What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Bailey Zappe, CLE (1 Viewer)

LOTS of creative embellishment in your post. Jones is the starter. Zappe is the backup. Full stop. There is no competition.
Absolutely zero creative embellishment. Just saw that yesterday Mac Jones was 0-fer, overthrowing receivers on the sideline, putting them out of bounds. Meanwhile Zappe was 3/4 or something.

Full stop. I’m just reporting what they’re seeing. Sorry if you don’t like reality.
 
Last edited:
Wait, Mac Jones still sucks? This is my shocked face.

I would make a hefty bet Jones is benched for Zappe for performance reasons at some point this season.
Based on what I’m seeing on Twitter from beat writers & others, I completely agree with this.
 
Last edited:
Wait, Mac Jones still sucks? This is my shocked face.

I would make a hefty bet Jones is benched for Zappe for performance reasons at some point this season.
Based on what I’m seeing on Twitter from local beat writers, I completely agree with this.

He needs to obviously improve to make BB content enough to keep the job IMO. Treading water isn’t enough. It’s a tough division and conference, sitting mid season with a 5-5 record and same old boring play from him is not going to cut it.
 
LOTS of creative embellishment in your post. Jones is the starter. Zappe is the backup. Full stop. There is no competition.
Absolutely zero creative embellishment. Just saw that yesterday Mac Jones was 0-fer, overthrowing receivers on the sideline, putting them out of bounds. Meanwhile Zappe was 6/7 or something.
Jones has only been practicing with the starting offense against the starting defense. Zappe has been 85% of the time playing with the backups against the backup defense. Throughout OTAs and training camp, Zappe has gotten one limited set of reps at the end of practice with a blend of ones and twos. Almost everything has been with Jones as the lead dog. Warmups, drills, 7v7, 11v11, etc. This is essentially the same breakdown they gave for starter vs. backup when Brady was in NE. If people want to say Zappe looked better working with the B team, so be it. Sample all the beat guys and tweets you want, but the big issue so far has been the receivers have not been getting open / separation against the defense in close quarters.

But like I already said, when they have been running actual offense vs. defense plays, they have all been in the red zone at the 10-yard line. As far as I have seen, they have only been running passing plays from there and only passes into the end zone. They are running the same routes and schemes, so the defense knows what plays they are running.
 
LOTS of creative embellishment in your post. Jones is the starter. Zappe is the backup. Full stop. There is no competition.
Absolutely zero creative embellishment. Just saw that yesterday Mac Jones was 0-fer, overthrowing receivers on the sideline, putting them out of bounds. Meanwhile Zappe was 6/7 or something.
Jones has only been practicing with the starting offense against the starting defense. Zappe has been 85% of the time playing with the backups against the backup defense. Throughout OTAs and training camp, Zappe has gotten one limited set of reps at the end of practice with a blend of ones and twos. Almost everything has been with Jones as the lead dog. Warmups, drills, 7v7, 11v11, etc. This is essentially the same breakdown they gave for starter vs. backup when Brady was in NE. If people want to say Zappe looked better working with the B team, so be it. Sample all the beat guys and tweets you want, but the big issue so far has been the receivers have not been getting open / separation against the defense in close quarters.

But like I already said, when they have been running actual offense vs. defense plays, they have all been in the red zone at the 10-yard line. As far as I have seen, they have only been running passing plays from there and only passes into the end zone. They are running the same routes and schemes, so the defense knows what plays they are running.
Well Jones isn’t hitting his receivers very often, so there’s that.

I edited my post - I went back and checked and it was 0/4 V’s 3/4

FWIW McSorley was also 0/2, so at least Jones wasn’t outplayed by the 3rd stringer?
 
My link was from today.
It says “updated” today - when I clicked it it said July 18th.

Weird. Anyway, still not believing this WB competition is all settled and done with.

Seems a little coin flippy at the moment. We’ll know more in the coming weeks. Glad I have a share of Zappe though. Wish I had him everywhere.
 
I agree with @Anarchy99 that Jones is the starter and it will take a string of poor performance from him and/or the team in the regular season before they pull the plug. The cool thing about that though is you can absolutely bank on it happening lol.
 
