Im hoping you rolled the dice and went with Marcus. 2qb league here also, i sat mccown and flacco for a Monday night miracle from Marcus.Ugh. Start 2 QB I've gotta decide whether to start Hoyer or Flacco instead of MM.
reports were he's not running in practice yet. I'm rolling Hoyer I think.
Nope. Would have been better even if he sits. LolIm hoping you rolled the dice and went with Marcus. 2qb league here also, i sat mccown and flacco for a Monday night miracle from Marcus.
He does have an intriguing matchup this week. His hamstring is still clearly bothering him, which makes it easier on the defenses as they don't need to have a spy. But what was said during the broadcast makes sense. I remember when McNabb was a scrambler until he got hurt and learned that he could make the throws from the pocket. This could potentially do the same thing for Mariota. Regardless, he looked good throwing the ball. He didn't seem to have 100% of his throwing power as he didn't seem to be able to drive off his legs completely. Perhaps I was reading into it too much. But he did well after a very slow start. Let us hope he makes it through the Cleveland game without further injury and comes back 100% after the bye.He looked good in the 2nd half after a rough start. Hopefully he will gain some more mobility this week.
He could be in line for a nice day against the Browns!
The Browns sort of break near the end. They're not bad on D. Jason McCourty is playing out of his mind good and they've got some pass rushers. It's like if the game is out of reach they've got some quit in them but the rest of the time they're pretty good on D.He looked good in the 2nd half after a rough start. Hopefully he will gain some more mobility this week.
He could be in line for a nice day against the Browns!
The whole offense seemed off. That starts with Mariota. So good for Mularkey I guess.Mularkey said Mariota missed a FEW touchdown throws on Sunday. He also said QB is accountable as is everyone else but umm he's never been called out before
I thought the scheme was horrible but you do offer an extremely valid pointThe whole offense seemed off. That starts with Mariota. So good for Mularkey I guess.
You're probably right about that. Honestly I didn't pay much attention yesterday to the structure or plan. Just that they weren't executing well. It definitely could have started with the coaches.I thought the scheme was horrible but you do offer an extremely valid point
Don't get it. Great matchup. McCourty actually out too.Utterly and completely and pretty much single-handed my killed me this weekend.
I get that even what looks like a juicy matchup goes awry in an Any Given Sunday league, but what happened here?
One week aberration or signs of things that will persist?
Mularkey went with his TE heavy offense that is about as fresh as a zombiekyoun1e said:Don't get it. Great matchup. McCourty actually out too.
He's not completely healed yet, but this game was flat out bad. Hoping he comes back stronger after the bye.Stompin' Tom Connors said:Utterly and completely and pretty much single-handed my killed me this weekend.
I get that even what looks like a juicy matchup goes awry in an Any Given Sunday league, but what happened here?
One week aberration or signs of things that will persist?
Had to drop a backup QB to cover for other positional byes, and actually debating seeing the season out with just one QB myself. If Rivers was available I would likely grab him too, but my options are much more limited (Bortles, Brissett, Flacco being the highest scoring QBs still available). So if Mariota goes down again (please no, fantasy gods), it's not like I'd gain anything by holding an extra QB this time as these waiver QBs are likely going to still be there. Would definitely be the end of my season though.Mariota is the only QB on my roster right now (long story, nobody cares) so I'll probably be starting him in some of those juicy match ups you mentioned. However, I do have some of the same concerns as you and I do view him as a streamer and not a must start type of player. The Goff owner dropped Rivers last week so I'm planning to add him because he seems to have some decent match ups down the stretch too. So yeah, if all goes well (at least as well as I can hope given my situation) I'll be streaming Mariota and Rivers the rest of the year.![]()
Yeah, given what's available on your wire holding only Mariota makes sense for the reasons you listed.Had to drop a backup QB to cover for other positional byes, and actually debating seeing the season out with just one QB myself. If Rivers was available I would likely grab him too, but my options are much more limited (Bortles, Brissett, Flacco being the highest scoring QBs still available). So if Mariota goes down again (please no, fantasy gods), it's not like I'd gain anything by holding an extra QB this time as these waiver QBs are likely going to still be there. Would definitely be the end of my season though.
Agreed.Zero chatter on Mariota since October. Wow.
Bringing it up now as I still have concerns. Mariota and the Titans have some super-juicy matchups coming up after facing PIT this weekend -- IND, HOU, ARI (depending on which ARI team shows up), SF.
Since coming back from injury in week 5, Mariota has been a little pedestrian.
Week 6 he hung 300+ against IND, with 1:1 TD/INT. 18.74 points in my league's scoring. I'll take it.
Week 7 he faced a CLE team ready to be dismantled, and barely cracked 200 with 0 TDs. 8.92 FP in my league (FPiml)
Week 9 after the bye, Mariota only threw for 218 against a BAL team that is ripe for beating, but threw for 2 TDs which luckily saved an otherwise mediocre performance (17.82 FPiml)
Week 10 against CIN, 264 yards with 1 TD 1 INT -- respectable 19.16 FPiml, but it's not like the CIN D has been the stalwart force they have been in the past. Liked, however, that they took off the reins on Marcus's rush attempts, and he had 6 for 51 on the day.
So what should we expect for these juicy matchups coming up?
