They just want to rest him for the regular season is my guess but something you need to keep an eye on. Doesn't sound like a major injury and is a little vague
You're not wrong but the Rams seem like a team on the rise and the rankings are probably taking that into account - the D is much improved and they were the only team to hang with Philly in the playoff if I recall correctly. Those ADPs might be a little high, but not ridiculously so. While there is room to quibble, Puka is still a solid WR1, Adams a WR2, etc. I wouldn't underestimate Stafford either - with the exception of his first 2 seasons, he's been durable over the course of his career and has played at a high level fairly consistently. He definitely passes the eye test when he's on the field. Assuming he's healthy, I'll happily take him as my QB2.The biggest ADP mystery to me this year is Puka top 5 WR, Adams top 15 WR and Stafford at QB 20+...and he's old and hurt. I'm not sure a healthy Stafford supports those ADPs, let alone some Jimmy G sprinkled in there.
You're not wrong but the Rams seem like a team on the rise and the rankings are probably taking that into account - the D is much improved and they were the only team to hang with Philly in the playoff if I recall correctly. Those ADPs might be a little high, but not ridiculously so. While there is room to quibble, Puka is still a solid WR1, Adams a WR2, etc. I wouldn't underestimate Stafford either - with the exception of his first 2 seasons, he's been durable over the course of his career and has played at a high level fairly consistently. He definitely passes the eye test when he's on the field. Assuming he's healthy, I'll happily take him as my QB2.The biggest ADP mystery to me this year is Puka top 5 WR, Adams top 15 WR and Stafford at QB 20+...and he's old and hurt. I'm not sure a healthy Stafford supports those ADPs, let alone some Jimmy G sprinkled in there.
Blaine Grisak
Rams HC Sean McVay also noted that Matthew Stafford saw back specialist Dr. Robert Watkins again on Saturday.
It's the second time that Stafford has seen Dr. Watkins in the last two weeks.
That certainly doesn’t seem positiveBlaine Grisak
Rams HC Sean McVay also noted that Matthew Stafford saw back specialist Dr. Robert Watkins again on Saturday.
It's the second time that Stafford has seen Dr. Watkins in the last two weeks.
As much as McVay is considered a whiz with the passing offense, he prefers to run around the goal line. And Stafford ain’t getting those runs.You're not wrong but the Rams seem like a team on the rise and the rankings are probably taking that into account - the D is much improved and they were the only team to hang with Philly in the playoff if I recall correctly. Those ADPs might be a little high, but not ridiculously so. While there is room to quibble, Puka is still a solid WR1, Adams a WR2, etc. I wouldn't underestimate Stafford either - with the exception of his first 2 seasons, he's been durable over the course of his career and has played at a high level fairly consistently. He definitely passes the eye test when he's on the field. Assuming he's healthy, I'll happily take him as my QB2.The biggest ADP mystery to me this year is Puka top 5 WR, Adams top 15 WR and Stafford at QB 20+...and he's old and hurt. I'm not sure a healthy Stafford supports those ADPs, let alone some Jimmy G sprinkled in there.
Over the past 3 seasons, Stafford has:
That passing yardage is enough to support two top 15 WRs, but I'm skeptical 24 passing TDs is enough to do it, since they won't all go to Puka and Adams. That recent track record plus health questions means I will let others draft Puka and especially Adams at their ADPs. I'm happy to take either at the right draft position, but that is not their current ADPs for me.
- 60 passing TDs in 43 games, which projects to 23.7 passing TDs over 17 games.
- 10,714 passing yards in 43 games, which projects to 4,236 passing yards over 17 games.
I'm not a Rams local or fan but Jourdana Rodrigue might be the best beat writer* in the whole business.What Rams beat writers do Rams locals love?
This is a sizzling hot take hahaI think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years. This doesn't sound out of the scope of his normal. Second, he isn't very good. The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
It's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
The system is a huge factor. Stafford is at this point probably around QB 25 in the NFL. Jimmy G is probably QB 40, but the fall off is pretty flat in that space.This is a sizzling hot take hahaI think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years. This doesn't sound out of the scope of his normal. Second, he isn't very good. The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Stafford's "Down year" last year is = to Jimmy G's 2nd best TD total of his career
![]()
Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
Reputation matters in NFL circles. He has been around forever, but has never been the 6th best QB in the league. He offers very little with his feet and is turnover prone.He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
I'm going to defer to them, McVay and my eyes on this one.
I think there are less than 10 QBs that have had 2 separate 40+ Touchdown Seasons.Reputation matters in NFL circles. He has been around forever, but has never been the 6th best QB in the league. He offers very little with his feet and is turnover prone.He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
I'm going to defer to them, McVay and my eyes on this one.
Probably. He has had a long career and amassed some big stats. He has been a Pro Bowl selections twice. Matt Ryan and Phillip Rivers were way better QB's.I think there are less than 10 QBs that have had 2 separate 40+ Touchdown Seasons.Reputation matters in NFL circles. He has been around forever, but has never been the 6th best QB in the league. He offers very little with his feet and is turnover prone.He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
I'm going to defer to them, McVay and my eyes on this one.
Appreciate your opinion, and while he isn't as good as he was maybe in his prime, he is still VERY good.
Will be in Canton one day.