LOTS of creative embellishment in your post. Jones is the starter. Zappe is the backup. Full stop. There is no competition.
Absolutely zero creative embellishment. Just saw that yesterday Mac Jones was 0-fer, overthrowing receivers on the sideline, putting them out of bounds. Meanwhile Zappe was 6/7 or something.
Jones has only been practicing with the starting offense against the starting defense. Zappe has been 85% of the time playing with the backups against the backup defense. Throughout OTAs and training camp, Zappe has gotten one limited set of reps at the end of practice with a blend of ones and twos. Almost everything has been with Jones as the lead dog. Warmups, drills, 7v7, 11v11, etc. This is essentially the same breakdown they gave for starter vs. backup when Brady was in NE. If people want to say Zappe looked better working with the B team, so be it. Sample all the beat guys and tweets you want, but the big issue so far has been the receivers have not been getting open / separation against the defense in close quarters.

But like I already said, when they have been running actual offense vs. defense plays, they have all been in the red zone at the 10-yard line. As far as I have seen, they have only been running passing plays from there and only passes into the end zone. They are running the same routes and schemes, so the defense knows what plays they are running.
Well Jones isn’t hitting his receivers very often, so there’s that.

I edited my post - I went back and checked and it was 0/4 V’s 3/4

FWIW McSorley was also 0/2, so at least Jones wasn’t outplayed by the 3rd stringer?
The 11 v 11 numbers for any NE QB have all been terrible so far. But again, it's been non-contact, and not always full speed. Buy as many shares of Zappe as you want. There are very few people that cover the team suggesting Zappe is even in the running to start. If folks want to say that Jones is horrible and will lose the job, that's fine, but it would take the offense to be terrible, weeks and weeks of losses, and that likely would be a midseason thing not an out of camp thing.
 
Welp, can't say I am surprised. After last night, there's already some talk on the airwaves, twitterverse, and innerwebs that Zappe actually is in a QB battle. Except it's with Cunningham to be QB2.
 
Just wait until Mac throws 3 Ints in game 1 & throws a clipboard at Belichick.

Then it’s Zappe Hour
:pickle:

ETA: this is firmly tongue in cheek
 
Except it's with Cunningham to be QB2.
Yeah right
I am being serious. Some of the media have latched on to Cunningham after last night and are suggesting that he and Zappe will be fighting for one roster spot. I think they are right that there will be one roster spot between them . . . I just don't think there is a competition for it. It's Zappe's . . . and Cunningham will have to earn a spot as last man on the roster or a place on the practice squad.
 
So the patriots are keeping (checks notes) 1 QB?

No backup?

Huh
I think they will open a roster spot likely by putting a player on short-term IR then bring back a QB.
I'm sure that's the plan. A plan to bring back a QB that passes through waivers.

Inspiring.

I wrote this in the Pats thread...it is good news/bad news with Zappe...the good news is he is expected to clear waivers...the bad news is it is because he looked so bad in preseason no one wants him....right now the Pats have 1 QB, 2 RBs and 2 TEs...add in a Tackle position that is beyond an accident waiting to happen and it is becoming apparent this offense was set-up for failure months ago.
 
So the patriots are keeping (checks notes) 1 QB?

No backup?

Huh
I think they will open a roster spot likely by putting a player on short-term IR then bring back a QB.
I'm sure that's the plan. A plan to bring back a QB that passes through waivers.

Inspiring.

I wrote this in the Pats thread...it is good news/bad news with Zappe...the good news is he is expected to clear waivers...the bad news is it is because he looked so bad in preseason no one wants him....right now the Pats have 1 QB, 2 RBs and 2 TEs...add in a Tackle position that is beyond an accident waiting to happen and it is becoming apparent this offense was set-up for failure months ago.
I know it’s Belichick, and the Pats will find ways to win games that perhaps they shouldn’t - but I can really see the Pats “competing” for a top 3 draft pick this season. They may have the worst offense in the league - including Arizona starting Josh Dobbs.
 
