What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Matt Stafford, LAR (4 Viewers)

Overrated as a real life qb (not fantasy)?

  • Way overrated

    Votes: 82 14.4%
  • Slightly overrated

    Votes: 156 27.4%
  • Rated just where he should be

    Votes: 197 34.6%
  • Slightly underrated

    Votes: 103 18.1%
  • Way underrated

    Votes: 32 5.6%

  • Total voters
    570
there are 2 years remaining on his current deal.
You can choose to not believe her but I'll again cite comments from Jordan Rodrigue, which she's not alone in making, but she's said multiple times even going back all the way to last off-season that there was an understanding between Stafford and the Rams that he would never play his last two years for the Rams on his current contract.

Again you can disagree, you can be of the opinion that the Rams can just play hardball if they want but similar to how I responded a few posts up that while everone is welcome to their opinions the reality of the situation is the Rams are not going to take that hardball stance with him and try and force him to play out those last two years without an adjustment on his contract.
 
The sheer number of startable qbs in free agency or the draft certainly reduces the leverage Stafford has. But he’s probably the strongest option for 1/2 years among them.
Huh? I would say the exact opposite.

Not sure what you mean exactly but there’s not a lot of jobs available relative to guys who can fill them.

Startable QBs (8.5): Stafford, Darnold, Wilson, Fields, Rodgers, Cousins maybe. Cam Ward, Shadeur Sanders, Jaxson Dart.

Qb needy teams (6.5): Tenn, Cle, NYG, LV, NYJ, Pit, maybe Indy
 
The sheer number of startable qbs in free agency or the draft certainly reduces the leverage Stafford has. But he’s probably the strongest option for 1/2 years among them.
Huh? I would say the exact opposite.

Not sure what you mean exactly but there’s not a lot of jobs available relative to guys who can fill them.

Startable QBs (8.5): Stafford, Darnold, Wilson, Fields, Rodgers, Cousins maybe. Cam Ward, Shadeur Sanders, Jaxson Dart.

Qb needy teams (6.5): Tenn, Cle, NYG, LV, NYJ, Pit, maybe Indy
Any team expecting Jaxson Dart to be their starter in 2025 is asking for trouble. He's definitely a sit for a year guy coming from that Ole Miss offense. Could very much see a team adding one of the vet QBs and then also drafting Dart.

Could probably add Carr and NO to that list. That marriage seems flimsy at best.
 
I typed Colts and then erased it because like memo said I don’t think they want to give up on AR
You don’t have to give up on AR to sign stafford for a couple of years. It would probably do him good. Stafford isn’t like the other retreads they signed in Rivers, Wentz, and Ryan. At least I don’t think he is.

Why criticize Rivers here? He was good in his one season in Indy. I seriously doubt Stafford in Indy in 2025 would be better than Rivers there in 2020.
 
The sheer number of startable qbs in free agency or the draft certainly reduces the leverage Stafford has. But he’s probably the strongest option for 1/2 years among them.
Huh? I would say the exact opposite.

Not sure what you mean exactly but there’s not a lot of jobs available relative to guys who can fill them.

Startable QBs (8.5): Stafford, Darnold, Wilson, Fields, Rodgers, Cousins maybe. Cam Ward, Shadeur Sanders, Jaxson Dart.

Qb needy teams (6.5): Tenn, Cle, NYG, LV, NYJ, Pit, maybe Indy
Some of those options are pretty suspect, like ok maybe they're starters but bottom of the barrel starters, esp. for a team like the Rams that is going to be very competitive next year. Darnold and Rodgers I guess are viable options but a step down from Stafford, Cousins was bad last year, Fields has never proven anything. And the rooks aren't options for them.
 
someone would need to be willing to take on the contract first.
His current contract is not relevant since it will be redone and we already have reports that Stafford knows other teams are willing to pay more then the Rams have offered.

So that part of the equation does not seem like it’s going to be an issue.