Stafford is a lot like Eli Manning. The numbers don't look great, but if you're in a back alley monkey knife fight and the game is on the line, you want him on that wall. JimmyG? the exact opposite.Reputation matters in NFL circles. He has been around forever, but has never been the 6th best QB in the league. He offers very little with his feet and is turnover prone.He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
I'm going to defer to them, McVay and my eyes on this one.
Name checks out. Definitely a drunk take.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years. This doesn't sound out of the scope of his normal. Second, he isn't very good. The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Hayden Winks
Sean McVay said Matthew Stafford "looked awesome" during his workout this morning.
Neither ever sealed the deal and won a SB. That is Stafford's big win. Ryan has the MVP. Rivers has the most Pro Bowls but like Stafford, no All Pros either. It was tough competing in the same conference as Brady, Manning and BIg Ben. I think Rivers was the best of the 3 but also seemed to be the least clutch. Ryan and Stafford are pretty close. I would say all 3 are very very good franchise QBs but not great.Probably. He has had a long career and amassed some big stats. He has been a Pro Bowl selections twice. Matt Ryan and Phillip Rivers were way better QB's.I think there are less than 10 QBs that have had 2 separate 40+ Touchdown Seasons.Reputation matters in NFL circles. He has been around forever, but has never been the 6th best QB in the league. He offers very little with his feet and is turnover prone.He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
I'm going to defer to them, McVay and my eyes on this one.
Appreciate your opinion, and while he isn't as good as he was maybe in his prime, he is still VERY good.
Will be in Canton one day.
I had never heard of her before and then got to see her twice in the last week on either ESPN or NFLN. She's a very good reporter.I'm not a Rams local or fan but Jourdana Rodrigue might be the best beat writer* in the whole business.What Rams beat writers do Rams locals love?
*Technically she just got promoted to national writer but she still covers Rams in depth.
Of course there is a point where eventually the toll all adds up and he can't go but I think he's done something similar the last few offseasons.I get the feeling he's done. Back problems are no joke. And depending on the severity, require surgery or pain meds. He's gonna get rocked by a D-lineman or just seize up tying his laces and he's gonna miss games. In my SF leagues, I've been trying to scoop Jimmy G.![]()
Until he's missing time, or announced by the team to be in danger of missing time at least, I'm not worried. Stafford is about as tough as they come. Missed 15 games in 14 seasons.Of course there is a point where eventually the toll all adds up and he can't go but I think he's done something similar the last few offseasons.I get the feeling he's done. Back problems are no joke. And depending on the severity, require surgery or pain meds. He's gonna get rocked by a D-lineman or just seize up tying his laces and he's gonna miss games. In my SF leagues, I've been trying to scoop Jimmy G.![]()
And most of those were in his first two years when he broke his collarbone twice and the talk was that he was too fragile to survive the NFLUntil he's missing time, or announced by the team to be in danger of missing time at least, I'm not worried. Stafford is about as tough as they come. Missed 15 games in 14 seasons.Of course there is a point where eventually the toll all adds up and he can't go but I think he's done something similar the last few offseasons.I get the feeling he's done. Back problems are no joke. And depending on the severity, require surgery or pain meds. He's gonna get rocked by a D-lineman or just seize up tying his laces and he's gonna miss games. In my SF leagues, I've been trying to scoop Jimmy G.![]()
To add to this he was listed as the 5th overall and last tier one QB in Sando's annual QB tier article.He was recently listed as the 6th best QB in that ESPN poll of scouts/execs. At 37 years old.Stafford was never an elite QB. He was at best a slightly above average NFL QB. He is now an old guy who used to be a slightly above average NFL QBIt's a huge deal and should be discussed more but the fact he's had the issue for 6 years is actually a little comforting, would be worse to me if it was new.I think everyone is overestimating the importance of this. First his back has been an issue for at least 6 years.
For fantasy yes, he's not very good in part because they run so frequently in the red zone.Second, he isn't very good.
If you mean this in real life I'm thinking you got tossed off a horse recently and landed on your head. j/k
If Stafford had left them they would have signed Rodgers to be their starter(I wonder if part of him wishes he'd have waited this out?). Jimmy G is option 3 and in Mcvay I trust. He's a good backup but let's not get carried away.The drop to Jimmy G isn't a big one.
Plus, and this is very significant to me for fantasy value of Rams, if a situation occurred where Jimmy G had to take the reigns for awhile I'd still be nervous as heck for Rams skill position players because I'd be constantly fretting Jimmy G going down. He has seemed awfully brittle lately.
I'm going to defer to them, McVay and my eyes on this one.
As far as I know he's only had epidural shots.What concerns me is he recently had surgery
Ah. I misread an article. I thought it said he recently had surgery, but it is just an option they may have to discuss. You are correct...he's not had back surgery to this point.As far as I know he's only had epidural shots.What concerns me is he recently had surgery
All good and fwiw I did agree with everything you said in your post about pitfalls of back surgery and deal with a lot of similar sounding back issues as you do.Ah. I misread an article. I thought it said he recently had surgery, but it is just an option they may have to discuss. You are correct...he's not had back surgery to this point.As far as I know he's only had epidural shots.What concerns me is he recently had surgery
Other then SF leagues I'd imagine most people are far more concerned for his impact on Puka and Davante then worrying about Stafford, who is not very good for fantasy.I have zero shares, but owners must get a bad feeling every time this thread appears at the top of the page.