So the patriots are keeping (checks notes) 1 QB?

No backup?

Huh
I think they will open a roster spot likely by putting a player on short-term IR then bring back a QB.
I'm sure that's the plan. A plan to bring back a QB that passes through waivers.

Inspiring.

I wrote this in the Pats thread...it is good news/bad news with Zappe...the good news is he is expected to clear waivers...the bad news is it is because he looked so bad in preseason no one wants him....right now the Pats have 1 QB, 2 RBs and 2 TEs...add in a Tackle position that is beyond an accident waiting to happen and it is becoming apparent this offense was set-up for failure months ago.
I know it’s Belichick, and the Pats will find ways to win games that perhaps they shouldn’t - but I can really see the Pats “competing” for a top 3 draft pick this season. They may have the worst offense in the league - including Arizona starting Josh Dobbs.

So much room for error...the tackle situation is a mess...you have one guy you can't trust in Trent Brown than nothing else...the interior is solid (not sure if Mike O is staying at Guard) but Andrews is now 31 and has a lot of mileage on him...word is outside of the Mafi kid the other rookie O lineman don't look too good so depth on the interior could be an issue as well (both Strange and Mike O are just coming back from injuries)...at RB you only have 2 rostered players in Stevenson and Zeke...if Stevenson gets hurt it is big time trouble...at TE you only have two rostered players which is odd because they plan to play a lot of two TE sets...at WR there are legit concerns about Juju's knee and Thornton is not trending in the right direction and even if things fall well for this unit it is still no better than average and not difficult to defend at all...reports on Mac have been good this preseason but while I was high on him after his rookie year I now believe his lack of athleticism will always limit him to being an average at best QB in the NFL...IMO the roster construction of this offense is totally unacceptable...it is so set-up for failure and if that occurs, I don't know how anyone can be surprised by it.
 
So the patriots are keeping (checks notes) 1 QB?

No backup?

Huh
I think they will open a roster spot likely by putting a player on short-term IR then bring back a QB.
I'm sure that's the plan. A plan to bring back a QB that passes through waivers.

Inspiring.

I wrote this in the Pats thread...it is good news/bad news with Zappe...the good news is he is expected to clear waivers...the bad news is it is because he looked so bad in preseason no one wants him....right now the Pats have 1 QB, 2 RBs and 2 TEs...add in a Tackle position that is beyond an accident waiting to happen and it is becoming apparent this offense was set-up for failure months ago.
I know it’s Belichick, and the Pats will find ways to win games that perhaps they shouldn’t - but I can really see the Pats “competing” for a top 3 draft pick this season. They may have the worst offense in the league - including Arizona starting Josh Dobbs.
Are people really that influenced by the preseason? NE barely played any of their starters in the preseason. Like 10-15 snaps. The huge majority of players that were thrown into the lineup in the preseason games are off the team. I already outlined that the players they have are better than two years ago, when they were a Top Half of the league offense and Top 10 in scoring. Bill O'Brien is a proven commodity at OC. Gone are the Patricia-Judge collaborative brain trust that ruined the offense.

The only major issue they have is their OL is banged up. Yesterday, they had all 11 guys on the OL available and all at practice for the first time all training camp. Brown-Strange-Andrews-Onwenu is the core of the OL that started last year. They have to see if one of Anderson, Reiff, Low, Reiff, or Wheatley can be their other tackle, whether to use a rotation, or if it makes more sense to kick Onwenu back out to tackle. There is also still time to acquire someone else as well.

No way will they come anywhere near having the worst offense in the league. But feel free to take the cheese that NE is a Bottom 3 team.
 
No way will they come anywhere near having the worst offense in the league.
No way? None at all? With a bad o-line, average at best WRS and TEs, and a bottom rung QB? No chance at all?

List the worse offenses, please - lets see how far you get.
 
Last edited:
No way will they come anywhere near having the worst offense in the league.
No way? None at all? With a bad o-line, average at best WRS and TEs, and a bottom rung QB? No chance at all?

