I know, that's why I'm suggesting they get their franchise QB in there ASAP!Yeah lets hinder the development of our franchise Qb for a decent backup
Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
he's had about 1 second to make a play. his oline might be the worst Ive seen in ages.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
luck looking kinda sucky tooBuffaloes said:yes, it's called a young QB. not everyone is like Indy and can time their suckitude to have Manning and then Luck fall into their laps. Some QBs who aren't once-in-a-generation prospects take thyme to season.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
I'm sure losing Wayne and having no running game has something to do w/ it, but it's probably easier to chalk it up as being a bustluck looking kinda sucky tooBuffaloes said:yes, it's called a young QB. not everyone is like Indy and can time their suckitude to have Manning and then Luck fall into their laps. Some QBs who aren't once-in-a-generation prospects take thyme to season.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
Were you saying this last year? ROYBuffaloes said:yes, it's called a young QB. not everyone is like Indy and can time their suckitude to have Manning and then Luck fall into their laps. Some QBs who aren't once-in-a-generation prospects take thyme to season.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
I don't know and I'm too lazy to look. check my posting history and let me know.Were you saying this last year? ROYBuffaloes said:yes, it's called a young QB. not everyone is like Indy and can time their suckitude to have Manning and then Luck fall into their laps. Some QBs who aren't once-in-a-generation prospects take thyme to season.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
Sucks to be 7-4. Needs more time to develop to beat teams like Denver, Seattle, and these 49ers.luck looking kinda sucky tooBuffaloes said:yes, it's called a young QB. not everyone is like Indy and can time their suckitude to have Manning and then Luck fall into their laps. Some QBs who aren't once-in-a-generation prospects take thyme to season.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
I'm not that interested.I don't know and I'm too lazy to look. check my posting history and let me know.Were you saying this last year? ROYBuffaloes said:yes, it's called a young QB. not everyone is like Indy and can time their suckitude to have Manning and then Luck fall into their laps. Some QBs who aren't once-in-a-generation prospects take thyme to season.Or you've never heard of a QB that holds the ball too long, is too slow in his progressions, and is playing terribly?apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
I've defended your posting in the past. I'm starting to see the antagonistic nature of it. I know you don't care. Just a realization I had.Maybe the Skins can lose out and get Bridgewater? You can have 3 active QBs, right?
Discuss that you're a troll?Bobby Three Sticks just not good these days.
Discuss...
So, you're disagreeing? Is he playing well?Discuss that you're a troll?Bobby Three Sticks just not good these days.
Discuss...
I think they're hard headed in leaving RG3 in there. Why not let him sit back and take it in? What could possibly hurt by playing Cousins?I've defended your posting in the past. I'm starting to see the antagonistic nature of it.I know you don't care. Just a realization I had.Maybe the Skins can lose out and get Bridgewater? You can have 3 active QBs, right?
no trade clause?My point is that it was a terrible mistake to draft Cousins. They're not using him, they can't trade him
Cousins' line for the season is 5/9 w/ 2 Ints. I watched that game and he was being hit repeatedly after RGIII had been knocked out of the game. Not sure how the op expects Cousins to have a better time when he's taking hits like this playing behind the same OL as RGIIII like Cousins a lot but come one, he'd get killed too.
Cousins' line for the season is 5/9 w/ 2 Ints. I watched that game and he was being hit repeatedly after RGIII had been knocked out of the game. Not sure how the op expects Cousins to have a better time when he's taking hits like this playing behind the same OL as RGIIII like Cousins a lot but come one, he'd get killed too.
Russell Wilson did just fine without three of the 5 starters in. Keep making excuses for bobby griff 3.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
What could hurt? How about your franchise QB losing confidence? How about your franchise quarterback losing valuable game reps? Both of those things could hurt.I think they're hard headed in leaving RG3 in there. Why not let him sit back and take it in? What could possibly hurt by playing Cousins?I've defended your posting in the past. I'm starting to see the antagonistic nature of it.I know you don't care. Just a realization I had.Maybe the Skins can lose out and get Bridgewater? You can have 3 active QBs, right?
I'm assuming you are talking about their most recent game against Minny? RGIII had just as good a game as Wilson, when he played the Vikings.Russell Wilson did just fine without three of the 5 starters in. Keep making excuses for bobby griff 3.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
RW is probably on roids too.Russell Wilson did just fine without three of the 5 starters in. Keep making excuses for bobby griff 3.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
I think it is a lot of both. I see rg3 holding onto the ball way too long, I also see him get next to no time to throw or think for that matter.Russell Wilson did just fine without three of the 5 starters in. Keep making excuses for bobby griff 3.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
Neither have the Redskins, sadly.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
Thank you. I don't care who is playing QB right now, the OL can't block anyone. RG3 had zero time to throw last night. Kirk is less mobile and would get crushed behind this line.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
It's 12 weeks into the season, that excuse is expired.I don't think he's #1. RG3 was rushed back into the lineup.
Heard that excuse with the Raiders & Terrell Pryor and then McGloin came in and there were no problems with the O-line after that. Yet another weak excuse. Lets go to the source - RG the TURD.apparently you guys have never heard of an o-line.
Honestly I didnt think RG3 was all that good last year. Certainly not the second coming that Espn and the skin fans made him out to beIt's 12 weeks into the season, that excuse is expired.I don't think he's #1. RG3 was rushed back into the lineup.
Dude had his shot, he stinks, time to look at other options. There is enough game film now that teams game plan for his 'skills'. it's a pretty easy game plan. When there is no film, most running QBs look like they are the greatest thing ever and fool most of the commoners out there.Honestly I didnt think RG3 was all that good last year. Certainly not the second coming that Espn and the skin fans made him out to beIt's 12 weeks into the season, that excuse is expired.I don't think he's #1. RG3 was rushed back into the lineup.