This was already discussed a few weeks ago. Holmes will get the bulk of the carries (20 to 25) and LJ will get 8 to 10. Even if it is 50/50, Holmes will still get the paydirt carries.
Nothing to see here. Move along.....
TD Larry Johnson, 4 Yd run (Lawrence Tynes kick is good), 14:56. Drive: 7 plays, 66 yards in 2:57. Bristol-Pretty lame you keep referring to my member #.
You mentioned Holmes will still get the paydirt carries. Looks like LJ ran one in from 4 yards. Now I know I am just some dumb '5 digiter' but that sure looks like a "paydirt carry" that Priest didn't get. Last season Priest gets that TD no question.
Bristol =
(for wk 1 at least)
WRONG!!! Numnuts failed to mention that when LJ scored the TD, he played the whole series. It was not like LJ came in and took the TD away from Holmes. KC played the way that i expected them to. LJ got his 9 carries (like I said) and Holmes got his 22 carries (like I said alomg with a PAYDIRT TD).More like LivingtheDream and gman8343 =
Numnuts?? Let me write that one down...Yea, LJ played the whole series. That's the point. It's not like Priest broke a long run and LJ came in because he was winded.. Last season if the Chiefs were in the red zone, you could sure as hell count on Priest being in the game. If Blaylock or LJ was spelling him (very rare ocurrence), Priest would come in when it was redzone time.
Priest's ppg value is definitely hurt by LJ's presence. He will miss out on several TDs (including paydirt) because LJ will be in the game. It's pretty simple actually.
On the other hand, LJ should help keep Priest fresher and lessen the likelihood of injury.I'd still like to have Priest on my teams. You're not gonna find a much better fantasy player, but he is not same fantasy force as he once was.