List the worse offenses, please - lets see how far you get.
I expect NE do have more yardage than they did in 2021 (6,000 YFS). The following teams had less than that last year: LV, SEA, CLE, TB, BAL, GB, NYG, NOS, WAS, DEN, ARI, PIT, ATL, NYJ, IND, CHI, CAR, TEN, HOU, LAR. The Ravens should be better with a full season of Lamar, and the Jets should be better with ARod over the debacle that was out there last year at QB. I don't see those other teams as making huge improvements. If you want to take the stance that NE won't be a 6K offense, that's fine. But based on that, NE should be middle of the league based on yardage. The 2021 team had worse weapons and that's what they produced.
 
No way will they come anywhere near having the worst offense in the league.
No way? None at all? With a bad o-line, average at best WRS and TEs, and a bottom rung QB? No chance at all?

List the worse offenses, please - lets see how far you get.
I expect NE do have more yardage than they did in 2021 (6,000 YFS). The following teams had less than that last year: LV, SEA, CLE, TB, BAL, GB, NYG, NOS, WAS, DEN, ARI, PIT, ATL, NYJ, IND, CHI, CAR, TEN, HOU, LAR. The Ravens should be better with a full season of Lamar, and the Jets should be better with ARod over the debacle that was out there last year at QB. I don't see those other teams as making huge improvements. If you want to take the stance that NE won't be a 6K offense, that's fine. But based on that, NE should be middle of the league based on yardage. The 2021 team had worse weapons and that's what they produced.
You keep using 2021 as your benchmark.

I'm going to say McDaniels>>>O'Brien so I am not certain 6,000 yards is the appropriate benchmark.

I must have missed your post above but you said in the Zappe thread that the talent on offense is better this season.

I don't see that the WR room is any better. Without doing a deep dive as a room I would put them in the bottom third of the league. Added Zeke, lost Jakobi it's not 2018 so that feels like a push.

They added Mike Gesicki, who is marginally better than Jonnu Smith and Zeke v Harris doesn't seem like a crazy bump for the Pats either.

IMO there may be slightly more talent on offense but I am not seeing anything to get very excited about.

Obviously you are much more fialed into this franchise than I am so what am I missing?
 
Are people really that influenced by the preseason? NE barely played any of their starters in the preseason. Like 10-15 snaps
No - I'm going by knowing the players. :lmao:

These observations are not based on preseason…preseason (and scrambling for players in August to fill holes) is merely reinforcing what many already thought about this offense.
We're never going to see eye to eye, but "the scrambling to fill holes" is essentially ONE SPOT. Right tackle. Brown-Strange-Andrews-Onwenu are 4/5 of the offensive line, returning from last year, which was a solid core. They have two weeks to figure out whether they want to move Onwenu to tackle again or figure out a rotation of Anderson, Reiff, Sow, Lowe, and Wheatley.

Should they have done more long-term to address both tackle spots? Yup. They took a CB instead of the 4th OT in the first round. There were 7 tackles that went in the first 65 picks of the draft. They apparently didn't think the guys 8+ deep in the draft were worth it. There also were very few FA OT available. The Top 3 free agents signed for $64M, $80M, and $87M. The guys rated just after that were Isaiah Wynn, Jermaine Elumenor, and Cameron Fleming . . . all NE cast offs. Would you want any of those guys back? Should they have taken a tackle in the preceding draft? Probably . . . but they took a guard instead. They have a treasure chest of money to spend next year and could certainly afford to sign an OT and draft one.

As for depth at other positions (QB, RB, TE), the guys they released yesterday should all end up on the practice squad. I agree, none of those guys are proven or are world beaters, but how many teams have great options at backup QB, third RB, or third TE?
 
No way will they come anywhere near having the worst offense in the league.
No way? None at all? With a bad o-line, average at best WRS and TEs, and a bottom rung QB? No chance at all?

