I just think if you're going to take a franchise QB #1 overall it is imperative that he has an offense minded HC. Absent that, you've got to find him an OC that can relate to the player, a la Kliff Kingsbury in DC. Prefect coach for a rookie QB to learn from while the HC runs the defense/operations. Bo Nix was hand selected by Payton, an offensive power brain. I think the biggest mistake Chicago made wasn't drafting Williams - I still think he's got STAR written all over him - it was pairing him up with a defensive coach and an OC who wasn't highly regarded coming in.
The Carr comparisons aren't perfect though I do see an erosion of confidence as a problem. Carr wasn't mobile, he just sat back there and got abused by an expansion team's OL. What Caleb is doing is trying to buy time the way he did at USC and while he could get away with it in college, his WRs aren't going to magically get open with more time. The dancing around in the backfield is a habit his next coaches are going to have to break him out of because say what you will, the kid is TOUGH but there's only so many hits his body will be able to take. See Newton, Cam.
Kind of amazing Eberflus has been allowed to crush two top QB prospects like he has. He's not head coach material, and certainly not someone that's going to develop a QB, not even a transcendent talent like Williams.
The Bears screwed up big time not hiring Kingsbury over Waldron. Eberflus probably knew exactly what he was doing because if Kingsbury was on staff for a 4-5 start Eberflus might be the one that was sent packing. Bad leaders surround themselves with the weak minded. Good leaders surround themselves with people smarter than they are.
I know this is always the line. But I have a hard time believing Eberflus would intentionally not hire the guy he thought would give Williams the best chance. If Williams plays great, Eberflus looks great. The same way Dan Quinn does in Washington.
I know we like to paint these guys as petty idiots, but I have a hard time believing that was the reason. It's not like Kingsbury was Ben Johnson last year.
Whoa, hold on a minute.
"Who gives Williams the best chance to succeed" is very subjective even more so when you're considering why someone was hired and the factors taken into account before doing so. Bad leaders tend to gravitate towards bad employees, it's the way of the world. They don't like being challenged by superior talent, charisma and knowledge. Intentional or not, this is why the Peter Principle even exists in any organization with a hierarchy. It's even worse in an old boy's club like the NFL where sometimes a transcendent talent at QB or HC elevates a group of coaches to levels they should never see, but once they've climbed that mountain, it's hard to completely kick them off of it.
I have a firm belief 99.999% of players and coaches in the NFL WANT TO succeed. The number would be 100% but I do believe there are some sour grape ******* that show up from time to time. That said, that's not Eberflus. Just like almost all other head coaches in the NFL, he wants to win, he just doesn't know how. The problem lies in that all coaching talent is not created equal. Some coaches simply lack the skill, ability, charisma, self-awareness and knowledge to succeed in this business. Eberflus is that.
Just for fun, name me the best OC or DC the Bears have had in the 3 years Eberflus has been the HC with the Bears. I'll save you the time. Here's your list to choose from.
2022
OC - Luke Getsy
DC - Alan Williams
2023
OC - Luke Getsy
DC - Alan Williams/Ebeflus
2024
OC - Shane Waldron/Thomas Brown
DC - Eric Washington
FWIW, it wouldn't have taken a deep dive or much research to understand Luke Getsy or Shane Waldron were going to be terrible hires.