Working trade comp with team he wants to go to won’t be an easy hurdle but it will get done if Rams don’t up their offer and Stafford wants to go

Stafford had made 360 million in his career. No NFL player has ever made more money. Stafford came in the last year before the rookie cap so he got a huge deal. Then more and more. So right now it should not be about the $$$$.

I’ve never known anyone who has made a lot of money to stop wanting to make more plus money is a sign of respect.
Yes, the respect would get picking himself off the ground after every play in a Giants uniform would be incredible. In all seriousness, I think adding another ring would garner more respect at this point. It doesn’t mean he would have to play for free, there has to be more to this between him and the Rams.
I'm talking about being respected enough by his employers he won a SB for to get paid a fair wage with a little security. He's been underpaid for a few years now and Rams approach lately which has been to take things year to year with him going as far to reportedly dangle him in trades all the way back in 2023. They made him haggle last off-season just to pick up another $4-5M for the year.

If they can get close to what other teams are offering and give him at least two years guaranteed they'll likely smooth things over but they got to at least get close and give him more then a year guaranteed.

"Fair Wage and security"? That applies more to minimum wage workers than NFL QBs. Heck most backup QBs are set for life after the NFL now.


Stafford has not been underpaid. When he signed his new 4 year extension in 2021 for 4-160 million he was one of the highest paid QBs. Of course every year the next man up gets more but that is how the NFL works.

That being said I would be shocked if Stafford goes to the Giants to play against Eagles and Washington for the last couple years of his career. Going to be their division for a few years to come.
No fair wage and security does not only apply to minimum wage people.

Security is more then financial. It's about not having to uproot your family when a team wants to cut or trade you. It's about getting a contract that ties you to a team for multiple years.

On the topic of fair wage what I believe to be the best beat writer in the NFL, Jordan Rodrigue, had this to say a few days ago " Rams understand there is a certain level of financial respectability owed to a quarterback of his skill level and status" . That's just another way of saying "fair wage".


Stafford got extended the off-season after winning the SB. Had incredible leverage, all time kind of leverage considering winning the SB and the large amount they gave up for in the trade. That off-season 3 other Qb's signed for more APY. Rodgers, Watson and Derek Carr. Not sure how next man up accounts for that.

I think Joel Corry understands what he's talking about, though you can disagree: https://x.com/corryjoel/status/1894089263547125798

Safe to say you think he's been paid enough in his career. You are certainly entitled to all of your opinions but I'm trying to focus less on people's opinions and the reality of the situation and the reality is his contract is the issue right now. So again you are very welcome to think he's been paid enough in his career and does not need to care about money, the reality is he does and the reality is what I'm focused on and not opinions that he's been paid enough and should just be happy with what he's got. No snark meant either, it's just not relevant to assessing where things stand with Stafford and the Rams.

I understand.

If the NFL was not a salary capped league pretty sure the Rams would have no issue with a new contract, as would many teams. Pretty sure they do not want to commit to more than a 1-2 deal if that at this point given his age.

History has shown the NFL has not been kind to 37 year old QBs, even worse are old QBs switching teams.

With old QBs you move on at the right time or a year too late. That is why the Rams have told Jimmy Sexton he can talk to other teams to gauge interest.
 
The sheer number of startable qbs in free agency or the draft certainly reduces the leverage Stafford has. But he’s probably the strongest option for 1/2 years among them.
Huh? I would say the exact opposite.

Not sure what you mean exactly but there’s not a lot of jobs available relative to guys who can fill them.

Startable QBs (8.5): Stafford, Darnold, Wilson, Fields, Rodgers, Cousins maybe. Cam Ward, Shadeur Sanders, Jaxson Dart.

Qb needy teams (6.5): Tenn, Cle, NYG, LV, NYJ, Pit, maybe Indy
Some of those options are pretty suspect, like ok maybe they're starters but bottom of the barrel starters, esp. for a team like the Rams that is going to be very competitive next year. Darnold and Rodgers I guess are viable options but a step down from Stafford, Cousins was bad last year, Fields has never proven anything. And the rooks aren't options for them.