List the worse offenses, please - lets see how far you get.
I expect NE do have more yardage than they did in 2021 (6,000 YFS). The following teams had less than that last year: LV, SEA, CLE, TB, BAL, GB, NYG, NOS, WAS, DEN, ARI, PIT, ATL, NYJ, IND, CHI, CAR, TEN, HOU, LAR. The Ravens should be better with a full season of Lamar, and the Jets should be better with ARod over the debacle that was out there last year at QB. I don't see those other teams as making huge improvements. If you want to take the stance that NE won't be a 6K offense, that's fine. But based on that, NE should be middle of the league based on yardage. The 2021 team had worse weapons and that's what they produced.
You keep using 2021 as your benchmark.

I'm going to say McDaniels>>>O'Brien so I am not certain 6,000 yards is the appropriate benchmark.

I must have missed your post above but you said in the Zappe thread that the talent on offense is better this season.

I don't see that the WR room is any better. Without doing a deep dive as a room I would put them in the bottom third of the league. Added Zeke, lost Jakobi it's not 2018 so that feels like a push.

They added Mike Gesicki, who is marginally better than Jonnu Smith and Zeke v Harris doesn't seem like a crazy bump for the Pats either.

IMO there may be slightly more talent on offense but I am not seeing anything to get very excited about.

Obviously you are much more fialed into this franchise than I am so what am I missing?
I posted this in the NE team thread yesterday . . .

JJSS, Parker, Bourne, Thornton, Douglas, Boutte >>> Meyers, Bourne, Agholor, Harry, Olszewski, Wilkerson
RS + EE = DH + rookie RS
Henry + Gesicki >> Henry and Smith
Brown, Strange, Andrews, Onwenu, TBA << Wynn, Karas, Andrews, Mason, Brown

Gonzalez, Jones, Jones, Jones, Bryant, Wade = Jackson, Mills, Jon Jones, Bryant, Joejuan Williams, Ross
Duggar, Phillips, Peppers, Mills = McCourty, Phillips, Dugger, Davis
Godchaux, Barmore, Guy, Ekuale, Wise, Roberts, White > Godchaux, Wise, Guy, Ekuale, Davis, Barmore
Judon, Uche, Jennings, Bentley, Mapu, Tavai > Judon, Bentley, Hightower, Winovich, Van Noy, Uche, Collins

O'Brien is CERTAINLY an upgrade over Matt Patricia. McDaniels may be a better OC than O'Brien, but I don't think there is a huge difference. Agholor, Harry, and Smith contributed close to nothing in 2021. Are any of the WRs Hill, Chase, or Jefferson? Nope. Are they going to have 9 weeks where they score 30+ points like NC? Nope. They still have a strong defense and can get after the QB. The defense should be able to give the offense short fields to work with (and get points without having to drive 80 yards). They had a bunch of marginal, no name, non-explosive players and still had a functional offense with Mac as a rookie. Guess we'll find out if the offense can bounce back . . .
 
No way will they come anywhere near having the worst offense in the league.
No way? None at all? With a bad o-line, average at best WRS and TEs, and a bottom rung QB? No chance at all?

List the worse offenses, please - lets see how far you get.
I expect NE do have more yardage than they did in 2021 (6,000 YFS). The following teams had less than that last year: LV, SEA, CLE, TB, BAL, GB, NYG, NOS, WAS, DEN, ARI, PIT, ATL, NYJ, IND, CHI, CAR, TEN, HOU, LAR. The Ravens should be better with a full season of Lamar, and the Jets should be better with ARod over the debacle that was out there last year at QB. I don't see those other teams as making huge improvements. If you want to take the stance that NE won't be a 6K offense, that's fine. But based on that, NE should be middle of the league based on yardage. The 2021 team had worse weapons and that's what they produced.
You keep using 2021 as your benchmark.

I'm going to say McDaniels>>>O'Brien so I am not certain 6,000 yards is the appropriate benchmark.

I must have missed your post above but you said in the Zappe thread that the talent on offense is better this season.

I don't see that the WR room is any better. Without doing a deep dive as a room I would put them in the bottom third of the league. Added Zeke, lost Jakobi it's not 2018 so that feels like a push.

They added Mike Gesicki, who is marginally better than Jonnu Smith and Zeke v Harris doesn't seem like a crazy bump for the Pats either.

