rank
Sep 11 San Diego 10:15pm - 28
Sep 17 @Baltimore 1:00pm - 8
Week 3 BYE
Oct 1 Cleveland 4:15pm - 4
Oct 8 @San Francisco 4:05pm - 32
Oct 15 @Denver 8:15pm - 29
Oct 22 Arizona 4:15pm - 12
Oct 29 Pittsburgh 4:15pm - 16
Nov 6 @Seattle 8:30pm - 25
Nov 12 Denver 4:05pm - 29
Nov 19 @Kansas City 1:00pm - 30
Nov 26 @San Diego 4:05pm - 28
Dec 3 Houston 4:05pm - 24
Dec 10 @Cincinnati 1:00pm - 26
Dec 17 St. Louis 4:15pm - 23
Dec 23 Kansas City 8:00pm - 30
Dec 31 @N.Y. Jets 1:00pm - 2
They could easily go 3-8 and Brooks could be on the bench.
The key is IF Brooks can keep his job the whole year he should put up some career numbers.
Revised using Passing TD's. Once again, I think this is a misleading stat. Looking at that schedule, as menobrown said, Brooks could possibly put up some monster numbers and STILL get benched due to Oakland losing games.Raiders 2006 Schedule
Date Opponent Time/Result - Passing TD's
Sep 11 San Diego 10:15pm - 28
Sep 17 @Baltimore 1:00pm - 8
Week 3 BYE
Oct 1 Cleveland 4:15pm - 4
Oct 8 @San Francisco 4:05pm - 32
Oct 15 @Denver 8:15pm - 29
Oct 22 Arizona 4:15pm - 12
Oct 29 Pittsburgh 4:15pm - 16
Nov 6 @Seattle 8:30pm - 25
Nov 12 Denver 4:05pm - 29
Nov 19 @Kansas City 1:00pm - 30
Nov 26 @San Diego 4:05pm - 28
Dec 3 Houston 4:05pm - 24
Dec 10 @Cincinnati 1:00pm - 26
Dec 17 St. Louis 4:15pm - 23
Dec 23 Kansas City 8:00pm - 30
Dec 31 @N.Y. Jets 1:00pm - 2
They could easily go 3-8 and Brooks could be on the bench.
Maybe New Orleans is just a bad team and doesn't realize where their problems are. Always blaming the quarterback doesn't seem to ever solve much for any losing team. Aaron Brooks just got the butt end of a bad front office decisionIf he's such a winner, then why isn't he still with New Orleans?That's good to know. And seeing how Brooks made 82 straight starts I guess you can just say he wins enough.
Why did Brees, Favre, Warner, and C-Pep all recently switch teams?If he's such a winner, then why isn't he still with New Orleans?That's good to know. And seeing how Brooks made 82 straight starts I guess you can just say he wins enough.
Wait a minute......Why did Brees, Favre, Warner, and C-Pep all recently switch teams?
From the above, I calculate 318.6 fantasy pts which would make Brooks the #1 QB according to DD's projections. I'm not saying that Brooks won't produce those numbers -- he's had slightly above 3800 twice in his career and he's had 26 and 27 passing TDs, plus over 300 rushing yds and 4 rushing TDs as career highs.I like Brooks this year. The Raiders may be a very good fit for him, and he certainly has good offensive players with RB LJordan and a strong set of WRs (RMoss, Porter, Gabriel, and Curry).All this talk about whether Aaron Brooks is better than Kerry Collins is pointless. The only thing that matters is whether Aaron Brooks is better than his backups. I don't think it's too much of a stretch, at this point in time, to say that yes, I think he is.
Also, while Brooks has been one of the most inconsistant QBs in the NFL, he's also been one of the most consistant QBs in the FFL. I don't see any reason why that will change. I have no problem taking his career per-game averages (225/1.4/1 passing, 16.6/.15 rushing), projecting them out to a 16 game season (3600/22.4/16 passing, 266/2 rushing), and then shading the passing numbers up a little bit for the "Moss Effect".
3800 yards, 26 TDs, 14 INTs passing
266 yards, 2 TDs rushing
Yes, Favre. He wasn't drafted by the Packers.Wait a minute......Why did Brees, Favre, Warner, and C-Pep all recently switch teams?![]()
Note the use of the term "recently".Yes, Favre. He wasn't drafted by the Packers.Wait a minute......Why did Brees, Favre, Warner, and C-Pep all recently switch teams?![]()
Aaron Brooks, like his cousin Michael Vick, is a case of perception differing from reality. I actually looked at the numbers and found that he was, in reality, one of the most consistant fantasy producers in the entire NFL.I posted this in the Michael Vick spotlight thread, but I'll copy/paste it over here. This is the game-by-game scoring breakdown from last season of Peyton Manning, Brett Favre, Trent Green, Michael Vick, Aaron Brooks, and Eli Manning. Try and figure out which one was Brooks.Weak points - Bad NFL performer to date. Pretty inconsistent with high and low weeks. Perceived as flaky (may not be a problem in OAK).