That’s why I added Stafford is probably the best option short term. Rams probably wouldn’t be able to get the rookies, but the other qb needy teams can. Point is there is no obvious desperate team to trade him to thus reducing his leverage a little. He should get 2/80 and stay put but we’ll see.
 
Stafford should focus on NYG and LV, if he actually wants to leave LA. I wouldnt look twice at CLE, PIT, NYJ or TENN. Assuming the money is within $2-3M, LV would be my choice if he wants out of LA, got an old school coach, who has won, and its Vegas baby, Vegas!, maybe they get him McMillan in the draft, and his wife can go sit around the pool, or get spa treatments. WTH is she gonna do in CLE or PIT? Eat sandwiches?
 
19 wins and 12 losses his last 2 seasons as an NFL starting QB on a team that had won the Super Bowl in '21 and trying to retool/rebuild as they parted with a lot of draft capital and salary cap space in order to get that Lombardi Trophy and I doubt they regret any of it

19-12 last 2 years plus the Rams went to the Playoffs both years and even advanced to the 2nd round this past season
8th in MVP voting in '23
44 TD vs 19 Int over the last 2 seasons

I don't care what anyone's opinion is of whether he still has the goods or not, the records speak for themselves and I only focused on very recent seasons
He missed a lot of '22 after they won the Super Bowl

The question of which team suits him the best, Stafford can only look at teams with talent already surrounding him or a team where he believes in the Owner/GM/HC and other supporting characters like a Tom Brady with major influence now as a member of the Raiders

I actually see Carroll and the Raiders taking a QB in the 2nd-3rd round as their QB of the future but maybe they can bring Staff in as a bridge for a year or two...I just don't think the Raiders really want a bridge, I see them more as trying to replicate the blueprint of what worked in Seattle during the early 2010s, just my opinion based on PC being hired as HC

Stafford is better right now than probably half of the starting QBs out there depending on what you value
Stafford just turned 37, short 2-3 year window but some teams might push all in
 
McVay getting a little expansive on Stafford situation: https://x.com/AlbertBreer/status/1894564576244510998
Refreshing how seemingly honest Sean is about it. Bottom line is they would love to have him back but at his age they are hesitant on backing the Brinks truck up for him. The additional challenge is this team is good and ready to compete, so they cannot go into the season with a huge question mark at QB. Thankfully for them, there are some options out there.
 
I always like to add the betting markets to the other opinions, so while looking for odds on a player's next team I stumbled across Aaron Rodgers being the even money favorite to be the next Rams QB. 🤔
 
I always like to add the betting markets to the other opinions, so while looking for odds on a player's next team I stumbled across Aaron Rodgers being the even money favorite to be the next Rams QB. 🤔
A lot of dots that can connect Rodgers to LA. Had 2 MVP seasons with Matt LaFleur (who is a McVay disciple) Rodgers lives in Malibu, and the Rams hired Alex Van Pelt who was Rodgers QB coach in GB. Plus Mike LaFleur (Matt's brother) is the Rams OC.

There is a non-zero chance, the Rams could replace Stafford/Kupp with Rodgers/Adams and save 20 million in the process, while not having to commit long-term cash.

Speaking of dot connecting, The Giants QB coach is Stafford's brother in-law. I know many were curious why Stafford could be interested in NYG, beyond maybe his wife would like the spotlight. That could be another reason. If he did go to NYG, he wouldn't be the 1st Rams QB to win a Super Bowl and go there years later.
 
Sources: #Raiders minority owner Tom Brady recently hosted #Rams QB Matthew Stafford at his home in Montana, where they spent time together and went skiing. Brady has been actively trying to convince Stafford to join the Raiders, and discussions are ongoing.