IMO there may be slightly more talent on offense but I am not seeing anything to get very excited about.

Obviously you are much more fialed into this franchise than I am so what am I missing?
I posted this in the NE team thread yesterday . . .

JJSS, Parker, Bourne, Thornton, Douglas, Boutte >>> Meyers, Bourne, Agholor, Harry, Olszewski, Wilkerson
RS + EE = DH + rookie RS
Henry + Gesicki >> Henry and Smith
Brown, Strange, Andrews, Onwenu, TBA << Wynn, Karas, Andrews, Mason, Brown

Gonzalez, Jones, Jones, Jones, Bryant, Wade = Jackson, Mills, Jon Jones, Bryant, Joejuan Williams, Ross
Duggar, Phillips, Peppers, Mills = McCourty, Phillips, Dugger, Davis
Godchaux, Barmore, Guy, Ekuale, Wise, Roberts, White > Godchaux, Wise, Guy, Ekuale, Davis, Barmore
Judon, Uche, Jennings, Bentley, Mapu, Tavai > Judon, Bentley, Hightower, Winovich, Van Noy, Uche, Collins

O'Brien is CERTAINLY an upgrade over Matt Patricia. McDaniels may be a better OC than O'Brien, but I don't think there is a huge difference. Agholor, Harry, and Smith contributed close to nothing in 2021. Are any of the WRs Hill, Chase, or Jefferson? Nope. Are they going to have 9 weeks where they score 30+ points like NC? Nope. They still have a strong defense and can get after the QB. The defense should be able to give the offense short fields to work with (and get points without having to drive 80 yards). They had a bunch of marginal, no name, non-explosive players and still had a functional offense with Mac as a rookie. Guess we'll find out if the offense can bounce back . . .
A lot of your analysis between past & current position groups feels fanciful. Not wrong, necessarily but overestimating the differences between the groups.

Are we really saying Mike Gesicki is some kind of big upgrade over Jonnu Smith? That change will somehow have an appreciable downstream impact?

And again, it looks like you are using the 2021 roster as the point of comparison. 2022 happened.

Then there is the schedule which got a lot more difficult with Aaron Rodgers joining a stacked division.

IMO the Pats look to be in for a rough year.
 
I expect NE do have more yardage than they did in 2021 (6,000 YFS). The following teams had less than that last year: LV, SEA, CLE, TB, BAL, GB, NYG, NOS, WAS, DEN, ARI, PIT, ATL, NYJ, IND, CHI, CAR, TEN, HOU, LAR.

Half the teams on that list have new QBs (or second year QBs that should improve) and/or added other weapons. Why does what they did last season matter, when it's not the same situation? - very disingenuous way to compare what we think will happen in 2023.

From that list, in 2023, I expect the Patriots to finish behind BAL, SEA, CLE, NYG, NO, WAS, PIT, ATL, CHI and LAR. I'd put them on par with: TEN, LV and DEN.

They will probably be better than GB, ARI, HOU and maybe TB. So bottom 7, not bottom 3, I suppose.
 
JJSS, Parker, Bourne, Thornton, Douglas, Boutte >>> Meyers, Bourne, Agholor, Harry, Olszewski, Wilkerson
RS + EE = DH + rookie RS
Henry + Gesicki >> Henry and Smith
Brown, Strange, Andrews, Onwenu, TBA << Wynn, Karas, Andrews, Mason, Brown

maybe - but it's like comparing McDonalds to Burger King - both are subpar options if going to a Steakhouse is also an available option.
 
Are people really that influenced by the preseason? NE barely played any of their starters in the preseason. Like 10-15 snaps
No - I'm going by knowing the players. :lmao:

These observations are not based on preseason…preseason (and scrambling for players in August to fill holes) is merely reinforcing what many already thought about this offense.
We're never going to see eye to eye, but "the scrambling to fill holes" is essentially ONE SPOT. Right tackle. Brown-Strange-Andrews-Onwenu are 4/5 of the offensive line, returning from last year, which was a solid core. They have two weeks to figure out whether they want to move Onwenu to tackle again or figure out a rotation of Anderson, Reiff, Sow, Lowe, and Wheatley.