Would love to believe that this is a team that is trending in the right direction but given past performance, not really sure if Mariota is as dependable an option as I'd like facing some cake teams in the next few weeks.
What say you -- are you relying on Mariota without questions for this end stretch? Or do you see him as solely a stream option, and if so, between Mariota and another QB facing what appears to be a soft D, which way do you think you'd go?
Thought Mariota was going to be gold this year. He's currently sitting at 21st overall by total FPiml behind guys like Bortles, Taylor, and McCown -- even Brisset and Manning. Yes, he was injured, but so was Carr and Carr is outperforming him. So trying to get a bead on how much people trust Mariota and are planning on leaning on him for the stretch run.
Has Norrapolo been given a timetable to start? Do we think that's inevitable? Would tend to think that way, especially given the upcoming bye gives SF the chance to get Norrapolo reps to tune him up.It rhymes with Fimmy Norrapolo
That may not be such a terrible pairing if Mariota plays up to his matchups. Not too shabby with both Watson and Rodgers gone (which is unbelievably bad luck in a 2QB league -- my condolences).Agreed.
Still a big fan of the guy but he's probably seeing my bench for keenum or ty Taylor for the next couple weeks.
But in another, 2qb league he's starting with Goff thanks to Watson and Rodgers injuries.![]()
Might be risky. But I'm going for another trophy. Roto seems to think after their bye. I feel like he's got a chance to have huge upside. Lots of incentive for him to show he can be the man. Probably lots of chances for big time garbage time points as well.Has Norrapolo been given a timetable to start? Do we think that's inevitable? Would tend to think that way, especially given the upcoming bye gives SF the chance to get Norrapolo reps to tune him up.
But Beathard actually had a solid day (albeit against the Jints), and is good at running the ball in himself.
Do what you want but that seems like a mistake in any format.I’m thinking of dropping Mariota for Bridgewater as a flyer. QB2 obvs
Mariotta is getting healthier, Mariotta is getting groove back with Corey Davis. Mariotta has a stretch where he played lights out. Teddy has not played in 26 games, when he did, he was efficient, not lights out, now team as evolved since he played. I think Minnesota would be making a mistake taking out Keenum now, he's playing well, but Minn did try and trot out Bradford in Chi and he clearly shouldn't have been out there- so who knows what they do-OZ- said:Do what you want but that seems like a mistake in any format.
Said I was thinking about it. Probably won’t do it. I just have this feeling Bridgewater is going to be very fantasy relevant down the home stretch here.-OZ- said:Do what you want but that seems like a mistake in any format.
That’s a horrible move, not something you even think about imo.Said I was thinking about it. Probably won’t do it. I just have this feeling Bridgewater is going to be very fantasy relevant down the home stretch here.
This. Even if you get what you got pre injury, you're not getting a whole lotBridgewater is probably lucky to be walking much less play qb at the NFL level effectively. I have my doubts he'll ever be the same (which was not all that great in the first place).
Why? Because Mariota has been stellar this year? Or even returned value based on where he was projected? I drafted him to be my QB1 this year. Had to make an early move to plug that hole and then another when Watson went down. Why? Cuz Marcus isn’t QB’n people to titles this year. He has been a borderline bust.That’s a horrible move, not something you even think about imo.
Do you guys read the news? The coaching staff was itching to get him in there. Last week.This. Even if you get what you got pre injury, you're not getting a whole lot
I get what you're saying. I'm just saying he ain't that good, that's allDo you guys read the news? The coaching staff was itching to get him in there. Last week.
Keenum ain’t the guy that will be calling signals down the home stretch (playoffs)
Happy to come back and eat the crow if I’m wrong.
True but this MN team is very different than what he had to work with in 2015.This. Even if you get what you got pre injury, you're not getting a whole lot
Fair enough. Just my opinion obviously, but I'd have a hard time starting him...having not played in over a year...in my FF playoffs.True but this MN team is very different than what he had to work with in 2015.
If you can get both keenum and Bridgewater, maybe. But I'd still prefer Mariota.Why? Because Mariota has been stellar this year? Or even returned value based on where he was projected? I drafted him to be my QB1 this year. Had to make an early move to plug that hole and then another when Watson went down. Why? Cuz Marcus isn’t QB’n people to titles this year. He has been a borderline bust.
So yeah, I’m thinking outside the box for what I see playing out three weeks from now in Minny. And my gut tells me Teddy is the guy. Easier to pull the trigger on a gut feeling when you have a decent QB1 too.
If marcus was my #1 I wouldn’t do it. But he’s not.
For now, yes. We'll see what happens in the next few years.Weird to think how much Wentz and Goff seem to have already passed Mariota and Winston in their respective progressions.
I was thinking the same thing. Mariota hasn' improved and Winston has actually regressed. Add Dak Prescott to Wentz and Goff and the 2016 QB draft seems like a great one.Weird to think how much Wentz and Goff seem to have already passed Mariota and Winston in their respective progressions.
This is true. We can make excuses for both players, Jameis and Marcus, but it seems like both organizations made efforts to surround them with talent for this season. Neither player took the step we expected.For now, yes. We'll see what happens in the next few years.
I want to like Mularkey but he's losing this fan. Robiskie too. Bring in some guys who can actually utilize and coach up Marcus, Davis, and Taylor.