I fully agree with this. No one else on the Raiders roster beside Brooks even resembles a starting NFL qb. Unless Brooks gets injured, he will be starting the full year.Also, Shell rates to be more conservative to make Brooks a better qb.Shell will be conservative. Brooks will have an ok, but unspectacular year.
3300 yards, 20/15, 330/2. Good enough for a QB1, but no stud.
As far as losing his job? TO WHOM!!?? The Raiders have nobody else close to him in talent or in potential.
I'm going to guess number 1 because of the 13 games started. You can't ignore the rushing numbers from Brooks because three points extra a week looks huge at season's end. 280 yards and 2 TDs in 13 games isn't bad on the ground for a QB.Aaron Brooks, like his cousin Michael Vick, is a case of perception differing from reality. I actually looked at the numbers and found that he was, in reality, one of the most consistant fantasy producers in the entire NFL.I posted this in the Michael Vick spotlight thread, but I'll copy/paste it over here. This is the game-by-game scoring breakdown from last season of Peyton Manning, Brett Favre, Trent Green, Michael Vick, Aaron Brooks, and Eli Manning. Try and figure out which one was Brooks.Weak points - Bad NFL performer to date. Pretty inconsistent with high and low weeks. Perceived as flaky (may not be a problem in OAK).
QB1
8.0 points or less- 1
8.1 to 10.0 points- 1
10.1 to 12.0 points- 1
12.1 to 15.0 points- 2
15.1 to 18.0 points- 3
18.1 to 20.0 points- 0
20.1 to 22.0 points- 3
22.1 points or more- 2
QB2
8.0 points or less- 1
8.1 to 10.0 points- 3
10.1 to 12.0 points- 3
12.1 to 15.0 points- 1
15.1 to 18.0 points- 4
18.1 to 20.0 points- 0
20.1 to 22.0 points- 0
22.1 points or more- 4
QB3
8.0 points or less- 1
8.1 to 10.0 points- 0
10.1 to 12.0 points- 2
12.1 to 15.0 points- 4
15.1 to 18.0 points- 4
18.1 to 20.0 points- 0
20.1 to 22.0 points- 0
22.1 points or more- 5
QB4
8.0 points or less- 2
8.1 to 10.0 points- 1
10.1 to 12.0 points- 0
12.1 to 15.0 points- 3
15.1 to 18.0 points- 1
18.1 to 20.0 points- 2
20.1 to 22.0 points- 2
22.1 points or more- 4
QB5
8.0 points or less- 3
8.1 to 10.0 points- 0
10.1 to 12.0 points- 1
12.1 to 15.0 points- 1
15.1 to 18.0 points- 0
18.1 to 20.0 points- 3
20.1 to 22.0 points- 3
22.1 points or more- 5
QB6
8.0 points or less- 0
8.1 to 10.0 points- 3
10.1 to 12.0 points- 1
12.1 to 15.0 points- 1
15.1 to 18.0 points- 4
18.1 to 20.0 points- 3
20.1 to 22.0 points- 2
22.1 points or more- 2
Counting games is cheating. I was tempted to put %ages instead of number of games just to deter cheaters like you (I'm going to guess number 1 because of the 13 games started. You can't ignore the rushing numbers from Brooks because three points extra a week looks huge at season's end. 280 yards and 2 TDs in 13 games isn't bad on the ground for a QB.
Those are pretty darn good numbers for a #1 QB. If you convert his rushing numbers to passing, hes putting up 4100/26. Thats going to make him easily top 10.Being a Saints fan ... it would freak me out of my skin to see Brooks succeed wildly elsewhere. No way could I, personally, draft him as a #1 fantasy QB ... and I do realize that's homerism talking.
The weapons around him give him a chance at more or less similar numbers to his 2002-2004 campaigns:
3,650 yds
23 TDs
16 INTs
6 fumbles lost (if they count in your league)
Brooks doesn't run like he used to ... if Shell likes to sneak, he may get 3 or so TDs. If not ... he's not going to add much value scrambling around. Let's call his rushing numbers for the year:
225 yds
2 TDs