Should they have done more long-term to address both tackle spots? Yup. They took a CB instead of the 4th OT in the first round. There were 7 tackles that went in the first 65 picks of the draft. They apparently didn't think the guys 8+ deep in the draft were worth it. There also were very few FA OT available. The Top 3 free agents signed for $64M, $80M, and $87M. The guys rated just after that were Isaiah Wynn, Jermaine Elumenor, and Cameron Fleming . . . all NE cast offs. Would you want any of those guys back? Should they have taken a tackle in the preceding draft? Probably . . . but they took a guard instead. They have a treasure chest of money to spend next year and could certainly afford to sign an OT and draft one.

As for depth at other positions (QB, RB, TE), the guys they released yesterday should all end up on the practice squad. I agree, none of those guys are proven or are world beaters, but how many teams have great options at backup QB, third RB, or third TE?

They have two RBs on their roster, one of which they signed two weeks ago…they do not have a legit third TE…if Zappe gets claimed they will not have a backup QB…they are scrambling on offense…it is more than one position.
 
If Zappe gets claimed they will not have a backup QB.
Do you really think there is much chance that one of the 31 other teams would claim Zappe and put him on their 53-man roster? That's their only option. Those teams can't sign him and put him on their practice squad. What has Zappe shown that he is worthy of a roster spot on another team with no knowledge of their playbook, no practice time, and a total of 0 snaps in that team's system? Realistically, there is no chance of another team bringing him in as a QB2. So he'd have to be on their roster as a QB3 (and effectively completely useless to begin the season). Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see a huge market for Zappe getting claimed by another team. They could always bring back McSourley.
 
If Zappe gets claimed they will not have a backup QB.
Do you really think there is much chance that one of the 31 other teams would claim Zappe and put him on their 53-man roster? That's their only option. Those teams can't sign him and put him on their practice squad. What has Zappe shown that he is worthy of a roster spot on another team with no knowledge of their playbook, no practice time, and a total of 0 snaps in that team's system? Realistically, there is no chance of another team bringing him in as a QB2. So he'd have to be on their roster as a QB3 (and effectively completely useless to begin the season). Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see a huge market for Zappe getting claimed by another team. They could always bring back McSourley.
Wouldn’t be shocked if the cardinals nabbed him. He’s not necessarily worse than Dobbs or Tune.
 
If Zappe gets claimed they will not have a backup QB.
Do you really think there is much chance that one of the 31 other teams would claim Zappe and put him on their 53-man roster? That's their only option. Those teams can't sign him and put him on their practice squad. What has Zappe shown that he is worthy of a roster spot on another team with no knowledge of their playbook, no practice time, and a total of 0 snaps in that team's system? Realistically, there is no chance of another team bringing him in as a QB2. So he'd have to be on their roster as a QB3 (and effectively completely useless to begin the season). Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see a huge market for Zappe getting claimed by another team. They could always bring back McSourley.

So we have two options...lose a crappy QB because he gets claimed so they don't have a backup QB or he doesn't get claimed and they have a crappy backup QB...either option kind of sucks.
 

A few highlights:

In any event, it's not where the Patriots want to be. Belichick has spoken hundreds of words on the importance of depth as he's fielded roster-building questions over the last few days, and now he has just one player on his active roster at the most important position in the sport. It's also worth noting that his team has a banged-up offensive line that will face one of the most talented pass-rushing units in football in Week 1.

Which makes one wonder: If Zappe's summer was that rough, why wait so long to address the issue?

Now Belichick is left with two less-than-ideal options: 1) Import a new arm and hope he qualifies as an upgrade, or 2) be left with the original backup who left you wanting in the first place.
 