Several teams are interested in Stafford if the Rams decide to move him, with Las Vegas believed to be the most aggressive suitor.

 
hes still good. he would instantly make the raiders viable

Viable for what? Playoffs, maybe. Division contender or Super Bowl contender? I don't think so.

It's a tough division with 3 other teams that just made the playoffs. I don't think Stafford would elevate the Raiders into top 2 division status, at least not him alone. If they also kill the draft and the rest of free agency, maybe.
 
hes still good. he would instantly make the raiders viable

Viable for what? Playoffs, maybe. Division contender or Super Bowl contender? I don't think so.

It's a tough division with 3 other teams that just made the playoffs. I don't think Stafford would elevate the Raiders into top 2 division status, at least not him alone. If they also kill the draft and the rest of free agency, maybe.
I think the Colts would be more relevant with Stafford than the Raiders would be. I believe the Colts are an overall better team than the Raiders are.
 
hes still good. he would instantly make the raiders viable

Viable for what? Playoffs, maybe. Division contender or Super Bowl contender? I don't think so.

It's a tough division with 3 other teams that just made the playoffs. I don't think Stafford would elevate the Raiders into top 2 division status, at least not him alone. If they also kill the draft and the rest of free agency, maybe.
I think the Colts would be more relevant with Stafford than the Raiders would be. I believe the Colts are an overall better team than the Raiders are.
He would thrive on the Colts with their current cast of skill players.
 
Sources: #Raiders minority owner Tom Brady recently hosted #Rams QB Matthew Stafford at his home in Montana, where they spent time together and went skiing. Brady has been actively trying to convince Stafford to join the Raiders, and discussions are ongoing.

Several teams are interested in Stafford if the Rams decide to move him, with Las Vegas believed to be the most aggressive suitor.

The Schultz vs Rapaport reporting battle was interesting.
 
Sources: #Raiders minority owner Tom Brady recently hosted #Rams QB Matthew Stafford at his home in Montana, where they spent time together and went skiing. Brady has been actively trying to convince Stafford to join the Raiders, and discussions are ongoing.

Several teams are interested in Stafford if the Rams decide to move him, with Las Vegas believed to be the most aggressive suitor.

ok some people are talking like Stafford is a free agent. thats clearly not the case. he has 2 years remaining (I think) on his current deal. unless there is a no trade clause that he needs to waive. but I'd assume then that the Rams would need to give permission for him to seek a trade (or at least permission for teams to contact him)

am I missing anything here?
 
Sources: #Raiders minority owner Tom Brady recently hosted #Rams QB Matthew Stafford at his home in Montana, where they spent time together and went skiing. Brady has been actively trying to convince Stafford to join the Raiders, and discussions are ongoing.

Several teams are interested in Stafford if the Rams decide to move him, with Las Vegas believed to be the most aggressive suitor.

ok some people are talking like Stafford is a free agent. thats clearly not the case. he has 2 years remaining (I think) on his current deal. unless there is a no trade clause that he needs to waive. but I'd assume then that the Rams would need to give permission for him to seek a trade (or at least permission for teams to contact him)

am I missing anything here?
The Rams have already discussed possible trade compensation with at least 2 interested teams. They'll absolutely trade him if they can't agree on a new contract.
 
Sources: #Raiders minority owner Tom Brady recently hosted #Rams QB Matthew Stafford at his home in Montana, where they spent time together and went skiing. Brady has been actively trying to convince Stafford to join the Raiders, and discussions are ongoing.

Several teams are interested in Stafford if the Rams decide to move him, with Las Vegas believed to be the most aggressive suitor.

ok some people are talking like Stafford is a free agent. thats clearly not the case. he has 2 years remaining (I think) on his current deal. unless there is a no trade clause that he needs to waive. but I'd assume then that the Rams would need to give permission for him to seek a trade (or at least permission for teams to contact him)

am I missing anything here?
The Rams have already discussed possible trade compensation with at least 2 interested teams. They'll absolutely trade him if they can't agree on a new contract.
I think he was talking about the reporting saying Stafford had such an open dialogue with Brady about joining the Raiders and if he had permission.