If Zappe gets claimed they will not have a backup QB.
Do you really think there is much chance that one of the 31 other teams would claim Zappe and put him on their 53-man roster? That's their only option. Those teams can't sign him and put him on their practice squad. What has Zappe shown that he is worthy of a roster spot on another team with no knowledge of their playbook, no practice time, and a total of 0 snaps in that team's system? Realistically, there is no chance of another team bringing him in as a QB2. So he'd have to be on their roster as a QB3 (and effectively completely useless to begin the season). Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see a huge market for Zappe getting claimed by another team. They could always bring back McSourley.
Wouldn’t be shocked if the cardinals nabbed him. He’s not necessarily worse than Dobbs or Tune.
There's serious discussion out there that the Cardinals have very little desire or incentive to win and could be tanking the entire season. They just traded for Dobbs and drafted Clayton Tune this past draft. Don't see them moving on from those two, so adding Zappe as a 4th QB on the 53-man roster seems unlikely. It doesn't appear that Zappe has as much game as he showed briefly last year, so they may not really have a capable backup QB even if he does come back. That being said, NE wouldn't be a contender if they had to rely on a backup QB anyway. Even if Mac plays all 17 games, they aren't winning the SB, so they need to access where they are headed.

This season is all about finding out if Mac can right the ship or if they need to start over at QB. I suspect he will do well enough to be a respectable, middle of the road QB. The team again should be in that 8-10 win window (unless they have a bunch of injuries). The problem is, there probably isn't a great path for Jones to be a Top 5, impact QB, nor is there a great chance that the team will go back to winning 12-13 games each year. The rest of the conference is way better than it used to be.

As for the question of if Zappe's summer was that rough, why wait so long to address the issue? Again, they could be fine with Zappe and felt they have a 98% chance of him returning to the team. But just like at OT, who else were they going to bring in as a QB2? Lance? Wentz? The backup free agent market wasn't exactly overflowing with options. Sure, at this point, if the backup is someone new, that guy will have to take a crash course on the playbook.
 
If Zappe gets claimed they will not have a backup QB.
Do you really think there is much chance that one of the 31 other teams would claim Zappe and put him on their 53-man roster? That's their only option. Those teams can't sign him and put him on their practice squad. What has Zappe shown that he is worthy of a roster spot on another team with no knowledge of their playbook, no practice time, and a total of 0 snaps in that team's system? Realistically, there is no chance of another team bringing him in as a QB2. So he'd have to be on their roster as a QB3 (and effectively completely useless to begin the season). Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see a huge market for Zappe getting claimed by another team. They could always bring back McSourley.

So we have two options...lose a crappy QB because he gets claimed so they don't have a backup QB or he doesn't get claimed and they have a crappy backup QB...either option kind of sucks.
On the one hand, kudos to BB for recognizing that Zappe is so underwhelming that he’s not afraid to potentially cut his losses there

On the other hand, Zappe was the guy he picked as his developmental flier at QB, and to give up on him after one year (and not have a contingency plan in place) is an indictment on BB

He spilled the entire bottle of milk, cleaned up the spill, but now there’s no milk left. That’s BB’s 2023 roster construction in a nutshell.
 
Zappe added to the NE practice squad. It was reported that 7 teams expressed some level of interest in him. But he chose to stick with NE. Cunningham also added to the PS.
Odds are the Pats still offered his best chance at starter snaps with only Mac in front of him. I’m guessing the other teams viewed him as a third guy. I’m glad Cunningham is returning at least.
 
Zappe added to the NE practice squad. It was reported that 7 teams expressed some level of interest in him. But he chose to stick with NE. Cunningham also added to the PS.
Odds are the Pats still offered his best chance at starter snaps with only Mac in front of him. I’m guessing the other teams viewed him as a third guy. I’m glad Cunningham is returning at least.
The big takeaway is that no team put a claim in for any player NE released. That’s not a good sign.
 
Zappe added to the NE practice squad. It was reported that 7 teams expressed some level of interest in him. But he chose to stick with NE. Cunningham also added to the PS.
Odds are the Pats still offered his best chance at starter snaps with only Mac in front of him. I’m guessing the other teams viewed him as a third guy. I’m glad Cunningham is returning at least.
The big takeaway is that no team put a claim in for any player NE released. That’s not a good sign.
Indeed. We were always good for a couple of cuts being snatched up by other teams each year, but not the case now. Even the 19-year streak of having an undrafted guy make the team ended.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top