On that subject yes he was given permission to discuss contract terms with other teams. I don't know any restrictions that may or may not have existed on how much he could engage with them.

Either way I'd not look for the Rams to be in any position of saying someone tampered, as McVay and Stafford had a similar get together in Cabo when he was on the market.
 
Sources: #Raiders minority owner Tom Brady recently hosted #Rams QB Matthew Stafford at his home in Montana, where they spent time together and went skiing. Brady has been actively trying to convince Stafford to join the Raiders, and discussions are ongoing.

Several teams are interested in Stafford if the Rams decide to move him, with Las Vegas believed to be the most aggressive suitor.

The Schultz vs Rapaport reporting battle was interesting.
It got a lot more interesting, wow: https://x.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1894944983460766184
 
19 wins and 12 losses his last 2 seasons as an NFL starting QB on a team that had won the Super Bowl in '21 and trying to retool/rebuild as they parted with a lot of draft capital and salary cap space in order to get that Lombardi Trophy and I doubt they regret any of it

19-12 last 2 years plus the Rams went to the Playoffs both years and even advanced to the 2nd round this past season
8th in MVP voting in '23
44 TD vs 19 Int over the last 2 seasons

I don't care what anyone's opinion is of whether he still has the goods or not, the records speak for themselves and I only focused on very recent seasons
He missed a lot of '22 after they won the Super Bowl

The question of which team suits him the best, Stafford can only look at teams with talent already surrounding him or a team where he believes in the Owner/GM/HC and other supporting characters like a Tom Brady with major influence now as a member of the Raiders

I actually see Carroll and the Raiders taking a QB in the 2nd-3rd round as their QB of the future but maybe they can bring Staff in as a bridge for a year or two...I just don't think the Raiders really want a bridge, I see them more as trying to replicate the blueprint of what worked in Seattle during the early 2010s, just my opinion based on PC being hired as HC

Stafford is better right now than probably half of the starting QBs out there depending on what you value
Stafford just turned 37, short 2-3 year window but some teams might push all in
And cooler heads prevailed, Stafford suddenly restructures
 
19 wins and 12 losses his last 2 seasons as an NFL starting QB on a team that had won the Super Bowl in '21 and trying to retool/rebuild as they parted with a lot of draft capital and salary cap space in order to get that Lombardi Trophy and I doubt they regret any of it

19-12 last 2 years plus the Rams went to the Playoffs both years and even advanced to the 2nd round this past season
8th in MVP voting in '23
44 TD vs 19 Int over the last 2 seasons

I don't care what anyone's opinion is of whether he still has the goods or not, the records speak for themselves and I only focused on very recent seasons
He missed a lot of '22 after they won the Super Bowl

The question of which team suits him the best, Stafford can only look at teams with talent already surrounding him or a team where he believes in the Owner/GM/HC and other supporting characters like a Tom Brady with major influence now as a member of the Raiders

I actually see Carroll and the Raiders taking a QB in the 2nd-3rd round as their QB of the future but maybe they can bring Staff in as a bridge for a year or two...I just don't think the Raiders really want a bridge, I see them more as trying to replicate the blueprint of what worked in Seattle during the early 2010s, just my opinion based on PC being hired as HC

Stafford is better right now than probably half of the starting QBs out there depending on what you value
Stafford just turned 37, short 2-3 year window but some teams might push all in
And cooler heads prevailed, Stafford suddenly restructures
Stafford never was going to leave. Just had to work the system.

NY Giants was not possible..an old QB playing in a cold wind tunnel after being in a dome and warm climate his whole career?

That would have never worked. NY is a young mans QB spot.
 
Stafford to the Giants would've been dumb, giving up 40-50M/yr contract plus draft capital, would have helped the GM look better by getting a few more wins but do little for their franchise long term.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top